リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Robot-Assisted Total Hysterectomy of Extremely Unusual Pelvic Anatomy: A Case Report and Literature Review」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Robot-Assisted Total Hysterectomy of Extremely Unusual Pelvic Anatomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Nagata, Hiroki Komatsu, Hiroaki Nakaso, Takaya Kudoh, Akiko 東 幸弘 谷口 文紀 鳥取大学 DOI:10.33160/yam.2022.11.003

2022.11.28

概要

We report a case of robot-assisted total hysterectomy in a patient with extremely rare pelvic anatomy. Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed for lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia on the left side of the uterus. The sigmoid colon was present between the two uterine corpora of a uterine didelphys and was attached to the bladder via the mesentery and fat. During surgery, the surgeon left the console and confirmed the magnetic resonance images. The surgery was then completed safely after the surgeon understood the anatomy. The postoperative condition was good, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 5. Robot-assisted surgery has various advantages, including a good field of view, accuracy of instrument movement, and ease of viewing information in the medical record by pausing the operation. Robot assisted surgery improves not only safety and operational precision but also intraoperative convenience. Further studies are needed regarding the specific anatomy seen in this case.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

1 O’Neill M, Moran PS, Teljeur C, O’Sullivan OE, O’Reilly BA, Hewitt M, et al. Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:907-18. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2681-z, PMID: 23291924

2 Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, et al. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:3251-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00464018-06612-x, PMID: 30515610

3 Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:1210-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.16000412.2011.01253.x, PMID: 21854364

4 Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:161-74. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/7.2.161, PMID: 11284660

5 Semmens JP. Congenital anomalies of female genital tract. Functional classification based on review of 56 personal cases and 500 reported cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;19:328-50. PMID: 13910590

6 C h a n Y Y, Jayapr a k a sa n K , Ta n A , T hor nt on JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:371-82. DOI: 10.1002/uog.10056, PMID: 21830244

7 Sadler TW. Langman’s Medical Embryology. 13th ed. Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn; 2014.

8 Hu H, Feng X, Shao Z, Xie M, Xu S, Wu X, et al. Application and Prospect of Mixed Reality Technology in Medical Field. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39:1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-1992-8, PMID: 30868484

9 Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1895-904. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395, PMID: 30380365

10 Kim S, Min KJ, Lee S, Hong JH, Song JY, Lee JK, et al. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:174-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.006, PMID: 32467009

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文
を
一発検索！

この論文の関連論文を見る