リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「The ethics of blood transfusion refusal in clinical practice among legal and medical professions in Japan」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

The ethics of blood transfusion refusal in clinical practice among legal and medical professions in Japan

Iijima, Yoshihiko 名古屋大学

2020.05

概要

We investigated the differences in Japanese and United States medical and legal professional opinions on ethical support for clinical ethical issues using the refusal of blood transfusions on the grounds of religious principles as an example of a clinical ethical issue. In ethical support systems for medical institutions in Japan, 95.0% of “clinical training designation hospitals” have hospital ethics committees, and 63.1% have medical safety divisions; clinical ethical support is provided in accordance with their scale and function. In terms of clinical ethical support limits the discretion of physicians, 59.2% of lawyers responded “No” and 54.4% of doctors responded “Yes”. In addition, on the feasibility of government or academic guidelines in clinical practice, 37.7% of lawyers responded “Yes” and 63.0% of doctors responded “No”. In terms of “relative transfusion-free” policy, 83.2% of lawyers and 76.8% of doctors responded that it is “unavoidable,” while 81.6% of U.S. committee heads responded that it is a “violation of rights.” In terms of hospital transfers due to a hospital being unable to treat patients refusing blood transfusion, 62.6% of lawyers reported that it is “unavoidable” while 57.1% of U.S. committee heads reported that it “should be avoided”. The results of this study indicate that medical and legal professionals and U.S. ethics committee heads recognize clinical ethical issues in slightly different ways.

参考文献

1. Iijima Y. Caring for patients and the medical team: guidelines as solution to issues in the law and ethics

of the medical practice [in Japanese]. J Med Law. 2016;31:23–29.

2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Clinical Training Designation Hospital [in Japanese]. https://www.

mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryou/rinsyo/index.html. Accessed January 18, 2019.

3. Becker’s Hospital Review. 100 Great Hospitals in America 2018. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/

lists/100-great-hospitals-in-america-2018.html. Accessed January 18, 2019.

4. U.S. News and World Report. 2018–19 Best Hospitals. https://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals. Accessed

January 18, 2019.

5. O’Neill O. Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research. Clin Med.

2004;4(3):269–276.

6. Iijima Y. Effort to grasp issues of clinical ethics in Nagoya University Hospital [in Japanese]. J Clin Ethics.

2016;4:17–22.

7. Ikka T. Medical Ethics Committees [in Japanese]. Waseda Law J. 2005;55:1–39.

8. Nagao N, Takimoto Y, Akabayashi A. A survey on the current state of hospital ethics consultation in Japan

[in Japanese]. Bioethics. 2005;15(1):101–106.

9. Meslin E. Hospital ethics committee in the United Kingdom. HEC Forum. 1996;8(5):301–315.

10. Iijima Y. The issues of the hospital ethics committee [in Japanese]. J Clin Ethics. 2015;3:23–30.

11. Orlowski JP, Hein S, Christensen JA, et al. Why doctors use or do not use ethics consultation. J Med

Ethics. 2006;32(4):499–502.

12. Mino JC, Copel L, Zunker JM. A French perspective on hospital ethics committees. Camb Q Healthc

Ethics. 2008;17:300–307.

13. Special committee on the state of terminal care in emergency medicine. Results from a questionnaire survey

regarding suggestions (guidelines) for terminal care in emergency medicine. Japanese Association for Acute

Medicine [in Japanese]. 2008;19(12):1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.3893/jjaam.19.1116. Published August 7,

2009. Accessed December 5, 2018.

14. Iijima Y. Public Decisions in Medical Practice [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Shinzansha; 2017.

15. Wilson RF. Rethinking the shield of immunity: should ethics committees be accountable for their mistakes?

HEC Forum. 2002;14(2):172–191.

16. Higuchi N. Jehovah’s witnesses supreme court rulings [in Japanese]. Law Classroom. 2000;239(43):41–44.

17. Iijima Y. Discussion of legal problems relation to refusal of blood transfusion based on religious beliefs

[in Japanese]. J Clin Ethics. 2014;2:46–55.

18. Fosmire v. Nicoleau, 75 N.Y.2d 218, 227, 551 N.E.2d 77, 81–82, 551 N.Y.S2d 876, 880–881 (1990).

19. Hoover JF. Adult’s right to resist blood transfusions: a view through John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital

v. Heston. Notre Dame Law Rev. 1972;43(3):571–587.

20. McAninch WS. A Catalyst for the evolution of constitutional law: Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Supreme

Court. U Cin L Rev. 1985;55:997–1077.

21. Moore ML. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah’s Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts. N Ky L Rev.

1983;10:281–304.

22. New York State Council on Human Blood and Transfusion Services. Guidelines for transfusion options

and alternatives. https://www.wadsworth.org/sites/default/files/WebDoc/1384562792/transfusion%20option%20

alternatives.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed June 18, 2019.

23. Tanaka S. Modern Legal Philosophy [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Yuhikaku Publishing; 2011.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る