リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Survey analysis on clinical problems of healthcare workers using blood collection devices in Japan」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Survey analysis on clinical problems of healthcare workers using blood collection devices in Japan

MATSUI Takeshi SUGAWA Makiko KAWAHARA Kazuo 東京医科歯科大学 DOI:10.11480/jmds.690001

2022.07

概要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical problems recognized and reported by healthcare workers (HCWs) who handle medical devices and analyze the factors associated with each problem, in order to investigate the development of blood collection support devices that are not widely used. An online survey was administered to 300 HCWs registered with a net research company to investigate how the intensity and frequency of 10 predetermined clinical problems would be reported. The relationship between the clinical problems and the attributes of the survey subjects was then analyzed using logistic regression analyses. As a result, the clinical problems frequently reported by the respondents were, to reduce labor, simplify data management, and obtain good medical materials. The need for imaging devices was reported to be low. The larger the scale of the medical institution, the more the problems reported by the HCWs. The fewer years of experience the HCWs had, the more likely they were to report a greater number of issues. In the development of blood collection support devices, it is necessary to listen to the opinions of HCWs with short clinical experience, working in large medical institutions and prioritize the development of devices that reduce labor.

参考文献

1. Yock P. Needs-based innovation: the Biodesign process. BMJ Innov. 2015; 1:3.

2. Brinton TJ, Kurihara CQ, Camarillo DB, et al. Outcomes from a postgraduate biomedical technology innovation training program: the first 12 years of Stanford Biodesign. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41:1803-10.

3. Yock PG, Zenios S, Makower J, et al. Biodesign - the pro- cess of innovating medical technologies -: Cambridge Uni- versity Press; 2015.

4. Schwartz JG, Kumar UN, Azagury DE, et al. Needs-based innovation in cardiovascular medicine: The Stanford Bio- design Process. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016; 1(6):541-7.

5. Arun-Kumar P, Sridhar S, Chaturvedi J, et al. Identification of unmet clinical needs in the field of nephrology — A mod- ified bio-design approach. Med Devices Diagn Eng. 2017; 2(1):52-6.

6. Sun X, Okamoto J, Masamune K, et al. Robotic Technol- ogy in Operating Rooms: a Review. Curr Robot Rep. 2021; 2(3):333-41.

7. Amano-Ito Y. Introduction of Medical Device Development through Industry - Academia Collaboration by the Hama- matsu Method. Adv Biomed Eng. 2020; 9(0):112-6.

8. Mobasheri MH, King D, Johnston M, et al. The ownership and clinical use of smartphones by doctors and nurses in the UK: a multicentre survey study. BMJ Innov. 2015; 1(4):174-81.

9. Chowdhury MK, Srivastava A, Sharma N, et al. Noninva- sive blood glucose measurement utilizing a newly designed system based on modulated ultrasound and infrared light. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2015; 36(4):439-48.

10. Sawai E, Kawahara Y, Kunisawa N. Syringe control prac- tice system using sound for blood collection. JJMI. 2018; 88(6):597-603. (in Japanese)

11. Mori N, Kawahara Y, Hara T, et al. Development of a Dia- lyzer Recognition System in Hemodialysis. JJMI. 2012; 82(6):447-54. (in Japanese)

12. Fakhr-Movahedi A, Rahnavard Z, Salsali M, et al. Exploring nurse’s communicative role in nurse-patient relations: A qualitative study. J Caring Sci. 2016; 5:267-76.

13. Younas A, Sundus A. Experiences of and satisfaction with care provided by male nurses: A convergent mixed- method study of patients in medical surgical units. J Adv Nurs. 2018; 74:2640-53.

14. Zangeneh A, Lebni JY, Azar FEF, et al. A study of the communication skills in health care and the role of demo- graphic variables (a case study of the nurses at the Edu- cational, Therapeutic and Research Center of Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran in 2018). J Public Health. 2019; 29(2):361-7.

15. Eriksson J, Gellerstedt L, Hilleras P, et al. Registered nurses’ perceptions of safe care in overcrowded emer- gency departments. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27:1061-7.

16. Akinaga R, Inaba N, Kato S. Matching of patient’s difficulty and staff’s ability to take blood for improving blood collec- tion operation for outpatients. JJCLA. 2017; 42:599-606. (in Japanese)

17. Sonoda M, Sasagawa K, Fujisaki K, et al. Evaluation of venipuncture techniques based on measurements of haptic sense and finger motion. Adv Biomed Eng. 2020; 9(0):197-201.

18. Aulagnier J, Hoc C, Mathieu E, et al. Efficacy of AccuVein to facilitate peripheral intravenous placement in adults presenting to an emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2014; 21(8):858-63.

19. de Graaff JC, Cuper NJ, Mungra RA, et al. Near-infrared light to aid peripheral intravenous cannulation in chil- dren: a cluster randomised clinical trial of three devices. Anaesth. 2013; 68:835-45.

20. Szmuk P, Steiner J, Pop RB, et al. The VeinViewer vascu- lar imaging system worsens first-attempt cannulation rate for experienced nurses in infants and children with antic- ipated difficult intravenous access. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116(5):1087-92.

21. Cuper NJ, Klaessens JHG, Jaspers JEN, et al. The use of near-infrared light for safe and effective visualization of subsurface blood vessels to facilitate blood withdrawal in children. Med Eng Phys. 2013; 35:433-40.

22. Matsui T, Tomita K, Hasegawa H, et al. Awareness sur- vey on medical device development in university hospitals and problem analysis of medical field. JSPH2018. 2018; 65:515. (in Japanese)

23. Matsui T, Sugawa M, Kawahara K. Survey on recogni- tion and usefulness of venipuncture support devices and analysis of device improvement points. JJMI. 2021; 91(4):332-41.

24. Tourangeau RG, Conrad FG, Couper MP. The Science of Web Surveys: Oxford University Press; 2013.

25. Ball HL. Conducting online surveys. J Hum Lact. 2019; 35(3):413-7.

26. Bastian M, Eggett DL, Jefferies LK. Panel condition- ing: Effect of participation frequency on overall accep- tance scores from consumer panels. J Sens Stud. 2014; 29:450-62.

参考文献をもっと見る