1. Bianconi, E. et al. An estimation of the number of cells in the human body. Ann Hum Biol 40, 463-471 (2013).
2. Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537, 347-355 (2016).
3. Aebersold, R. et al. How many human proteoforms are there? Nat Chem Biol 14, 206-214 (2018).
4. Carbonara, K., Andonovski, M. & Coorssen, J.R. Proteomes Are of Proteoforms: Embracing the Complexity. Proteomes 9 (2021).
5. Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198- 207 (2003).
6. Hebert, A.S. et al. The one hour yeast proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 13, 339-347 (2014).
7. Scheltema, R.A. et al. The Q Exactive HF, a Benchtop mass spectrometer with a prefilter, high-performance quadrupole and an ultra-high-field Orbitrap analyzer. Mol Cell Proteomics 13, 3698-3708 (2014).
8. Meier, F. et al. Online Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF) with a Novel Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics 17, 2534-2545 (2018).
9. Bekker-Jensen, D.B. et al. A Compact Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer with FAIMS Interface Improves Proteome Coverage in Short LC Gradients. Mol Cell Proteomics 19, 716-729 (2020).
10. MacNair, J.E., Patel, K.D. & Jorgenson, J.W. Ultrahigh-pressure reversed-phase capillary liquid chromatography: isocratic and gradient elution using columns packed with 1.0-micron particles. Anal Chem 71, 700-708 (1999).
11. Mellors, J.S. & Jorgenson, J.W. Use of 1.5-microm porous ethyl-bridged hybrid particles as a stationary-phase support for reversed-phase ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 76, 5441-5450 (2004).
12. Patel, K.D., Jerkovich, A.D., Link, J.C. & Jorgenson, J.W. In-depth characterization of slurry packed capillary columns with 1.0-microm nonporous particles using reversed-phase isocratic ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 76, 5777-5786 (2004).
13. Luo, Q. et al. Preparation of 20-microm-i.d. silica-based monolithic columns and their performance for proteomics analyses. Anal Chem 77, 5028-5035 (2005).
14. Kobayashi, H. et al. Properties of monolithic silica columns for HPLC. Anal Sci 22, 491-501 (2006).
15. Iwasaki, M., Sugiyama, N., Tanaka, N. & Ishihama, Y. Human proteome analysis by using reversed phase monolithic silica capillary columns with enhanced sensitivity. J Chromatogr A 1228, 292-297 (2012).
16. He, B., Tait, N. & Regnier, F. Fabrication of nanocolumns for liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 70, 3790-3797 (1998).
17. Baca, M., Desmet, G., Ottevaere, H. & De Malsche, W. Achieving a Peak Capacity of 1800 Using an 8 m Long Pillar Array Column. Anal Chem 91, 10932-10936 (2019).
18. Bekker-Jensen, D.B. et al. An Optimized Shotgun Strategy for the Rapid Generation of Comprehensive Human Proteomes. Cell Syst 4, 587-599 e584 (2017).
19. Pandey, A. & Mann, M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 405, 837- 846 (2000).
20. Shishkova, E., Hebert, A.S. & Coon, J.J. Now, More Than Ever, Proteomics Needs Better Chromatography. Cell Syst 3, 321-324 (2016).
21. Boersema, P.J., Raijmakers, R., Lemeer, S., Mohammed, S. & Heck, A.J. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 4, 484-494 (2009).
22. Geiger, T. et al. Use of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture as a spike-in standard in quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 6, 147-157 (2011).
23. Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M.M. & Kuster, B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal Bioanal Chem 404, 939-965 (2012).
24. Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13, 2513-2526 (2014).
25. Rauniyar, N. & Yates, J.R., 3rd Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 13, 5293-5309 (2014).
26. Thompson, A. et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem 75, 1895- 1904 (2003).
27. Ting, L., Rad, R., Gygi, S.P. & Haas, W. MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat Methods 8, 937-940 (2011).
28. McAlister, G.C. et al. MultiNotch MS3 enables accurate, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of differential expression across cancer cell line proteomes. Anal Chem 86, 7150-7158 (2014).
29. Schweppe, D.K. et al. Full-Featured, Real-Time Database Searching Platform Enables Fast and Accurate Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics. J Proteome Res 19, 2026-2034 (2020).
30. Schweppe, D.K. et al. Characterization and Optimization of Multiplexed Quantitative Analyses Using High-Field Asymmetric-Waveform Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 91, 4010-4016 (2019).
31. Pfammatter, S., Bonneil, E. & Thibault, P. Improvement of Quantitative Measurements in Multiplex Proteomics Using High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Spectrometry. J Proteome Res 15, 4653-4665 (2016).
32. Hunter, T. Tyrosine phosphorylation: thirty years and counting. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21, 140-146 (2009).
33. Pawson, T. & Scott, J.D. Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science 278, 2075-2080 (1997).
34. Hunter, T. Signaling--2000 and beyond. Cell 100, 113-127 (2000).
35. Olsen, J.V. et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635-648 (2006).
36. Needham, E.J., Parker, B.L., Burykin, T., James, D.E. & Humphrey, S.J. Illuminating the dark phosphoproteome. Sci Signal 12 (2019).
37. Cohen, P. The origins of protein phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 4, E127-130 (2002).
38. Hunter, T. & Sefton, B.M. Transforming gene product of Rous sarcoma virus phosphorylates tyrosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77, 1311-1315 (1980).
39. Hogrebe, A. et al. Benchmarking common quantification strategies for large-scale phosphoproteomics. Nat Commun 9, 1045 (2018).
40. Humphrey, S.J., Azimifar, S.B. & Mann, M. High-throughput phosphoproteomics reveals in vivo insulin signaling dynamics. Nat Biotechnol 33, 990-995 (2015).
41. Mertins, P. et al. Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 13, 1632-1661 (2018).
42. Ikeguchi, Y. & Nakamura, H. Determination of organic phosphates by columnswitching high performance anion-exchange chromatography using on-line preconcentration on titania. Analytical Sciences 13, 479-483 (1997).
43. Stensballe, A., Andersen, S. & Jensen, O.N. Characterization of phosphoproteins from electrophoretic gels by nanoscale Fe(III) affinity chromatography with offline mass spectrometry analysis. Proteomics 1, 207-222 (2001).
44. Ficarro, S.B. et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 20, 301-305 (2002).
45. Wolschin, F., Wienkoop, S. & Weckwerth, W. Enrichment of phosphorylated proteins and peptides from complex mixtures using metal oxide/hydroxide affinity chromatography (MOAC). Proteomics 5, 4389-4397 (2005).
46. Kweon, H.K. & Hakansson, K. Selective zirconium dioxide-based enrichment of phosphorylated peptides for mass spectrometric analysis. Anal Chem 78, 1743- 1749 (2006).
47. Abe, Y., Nagano, M., Tada, A., Adachi, J. & Tomonaga, T. Deep Phosphotyrosine Proteomics by Optimization of Phosphotyrosine Enrichment and MS/MS Parameters. J Proteome Res 16, 1077-1086 (2017).
48. Bian, Y. et al. Ultra-deep tyrosine phosphoproteomics enabled by a phosphotyrosine superbinder. Nat Chem Biol 12, 959-966 (2016).
49. Dong, M. et al. Sensitive, Robust, and Cost-Effective Approach for Tyrosine Phosphoproteome Analysis. Anal Chem 89, 9307-9314 (2017).
50. Stokes, M.P. et al. PTMScan direct: identification and quantification of peptides from critical signaling proteins by immunoaffinity enrichment coupled with LCMS/MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 11, 187-201 (2012).
51. Pasa-Tolić, L., Masselon, C., Barry, R.C., Shen, Y. & Smith, R.D. Proteomic analyses using an accurate mass and time tag strategy. Biotechniques 37, 621-624, 626-633, 636 passim (2004).
52. Krokhin, O.V. et al. Use of peptide retention time prediction for protein identification by off-line reversed-phase HPLC-MALDI MS/MS. Anal Chem 78, 6265-6269 (2006).
53. Lucas, J. & Henschen, A. Identification and assay of phosphoserine and tyrosine-Osulphate in fibrinopeptides by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 369, 357-364 (1986).
54. Kim, J. et al. Phosphopeptide elution times in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1172, 9-18 (2007).
55. Ishihama, Y. et al. Enhancement of the efficiency of phosphoproteomic identification by removing phosphates after phosphopeptide enrichment. J Proteome Res 6, 1139-1144 (2007).
56. Kawakami, T. et al. Protein identification from product ion spectra of peptides validated by correlation between measured and predicted elution times in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5, 856-864 (2005).
57. Steen, H., Jebanathirajah, J.A., Rush, J., Morrice, N. & Kirschner, M.W. Phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry: myths, facts, and the consequences for qualitative and quantitative measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 172-181 (2006).
58. Marx, H. et al. A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 31, 557-564 (2013).
59. Perlova, T.Y. et al. Retention time prediction using the model of liquid chromatography of biomacromolecules at critical conditions in LC-MS phosphopeptide analysis. Proteomics 10, 3458-3468 (2010).
60. Dass, C., Mahalakshmi, P. & Grandberry, D. Manipulation of ion-pairing reagents for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of phosphorylated opioid peptides from their non-phosphorylated analogues. J Chromatogr A 678, 249-257 (1994).
61. Stadalius, M.A., Gold, H.S. & Snyder, L.R. Optimization Model for the Gradient Elution Separation of Peptide Mixtures by Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid-Chromatography - Verification of Band-Width Relationships for Acetonitrile-Water Mobile Phases. Journal of Chromatography 327, 27-45 (1985).
62. Sakamoto, Y., Kawakami, N. & Sasagawa, T. Prediction of peptide retention times. J Chromatogr 442, 69-79 (1988).
63. Shinoda, K., Tomita, M. & Ishihama, Y. Aligning LC peaks by converting gradient retention times to retention index of peptides in proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics 24, 1590-1595 (2008).
64. Spicer, V., Grigoryan, M., Gotfrid, A., Standing, K.G. & Krokhin, O.V. Predicting retention time shifts associated with variation of the gradient slope in peptide RPHPLC. Anal Chem 82, 9678-9685 (2010).
65. Ishihama, Y. Analytical Platforms for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics. Chromatography 40, 89-97 (2019).
66. Rappsilber, J., Ishihama, Y. & Mann, M. Stop and go extraction tips for matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal Chem 75, 663-670 (2003).
67. Mitulovic, G. et al. An improved method for tracking and reducing the void volume in nano HPLC-MS with micro trapping columns. Anal Bioanal Chem 376, 946-951 (2003).
68. Ishihama, Y. Proteomic LC-MS systems using nanoscale liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1067, 73-83 (2005).
69. Maia, T.M. et al. Simple Peptide Quantification Approach for MS-Based Proteomics Quality Control. ACS Omega 5, 6754-6762 (2020).
70. Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc 2, 1896-1906 (2007).
71. Larsen, M.R., Graham, M.E., Robinson, P.J. & Roepstorff, P. Improved detection of hydrophilic phosphopeptides using graphite powder microcolumns and mass spectrometry: evidence for in vivo doubly phosphorylated dynamin I and dynamin III. Mol Cell Proteomics 3, 456-465 (2004).
72. Tsai, C.F. et al. Tandem Mass Tag Labeling Facilitates Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides. Anal Chem 91, 11606-11613 (2019).
73. Shibue, M., Mant, C.T. & Hodges, R.S. Effect of anionic ion-pairing reagent concentration (1-60 mM) on reversed-phase liquid chromatography elution behaviour of peptides. J Chromatogr A 1080, 58-67 (2005).
74. Ishihama, Y., Rappsilber, J. & Mann, M. Modular stop and go extraction tips with stacked disks for parallel and multidimensional Peptide fractionation in proteomics. J Proteome Res 5, 988-994 (2006).
75. Ohguro, H. & Palczewski, K. Separation of phospho- and non-phosphopeptides using reverse phase column chromatography. FEBS Letters 368, 452-454 (1995).
76. Ogata, K., Krokhin, O.V. & Ishihama, Y. Retention Order Reversal of Phosphorylated and Unphosphorylated Peptides in Reversed-Phase LC/MS. Anal Sci 34, 1037-1041 (2018).
77. Garcia, B.A. et al. Chemical derivatization of histones for facilitated analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 2, 933-938 (2007).
78. Sidoli, S. et al. Drawbacks in the use of unconventional hydrophobic anhydrides for histone derivatization in bottom-up proteomics PTM analysis. Proteomics 15, 1459-1469 (2015).
79. Chin, E.T. & Papac, D.I. The use of a porous graphitic carbon column for desalting hydrophilic peptides prior to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-offlight mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 273, 179-185 (1999).
80. Piovesana, S. et al. Sensitive untargeted identification of short hydrophilic peptides by high performance liquid chromatography on porous graphitic carbon coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1590, 73-79 (2019).
81. Alley, W.R., Jr., Mechref, Y. & Novotny, M.V. Use of activated graphitized carbon chips for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometric and tandem mass spectrometric analysis of tryptic glycopeptides. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 23, 495-505 (2009).
82. Jennings, M.E., 2nd, Silveira, J.R., Treier, K.M., Tracy, P.B. & Matthews, D.E. Total Retention Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry to Achieve Maximum Protein Sequence Coverage. Anal Chem 93, 5054-5060 (2021).
83. Greibrokk, T. Heating or cooling LC columns. Anal Chem 74, 374A-378A (2002).
84. Tanase, M., Soare, A., David, V. & Moldoveanu, S.C. Sources of Nonlinear van't Hoff Temperature Dependence in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. ACS Omega 4, 19808-19817 (2019).
85. Li, B. et al. The characterization of column heating effect in nanoflow liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS)-based proteomics. J Mass Spectrom 55, e4441 (2020).
86. Wilson, R.E., Groskreutz, S.R. & Weber, S.G. Improving the Sensitivity, Resolution, and Peak Capacity of Gradient Elution in Capillary Liquid Chromatography with Large-Volume Injections by Using Temperature-Assisted On-Column Solute Focusing. Anal Chem 88, 5112-5121 (2016).
87. Groskreutz, S.R., Horner, A.R. & Weber, S.G. Temperature-based on-column solute focusing in capillary liquid chromatography reduces peak broadening from precolumn dispersion and volume overload when used alone or with solvent-based focusing. J Chromatogr A 1405, 133-139 (2015).
88. Eghbali, H. et al. Exploring the possibilities of cryogenic cooling in liquid chromatography for biological applications: a proof of principle. Anal Chem 84, 2031-2037 (2012).
89. Schö binger, M., Klein, O.-J. & Mitulović, G. Low-Temperature Mobile Phase for Peptide Trapping at Elevated Separation Temperature Prior to Nano RP-HPLCMS/MS. Separations 3, 6 (2016).
90. Young, C., Podtelejnikov, A.V. & Nielsen, M.L. Improved Reversed Phase Chromatography of Hydrophilic Peptides from Spatial and Temporal Changes in Column Temperature. J Proteome Res 16, 2307-2317 (2017).
91. Ogata, K., Tsai, C.F. & Ishihama, Y. Nanoscale Solid-Phase Isobaric Labeling for Multiplexed Quantitative Phosphoproteomics. J Proteome Res 20, 4193-4202 (2021).
92. Collins, M.O., Yu, L., Campuzano, I., Grant, S.G. & Choudhary, J.S. Phosphoproteomic analysis of the mouse brain cytosol reveals a predominance of protein phosphorylation in regions of intrinsic sequence disorder. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 1331-1348 (2008).
93. Landry, C.R., Levy, E.D. & Michnick, S.W. Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. Trends Genet 25, 193-197 (2009).
94. Dyson, H.J. Making Sense of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Biophys J 110, 1013- 1016 (2016).
95. Morris, O.M., Torpey, J.H. & Isaacson, R.L. Intrinsically disordered proteins: modes of binding with emphasis on disordered domains. Open Biol 11, 210222 (2021).
96. Masuda, T., Sugiyama, N., Tomita, M. & Ishihama, Y. Microscale phosphoproteome analysis of 10,000 cells from human cancer cell lines. Anal Chem 83, 7698-7703 (2011).
97. Humphrey, S.J., Karayel, O., James, D.E. & Mann, M. High-throughput and highsensitivity phosphoproteomics with the EasyPhos platform. Nat Protoc 13, 1897- 1916 (2018).
98. Schilling, B. et al. Platform-independent and label-free quantitation of proteomic data using MS1 extracted ion chromatograms in skyline: application to protein acetylation and phosphorylation. Mol Cell Proteomics 11, 202-214 (2012).
99. Falkenby, L.G. et al. Integrated solid-phase extraction-capillary liquid chromatography (speLC) interfaced to ESI-MS/MS for fast characterization and quantification of protein and proteomes. J Proteome Res 13, 6169-6175 (2014).
100. Bache, N. et al. A Novel LC System Embeds Analytes in Pre-formed Gradients for Rapid, Ultra-robust Proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 17, 2284-2296 (2018).
101. Yi, L. et al. Boosting to Amplify Signal with Isobaric Labeling (BASIL) Strategy for Comprehensive Quantitative Phosphoproteomic Characterization of Small Populations of Cells. Anal Chem 91, 5794-5801 (2019).
102. Budnik, B., Levy, E., Harmange, G. & Slavov, N. SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biol 19, 161 (2018).
103. Tsai, C.F. et al. An Improved Boosting to Amplify Signal with Isobaric Labeling (iBASIL) Strategy for Precise Quantitative Single-cell Proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 19, 828-838 (2020).
104. Dou, M. et al. High-Throughput Single Cell Proteomics Enabled by Multiplex Isobaric Labeling in a Nanodroplet Sample Preparation Platform. Anal Chem 91, 13119-13127 (2019).
105. Cheung, T.K. et al. Defining the carrier proteome limit for single-cell proteomics. Nat Methods 18, 76-83 (2021).
106. Huang, F.K. et al. Deep Coverage of Global Protein Expression and Phosphorylation in Breast Tumor Cell Lines Using TMT 10-plex Isobaric Labeling. J Proteome Res 16, 1121-1132 (2017)
107. Navarrete-Perea, J., Yu, Q., Gygi, S.P. & Paulo, J.A. Streamlined Tandem Mass Tag (SLTMT) Protocol: An Efficient Strategy for Quantitative (Phospho)proteome Profiling Using Tandem Mass Tag-Synchronous Precursor Selection-MS3. J Proteome Res 17, 2226-2236 (2018).
108. Lombardi, B., Rendell, N., Edwards, M., Katan, M. & Zimmermann, J.G. Evaluation of phosphopeptide enrichment strategies for quantitative TMT analysis of complex network dynamics in cancer-associated cell signalling. EuPA Open Proteom 6, 10- 15 (2015).
109. Paulo, J.A., Navarrete-Perea, J., Erickson, A.R., Knott, J. & Gygi, S.P. An Internal Standard for Assessing Phosphopeptide Recovery from Metal Ion/Oxide Enrichment Strategies. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 29, 1505-1511 (2018).
110. Erickson, B.K. et al. Evaluating multiplexed quantitative phosphopeptide analysis on a hybrid quadrupole mass filter/linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal Chem 87, 1241-1249 (2015).
111. Bohm, G. et al. Low-pH Solid-Phase Amino Labeling of Complex Peptide Digests with TMTs Improves Peptide Identification Rates for Multiplexed Global Phosphopeptide Analysis. J Proteome Res 14, 2500-2510 (2015).
112. de Graaf, E.L., Pellegrini, D. & McDonnell, L.A. Set of Novel Automated Quantitative Microproteomics Protocols for Small Sample Amounts and Its Application to Kidney Tissue Substructures. J Proteome Res 15, 4722-4730 (2016).
113. Myers, S.A. et al. Streamlined Protocol for Deep Proteomic Profiling of FAC-sorted Cells and Its Application to Freshly Isolated Murine Immune Cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 18, 995-1009 (2019).
114. Mao, Y. et al. Fully Integrated and Multiplexed Sample Preparation Technology for Sensitive Interactome Profiling. Anal Chem 93, 3026-3034 (2021).
115. Thompson, A. et al. TMTpro: Design, Synthesis, and Initial Evaluation of a ProlineBased Isobaric 16-Plex Tandem Mass Tag Reagent Set. Anal Chem 91, 15941-15950 (2019).
116. Thingholm, T.E., Palmisano, G., Kjeldsen, F. & Larsen, M.R. Undesirable chargeenhancement of isobaric tagged phosphopeptides leads to reduced identification efficiency. J Proteome Res 9, 4045-4052 (2010).
117. Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R.F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157, 105-132 (1982).
118. Bhhatarai, B. & Gramatica, P. Prediction of aqueous solubility, vapor pressure and critical micelle concentration for aquatic partitioning of perfluorinated chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 45, 8120-8128 (2011).
119. Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13, 731-740 (2016).
120. Davies, B.R. et al. AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models. Mol Cancer Ther 6, 2209-2219 (2007).
121. Basken, J. et al. Specificity of Phosphorylation Responses to Mitogen Activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Pathway Inhibitors in Melanoma Cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 17, 550-564 (2018).
122. Kosako, H. et al. Phosphoproteomics reveals new ERK MAP kinase targets and links ERK to nucleoporin-mediated nuclear transport. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16, 1026-1035 (2009).
123. Stuart, S.A. et al. A Phosphoproteomic Comparison of B-RAFV600E and MKK1/2 Inhibitors in Melanoma Cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 14, 1599-1615 (2015).
124. Wiredja, D.D., Koyuturk, M. & Chance, M.R. The KSEA App: a web-based tool for kinase activity inference from quantitative phosphoproteomics. Bioinformatics 33, 3489-3491 (2017).
125. Hoeflich, K.P. et al. In vivo antitumor activity of MEK and phosphatidylinositol 3- kinase inhibitors in basal-like breast cancer models. Clin Cancer Res 15, 4649-4664 (2009).
126. Sunayama, J. et al. Crosstalk between the PI3K/mTOR and MEK/ERK pathways involved in the maintenance of self-renewal and tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Stem Cells 28, 1930-1939 (2010).
127. Holt, S.V. et al. Enhanced apoptosis and tumor growth suppression elicited by combination of MEK (selumetinib) and mTOR kinase inhibitors (AZD8055). Cancer Res 72, 1804-1813 (2012).
128. Posch, C. et al. MEK/CDK4,6 co-targeting is effective in a subset of NRAS, BRAF and 'wild type' melanomas. Oncotarget 9, 34990-34995 (2018).
129. Chua, X.Y. et al. Tandem Mass Tag Approach Utilizing Pervanadate BOOST Channels Delivers Deeper Quantitative Characterization of the Tyrosine Phosphoproteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 19, 730-743 (2020).
130. Li, X. et al. Quantifying Kinase-Specific Phosphorylation Stoichiometry Using Stable Isotope Labeling In a Reverse In-Gel Kinase Assay. Anal Chem 88, 11468-11475 (2016).
131. Mundiñ a-Weilenmann, C., Chang, C.F., Gutierrez, L.M. & Hosey, M.M. Demonstration of the phosphorylation of dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels in chick skeletal muscle and the resultant activation of the channels after reconstitution. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266, 4067-4073 (1991).
132. Tsai, C.F. et al. Large-scale determination of absolute phosphorylation stoichiometries in human cells by motif-targeting quantitative proteomics. Nat Commun 6, 6622 (2015).
133. Sharma, K. et al. Ultradeep human phosphoproteome reveals a distinct regulatory nature of Tyr and Ser/Thr-based signaling. Cell Rep 8, 1583-1594 (2014).
134. Wenger, C.D. et al. Gas-phase purification enables accurate, multiplexed proteome quantification with isobaric tagging. Nat Methods 8, 933-935 (2011).
135. Wuhr, M. et al. Accurate multiplexed proteomics at the MS2 level using the complement reporter ion cluster. Anal Chem 84, 9214-9221 (2012).
136. Sonnett, M., Yeung, E. & Wuhr, M. Accurate, Sensitive, and Precise Multiplexed Proteomics Using the Complement Reporter Ion Cluster. Anal Chem 90, 5032-5039 (2018).
137. Virreira Winter, S. et al. EASI-tag enables accurate multiplexed and interferencefree MS2-based proteome quantification. Nat Methods 15, 527-530 (2018).
138. Niu, M. et al. Extensive Peptide Fractionation and y1 Ion-Based Interference Detection Method for Enabling Accurate Quantification by Isobaric Labeling and Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 89, 2956-2963 (2017).
139. Haynes, S.E. et al. Variable-Velocity Traveling-Wave Ion Mobility Separation Enhancing Peak Capacity for Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics. Anal Chem 89, 5669-5672 (2017).
140. Chouinard, C.D. et al. Improved Sensitivity and Separations for Phosphopeptides using Online Liquid Chromotography Coupled with Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 90, 10889-10896 (2018).
141. Shliaha, P.V. et al. Additional precursor purification in isobaric mass tagging experiments by traveling wave ion mobility separation (TWIMS). J Proteome Res 13, 3360-3369 (2014).
142. Pfammatter, S. et al. A Novel Differential Ion Mobility Device Expands the Depth of Proteome Coverage and the Sensitivity of Multiplex Proteomic Measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics 17, 2051-2067 (2018).
143. Meier, F. et al. Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF): Multiplying Sequencing Speed and Sensitivity by Synchronized Scans in a Trapped Ion Mobility Device. J Proteome Res 14, 5378-5387 (2015).
144. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26, 1367-1372 (2008).
145. Prianichnikov, N. et al. MaxQuant Software for Ion Mobility Enhanced Shotgun Proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 19, 1058-1069 (2020).
146. Paulo, J.A., O'Connell, J.D. & Gygi, S.P. A Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteomics Standard for Diagnosing Ion Interference in Isobaric Labeling Experiments. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 27, 1620-1625 (2016).
147. Mann, M. & Jensen, O.N. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat Biotechnol 21, 255-261 (2003).
148. Spicer, V. et al. Sequence-specific retention calculator. A family of peptide retention time prediction algorithms in reversed-phase HPLC: applicability to various chromatographic conditions and columns. Anal Chem 79, 8762-8768 (2007).
149. Ma, C. et al. Improved Peptide Retention Time Prediction in Liquid Chromatography through Deep Learning. Anal Chem 90, 10881-10888 (2018).
150. Moruz, L., Tomazela, D. & Kall, L. Training, selection, and robust calibration of retention time models for targeted proteomics. J Proteome Res 9, 5209-5216 (2010).
151. Gessulat, S. et al. Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning. Nat Methods 16, 509-518 (2019).
152. Takahashi, C., Yazaki, T., Sugiyama, N. & Ishihama, Y. Selected Reaction Monitoring of Kinase Activity-Targeted Phosphopeptides. Chromatography 40, 39-47 (2019).
153. Schmidlin, T. et al. High-Throughput Assessment of Kinome-wide Activation States. Cell Syst 9, 366-374 e365 (2019).
154. Ludwig, C. et al. Data-independent acquisition-based SWATH-MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol 14, e8126 (2018).
155. Myung, S. et al. Development of high-sensitivity ion trap ion mobility spectrometry time-of-flight techniques: a high-throughput nano-LC-IMS-TOF separation of peptides arising from a Drosophila protein extract. Anal Chem 75, 5137-5145 (2003).
156. Bonneil, E., Pfammatter, S. & Thibault, P. Enhancement of mass spectrometry performance for proteomic analyses using high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS). J Mass Spectrom 50, 1181-1195 (2015).
157. Ogata, K. & Ishihama, Y. Extending the Separation Space with Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry Improves the Accuracy of Isobaric Tag-Based Quantitation in Proteomic LC/MS/MS. Anal Chem 92, 8037-8040 (2020).
158. Thalassinos, K. et al. Characterization of phosphorylated peptides using traveling wave-based and drift cell ion mobility mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 81, 248-254 (2009).
159. Glover, M.S. et al. Examining the Influence of Phosphorylation on Peptide Ion Structure by Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 27, 786-794 (2016).
160. Ruotolo, B.T. et al. Distinguishing between phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated peptides with ion mobility-mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 1, 303-306 (2002).
161. Ruotolo, B.T. et al. Analysis of phosphorylated peptides by ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 76, 6727-6733 (2004).
162. Valentine, S.J., Counterman, A.E., Hoaglund-Hyzer, C.S. & Clemmer, D.E. Intrinsic amino acid size parameters from a series of 113 lysine-terminated tryptic digest peptide ions. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 103, 1203-1207 (1999).
163. Valentine, S.J. et al. Using ion mobility data to improve peptide identification: intrinsic amino acid size parameters. J Proteome Res 10, 2318-2329 (2011).
164. Kaszycki, J.L. & Shvartsburg, A.A. A Priori Intrinsic PTM Size Parameters for Predicting the Ion Mobilities of Modified Peptides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 28, 294- 302 (2017).
165. Kim, D. et al. Probing the electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry of phosphopeptides with traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 26, 1004-1013 (2015).
166. Fernandez-Lima, F., Kaplan, D.A., Suetering, J. & Park, M.A. Gas-phase separation using a trapped ion mobility spectrometer. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 14, 93-98 (2011).
167. Lietz, C.B., Yu, Q. & Li, L. Large-scale collision cross-section profiling on a traveling wave ion mobility mass spectrometer. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 25, 2009-2019 (2014).
168. Shah, A.R. et al. Machine learning based prediction for peptide drift times in ion mobility spectrometry. Bioinformatics 26, 1601-1607 (2010).
169. Valentine, S.J., Counterman, A.E. & Clemmer, D.E. A database of 660 peptide ion cross sections: Use of intrinsic size parameters for bona fide predictions of cross sections. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 10, 1188-1211 (1999).
170. Simmonds, A.L. et al. Structural Analysis of 14-3-3-zeta-Derived Phosphopeptides Using Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry, Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Spectrometry, and Molecular Modeling. J Phys Chem B 124, 461-469 (2020). 171. Okuda, S. et al. jPOSTrepo: an international standard data repository for proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res 45, D1107-D1111 (2017).
172. Hudgins, R.R., Ratner, M.A. & Jarrold, M.F. Design of helices that are stable in vacuo. Journal of the American Chemical Society 120, 12974-12975 (1998).
173. Xiao, C., Perez, L.M. & Russell, D.H. Effects of charge states, charge sites and side chain interactions on conformational preferences of a series of model peptide ions. Analyst 140, 6933-6944 (2015).
174. Masuda, T., Tomita, M. & Ishihama, Y. Phase transfer surfactant-aided trypsin digestion for membrane proteome analysis. J Proteome Res 7, 731-740 (2008).
175. Sugiyama, N. et al. Phosphopeptide enrichment by aliphatic hydroxy acid-modified metal oxide chromatography for nano-LC-MS/MS in proteomics applications. Mol Cell Proteomics 6, 1103-1109 (2007).
176. Tyanova, S., Temu, T. & Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc 11, 2301-2319 (2016).
177. Kall, L., Canterbury, J.D., Weston, J., Noble, W.S. & MacCoss, M.J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods 4, 923-925 (2007).
178. Taus, T. et al. Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J Proteome Res 10, 5354-5362 (2011).
179. Lin, M.H., Sugiyama, N. & Ishihama, Y. Systematic profiling of the bacterial phosphoproteome reveals bacterium-specific features of phosphorylation. Sci Signal 8, rs10 (2015).
論文の公開元へ
