The impact of external and internal group activities on transactive memory systems formation and functioning

on socially shared cognition (p. 127–149).

Allen, T. J. (1971). Communication networks in

American Psychological Association.

R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 1, 14-

Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised

NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL:

21.

Psychological Assessment Resources.

Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technolo-

Crampton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge

gy. MIT Press: Cambridge.

Anand, V., Manz, C. C. & Glick, W. H. (1998). An

problem and its consequences in geographi-

Organizational Memory to Information

cally distributed teams. Organization Sci-

Management. Academy of Management Re-

ence, 12(3), 346-371.

Druskat, V. U. & Kayes, D. C. (1999). The ante-

view, 23(4), 796-809.

Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: strategies

cedents of team competence: towards a fine

for team survival in the organization. Acad-

grained model of self-managing team effec-

emy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365.

tiveness. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Research on

Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging

Managing Groups and Teams: Context (pp.

the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams. Administra-

201-231), Stanford: JAI.

Guzzo, R. A. & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in

organizations: recent research on perfor-

tive Science Quarterly, 37: 634-665.

Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond

task and maintenance: defining external

― 14 ―

mance and effectiveness, Annual Review of

Psychology, 47, 307-338.

Faraj, S. & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating Ex-

Group versus Individual Training and

pertise in Software Development Teams,

Group Performance: The Mediating Role of

Management Science. 46(12), 1554-1568.

Transactive Memory. Personality and Social

Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.

Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J.,

Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L. & Hein, M. B.

McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000).

(1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description

The study of groups: past, present and fu-

of leader behavior: a synthesis and function-

ture. Personality and Social Psychology Re-

al interpretation, Leadership Quarterly, 2(4),

view, 4, 95-105.

245-287.

Milliken, F. J. & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching

Hackman, J, R. (1987). The design of work

for common threads: understanding the

teams. Handbook of Organizational Behav-

multiple effects of diversity in organization-

ior, 315-342.

al groups. Academy of Management Review,

Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations:

The social identity approach. Thousand

21, 402-433.

Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996).

Oaks, CA: Sage

Socially shared cognition at work: Transac-

Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdepen-

tive memory and group performance. In J. L.

dence and convergent expectations in

Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social

transactive memory. Journal of Personality

about social cognition? Research on socially

and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1080-1089.

shared cognition in small groups (p. 57–84).

Sage Publications, Inc.

Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity

on project communication and performance.

Moreland, R. L. & McMinn, J. G. (1999). Gone but

Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81-104.

not forgotten: loyalty and betrayal among

Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project

ex-members of small groups. Personality

groups in research and new product devel-

and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(12), 1476-

opment: diversity, communications, job

1486.

stress, and outcomes, Academy of Manage-

Mortensen, M (2004). Antecedents and conse-

ment Journal, 44(3): 547-555.

quences of team boundary disagreement.

Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. Accounting for the

Academy of Management, New Orleans,

effect of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.

August 6-11.

Palazzolo, E. T. (2005). Organizing for information

Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M. & Wholey, D. R.

retrieval in transactive memory systems.

(2001). Cognitive diverge and shared cogni-

Communication Research, 32(6), 726-761.

tive models in software development teams.

Palazzolo, E. T., Serb, D. A., She, Y, Su, C. &

Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 135-

Contractor, N. S. (2006). Coevolution of Com-

144.

munication and Knowledge Networks in

Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in

Transactive Memory Systems: Using Com-

knowledge-worker teams: longitudinal

putational Models for Theoretical Develop-

study of transactive memory systems. Man-

ment. Communication Theory, 16, 233-250

Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory sys-

agement Science, 50(11), 1519-1533.

Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory

tems, Review of General Psychology, 12(4),

systems in the field: scale development and

validation. Journal of Applied Psychology,

378-394.

Peltokorpi, V. (2012). Organizational transactive

88(4), 587-604.

memory: review and extension, European

Liang, D. W., Moreland, R. L. & Argote, L. (1995).

― 15 ―

Psychologist, 17, 11-20.

Peltokorpi, V. (2014). Transactive Memory Sys-

nication networks: Emergence and evolu-

tem Coordination Mechanisms in Organiza-

tion in a new research organization. Journal

tions: An Exploratory Case Study, Group &

of Engineering and Technology Manage-

Organization Management, 39(4), 444-471.

ment, 7, 177-196.

Peltokorpi, V., & Hasu, M. (2015). Moderating Ef-

Stout, R. W., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. &

fects of Transformational Leadership be-

Milanovich, D. M. 1999. Planning, shared

tween External Team Learning and Re-

mental models, and coordinated perfor-

search Team Performance Outcomes. R&D

mance: an empirical link is established, Hu-

Management, 45(3), 304-316.

man Factors, 41(1): 61-71.

Peltokorpi, V., & Hasu, M. (2016). Transactive

Sundstrom, E., Demeuse, K. P. & Futrell, D.

memory systems in research team innova-

(1990). Work teams: applications and effec-

tion: A moderated mediation analysis. Jour-

tiveness. American Psychologist, 45: 120-133.

nal of Engineering and Technology Manage-

Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y. & Neale, M. A.

(2003). Who’s really sharing? Effects of so-

ment, 39(1), 1-12.

Peltokorpi, V., & Hood, A. (2019). Communication

cial and expertise status on knowledge ex-

in theory and research on transactive mem-

change within groups. Management Science,

ory systems: A literature review. Topics in

49(4), 464-477.

Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action:

Cognitive Science, 11(4), 644-667.

Social science bases of administrative theory.

Peltokorpi, V. & Manka, M-L. (2008). Anteced-

New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

ents and the performance outcome of transactive memory in daycare work groups,

Tushman, M. L. & Katz, R. (1980). External com-

European Psychologist, 13, 103-113.

munication and project performance: An in-

Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship con-

vestigation into the role of gatekeepers.

Management Science, 26, 1071-1085.

flict and trust on the transactive memory:

Performance relation in top management

Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group

effectiveness. Administrative Science Quar-

teams. Small Group Research, 36, 746-771.

Ren, Y., Carley, K. M. & Argote, L. (2006). The

terly, 40(1), 145–180.

Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory:

Wegner, D. M. (1995). A Computer Network

When is it More Beneficial to Know What

Model of Human Transactive Memory. So-

Others Know? Management Science, 52(5):

cial Cognition, 13(3), 319-339.

671-682.

Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive Memory: A

Shaw, M. E. (1971). The psychology of small

Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind.

group behavior. Group dynamics: McGraw

In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theo-

Hill.

ries of Group Behavior (pp. 185-208), New

Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as hu-

York: Springer-Verlag.

man resources. In K. M. Rowland & G. R.

Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zucker-

Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and hu-

man, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: To-

man resources management (Vol. 5, pp. 323–

ward an understanding of the collective

356). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

preference for shared information. Journal

Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation.

of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5),

London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

967–978.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productiv-

Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L. & Marks, M. A.

(2001). Team Leadership, Leadership Quar-

ity. London: Academic Press.

Stork, D. (1991). A longitudinal study of commu― 16 ―

terly, 12, 451-483.

...