1. Lefaucheur, J.P.; Ayache, S.S.; Sorel, M.; Farhat, W.H.; Zouari, H.G.; Ciampi De Andrade, D.; Ahdab, R.; Ménard-Lefaucheur, I.; Brugières, P.; Goujon, C. Analgesic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in neuropathic pain: Influence of theta burst stimulation priming. Eur. J. Pain 2012, 16, 1403–1413. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Liew, S.L.; Santarnecchi, E.; Buch, E.R.; Cohen, L.G. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: Local and distant effects for motor recovery. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 1–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Oliviero, A.; Mordillo-Mateos, L.; Arias, P.; Panyavin, I.; Foffani, G.; Aguilar, J. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 2011, 589, 4949–4958. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Kufner, M.; Brückner, S.; Kammer, T. No modulatory effects by transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of human motor and somatosensory cortex. Brain Stimul. 2017, 10, 703–710. [CrossRef]
5. Lorenz, S.; Alex, B.; Kammer, T. Ten minutes of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation does not reliably modulate motor cortex excitability. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233614. [CrossRef]
6. Watanabe, T.; Kubo, N.; Chen, X.; Yunoki, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Kuwabara, T.; Sunagawa, T.; Date, S.; Mima, T.; Kirimoto, H. Null Effect of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Behavioral Performance in a Go/NoGo Task. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 483. [CrossRef]
7. Nojima, I.; Oliviero, A.; Mima, T. Transcranial static magnetic stimulation—From bench to bedside and beyond. Neurosci. Res. 2020, 156, 250–255. [CrossRef]
8. Dileone, M.; Mordillo-Mateos, L.; Oliviero, A.; Foffani, G. Long-lasting effects of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Brain Stimul. 2018, 11, 676–688. [CrossRef]
9. Silbert, B.I.; Pevcic, D.D.; Patterson, H.I.; Windnagel, K.A.; Thickbroom, G.W. Inverse correlation between resting motor threshold and corticomotor excitability after static magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6, 817–820. [CrossRef]
10. Nojima, I.; Koganemaru, S.; Fukuyama, H.; Mima, T. Static magnetic field can transiently alter the human intracortical inhibitory system. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2015, 126, 2314–2319. [CrossRef]
11. Nojima, I.; Koganemaru, S.; Mima, T.; Kida, T.; Brown, M.J.N.; Kirimoto, H. Combination of static magnetic fields and peripheral nerve stimulation can alter focal cortical excitability. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 1–8. [CrossRef]
12. Kirimoto, H.; Asao, A.; Tamaki, H.; Onishi, H. Non-invasive modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials by the application of static magnetic fields over the primary and supplementary motor cortices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 4–11. [CrossRef]
13. Kirimoto, H.; Tamaki, H.; Otsuru, N.; Yamashiro, K.; Onishi, H.; Nojima, I.; Oliviero, A. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation over the primary motor cortex induces plastic changes in cortical nociceptive processing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 1–10. [CrossRef]
14. Kirimoto, H.; Tamaki, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Sugawara, K.; Suzuki, M.; Oyama, M.; Onishi, H. Effect of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Brain Stimul. 2014, 7, 836–840. [CrossRef]
15. Gonzalez-Rosa, J.J.; Soto-Leon, V.; Real, P.; Carrasco-Lopez, C.; Foffani, G.; Strange, B.A.; Oliviero, A. Static magnetic field stimulation over the visual cortex increases alpha oscillations and slows visual search in humans. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 9182–9193. [CrossRef]
16. Carrasco-López, C.; Soto-León, V.; Céspedes, V.; Profice, P.; Strange, B.A.; Foffani, G.; Oliviero, A. Static magnetic field stimulation over parietal cortex enhances somatosensory detection in humans. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 3840–3847. [CrossRef]
17. Shibata, S.; Watanabe, T.; Yukawa, Y.; Minakuchi, M.; Shimomura, R.; Mima, T. Effect of transcranial static magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 2020, 723, 134871. [CrossRef]
18. Pineda-Pardo, J.A.; Obeso, I.; Guida, P.; Dileone, M.; Strange, B.A.; Obeso, J.A.; Oliviero, A.; Foffani, G. Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2. [CrossRef]
19. Takamatsu, Y.; Koganemaru, S.; Watanabe, T.; Shibata, S.; Yukawa, Y.; Minakuchi, M.; Shimomura, R.; Mima, T. Transcranial static magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex can facilitate the contralateral cortical excitability in human. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5370. [CrossRef]
20. Shibata, S.; Watanabe, T.; Yukawa, Y.; Minakuchi, M.; Shimomura, R.; Ichimura, S.; Kirimoto, H.; Mima, T. Effects of transcranial static magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex on local and network spontaneous electroencephalogram oscillations. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8261. [CrossRef]
21. Nojima, I.; Watanabe, T.; Gyoda, T.; Sugata, H.; Ikeda, T.; Mima, T. Transcranial static magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex alters sequential implicit motor learning. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 696, 33–37. [CrossRef]
22. Nakagawa, K.; Sasaki, A.; Nakazawa, K. Accuracy in Pinch Force Control Can Be Altered by Static Magnetic Field Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex. Neuromodulation 2019, 22, 871–876. [CrossRef]
23. Kirimoto, H.; Watanabe, T.; Kubo, N.; Date, S.; Sunagawa, T.; Mima, T.; Ogata, K.; Nakazono, H.; Tobimatsu, S.; Oliviero, A. Influence of static magnetic field stimulation on the accuracy of tachystoscopically presented line bisection. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 1006. [CrossRef]
24. Tsuru, D.; Watanabe, T.; Chen, X.; Kubo, N.; Sunagawa, T.; Mima, T.; Kirimoto, H. The effects of transcranial static magnetic fields stimulation over the supplementary motor area on anticipatory postural adjustments. Neurosci. Lett. 2020, 723, 134863. [CrossRef]
25. Rose, E.J.; Ebmeier, K.P. Pattern of impaired working memory during major depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2006, 90, 149–161. [CrossRef]
26. Santarnecchi, E.; Brem, A.K.; Levenbaum, E.; Thompson, T.; Kadosh, R.C.; Pascual-Leone, A. Enhancing cognition using transcranial electrical stimulation. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2015, 4, 171–178. [CrossRef]
27. Curtis, C.E.; D’Esposito, M. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7, 415–423. [CrossRef]
28. Smith, E.E.; Jonides, J. Storage and Executive Processes in the Frontal Lobes. Science 1999, 283, 1657. [CrossRef]
29. Tsuchida, A.; Fellows, L.K. Lesion evidence that two distinct regions within prefrontal cortex are critical for n-back performance in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21, 2263–2275. [CrossRef]
30. Mull, B.R.; Seyal, M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left prefrontal cortex impairs working memory. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112, 1672–1675. [CrossRef]
31. Osaka, N.; Otsuka, Y.; Hirose, N.; Ikeda, T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts verbal working memory performance in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 418, 232–235. [CrossRef]
32. Hill, A.T.; Fitzgerald, P.B.; Hoy, K.E. Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings from Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations. Brain Stimul. 2016, 9, 197–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Brunoni, A.R.; Vanderhasselt, M.A. Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Cogn. 2014, 86, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Dedoncker, J.; Brunoni, A.; Stimulation, C.B.-B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in healthy and neuropsychiatric samples: Influence of stimulation parameters. Brain Stimul. 2016, 9, 501–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Mancuso, L.E.; Ilieva, I.P.; Hamilton, R.H.; Farah, M.J. Does transcranial direct current stimulation improve healthy working memory?: A meta-analytic review. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2016, 28, 1063–1089. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Jaeggi, S.M.; Buschkuehl, M.; Perrig, W.J.; Meier, B. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory 2010, 18, 394–412. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Folstein, J.R.; Van Petten, C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45, 152–170. [CrossRef]
38. Daffner, K.R.; Chong, H.; Sun, X.; Tarbi, E.C.; Riis, J.L.; McGinnis, S.M.; Holcomb, P.J. Mechanisms underlying age-and performance-related differences in working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23, 1298–1314. [CrossRef]
39. Donchin, E.; Ritter, W.; Mccallum, W.C. Cognitive Psychophysiology: The Endogenous Components of the ERP. Event Relat. Brain Potentials Man 1978, 349, 411.
40. Polich, J. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118, 2128–2148. [CrossRef]
41. Gajewski, P.D.; Falkenstein, M. Neurocognition of aging in working environments. Z. Arb. 2011, 44, 307–320. [CrossRef]
42. Wiedemann, G.; Pauli, P.; Dengler, W.; Lutzenberger, W.; Birbaumer, N.; Buchkremer, G. Frontal brain asymmetry as a biological substrate of emotions in patients with panic disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1999, 56, 78–84. [CrossRef]
43. Oldfield, R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9, 97–113. [CrossRef]
44. Watanabe, T.; Tsutou, K.; Saito, K.; Ishida, K.; Tanabe, S.; Nojima, I. Performance monitoring and response conflict resolution associated with choice stepping reaction tasks. Exp. Brain Res. 2016, 234, 3355–3365. [CrossRef]
45. Haatveit, B.C.; Sundet, K.; Hugdahl, K.; Ueland, T.; Melle, I.; Andreassen, O.A. The validity of d prime as a working memory index: Results from the Bergen n-back task. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2010, 32, 871–880. [CrossRef]
46. Macmillan, N.A.; Creelman, C.D. Detection Theory: A User’s Guide; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991; ISBN 0-521-36359-4.
47. Muller, A.; Sirianni, L.A.; Addante, R.J. Neural correlates of the Dunning–Kruger effect. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021, 53, 460–484. [CrossRef]
48. Addante, R.J.; Ranganath, C.; Yonelinas, A.P. Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. Neuroimage 2012, 62, 439–450. [CrossRef]
49. Friedman, D.; Cycowicz, Y.M.; Gaeta, H. The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2001, 25, 355–373. [CrossRef]
50. Dubreuil-Vall, L.; Chau, P.; Ruffini, G.; Widge, A.S.; Camprodon, J.A. tDCS to the left DLPFC modulates cognitive and physiological correlates of executive function in a state-dependent manner. Brain Stimul. 2019, 12, 1456–1463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Albuquerque, W.W.C.; Costa, R.M.P.B.; de Salazar e Fernandes, T.; Porto, A.L.F. Evidences of the static magnetic field influence on cellular systems. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2016, 121, 16–28. [CrossRef]
52. Rosen, A.D. Membrane response to static magnetic fields: Effect of exposure duration. BBA Biomembr. 1993, 1148, 317–320. [CrossRef]
53. Dobson, J.; Stewart, Z.; Martinac, B. Preliminary evidence for weak magnetic field effects on mechanosensitive ion channel subconducting states in Escherichia coli. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2002, 21, 89–95. [CrossRef]
54. Fregni, F.; Boggio, P.S.; Nitsche, M.; Bermpohl, F.; Antal, A.; Feredoes, E.; Marcolin, M.A.; Rigonatti, S.P.; Silva, M.T.A.; Paulus, W.; et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 166, 23–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Brzezicka, A.; Kami ´nski, J.; Reed, C.M.; Chung, J.M.; Mamelak, A.N.; Rutishauser, U. Working memory load related theta power decreases in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predict individual differences in performance. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2019, 31, 1290–1307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Osaka, M.; Osaka, N.; Kondo, H.; Morishita, M.; Fukuyama, H.; Aso, T.; Shibasaki, H. The neural basis of individual differences in working memory capacity: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003, 18, 789–797. [CrossRef]
57. Watanabe, T.; Mima, T.; Shibata, S.; Kirimoto, H. Midfrontal theta as moderator between beta oscillations and precision control. Neuroimage 2021, 235, 118022. [CrossRef]
58. Rodriguez Merzagora, A.C.; Izzetoglu, M.; Onaral, B.; Schultheis, M.T. Verbal working memory impairments following traumatic brain injury: An fNIRS investigation. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014, 8, 446–459. [CrossRef]
59. Gajewski, P.D.; Falkenstein, M. Age-Related Effects on ERP and Oscillatory EEG-Dynamics in a 2-Back Task. J. Psychophysiol. 2014, 28, 162–177. [CrossRef]
60. Polich, J. Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology 1996, 33, 334–353. [CrossRef]
61. Zaehle, T.; Sandmann, P.; Thorne, J.D.; Jäncke, L.; Herrmann, C.S. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: Combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. BMC Neurosci. 2011, 12, 9–14. [CrossRef]
62. Kupfer, D.J.; Frank, E.; Phillips, M.L. Major depressive disorder: New clinical, neurobiological, and treatment perspectives. Lancet 2012, 379, 1045–1055. [CrossRef]
63. Mann, J.J. The Medical Management of Depression. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1819–1834. [CrossRef]
64. Papakostas, G.I.; Fava, M. Pharmacotherapy for Depression and Treatment-Resistant Depression; World Scientific: Singapore, 2010; ISBN 981428758X.
65. Knott, V.; Mahoney, C.; Kennedy, S.; Evans, K. EEG power, frequency, asymmetry and coherence in male depression. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2001, 106, 123–140. [CrossRef]
66. Diego, M.A.; Field, T.; Hernandez-Reif, M. CES-D depression scores are correlated with frontal EEG alpha asymmetry. Depress. Anxiety 2001, 13, 32–37. [CrossRef]
67. Bench, C.J.; Frackowiak, R.S.; Dolan, R.J. Changes in regional cerebral blood flow on recovery from depression. Psychol. Med. 1995, 25, 247–261. [CrossRef]
68. Berlim, M.T.; Van Den Eynde, F.; Tovar-Perdomo, S.; Daskalakis, Z.J. Response, remission and drop-out rates following highfrequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Psychol. Med. 2014, 44, 225–239. [CrossRef]
69. Berlim, M.T.; Van Den Eynde, F.; Daskalakis, Z.J. Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 543–551. [CrossRef]
論文の公開元へ
