論文の公開元へ

書き出し

Refer/BibIX

RIS

BibTeX

TSV

Procedure of uniportal intercostal bullectomy for pneumothorax and its indications: a clinical practice review

Nishioka, Yuki Hokka, Daisuke Maniwa, Yoshimasa 神戸大学

2023.09.30

概要

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which is predominantly performed with an intercostal approach, has been gaining popularity as a less invasive surgical treatment for bullectomy. With the widespread use of this procedure, the number of reports on surgical outcomes has increased. With the advent of the transareolar or subxiphoid approach, there is an increasing need to discuss the indications for these approaches in order to establish evidence. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the intercostal procedures of uniportal VATS for pneumothorax and discuss the favorable indications for this approach. In terms of indications, the pneumothorax size of the patients treated by surgery has not been elucidated and needs to be clarified for the indication. Considering the indications and outcomes of uniportal intercostal VATS, the presence of bullae may be a favorable indication for the procedure. Additionally, initial surgery for pneumothorax is the preferable indication, since pleural adhesion was an exclusion criterion for performing uniportal VATS. To reduce invasiveness, postoperative prolonged air leakage should be minimized, and the causes should be investigated. Each approach has its own advantages owing to anatomical differences. The distribution of the responsible lesions can be an indication for these approaches. Both the transareolar and intercostal approaches allow for resection of the apex of the lung. The intercostal approach can be superior to the other two approaches for resecting posterior lesions. From the perspective of cosmesis and invasiveness, a transareolar approach may reduce the involvement of the intercostal nerve and it can be performed without any recognizable scarring. The subxiphoid approach eliminates the involvement of the intercostal nerve and offers favorable access to the bilateral thoracic cavity. An intercostal approach can cause intercostal nerve involvement, but the incision used for the placement of the preoperative drain tube in the lateral thorax can also be used as an operative incision with this approach. Moreover, this approach allows for the easy exploration of the whole lung in order to avoid overlooking any bullae, and its lateral decubitus position is favorable when an additional incision is needed in the case of unexpected situations, such as adhesion.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J, et al. Management of

spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society

Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010;65 Suppl

2:ii18-31.

2. Schnell J, Beer M, Eggeling S, et al. Management of

Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Post-Interventional

Pneumothorax: German S3 Guideline. Respiration

2019;97:370-402.

3. Yamamoto H, Okada M, Takada M, et al. Video-assisted

thoracic surgery through a single skin incision. Arch Surg

1998;133:145-7.

4. Liu CY, Lin CS, Liu CC. Subxiphoid single-incision

thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral primary spontaneous

pneumothorax. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne

2015;10:125-8.

5. Lin JB, Chen JF, Lai FC, et al. Transareolar pulmonary

bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:999-1005.

6. Masmoudi H, Etienne H, Sylvestre R, et al. Three

Hundred Fifty-One Patients With Pneumothorax

Undergoing Uniportal (Single Port) Video-Assisted

Thoracic Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:254-60.

7. Nachira D, Ismail M, Meacci E, et al. Uniportal vs.

triportal video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment

of primary pneumothorax-a propensity matched bicentric

study. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:S3712-9.

8. Kutluk AC, Kocaturk CI, Akin H, et al. Which is the

Best Minimal Invasive Approach for the Treatment of

Spontaneous Pneumothorax? Uniport, Two, or Three

Ports: A Prospective Randomized Trail. Thorac Cardiovasc

Surg 2018;66:589-94.

9. Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Furusawa S, et al. A prospective

comparative study of thoracoscopic transareolar and

uniportal approaches for young male patients with primary

spontaneous pneumothorax. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2021;69:1414-20.

Page 11 of 13

10. Li L, Tian H, Yue W, et al. Subxiphoid vs intercostal

single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for

spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomised controlled trial.

Int J Surg 2016;30:99-103.

11. Wang BY, Chang YC, Chang YC, et al. Thoracoscopic

surgery via a single-incision subxiphoid approach is

associated with less postoperative pain than singleincision transthoracic or three-incision transthoracic

approaches for spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Dis

2016;8:S272-8.

12. Chen L, Liu F, Wang B, et al. Subxiphoid vs transthoracic

approach thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous

pneumothorax: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC

Surg 2019;19:46.

13. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs

standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous

pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain

and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

2005;28:43-6.

14. Akçay O, Acar T, Cantay S, et al. Minimally invasive

approach to pneumothorax: Single port or two ports? Turk

Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2019;28:347-51.

15. Yang HC, Cho S, Jheon S. Single-incision thoracoscopic

surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using the

SILS port compared with conventional three-port surgery.

Surg Endosc 2013;27:139-45.

16. Song IH, Lee SY, Lee SJ. Can single-incision

thoracoscopic surgery using a wound protector be used as

a first-line approach for the surgical treatment of primary

spontaneous pneumothorax? A comparison with threeport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Gen Thorac

Cardiovasc Surg 2015;63:284-9.

17. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F, et al. Uniportal videoassisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous

pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in

comparison to the traditional approach. Interact Cardiovasc

Thorac Surg 2008;7:63-6.

18. Berlanga LA, Gigirey O. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic

surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using a

single-incision laparoscopic surgery port: a feasible and

safe procedure. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2044-7.

19. Chen PR, Chen CK, Lin YS, et al. Single-incision

thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous

pneumothorax. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;6:58.

20. Chen CH, Lee SY, Chang H, et al. The adequacy of

single-incisional thoracoscopic surgery as a first-line

endoscopic approach for the management of recurrent

primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective study.

Video-assist Thorac Surg 2023;8:31 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/vats-23-30

Page 12 of 13

J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;7:99.

21. Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Ibe T, et al. Single-incision

thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax

using multi-degrees of freedom forceps. Ann Thorac

Cardiovasc Surg 2014;20:974-9.

22. Kang DK, Min HK, Jun HJ, et al. Early outcomes of

single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary

spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc

Surg 2014;47:384-8.

23. Son BS, Kim DH, Lee SK, et al. Small Single-Incision

Thoracoscopic Surgery Using an Anchoring Suture in

Patients With Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax:

A Safe and Feasible Procedure. Ann Thorac Surg

2015;100:1224-9.

24. Tsuboshima K, Wakahara T, Matoba Y, et al. Singleincision thoracoscopic surgery using a chest wall pulley

for lung excision in patients with primary spontaneous

pneumothorax. Surg Today 2015;45:595-9.

25. Yamazaki K, Haratake N, Shikada Y, et al. Initial

Experience of Single-Incision Thoracoscopic Surgery for

100 Patients with Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;21:513-6.

26. Chong Y, Cho HJ, Kang SK, et al. Outcomes of the

Tower Crane Technique with a 15-mm Trocar in Primary

Spontaneous Pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc

Surg 2016;49:80-4.

27. Jeon HW, Kim YD. Does 11.5 mm guided single

port surgery has clinical advantage than multi-port

thoracoscopic surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax? J

Thorac Dis 2016;8:2924-30.

28. Ocakcioglu I, Alpay L, Demir M, et al. Is single port

enough in minimally surgery for pneumothorax? Surg

Endosc 2016;30:59-64.

29. Jung H, Oh TH, Cho JY, et al. Mid-Term Outcomes

of Single-Port versus Conventional Three-Port VideoAssisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Primary Spontaneous

Pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

2017;50:184-9.

30. Al-Githmi I. Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic

Surgery and Outcomes for Recurrent Primary Spontaneous

Pneumothorax: Single-Institution Experience. Surgical

Science 2018;9:122-7.

31. Zhang C, Zhang M, Wang H, et al. Next-day discharge

following small uniportal thoracoscopic bullectomy

assisted with an anchoring suture. J Int Med Res

2020;48:300060519896926.

32. Kapicibasi HO. Uniportal VATS technique for primary

spontaneous pneumothorax: An analysis of 46 cases. Pak J

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery, 2023

Med Sci 2020;36:224-8.

33. Fiorelli A, Cascone R, Carlucci A, et al. Uniportal

thoracoscopic surgical management using a suture traction

for primary pneumothorax. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann

2021;29:195-202.

34. Yoshikawa R, Matsuura N, Igai H, et al. Uniportal

approach as an alternative to the three-portal approach to

video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous

pneumothorax. J Thorac Dis 2021;13:927-34.

35. Lee SH, Lee SG, Cho SH, et al. Outcomes of SingleIncision Thoracoscopic Surgery Using the Spinal

Needle Anchoring Technique for Primary Spontaneous

Pneumothorax. J Chest Surg 2022;55:44-8.

36. Wang P, Zhang L, Zheng H, et al. Comparison of singleport vs. two-port VATS technique for primary spontaneous

pneumothorax. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol

2022;31:462-7.

37. Yazawa T, Igai H, Ohsawa F, et al. Feasibility of

thoracoscopic pulmonary bullectomy using a transareolar

approach for treatment of primary spontaneous

pneumothorax. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:5794-801.

38. Liu CC, Shih CS, Liu YH, et al. Subxiphoid singleport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Vis Surg

2016;2:112.

39. Fok M, Karunanantham J, Ali JM, et al. Subxiphoid

approach for spontaneous bilateral pneumothorax: a case

report. J Vis Surg 2017;3:146.

40. Ismail M, Swierzy M, Nachira D, et al. Uniportal videoassisted thoracic surgery for major lung resections: pitfalls,

tips and tricks. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:885-97.

41. Muramatsu T, Nishii T, Takeshita S, et al. Preventing

recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax after

thoracoscopic surgery: a review of recent results. Surg

Today 2010;40:696-9.

42. Lee S, Kim HR, Cho S, et al. Staple line coverage after

bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a

randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:2005-11.

43. Sihoe AD. The evolution of minimally invasive thoracic

surgery: implications for the practice of uniportal

thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2014;6:S604-17.

44. Bertolaccini L, Batirel H, Brunelli A, et al. Uniportal

video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: a consensus

report from the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG)

of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;56:224-9.

45. Brown SGA, Ball EL, Perrin K, et al. Conservative versus

Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

N Engl J Med 2020;382:405-15.

Video-assist Thorac Surg 2023;8:31 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/vats-23-30

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery, 2023

46. Olesen WH, Katballe N, Sindby JE, et al. Surgical

treatment versus conventional chest tube drainage in

primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized

controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;54:113-21.

47. Yang Y, Dong J, Huang Y. Single-incision versus

conventional three-port video-assisted surgery in the

Page 13 of 13

treatment of pneumothorax: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;23:722-8.

48. Xu W, Wang Y, Song J, et al. One-port video-assisted

thoracic surgery versus three-port video-assisted thoracic

surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2017;31:17-24.

doi: 10.21037/vats-23-30

Cite this article as: Nishioka Y, Hokka D, Maniwa Y.

Procedure of uniportal intercostal bullectomy for pneumothorax

and its indications: a clinical practice review. Video-assist

Thorac Surg 2023;8:31.

Video-assist Thorac Surg 2023;8:31 | https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/vats-23-30

...

参考文献をもっと見る

分野

大学

学位論文種類・取得年

言語

Procedure of uniportal intercostal bullectomy for pneumothorax and its indications: a clinical practice review

概要

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

Butterfly needle tap and suction (BTS) technique: a treatment for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma after burr hole craniostomy

Direct carotid exposure approach in the treatment of anterior circulation unruptured intracranial aneurysms for elderly patients

Applicability of a single camera-based catheter navigation system using teeth arch as an anatomical landmark for superselective intraarterial infusion in advanced oral cancer treatment

Thoracic and lumbar spine pedicle morphology in Japanese patients

Endoscopic soft palate augmentation using injectable materials in dogs to ameliorate velopharyngeal insufficiency

参考文献

分野

大学

学位論文種類・取得年

言語

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

Procedure of uniportal intercostal bullectomy for pneumothorax and its indications: a clinical practice review

概要

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

Butterfly needle tap and suction (BTS) technique: a treatment for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma after burr hole craniostomy

Direct carotid exposure approach in the treatment of anterior circulation unruptured intracranial aneurysms for elderly patients

Applicability of a single camera-based catheter navigation system using teeth arch as an anatomical landmark for superselective intraarterial infusion in advanced oral cancer treatment

Thoracic and lumbar spine pedicle morphology in Japanese patients

Endoscopic soft palate augmentation using injectable materials in dogs to ameliorate velopharyngeal insufficiency

参考文献