リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Validation of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life in Mongolia: a population-based cross-sectional study among adults in Ulaanbaatar」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Validation of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life in Mongolia: a population-based cross-sectional study among adults in Ulaanbaatar

Bat-Erdene, Enkhjin Tumurbaatar, Enkhnaran Tumur-Ochir, Gantsetseg Jamiyandorj, Otgonbold Jadamba, Tsolmon Yamamoto, Eiko Hamajima, Nobuyuki Oka, Takakazu Lkhagvasuren, Battuvshin 名古屋大学

2023.03.01

概要

There is currently no validated tool to measure the quality of life (QOL) in the Mongolian language. This study aimed to validate the Mongolian version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life – Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire for the general population of Mongolia. The subjects were 301 adults aged 18–65 years selected randomly by a computer from 30 centers in 8 districts of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, in 2020. Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficients. Convergent, discriminant, and construct validities were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses for a four-domain factor structure. Among the participants, 56.1% were women, 32.9% held a bachelor’s degree or higher, 48.8% were employed, and 61.8% were married. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was 0.804. Correlations between the component scores of the WHOQOL-BREF ranged from 0.581–0.822. All items showed higher item-total correlations with their corresponding domains than with other domains, except the mobility item from the physical domain. Discriminative validity was evident in physical and psychological domains. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factorial structure consisting of 24 items that provided an acceptable fit to the data (RMSEA=0.084; CFI=0.860). In conclusion, the Mongolian version of the WHOQOL-BREF demonstrated evidence of good reliability and validity for assessing QOL in the general population of Mongolia. These findings indicate that it allows the comparison of QOL of adults in Mongolia with those in other countries.

論文の公開元へ

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

1 GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.

2 Roser MR, Hannah. Burden of Disease 2016. https://ourworldindata.org/burden-of-disease. Published 2016. Accessed September 28, 2020.

3 Bollyky TJ, Templin T, Cohen M, Dieleman JL. Lower-income countries that face the most rapid shift in noncommunicable disease burden are also the least prepared. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(11):1866–1875. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0708.

4 Basch E. New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:307–317. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-010713-141500.

5 The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): develop- ment and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–1585. doi:10.1016/s0277- 9536(98)00009-4.

6 Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL- BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299–310. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.

7 Taylor WJ, Myers J, Simpson RT, McPherson KM, Weatherall M. Quality of life of people with rheumatoid arthritis as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, short form (WHOQOL- BREF): score distributions and psychometric properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(3):350–357. doi:10.1002/ art.20398.

8 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150- 00014.

9 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

10 Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.

11 Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: multiple factors or method effects? Behav Res Ther. 2003;41(12):1411–1426. doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00059-7.

12 Silva PA, Soares SM, Santos JF, Silva LB. Cut-off point for WHOQOL-bref as a measure of quality of life of older adults[in English, Portuguese]. Rev Saude Publica. 2014;48(3):390–397. doi:10.1590/s0034- 8910.2014048004912.

13 Tsutsumi A, Izutsu T, Kato S, et al. Reliability and validity of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF in an adult population in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60(4):493–498. doi:10.1111/j.1440- 1819.2006.01537.x.

14 Nedjat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R. Psychometric properties of the Iranian interview-administered version of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL- BREF): a population-based study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:61. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-61.

15 Yoshitake N, Sun Y, Sugawara M, et al. The psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in Japanese couples. Health Psychol Open. 2015;2(2):2055102915598089. doi:10.1177/2055102915598089.

16 Xia P, Li N, Hau KT, Liu C, Lu Y. Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: a psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:37. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-37.

17 Krägeloh CU, Kersten P, Rex Billington D, et al. Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for general use in New Zealand: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(6):1451–1457. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0265-9.

18 Kalfoss MH, Reidunsdatter RJ, Klöckner CA, Nilsen M. Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):13. doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01656-x.

参考文献をもっと見る