1. Mahdavi JM, Petersen TH, Sjölin M, Behrens CF, Mahmood F (2015) PO-0838: Determination of the effect on patient surface dose from unwanted air cavities under bolus in VMAT. Radiother Oncol 115:S424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(15)40830-8
2. Boman E, Ojala J, Rossi M, Kapanen M (2018) Monte Carlo investigation on the effect of air gap under bolus in post-mastec- tomy radiotherapy. Phys Med 55:82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejmp.2018.10.023
3. Ashburner MJ, Tudor S (2014) The optimization of superficial planning target volumes (PTVs) with helical tomotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i6. 4560
4. Khan FM, Gibbons JP (2014) Khan’s the physics of radiation therapy, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
5. Aoyama T, Uto K, Shimizu H, Ebara M, Kitagawa T, Tachibana H, Suzuki K, Kodaira T (2020) Physical and dosimetric characteriza- tion of thermoset shape memory bolus developed for radiotherapy. Med Phys 47:6103–6112. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14516
6. Luu A, Doerwald-Munoz L, Ostapiak O (2015) An evaluation of two approaches to skin bolus design for patients receiving radio- therapy for head and neck cancers. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 46:S37–S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2014.08.001
7. Ciesielski B, Reinstein LE, Wielopolski L, Meek A (1989) Dose enhancement in buildup region by lead, aluminum, and lucite absorbers for 15 MVp photon beam. Med Phys 16:609–613
8. Ehler ED, Sterling DA (2020) 3D printed copper-plastic compos- ite material for use as a radiotherapy bolus. Phys Med 76:202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.008
9. Park JM, Son J, An HJ, Kim JH, Wu HG, Kim JI (2019) Bio-com- patible patient-specific elastic bolus for clinical implementation. Phys Med Biol 64:105006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ ab1c93
10. Al-sudani TA, Biasi G, Wilkinson D, Davis JA, Kearnan R, Matar FS, Cutajar DL, Metcalfe P, Rosenfeld AB (2020) eXaSkin: A novel high-density bolus for 6 MV X-rays radiotherapy. Phys Med 80:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.002
11. Richmond ND, Daniel JM, Whitbourn JR, Greenhalgh AD (2016) Dosimetric characteristics of brass mesh as bolus under megavolt- age photon irradiation. Br J Radiol 89:20150796. https://doi.org/ 10.1259/bjr.20150796
12. Al-Rahbi ZS, Cutajar DL, Metcalfe P, Rosenfeld AB (2018) Dosi- metric effects of brass mesh bolus on skin dose and dose at depth for postmastectomy chest wall irradiation. Phys Med 54:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.009
13. Kijima K, Monzen H, Matsumoto K, Tamura M, Nishimura Y (2018) The shielding ability of novel tungsten rubber against the electron beam for clinical use in radiation therapy. Anticancer Res 38:3919–3927
14. Kijima K, Krisanachinda A, Tamura M, Nishimura Y, Monzen H (2019) Feasibility of a tungsten rubber grid collimator for electron grid therapy. Anticancer Res 39:2799–2804
15. Kijima K, Krisanachinda A, Tamura M, Monzen H, Nishimura Y (2020) Reduction of occupational exposure using a novel tung- sten-containing rubber shield in interventional radiology. Health Phys 118:609–614. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001177
16. Tamura M, Monzen H, Kubo K, Hirata M, Nishimura Y (2017) Feasibility of tungsten functional paper in electron grid therapy: a Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 62:878–889. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-6560/62/3/878
17. Takei Y, Kamomae T, Monzen H, Nakaya T, Sugita K, Suzuki K, Oguchi H, Tamura M, Nishimura Y (2020) Feasibility of using tungsten functional paper as a thin bolus for electron beam radio- therapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 43:1101–1111. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13246-020-00910-2
18. Kamomae T, Monzen H, Kawamura M, Okudaira K, Nakaya T, Mukoyama T, Miyake Y, Ishihara Y, Itoh Y, Naganawa S (2017) Dosimetric feasibility of using tungsten-based functional paper for flexible chest wall protectors in intraoperative electron radio- therapy for breast cancer. Phys Med Biol 63:015006. https://doi. org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa96cf
19. Inada M, Monzen H, Matsumoto K, Tamura M, Minami T, Naka- matsu K, Nishimura Y (2018) A novel radiation-shielding under- garment using tungsten functional paper for patients with perma- nent prostate brachytherapy. J Radiat Res 59:333–337. https://doi. org/10.1093/jrr/rry030
20. Kawai Y, Tamura M, Amano M, Kamomae T, Monzen H (2019) Dosimetric characterization of a novel surface collimator with tungsten functional paper for electron therapy. Anticancer Res 39:2839–2843
21. Monzen H, Kanno I, Fujimoto T, Hiraoka M (2017) Estimation of the shielding ability of a tungsten functional paper for diagnos- tic x-rays and gamma rays. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:325–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12122
22. Monzen H, Tamura M, Kijima K, Otsuka M, Matsumoto K, Waka- bayashi K, Choi MG, Yoon DK, Doi H, Akiyama H, Nishimura Y (2019) Estimation of radiation shielding ability in electron therapy and brachytherapy with real time variable shape tungsten rubber. Phys Med 66:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.233
23. Matsumoto K, Tamura M, Otsuka M, Wakabayashi K, Kijima K, Monzen H (2020) Dosimetric characteristics of a real time shapeable tungsten containing rubber with electron beams. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 76:1248–1255. https://doi.org/ 10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.12.1248
24. Wakabayashi K, Monzen H, Tamura M, Matsumoto K, Takei Y, Nishimura Y (2021) Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 22:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ acm2.13210
25. Kawai Y, Tamura M, Amano M, Kosugi T, Monzen H (2021) First clinical experience of tungsten rubber electron adaptive therapy with real-time variable-shape tungsten rubber. Anticancer Res 41:919–925
26. Japanese Industrial Standards (2012) Rubber, vulcanized or ther- moplastic -Determination of hardness - Part 3: Durometer method. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo
27. Japanese Industrial Standards (2017) Rubber, vulcanized or ther- moplastic - Determination of tensile stress-strain properties. Japa- nese Standards Association, Tokyo
28. Kamomae T, Oita M, Hayashi N, Sasaki M, Aoyama H, Oguchi H, Kawamura M, Monzen H, Itoh Y, Naganawa S (2016) Charac- terization of stochastic noise and post-irradiation density growth for reflective-type radiochromic film in therapeutic photon beam dosimetry. Phys Med 32:1314–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejmp.2016.07.091
29. International Electrotechnical Commission (2007) IEC 60976 International Standard: Medical electrical equipment–medical electron accelerators–functional performance characteristics, Edition 2.0. IEC, Geneva
30. Kaushik S, Punia R, Tyagi A, Malik A (2019) Effect of scattering and differential attenuation on beam profile in the presence of high-density intensity modifying compensator. J Cancer Res Ther 15:110. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_661_17
31. Ordonez-Sanz C, Bowles S, Hirst A, MacDougall ND (2014) A single plan solution to chest wall radiotherapy with bolus? Br J Radiol 87:20140035. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140035