Chapter1
1. Hossain, G. S. et al. Rewriting the metabolic blueprint: advances in pathway diversification in microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 9, (2018).
2. Chen, A. H. & Silver, P. A. Designing biological compartmentalization. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 662–670 (2012).
3. Agapakis, C. M., Boyle, P. M. & Silver, P. A. Natural strategies for the spatial optimization of metabolism in synthetic biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 527–535 (2012).
4. Bonacci, W. et al. Modularity of a carbon-fixing protein organelle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 478–483 (2012).
5. Savage, D. F., Afonso, B., Chen, A. H. & Silver, P. A. Spatially ordered dynamics of the bacterial carbon fixation machinery. Science 327, 1258–1261 (2010).
6. Wheeldon, I. et al. Substrate channelling as an approach to cascade reactions. Nat. Chem. 8, 299–309 (2016).
7. Schneider, T. R. et al. Loop closure and intersubunit communication in tryptophan synthase. Biochemistry 37, 5394–5406 (1998).
8. Dunn, M. F. Allosteric regulation of substrate channeling and catalysis in the tryptophan synthase bienzyme complex. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 519, 154–166 (2012).
9. Miles, E. W., Rhee, S. & Davies, D. R. The molecular basis of substrate channeling. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12193–12196 (1999).
10. Wu, F. & Minteer, S. Krebs cycle metabolon: structural evidence of substrate channeling revealed by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 1851–1854 (2015).
11. Guynn, R. W., Gelberg, H. J. & Veech, R. L. Equilibrium constants of the malate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, citrate lyase, and acetyl coenzyme A hydrolysis reactions under physiological conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 6957–6965 (1973).
12. Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L., & Stryer, L. Biochemistry. WH Freeman, New York, 2019.
13. Liu, L. N. Distribution and dynamics of electron transport complexes in cyanobacterial thylakoid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Bioenerg. 1857, 256–265 (2016).
14. Šrejber, M. et al. Membrane-attached mammalian cytochromes P450: an overview of the membrane’s effects on structure, drug binding, and interactions with redox partners. J. Inorg. Biochem. 183, 117–136 (2018).
15. Laage, D., Elsaesser, T. & Hynes, J. T. Water dynamics in the hydration shells of biomolecules. Chem. Rev. 117, 10694–10725 (2017).
16. Klermund, L., Poschenrieder, S. T. & Castiglione, K. Biocatalysis in polymersomes: improving multienzyme cascades with incompatible reaction steps by compartmentalization. ACS Catal. 7, 3900–3904 (2017).
17. Walde, P. & Ichikawa, S. Enzymes inside lipid vesicles: preparation, reactivity and applications. Biomol. Eng. 18, 143–177 (2001).
18. Zhang, G., Quin, M. B. & Schmidt-Dannert, C. Self-assembling protein scaffold system for easy in vitro coimmobilization of biocatalytic cascade enzymes. ACS Catal. 8, 5611–5620 (2018).
19. Zhao, F., Li, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, X. & Mu, X. Co-immobilization of multienzyme on control-reduced graphene oxide by non-covalent bonds: an artificial biocatalytic system for the one-pot production of gluconic acid from starch. Green Chem. 16, 2558–2565 (2014).
20. Wei, Q., He, S., Qu, J. & Xia, J. Synthetic multienzyme complexes assembled on virus-like particles for cascade biosynthesis in cellulo. Bioconjug. Chem. 31, 2413–2420 (2020).
21. Hong, F., Zhang, F., Liu, Y. & Yan, H. DNA origami: scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem. Rev. 117, 12584-12640 (2017).
22. Tapio, K. & Bald, I. The potential of DNA origami to build multifunctional materials. Multifunct. Mater. 3, (2020).
23. Rajendran, A., Nakata, E., Nakano, S. & Morii, T. Nucleic-acid-templated enzyme cascades. ChemBioChem 18, 696–716 (2017).
24. Lim, S., Kim, J., Kim, Y., Xu, D. & Clark, D. S. CRISPR/Cas-directed programmable assembly of multi-enzyme complexes. Chem. Commun. 56, 4950– 4953 (2020).
25. Seeman, N. C. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. J. Theor. Biol. 99, 237–247 (1982).
26. Seeman, N. C. & Sleiman, H. F. DNA nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, (2017).
27. Yan, H., Park, S. H., Finkelstein, G., Reif, J. H. & LaBean, T. H. DNA-templated self-assembly of protein arrays and highly conductive nanowires. Science 301, 1882–1884 (2003).
28. Park, S. H. et al. Three-helix bundle DNA tiles self-assemble into 2D lattice or 1D templates for silver nanowires. Nano Lett. 5, 693–696 (2005).
29. Shih, W. M., Quispe, J. D. & Joyce, G. F. A 1.7-kilobase single-stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron. Nature 427, 618–621 (2004).
30. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).
31. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).
32. Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).
33. Andersen, E. S. et al. Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid. Nature 459, 73–76 (2009).
34. Han, D. et al. DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space. Science 332, 342–346 (2011).
35. Dietz, H., Douglas, S. M. & Shih, W. M. Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes. Science 325, 725–730 (2009).
36. Han, D. et al. DNA gridiron nanostructures based on four-arm junctions. Science 339, 1412–1415 (2013).
37. Zadegan, R. M. et al. Construction of a 4 Zeptoliters switchable 3D DNA box origami. ACS Nano 6, 10050–10053 (2012).
38. Zhang, D. Y. & Winfree, E. Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17303–17314 (2009).
39. Zhang, D. Y. & Seelig, G. Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using stranddisplacement reactions. Nat. Chem. 3, 103–113 (2011).
40. Rangel, A. E., Hariri, A. A., Eisenstein, M. & Soh, H. T. Engineering aptamer switches for multifunctional stimulus-responsive nanosystems. Adv. Mater. (2020).
41. Turek, V. A. et al. Thermo-responsive actuation of a DNA origami flexor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1–7 (2018).
42. Kim, S. H. et al. Reversible regulation of enzyme activity by pH-responsive encapsulation in dna nanocages. ACS Nano 11, 9352–9359 (2017). 4
3. Marras, A. E. et al. Cation-activated avidity for rapid reconfiguration of dna nanodevices. ACS Nano 12, 9484–9494 (2018).
44. Kopperger, E. et al. A self-assembled nanoscale robotic arm controlled by electric field. Science 359, 296–301 (2018).
45. Deluca, M., Shi, Z., Castro, C. E. & Arya, G. Dynamic DNA nanotechnology: toward functional nanoscale devices. Nanoscale Horizons 5, 182–201 (2020).
46. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).
47. Amir, Y., Ben-Ishay, E., Levner, D., Ittah, S., Abu-Horowitz, A., & Bachelet, I. Universal computing by DNA origami robots in a living animal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 353-357 (2014).
48. Li, S. et al. A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 258–264 (2018).
49. Grossi, G., Dalgaard Ebbesen Jepsen, M., Kjems, J. & Andersen, E. S. Control of enzyme reactions by a reconfigurable DNA nanovault. Nat. Commun. 8, (2017).
50. Juul, S. et al. Temperature-controlled encapsulation and release of an active enzyme in the cavity of a self-assembled DNA nanocage. ACS Nano 7, 9724– 9734 (2013).
51. Ijäs, H., Hakaste, I., Shen, B., Kostiainen, M. A. & Linko, V. Reconfigurable DNA origami nanocapsule for pH-controlled encapsulation and display of cargo. ACS Nano 13, 5959-5967 (2019).
52. Chandrasekaran, A. R., Anderson, N., Kizer, M., Halvorsen, K., & Wang, X. Beyond the fold: emerging biological applications of DNA origami. ChemBioChem 17, 1081-1089 (2016).
53 Yang, Y. R., Liu, Y. & Yan, H. DNA Nanostructures as programmable biomolecular scaffolds. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 1381–1395 (2015).
54. Ngo, T. A. et al. Protein adaptors assemble functional proteins on DNA scaffolds. Chem. Commun. 55, 12428–12446 (2019).
55. Jaekel, A., Stegemann, P. & Saccà, B. Manipulating enzymes properties with DNA nanostructures. Molecules 24, (2019).
56. Kong, G. et al. DNA origami-based protein networks: from basic construction to emerging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 1846–1873 (2021).
57. Mallik, L. et al. Electron microscopic visualization of protein assemblies on flattened DNA origami. ACS Nano 9, 7133–7141 (2015).
58. Shen, W., Zhong, H., Neff, D. & Norton, M. L. NTA directed protein nanopatterning on DNA origami nanoconstructs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6660– 6661 (2009).
59. Yamazaki, T., Heddle, J. G., Kuzuya, A. & Komiyama, M. Orthogonal enzyme arrays on a DNA origami scaffold bearing size-tunable wells. Nanoscale 6, 9122–9126 (2014).
60. Chhabra, R. et al. Spatially addressable multiprotein nanoarrays templated by aptamer-tagged DNA nanoarchitectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10304–10305 (2007).
61. Valero, J., Pal, N., Dhakal, S., Walter, N. G. & Famulok, M. A bio-hybrid DNA rotor-stator nanoengine that moves along predefined tracks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 496–503 (2018).
62. Ge, Z. et al. Constructing submonolayer DNA origami scaffold on gold electrode for wiring of redox enzymatic cascade pathways. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 13881–13887 (2019).
63. Zhao, S. et al. Efficient intracellular delivery of RNase a using DNA origami carriers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 11112–11118 (2019).
64 Saccà, B. et al. Orthogonal protein decoration of DNA origami. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 122, 9568-9573 (2010).
65. Keppler, A. et al. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 86–89 (2003).
66. Los, G. V. Halo-tag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem. Biol. 3, 373-382 (2008).
67. Pavletich, N. P. & Pabo, C. Zinc finger-DNA recognition : crystal structure of a zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A. Science 252, 809–818 (1991).
68. Greisman, H. A. & Pabo, C. O. A general strategy for selecting high-affinity zinc finger proteins for diverse DNA target sites. Science 275, 657–661 (1997).
69. Shaner, N. C., Steinbach, P. A., & Tsien, R. Y. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 2, 905-909 (2005).
70. Nakata, E. et al. Zinc-finger proteins for site-specific protein positioning on DNA-origami structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51, 2421–2424 (2012).
71. Ellenberger, T. E., Brandl, C. J., Struhl, K. & Harrison, S. C. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted α helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell 71, 1223–1237 (1992).
72. Watanabe, S., Kodaki, T. & Makino, K. Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10340–10349 (2005).
73. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Kodaki, T. & Morii, T. A protein adaptor to locate a functional protein dimer on molecular switchboard. Methods 67, 142– 150 (2014).
74. Nakata, E., Dinh, H., Ngo, T. A., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. A modular zinc finger adaptor accelerates the covalent linkage of proteins at specific locations on DNA nanoscaffolds. Chem. Commun. 51, 1016–1019 (2015).
75. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3012–3021 (2016).
76. Nguyen, T. M., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Dinh, H. & Morii, T. Design of modular protein tags for orthogonal covalent bond formation at specific DNA sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8487–8496 (2017). 7
7. Nguyen, T. M. et al. Rational design of a DNA sequence-specific modular protein tag by tuning the alkylation kinetics. Chem. Sci. 10, 9315–9325 (2019).
78. Gautier, A. et al. An engineered protein tag for multiprotein labeling in living cells. Chem. Biol. 15, 128–136 (2008).
79. Linko, V. et al. DNA-based enzyme reactors and systems. Nanomaterials 6, 139 (2016).
80. Wilner, O. I. et al. Enzyme cascades activated on topologically programmed DNA scaffolds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 249–254 (2009).
81. Fu, J., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Woodbury, N. W. & Yan, H. Interenzyme substrate diffusion for an enzyme cascade organized on spatially addressable DNA nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5516–5519 (2012).
82. Xin, L., Zhou, C., Yang, Z. & Liu, D. Regulation of an enzyme cascade reaction by a DNA machine. Small 9, 3088–3091 (2013).
83. Linko, V., Eerikäinen, M. & Kostiainen, M. A. A modular DNA origami-based enzyme cascade nanoreactor. Chem. Commun. 51, 5351–5354 (2015).
84. Zhao, Z. et al. Nanocaged enzymes with enhanced catalytic activity and increased stability against protease digestion. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
85. Fu, J. et al. Multi-enzyme complexes on DNA scaffolds capable of substrate channelling with an artificial swinging arm. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 531–536 (2014).
86. Liu, M., Fu, J., Qi, X., Wootten, S., Woodbury, N. W., Liu, Y., & Yan, H. A three-enzyme pathway with an optimised geometric arrangement to facilitate substrate transfer. ChemBioChem, 17, 1097-1101 (2016).
87. Dinh, H. et al. Reaction of ribulose biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase assembled on a DNA scaffold. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 27, 115120 (2019).
88. Frey, R., Mantri, S., Rocca, M. & Hilvert, D. Bottom-up construction of a primordial carboxysome mimic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10072 (2016).
89. Zhang, Y., Ge, J. & Liu, Z. Enhanced activity of immobilized or chemically modified enzymes. ACS Catal. 5, 4503–4513 (2015).
90. Ellis, G. A. et al. Artificial multienzyme scaffolds: pursuing in vitro substrate channeling with an overview of current progress. ACS Catal. 9, 10812–10869 (2019).
91. Rudiuk, S., Venancio-Marques, A. & Baigl, D. Enhancement and modulation of enzymatic activity through higher-order structural changes of giant DNA-protein multibranch conjugates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 124, 12866–12870 (2012).
92. Lin, J. L. & Wheeldon, I. Kinetic enhancements in DNA-enzyme nanostructures mimic the sabatier principle. ACS Catal. 3, 560–564 (2013).
93. Gao, Y. et al. Tuning enzyme kinetics through designed intermolecular interactions far from the active site. ACS Catal. 5, 2149–2153 (2015).
94. Timm, C. & Niemeyer, C. M. Assembly and purification of enzymefunctionalized DNA origami structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 6745–6750 (2015).
95. Zhang, Y., Tsitkov, S. & Hess, H. Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase-horseradish peroxidase cascade. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
96. Xiong, Y., Huang, J., Wang, S. T., Zafar, S. & Gang, O. Local environment affects the activity of enzymes on a 3D molecular scaffold. ACS Nano 14, 14646–14654 (2020).
Chapter2
1. Di Cosimo, R., Mc Auliffe, J., Poulose, A. J. & Bohlmann, G. Industrial use of immobilized enzymes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6437–6474 (2013).
2. Sheldon, R. A. Enzyme immobilization: the quest for optimum performance. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 1289–1307 (2007).
3. Zhang, Y., Ge, J. & Liu, Z. Enhanced activity of immobilized or chemically modified enzymes. ACS Catal. 5, 4503–4513 (2015).
4. Lim, S., Jung, G. A., Glover, D. J. & Clark, D. S. Enhanced enzyme activity through scaffolding on customizable self-assembling protein filaments. Small 15, 1–11 (2019).
5. Tabaei, S. R., Rabe, M., Zetterberg, H., Zhdanov, V. P. & Höök, F. Single lipid vesicle assay for characterizing single-enzyme kinetics of phospholipid hydrolysis in a complex biological fluid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 14151–14158 (2013).
6. Wang, Y. & Caruso, F. Mesoporous silica spheres as supports for enzyme immobilization and encapsulation. Chem. Mater. 17, 953–961 (2005).
7. Lin, P. et al. Assembly of graphene oxide-formate dehydrogenase composites by nickel-coordination with enhanced stability and reusability. Eng. Life Sci. 18, 326–333 (2018).
8. Virgen-Ortíz, J. J. et al. Polyethylenimine: a very useful ionic polymer in the design of immobilized enzyme biocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 7461–7490 (2017).
9. Rajendran, A., Nakata, E., Nakano, S. & Morii, T. Nucleic-acid-templated enzyme cascades. ChemBioChem 18, 696–716 (2017).
10. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).
11. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).
12. Grossi, G., Dalgaard Ebbesen Jepsen, M., Kjems, J. & Andersen, E. S. Control of enzyme reactions by a reconfigurable DNA nanovault. Nat. Commun. 8, (2017).
13. Wilner, O. I. et al. Enzyme cascades activated on topologically programmed DNA scaffolds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 249–254 (2009).
14. Ngo, T. A. et al. Protein adaptors assemble functional proteins on DNA scaffolds. Chem. Commun. 55, 12428–12446 (2019).
15. Zhao, Z. et al. Nanocaged enzymes with enhanced catalytic activity and increased stability against protease digestion. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
16. Rudiuk, S., Venancio-Marques, A. & Baigl, D. Enhancement and modulation of enzymatic activity through higher-order structural changes of giant DNA-Protein multibranch conjugates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51, 12694–12698 (2012).
17. Timm, C. & Niemeyer, C. M. Assembly and purification of enzymefunctionalized DNA origami structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 6745–6750 (2015).
18. Lin, J. L. & Wheeldon, I. Kinetic enhancements in DNA-enzyme nanostructures mimic the sabatier principle. ACS Catal. 3, 560–564 (2013).
19. Zhang, Y., Tsitkov, S. & Hess, H. Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase-horseradish peroxidase cascade. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
20. Xiong, Y., Huang, J., Wang, S. T., Zafar, S. & Gang, O. Local environment affects the activity of enzymes on a 3D molecular scaffold. ACS Nano 14, 14646–14654 (2020).
21. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).
22. Sander, B. & Golas, M. M. Visualization of bionanostructures using transmission electron microscopical techniques. Microsc. Res. Tech. 74, 642–663 (2011).
23. Watanabe, S. et al. Ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing protein-engineered NADH-preferring xylose reductase from Pichia stipitis. Microbiology 153, 3044–3054 (2007).
24. Watanabe, S., Kodaki, T. & Makino, K. Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10340–10349 (2005).
25. Nakata, E., Dinh, H., Ngo, T. A., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. A modular zinc finger adaptor accelerates the covalent linkage of proteins at specific locations on DNA nanoscaffolds. Chem. Commun. 51, 1016–1019 (2015).
26. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3012–3021 (2016).
27. Nguyen, T. M., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Dinh, H. & Morii, T. Design of modular protein tags for orthogonal covalent bond formation at specific DNA sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8487–8496 (2017).
28. Nguyen, T. M. et al. Rational design of a DNA sequence-specific modular protein tag by tuning the alkylation kinetics. Chem. Sci. 10, 9315–9325 (2019).
29. Ellenberger, T. E., Brandl, C. J., Struhl, K. & Harrison, S. C. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted α helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell 71, 1223–1237 (1992).
30. England, C. G., Luo, H. & Cai, W. HaloTag technology: a versatile platform for biomedical applications. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 975–986 (2015).
31. Eriksson, T., Börjesson, J. & Tjerneld, F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31, 353–364 (2002).
32. Yang, B. & Wyman, C. E. BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 94, 611–617 (2006).
33. Whitaker, J. E., Haugland, R. P. & Prendergast, F. G. Spectral and photophysical studies of benzo[c]xanthene dyes: dual emission pH sensors. Anal. Biochem. 194, 330–344 (1991).
34. Nakata, E. et al. A newly designed cell-permeable SNARF derivative as an effective intracellular pH indicator. Chem. Commun. 46, 3526–3528 (2010).
35. Nakata, E. et al. A novel strategy to design latent ratiometric fluorescent pH probes based on self-assembled SNARF derivatives. RSC Adv. 4, 348–357 (2014).
36. Chen, X., Zhou, Y., Peng, X., & Yoon, J. Fluorescent and colorimetric probes for detection of thiols. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 2120-2135 (2010).
37. Langmuir, M. E., Yang, J. R., Moussa, A. M., Laura, R., & LeCompte, K. A. New naphthopyranone based fluorescent thiol probes. Tetrahedron Lett. 36, 3989- 3992 (1995).
38 Torrie, G. M., Kusalik, P. G. & Patey, G. N. Molecular solvent model for an electrical double layer: reference hypernetted-chain results for ion behavior at infinite dilution. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3285–3294 (1988).
39. Bérard, D. R., Kinoshita, M., Cann, N. M. & Patey, G. N. Structure of the metalaqueous electrolyte solution interface. J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4719–4728 (1997).
40. Kinoshita, M. Water structure and phase transition near a surface. J. Solution Chem. 33, 661–687 (2004).
41. Kratzer, R. et al. Enzyme identification and development of a whole-cell biotransformation for asymmetric reduction of o-chloroacetophenone. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 797–803 (2011).
42. Kratzer, R., Wilson, D. K. & Nidetzky, B. Catalytic mechanism and substrate selectivity of aldo-keto reductases: insights from structure-function studies of Candida tenuis xylose reductase. IUBMB Life 58, 499–507 (2006).
43. Drummond, C., Pérez-Fuentes, L. & Bastos-González, D. Can polyoxometalates be considered as superchaotropic ions? J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 28744–28752 (2019).
44. Collins, K. D. Ions from the Hofmeister series and osmolytes: efects on proteins in solution and in the crystallization process. Methods 34, 300–311 (2004).
45. Verduyn, C. et al. Properties of the NAD(P)H-dependent xylose reductase from the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Biochem. J. 226, 669–677 (1985).
46. Ehrensberger, A. H., Elling, R. A. & Wilson, D. K. Structure-guided engineering of xylitol dehydrogenase cosubstrate specificity. Structure 14, 567–575 (2006).
47. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Kodaki, T. & Morii, T. A protein adaptor to locate a functional protein dimer on molecular switchboard. Methods 67, 142– 150 (2014).
48. Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).
49. Amir, Y. et al. Universal computing by DNA origami robots in a living animal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 353–357 (2014).
50. Han, J. & Burgess, K. Fluorescent indicators for intracellular pH. Chem. Rev. 110, 2709–2728 (2010).
51. Nguyen, T. & Francis, M. B. Practical synthetic route to functionalized rhodamine dyes. Org. Lett. 5, 3245–3248 (2003).
52. Benjaminsen, R. V. et al. Evaluating nanoparticle sensor design for intracellular pH measurements. ACS Nano 5, 5864–5873 (2011).
Chapter3
1. Agapakis, C. M., Boyle, P. M. & Silver, P. A. Natural strategies for the spatial optimization of metabolism in synthetic biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 527–535 (2012).
2. Küchler, A., Yoshimoto, M., Luginbühl, S., Mavelli, F. & Walde, P. Enzymatic reactions in confined environments. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 409–420 (2016).
3. Conrado, R. J., Varner, J. D. & DeLisa, M. P. Engineering the spatial organization of metabolic enzymes: mimicking nature’s synergy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 492–499 (2008).
4. Bonacci, W. et al. Modularity of a carbon-fixing protein organelle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 478–483 (2012).
5. Gou, M., Ran, X., Martin, D. W. & Liu, C. J. The scaffold proteins of lignin biosynthetic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Nat. Plants 4, 299–310 (2018).
6. Liu, L. N. Distribution and dynamics of electron transport complexes in cyanobacterial thylakoid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Bioenerg. 1857, 256–265 (2016).
7. Brasch, M. et al. Assembling enzymatic cascade pathways inside virus-based nanocages using dual-tasking nucleic acid tags. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1512– 1519 (2017).
8. Walde, P. & Ichikawa, S. Enzymes inside lipid vesicles: preparation, reactivity and applications. Biomol. Eng. 18, 143–177 (2001).
9. Klermund, L., Poschenrieder, S. T. & Castiglione, K. Biocatalysis in polymersomes: improving multienzyme cascades with incompatible reaction steps by compartmentalization. ACS Catal. 7, 3900–3904 (2017).
10. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).
11. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).
12. Hong, F., Zhang, F., Liu, Y. & Yan, H. DNA origami: scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem. Rev. 117, (2017).
13. Simmel, F. C., Yurke, B. & Singh, H. R. Principles and applications of nucleic acid strand displacement reactions. Chem. Rev. 119, 6326-6369 (2019).
14. Rangel, A. E., Hariri, A. A., Eisenstein, M. & Soh, H. T. Engineering aptamer switches for multifunctional stimulus-responsive nanosystems. Adv. Mater. (2020).
15. Turek, V. A. et al. Thermo-responsive actuation of a DNA origami flexor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1–7 (2018).
16. Kim, S. H. et al. Reversible regulation of enzyme activity by pH-responsive encapsulation in DNA nanocages. ACS Nano 11, 9352–9359 (2017).
17. Deluca, M., Shi, Z., Castro, C. E. & Arya, G. Dynamic DNA nanotechnology: toward functional nanoscale devices. Nanoscale Horizons 5, 182–201 (2020).
18. Juul, S. et al. Temperature-controlled encapsulation and release of an active enzyme in the cavity of a self-assembled DNA nanocage. ACS Nano 7, 9724– 9734 (2013).
19. Ijäs, H., Hakaste, I., Shen, B., Kostiainen, M. A. & Linko, V. Reconfigurable DNA origami nanocapsule for pH-controlled encapsulation and display of cargo. ACS Nano 13, 5959-5967 (2019).
20. Marras, A. E. et al. Cation-activated avidity for rapid reconfiguration of DNA nanodevices. ACS Nano 12, 9484–9494 (2018).
21. Grossi, G., Dalgaard Ebbesen Jepsen, M., Kjems, J. & Andersen, E. S. Control of enzyme reactions by a reconfigurable DNA nanovault. Nat. Commun. 8, (2017).
22. Xin, L., Zhou, C., Yang, Z. & Liu, D. Regulation of an enzyme cascade reaction by a DNA machine. Small 9, 3088–3091 (2013).
23. Rajendran, A., Nakata, E., Nakano, S. & Morii, T. Nucleic-acid-templated enzyme cascades. ChemBioChem 18, 696–716 (2017).
24. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).
25. Roy, R., Hohng, S. & Ha, T. A practical guide to single-molecule FRET. Nat. Methods 5, 507–16 (2008).
26. Markegard, C. B., Gallivan, C. P., Cheng, D. D. & Nguyen, H. D. Effects of concentration and temperature on DNA hybridization by two closely related sequences via large-scale coarse-grained simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 7795–7806 (2016).
27. Groeer, S. & Walther, A. Switchable supracolloidal 3D DNA origami nanotubes mediated through fuel/antifuel reactions. Nanoscale 12, 16995–17004 (2020).
28. Watanabe, S., Kodaki, T. & Makino, K. Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10340–10349 (2005).
29. Nakata, E., Dinh, H., Ngo, T. A., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. A modular zinc finger adaptor accelerates the covalent linkage of proteins at specific locations on DNA nanoscaffolds. Chem. Commun. 51, 1016–1019 (2015).
30. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3012–3021 (2016).
31. Nguyen, T. M., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Dinh, H. & Morii, T. Design of modular protein tags for orthogonal covalent bond formation at specific DNA sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8487–8496 (2017).
32. Nguyen, T. M. et al. Rational design of a DNA sequence-specific modular protein tag by tuning the alkylation kinetics. Chem. Sci. 10, 9315–9325 (2019).
33. Ellenberger, T. E., Brandl, C. J., Struhl, K. & Harrison, S. C. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted α helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell 71, 1223–1237 (1992).
34. England, C. G., Luo, H. & Cai, W. HaloTag technology: a versatile platform for biomedical applications. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 975–986 (2015).
35. Lin, P. et al. Evaluation of the role of the DNA surface for enhancing the activity of scaffolded enzymes. Chem. Commun. 57, 3925–3928 (2021).
36. Zhao, Z. et al. Nanocaged enzymes with enhanced catalytic activity and increased stability against protease digestion. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
37. Timm, C. & Niemeyer, C. M. Assembly and purification of enzymefunctionalized DNA origami structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 6745–6750 (2015).
38. Lin, J. L. & Wheeldon, I. Kinetic enhancements in DNA-enzyme nanostructures mimic the sabatier principle. ACS Catal. 3, 560–564 (2013).
39. Zhang, Y., Tsitkov, S. & Hess, H. Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase-horseradish peroxidase cascade. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
40. Xiong, Y., Huang, J., Wang, S. T., Zafar, S. & Gang, O. Local environment affects the activity of enzymes on a 3D molecular scaffold. ACS Nano 14, 14646–14654 (2020).
41. Rudiuk, S., Venancio-Marques, A. & Baigl, D. Enhancement and modulation of enzymatic activity through higher-order structural changes of giant DNA-Protein multibranch conjugates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51, 12694–12698 (2012).
42. Huang, J. et al. Arranging small molecules with subnanometer precision on DNA origami substrates for the single-molecule investigation of protein-ligand interactions. Small Structures 1 : 2000038 (2020).
43. Zhang, P. et al. Quantitative measurement of spatial effects of DNA origami on molecular binding reactions detected using atomic force microscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 21973-21981 (2019).
44. Dinh, H. et al. Enhanced enzymatic activity exerted by a packed assembly of a single type of enzyme. Chem. Sci. 11, 9088–9100 (2020).
45. Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).
46. Amir, Y. et al. Universal computing by DNA origami robots in a living animal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 353–357 (2014).
Chapter4
1. Wheeldon, I. et al. Substrate channelling as an approach to cascade reactions. Nat. Chem. 8, 299–309 (2016).
2. Conrado, R. J., Varner, J. D. & DeLisa, M. P. Engineering the spatial organization of metabolic enzymes: mimicking nature’s synergy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 492–499 (2008).
3. Miles, E. W., Rhee, S. & Davies, D. R. The molecular basis of substrate channeling. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12193–12196 (1999).
4. Wu, F. & Minteer, S. Krebs cycle metabolon: structural evidence of substrate channeling revealed by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Angew. Chemie., Int. Ed. 54, 1851–1854 (2015).
5. Bonacci, W. et al. Modularity of a carbon-fixing protein organelle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 478–483 (2012).
6. Dueber, J. E. et al. Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 753–759 (2009).
7. Chen, L., Mulchandani, A. & Ge, X. Spore-displayed enzyme cascade with tunable stoichiometry. Biotechnol. Prog. 33, 383–389 (2017).
8. Xin, L., Zhou, C., Yang, Z. & Liu, D. Regulation of an enzyme cascade reaction by a DNA machine. Small 9, 3088–3091 (2013).
9. Wilner, O. I. et al. Enzyme cascades activated on topologically programmed DNA scaffolds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 249–254 (2009).
10. Fu, J., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Woodbury, N. W. & Yan, H. Interenzyme substrate diffusion for an enzyme cascade organized on spatially addressable DNA nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5516–5519 (2012).
11. Zhang, Y., Tsitkov, S. & Hess, H. Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase-horseradish peroxidase cascade. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
12. Hinzpeter, F., Gerland, U. & Tostevin, F. Optimal compartmentalization strategies for metabolic microcompartments. Biophys. J. 112, 767–779 (2017).
13. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3012–3021 (2016).
14. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science. 335, 831–834 (2012).
15. Zhang, Y. & Hess, H. Toward rational design of high-efficiency enzyme cascades. ACS Catal. 7, 6018–6027 (2017).
16. Tsitkov, S., Pesenti, T., Palacci, H., Blanchet, J. & Hess, H. Queueing theorybased perspective of the kinetics of ‘channeled’ enzyme cascade reactions. ACS Catal. 8, 10721–10731 (2018).
17. Watanabe, S., Kodaki, T. & Makino, K. Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10340–10349 (2005).
18. Pival, S. L., Birner-Gruenberger, R., Krump, C. & Nidetzky, B. D-Xylulose kinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation and characterization of the highly unstable enzyme, recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 79, 223–230 (2011).
19. Nakata, E., Dinh, H., Ngo, T. A., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. A modular zinc finger adaptor accelerates the covalent linkage of proteins at specific locations on DNA nanoscaffolds. Chem. Commun. 51, 1016–1019 (2015).
20. Nguyen, T. M., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Dinh, H. & Morii, T. Design of modular protein tags for orthogonal covalent bond formation at specific DNA sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8487–8496 (2017).
21. Nguyen, T. M. et al. Rational design of a DNA sequence-specific modular protein tag by tuning the alkylation kinetics. Chem. Sci. 10, 9315–9325 (2019).
22. Lin, P. et al. Evaluation of the role of the DNA surface for enhancing the activity of scaffolded enzymes. Chem. Commun. 57, 3925–3928 (2021).
23. Greisman, H. A. & Pabo, C. O. A general strategy for selecting high-affinity zinc finger proteins for diverse DNA target sites. Science 275, 657–661 (1997).
24. Gautier, A. et al. An engineered protein tag for multiprotein labeling in living cells. Chem. Biol. 15, 128–136 (2008).
25. Burton, R. M. & Kaplan, N. O. The reaction of reduced pyridine nucleotides with acid. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 101, 150–159 (1963).
26. Wu, J. T., Wu, L. H. & Knight, J. A. Stability of NADPH: effect of various factors on the kinetics of degradation. Clin. Chem. 32, 314–319 (1986).
27. Walsh, K. A., Daniel, R. M. & Morgan, H. W. A soluble NADH dehydrogenase (NADH: ferricyanide oxidoreductase) from Thermus aquaticus strain T351. Biochem. J. 209, 427–33 (1983).
28. Rover, L. et al. Study of NADH stability using ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometric analysis and factorial design. Anal. Biochem. 260, 50–55 (1998).
29. Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).
30 Amir, Y., Ben-Ishay, E., Levner, D., Ittah, S., Abu-Horowitz, A., & Bachelet, I. Universal computing by DNA origami robots in a living animal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 353-357 (2014).
31. Erickson, H. P. Size and shape of protein molecules at the nanometer level determined by sedimentation, gel filtration, and electron microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online 11, 32–51 (2009).
Chapter5
1. Agapakis, C. M., Boyle, P. M. & Silver, P. A. Natural strategies for the spatial optimization of metabolism in synthetic biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 527–535 (2012).
2. Pareek, V., Tian, H., Winograd, N. & Benkovic, S. J. Metabolomics and mass spectrometry imaging reveal channeled de novo purine synthesis in cells. Science 368, 283–290 (2020).
3. Bulutoglu, B., Garcia, K. E., Wu, F., Minteer, S. D. & Banta, S. Direct evidence for metabolon formation and substrate channeling in recombinant TCA cycle enzymes. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 2847–2853 (2016).
4. Sweetlove, L. J. & Fernie, A. R. The role of dynamic enzyme assemblies and substrate channelling in metabolic regulation. Nat. Commun. 9, (2018).
5. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).
6. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).
7. Saccà, B. et al. Orthogonal protein decoration of DNA origami. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 49, 9378–9383 (2010).
8. Yurke, B., Turber, A. J., Jr, A. P. M., Simmel, F. C. & Neumann, J. L. A DNAfuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature 406, 605–608 (2000).
9. Grossi, G., Dalgaard Ebbesen Jepsen, M., Kjems, J. & Andersen, E. S. Control of enzyme reactions by a reconfigurable DNA nanovault. Nat. Commun. 8, (2017).
10. Andersen, E. S. et al. Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid. Nature 459, 73–76 (2009).
11. Zadegan, R. M. et al. Construction of a 4 Zeptoliters switchable 3D DNA box origami. ACS Nano 6, 10050–10053 (2012).
12. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).
13. Li, S. et al. A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 258–264 (2018).
14. Marras, A. E. et al. Cation-activated avidity for rapid reconfiguration of DNA nanodevices. ACS Nano 12, 9484–9494 (2018).
15. Kuzuya, A., Sakai, Y., Yamazaki, T., Xu, Y. & Komiyama, M. Nanomechanical DNA origami ‘single-molecule beacons’ directly imaged by atomic force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2, (2011).
16. Ijäs, H., Hakaste, I., Shen, B., Kostiainen, M. A. & Linko, V. Reconfigurable DNA origami nanocapsule for pH-controlled encapsulation and display of cargo. ACS Nano 13, 5959–5967 (2019).
17. Kim, S. H. et al. Reversible regulation of enzyme activity by pH-responsive encapsulation in DNA nanocages. ACS Nano 11, 9352–9359 (2017).
18. Turek, V. A. et al. Thermo-responsive actuation of a DNA origami flexor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1–7 (2018).
19. Juul, S. et al. Temperature-controlled encapsulation and release of an active enzyme in the cavity of a self-assembled DNA nanocage. ACS Nano 7, 9724– 9734 (2013).
20. Kohman, R. E. & Han, X. Light sensitization of DNA nanostructures via incorporation of photo-cleavable spacers. Chem. Commun. 51, 5747–5750 (2015).
21. Feng, Y., Tohgasaki, T., Shitomi, Y., Sugiyama, H. & Endo, M. A photocaged DNA nanocapsule for delivery and manipulation in cells. Methods Enzymol. 641, 329-342 (2020).
22. Kopperger, E. et al. A self-assembled nanoscale robotic arm controlled by electric fields. Science 359, 296–301 (2018).
23. Linko, V. et al. DNA-based enzyme reactors and systems. Nanomaterials 6, 139 (2016).
24. Lin, P. et al. Evaluation of the role of the DNA surface for enhancing the activity of scaffolded enzymes. Chem. Commun. 57, 3925–3928 (2021).
25. Linko, V., Eerikäinen, M. & Kostiainen, M. A. A modular DNA origami-based enzyme cascade nanoreactor. Chem. Commun. 51, 5351–5354 (2015).
26. Fu, Y. et al. Single-step rapid assembly of DNA origami nanostructures for addressable nanoscale bioreactors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 696–702 (2013).
27. Zhao, Z. et al. Nanocaged enzymes with enhanced catalytic activity and increased stability against protease digestion. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
28. Zhang, D. Y. & Winfree, E. Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17303–17314 (2009).
29. Roy, R., Hohng, S. & Ha, T. A practical guide to single-molecule FRET. Nat. Methods 5, 507–516 (2008).
30. Watanabe, S. et al. Ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing protein-engineered NADH-preferring xylose reductase from Pichia stipitis. Microbiology 153, 3044–3054 (2007).
31. Watanabe, S., Kodaki, T. & Makino, K. Complete reversal of coenzyme specificity of xylitol dehydrogenase and increase of thermostability by the introduction of structural zinc. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10340–10349 (2005).
32. Nakata, E., Dinh, H., Ngo, T. A., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. A modular zinc finger adaptor accelerates the covalent linkage of proteins at specific locations on DNA nanoscaffolds. Chem. Commun. 51, 1016–1019 (2015).
33. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3012–3021 (2016).
34. Nguyen, T. M., Nakata, E., Saimura, M., Dinh, H. & Morii, T. Design of modular protein tags for orthogonal covalent bond formation at specific DNA sequences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8487–8496 (2017).
35. Nguyen, T. M. et al. Rational design of a DNA sequence-specific modular protein tag by tuning the alkylation kinetics. Chem. Sci. 10, 9315–9325 (2019).
36. Idan, O. & Hess, H. Origins of activity enhancement in enzyme cascades on scaffolds. ACS Nano 7, 8658–8665 (2013).
37. Chado, G. R., Stoykovich, M. P. & Kaar, J. L. Role of dimension and spatial arrangement on the activity of biocatalytic cascade reactions on scaffolds. ACS Catal. 6, 5161–5169 (2016).
38. Fu, J., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Woodbury, N. W. & Yan, H. Interenzyme substrate diffusion for an enzyme cascade organized on spatially addressable DNA nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5516–5519 (2012).
39. Lim, S., Kim, J., Kim, Y., Xu, D. & Clark, D. S. CRISPR/Cas-directed programmable assembly of multi-enzyme complexes. Chem. Commun. 56, 4950– 4953 (2020).
40. Cao, Y. et al. Investigating the origin of high efficiency in confined multienzyme catalysis. Nanoscale 11, 22108–22117 (2019).
41. Lin, J. L. & Wheeldon, I. Kinetic enhancements in DNA-enzyme nanostructures mimic the sabatier principle. ACS Catal. 3, 560–564 (2013).
42. Zhang, Y., Tsitkov, S. & Hess, H. Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase-horseradish peroxidase cascade. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016).
43. Zhang, Y. & Hess, H. Toward rational design of high-efficiency enzyme cascades. ACS Catal. 7, 6018–6027 (2017).
44. Timm, C. & Niemeyer, C. M. Assembly and purification of enzymefunctionalized DNA origami structures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 6745–6750 (2015).
45. Rudiuk, S., Venancio-Marques, A. & Baigl, D. Enhancement and modulation of enzymatic activity through higher-order structural changes of giant DNA-protein multibranch conjugates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51, 12694–12698 (2012).
46. Wu, N. et al. Molecular threading and tunable molecular recognition on DNA origami nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12172–12175 (2013).
47. Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).
48. Amir, Y. et al. Universal computing by DNA origami robots in a living animal. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 353–357 (2014).
Chapter6
1. Ngo, T. A., Nakata, E., Saimura, M. & Morii, T. Spatially organized enzymes drive cofactor-coupled cascade reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3012–3021 (2016).
論文の公開元へ
