ADB. (2017). Improving Payment for Implementation in Vietnam Best practices & lessons learned (Issue May). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34688.84483
Alston, L. J., Andersson, K., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Payment for environmental services: Hypotheses and evidence. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151830
Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., & Robalino, J. A. (2008).Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(42), 16089–16094. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800437105
Balvanera, P., Uriarte, M., Almeida-Leñero, L., Altesor, A., DeClerck, F., Gardner, T., Hall, J., Lara, A., Laterra, P., Peña-Claros, M., Silva Matos, D. M., Vogl, A. L., Romero-Duque, L. P., Arreola, L. F., Caro-Borrero, Á. P., Gallego, F., Jain, M., Little, C., de Oliveira Xavier, R., … Vallejos, M. (2012). Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art. Ecosystem Services, 2, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006
Baylis, K., Honey-Rosés, J., Börner, J., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Ferraro, P. J., Lapeyre, R., Persson, U. M., Pfaff, A., & Wunder, S. (2016). Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation. Conservation Letters, 9(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12180
Bennett, K. (2010). Additionality: The next step for ecosystem service markets. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 20(2), 417–438.
Beymer-Farris, B. A., & Bassett, T. J. (2012). The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.006
Bhatta, L. D., Van Oort, B. E. H., Rucevska, I., & Baral, H. (2014). Payment for ecosystem services: Possible instrument for managing ecosystem services in Nepal. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 10(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.973908
Börner, J., Baylis, K., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Persson, U. M., &Wunder, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development, 96, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020
Boyd, E., May, P., Chang, M., & Veiga, F. C. (2007). Exploring socioeconomic impacts of forest based mitigation projects: Lessons from Brazil and Bolivia. Environmental Science and Policy, 10(5), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.03.004
Bremer, L. L., Farley, K. A., Lopez-Carr, D., & Romero, J. (2014). Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for “win-win”? Ecosystem Services, 8, 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.007
Brown, K., & Corbera, E. (2003). Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy. Climate Policy, 3(SUPPL 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.004
Brownson, K., Guinessey, E., Carranza, M., Esquivel, M., Hesselbach, H., Madrid Ramirez, L., & Villa, L. (2019). Community-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services (CB-PES): Implications of community involvement for program outcomes. Ecosystem Services, 39(July), 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100974
Bui, T. D., Tran, T. H., & Tran, P. (2014). Evaluation of the Impact of Pilot Payments for Forest Environmental Services: Case study in Lam Dong Province, Viet Nam. In Climate Risks, Regional Integration, and Sustainability in the Mekong Region (Issue January, pp. 270– 284). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4888.7840
Calvet-Mir, L., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Fisher, J., & Gross-Camp, N. (2015). Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: A closer look at effectiveness and equity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14(May), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.001
Chomitz, K. M., Brenes, E., & Constantino, L. (1999). Financing environmental services: The Costa Rican experience and its implications. Science of the Total Environment, 240(1–3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00310-1
Clements, T., John, A., Nielsen, K., An, D., Tan, S., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2010). Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1283–1291.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010
Clements, T., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2015). Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia. Conservation Biology, 29(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12423
Clements, T., Rainey, H., An, D., Rours, V., Tan, S., Thong, S., Sutherland, W. J., & Milner- Gulland, E. J. (2013). An evaluation of the effectiveness of a direct payment for biodiversity conservation: The Bird Nest Protection Program in the Northern Plains of Cambodia.Biological Conservation, 157, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.020
Clot, S., Andriamahefazafy, F., Grolleau, G., Ibanez, L., & Méral, P. (2015). Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services 1 (CRES) and efficient design of contracts in developing countries. Behavioral insights from a natural field experiment. Ecological Economics, 113, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.021
Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, N. W. (2007). The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Development and Change, 38(4), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x
Corbera, E., Kosoy, N., & Martínez Tuna, M. (2007). Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso- America. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005
Corbera, E., Soberanis, C. G., & Brown, K. (2009). Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. LK - https://royalroads.on.worldcat.org/oclc/4592801201. Nature TA - TT -, 387(6630), 253–260. https://www-nature-com.ezproxy.royalroads.ca/articles/387253a0.pdf
Dam, B. V., Catacutan, D. C., & Ha, H. M. (2014). Piloting a Carbon-Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme in Vietnam—the Case of Bac Kan Province. In Environment and Natural Resources Research (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v4n1p39
De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
De Jong, W., Dinh, D., Trieu, S., & Hung, V. (2006). Forest Rehabilitation in Vietnam Lessons from the Past. CIFOR 2006.
Do, T. D., & NaRanong, A. (2019). Livelihood and environmental impacts of payments for forest environmental services: A case study in Vietnam. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154165
Do, T. H., Vu, T. P., Nguyen, V. T., & Catacutan, D. (2018). Payment for forest environmental services in Vietnam: An analysis of buyers’ perspectives and willingness. Ecosystem Services, 32(July), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.07.005
Duong, N. T. B., & de Groot, W. T. (2018). Distributional risk in PES: Exploring the concept in the Payment for Environmental Forest Services program, Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics, 92(July 2017), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.008
Duong, N. T. B., & De Groot, W. T. (2020). The impact of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) on community-level forest management in Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics, 113(5), 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102135
Edward L Webb. (2008). Forest Policy as a Changing Context in Asia. In Edward L Webb & G. Shivakoti (Eds.), Decentralization, forests and rural communities: Policy outcomes in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 21–43). SAGE Publications India. New Delhi.
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Fisher, J. (2012). No pay, no care? A case study exploring motivations for participation in payments for ecosystem services in Uganda. Oryx, 46(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605311001384
George, A., Pierret, A., Boonsaner, A., Christian, V., & Planchon, O. (2009). Potential and limitations of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) as a means to manage watershed services in mainland Southeast Asia. International Journal of the Commons, 3(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.131
Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Muradian, R. (2015). In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecological Economics, 117, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016
Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., & Wunder, S. (2005). How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development, 33(9 SPEC. ISS.), 1511–1527.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002
Haas, J. C., Loft, L., & Pham, T. T. (2019). How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam’s payments for Forest Environmental Services Program. Ecological Economics, 160(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.021
Hendrickson, C. Y., & Corbera, E. (2015). Participation dynamics and institutional change in the Scolel Té carbon forestry project, Chiapas, Mexico. Geoforum, 59, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.022
Hoan, T. (2014). Forest resources and forestry in Vietnam. Journal of Vietnamese Environment, 6(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.13141/jve.vol6.no2.pp171-177
Huang, M., & Upadhyaya, S. (2007). Watershed based payment for environmental services in Asia. SANREM CRSP Working Paper No. 06-07, 06, 28.
Huang, M., Upadhyaya, S. K., Jindal, R., & Kerr, J. (2009). Payments for watershed services in Asia: A review of current initiatives. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28(3–5), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549810902794287
Ingram, J. C., Wilkie, D., Clements, T., McNab, R. B., Nelson, F., Baur, E. H., Sachedina, H. T., Peterson, D. D., & Foley, C. A. H. (2014). Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. Ecosystem Services, 7, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.003
Inoue, M., & Shivakoti, G. P. (2015). Multi-level Forest Governance in Asia: an introduction. In M. Inoue & G. P. Shivakoti (Eds.), Multi-level Forest Governance in Asia: concepts, challenges and the way forward (pp. 3–18). SAGE.
Islam, K. K., Rahman, G. M., Fujiwara, T., & Sato, N. (2013). People’s participation in forest conservation and livelihoods improvement: Experience from a forestry project in Bangladesh. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 9(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.748692
Iwanaga, S., Yokoyama, S., Duong, D. T., & Minh, N. Van. (2019). Policy effects for forest conservation and local livelihood improvements in Vietnam: a case study on Bach Ma National Park. Journal of Forest Research, 24(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2019.1655129
Joshua Bishop, N. L.-M. (2002). Forest Environmental Services: An Overview. In S. P. Joshua Bishop (Ed.), Selling Forest Environmental Services (p. 21). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781849772501/selling-forest- environmental-services-joshua-bishop-stefano-pagiola?refId=864af07d-bce8-4222-85b5- 9cb3e11e8eb3&context=ubx
Kosoy, N., Corbera, E., & Brown, K. (2008). Participation in payments for ecosystem services: Case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico. Geoforum, 39(6), 2073–2083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.007
Kosoy, N., Martinez-Tuna, M., Muradian, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2007). Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016
Le, D.N.; Loft, L.; Tjajadi, J.S.; Pham, T.T.; Wong, G. Y. (2016). Being equitable is not always fair: An assessment of PFES implementation in Dien Bien, Vietnam. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006167
Legrand, T., Froger, G., & Le Coq, J. F. (2013). Institutional performance of Payments for Environmental Services: An analysis of the Costa Rican Program. Forest Policy and Economics, 37, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.016
Leimona, B., van Noordwijk, M., de Groot, R., & Leemans, R. (2015). Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia. Ecosystem Services, 12, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.012
Liu, C., Wang, S., Liu, H., & Zhu, W. (2013). The impact of China’s Priority Forest Programs on rural households’ income mobility. Land Use Policy, 31, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.004
Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., & Chen, X. (2008). Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28), 9477–9482. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706436105
Liu, Z., & Kontoleon, A. (2018). Meta-Analysis of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services Programmes in Developing Countries. Ecological Economics, 149(March), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.008
Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance principles for natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 23(10), 986– 1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214
Loft, L., Gehrig, S., Le, D. N., & Rommel, J. (2019). Effectiveness and equity of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Real-effort experiments with Vietnamese land users. Land Use Policy, 86(5), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.010
Loft, L., Le, D. N., Pham, T. T., Yang, A. L., Tjajadi, J. S., & Wong, G. Y. (2017). Whose Equity Matters? National to Local Equity Perceptions in Vietnam’s Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services Scheme. Ecological Economics, 135, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.016
Luong, T. H. (2014). Forest resources and forestry in Vietnam. Journal of Vietnamese Environment, 6(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.13141/jve.vol6.no2.pp171-177
Mahanty, S., Suich, H., & Tacconi, L. (2013). Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: Lessons from seven PES schemes.Land Use Policy, 31, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.009
Máñez Costa, M. (2011). A participatory framework for conservation payments. Land Use Policy, 28(2), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.003
MARD&UNDP(2018). (n.d.). Report on Assessment of Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Policy for Payment of Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam.
Martin, A., Gross-Camp, N., Kebede, B., McGuire, S., & Munyarukaza, J. (2014). Whose environmental justice? Exploring local and global perspectives in a payments for ecosystem services scheme in Rwanda. Geoforum, 54, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.006
McElwee, P. D. (2012). Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum, 43(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010
McElwee, P., Huber, B., & Nguyễn, T. H. V. (2020). Hybrid Outcomes of Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies in Vietnam: Between Theory and Practice. Development and Change, 51(1), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12548
McElwee, P., Nghiem, T., Le, H., Vu, H., & Tran, N. (2014). Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.08.003
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2008). Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts. Global Change Biology, 14(6), 1319–1336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2486.2008.01575.x
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. In ZooKeys(Issue 715). https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.715.13865
Miteva, D. A., Pattanayak, S. K., & Ferraro, P. J. (2012). Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn’t? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs009
Morris, J., Phi, L. T., Ingles, A., Raitree, J., & Duong, N. Van. (2004). Linking PovertyReduction with Forest Conservation: Case studies from Vietnam. In IUCN, Bangkok, Thailand (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Muradian, R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., Adaman, F., Aguilar, B., Agarwal, B., Corbera, E., Ezzine de Blas, D., Farley, J., Froger, G., Garcia-Frapolli, E., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gowdy, J., Kosoy, N., Le Coq, J. F., Leroy, P., May, P., Méral, P., Mibielli, P., … Urama,K. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions.Conservation Letters, 6(4), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
Muradian, Roldan, Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006
Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, B. N., Tran, N. T., Yasmi, Y., & Sunderlin, W. (2008). Forest Tenure Reform in Viet Nam : Case Studies From the Northern Upland and Central Highlands Regions. 68. http://www.recoftc.org/site/uploads/content/pdf/Forest_Tenure_Reform_Vietnam_53.pdf
Osborne, T. M. (2011). Carbon forestry and agrarian change: Access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.611281
Pagiola, S. (2011). Using PES to implement REDD. In PES Learning Paper Wolrd Bank (Vol. 1, Issue 86273).
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can Payments for Environmental Services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2 SPEC. ISS.), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
Pagiola, S., Rios, A. R., & Arcenas, A. (2008). Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua. Environment and Development Economics, 13(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004270
Palmer, C., Engel, S., Sommerville, M. M., Jones, J. P. G., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Tuấn, H. H.,Hằng, T. T. T., Vĩnh, L. Q., Milan, F., Huong, T. T. T., Hoanh, C. T., Suhardiman, D.,
Phuong, N. D., Zeller, M., Wunder, S., Bremer, L. L., Farley, K. A., Lopez-Carr, D., Hejnowicz, A. P., … von Hauff, M. (2017). From Paper to Forest: Local Motives for Participation in Different Conservation Initiatives. Case Studies in Southeastern Mexico. Ecological Economics, 9(3), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.007
Pamela McElwee and Nguyen Chi Thanh. (2014). Assessment report on the PFES policy after being implemented in the period 2011-2014.
Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Rodríguez, L. C., & Duraiappah, A. (2010). Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
Pascual, U., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E., Brown, K., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Gomez-Baggethun, E., & Muradian, R. (2014). Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services.BioScience, 64(11), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146
Pattanayak, S. K., Wunder, S., & Ferraro, P. J. (2010). Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req006
Petheram, L., & Campbell, B. M. (2010). Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(5), 1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.002
Pham, T.T, Bennett, K., Vu., T. ., Brunner, J., Le., N. ., & Nguyen., D. . (2013). Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam : from policy to practice. In Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam : from policy to practice. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004247
Pham, T.T, Dao, T. L. ., Hoang, T. ., Bui, T. M. ., Pham, H. ., & Nguyen, V. . (2018).Opportunities and challenges in mobilizing finance to implement Vietnam’s Forestry Development Strategy for 2006-2020. In Opportunities and challenges in mobilizing finance to implement Vietnam’s Forestry Development Strategy for 2006-2020. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007081
Pham, T.T, Loft, L., Bennett, K., Phuong, V. T., Dung, L. N., & Brunner, J. (2015). Monitoring and evaluation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam: From myth to reality. Ecosystem Services, 16, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.016
Pham, Thuy T., Nguyen, T. D., Dao, C. T. L., Hoang, L. T., Pham, L. H., Nguyen, L. T., & Tran,B. K. (2021). Impacts of payment for forest environmental services in Cat Tien national park. Forests, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070921
Pham, Thuy Thu, Moeliono, M., Brockhaus, M., Le, D. N., Wong, G. Y., & Le, T. M. (2014). Local preferences and strategies for effective, efficient, and equitable distribution of PES revenues in Vietnam: Lessons for REDD+. Human Ecology, 42(6), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9703-3
Pham, V. . (2015). Lessons and experiences from implementation of PFES in Viet Nam. https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/slide/7816
Phan, T. H. ., Brouwer, R., Hoang, L. ., & Davidson, M. D. (2018). Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam’s PES program. PLoS ONE, 13(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200881
Pirard, R. (2012). Payments for environmental services (PES) in the public policy landscape: “Mandatory” spices in the Indonesian recipe. Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.002
Qi, S. (2014). Research on the Legal System of Payment for Ecosystem Services Under the Global Perspective. Canadian Social Science, 10(2), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.3968/4458
Rasul, M. K. and G. (2010). Feature Addressing Equity and Poverty Concerns in Payments for(Issue January).
Rawlins, M. A., & Westby, L. (2013). Community participation in payment for ecosystem services design and implementation: An example from Trinidad. Ecosystem Services, 6, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.004
Salzman, J., Bennett, G., Carroll, N., Goldstein, A., & Jenkins, M. (2018). The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), 136–144.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0
Scherr, S. J., Bennett, M. T., Loughney, M., & Canby, K. (2006). Developing Future Ecosystem Developing Future Ecosystem Service Payments in China : In Reproduction.
Schomers, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002
Sikor, T. (2001). The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: Did it cause the expansion of forests in the northwest? Forest Policy and Economics, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389- 9341(00)00041-1
Sommerville, M. M., Jones, J. P. G., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2009). A revised conceptual framework for payments for environmental services. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03064-140234
Suhardiman, D., Wichelns, D., Lestrelin, G., & Thai Hoanh, C. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services in Vietnam: Market-based incentives or state control of resources? Ecosystem Services, 5, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.001
Sunderlin, W. D., & Ba, H. T. (2005). and Forests in Vietnam. In Forestry.T.T., P., T.N., D., D.T., N., M.T., L., V.T., P., T.L., H., & D.N., L. (2019). Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) policy learning tool: A case study from Vietnam. In Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) policy learning tool: A case study from Vietnam. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007412
Tacconi, L. (2012). Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 73, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
Tacconi, L., Mahanty, S., & Suich, H. (2009). Assessing the livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services: implications for avoided deforestation. XIII World Forestry Congress Buenos, 2009, 1–7. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/33695
Thua Thien Hue Forest Protection Department 2019. (2019). Thua Thien Hue Forest Protection Department 2019.
Thuy, P. T., Chau, N. H., Chi, D. T. L., Long, H. T., & Fisher, M. R. (2020). The politics of numbers and additionality governing the national payment for forest environmental services scheme in vietnam: A case study from son la province. Forest and Society, 4(2), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i2.10891
To, P., & Dressler, W. (2019). Rethinking 'success’: The politics of payment for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 81(11), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.010
To, P. X., Dressler, W. H., Mahanty, S., Pham, T. T., & Zingerli, C. (2012). The Prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: A Look at three payment schemes.Human Ecology, 40(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9480-9
To, P. X., Tran, N. H., & Zagt, R. (2013a). Forest Land Allocation in Viet Nam : Implementation Processes and Results. i, 1–16.
To, P. X., Tran, N. H., & Zagt, R. (2013b). Forest Land Allocation in Viet Nam : Implementation Processes and Results (Issue i).
To, X. P. (2007). Property Making in the Vietnamese Uplands : An Ethnography of Forest Relations in Three Dao Villages.
Trædal, L. T., Vedeld, P. O., & Pétursson, J. G. (2016). Analyzing the transformations of forest PES in Vietnam: Implications for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics, 62, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.001
Tran, T. T. ., Zeller, M., & Suhardiman, D. (2016). Payments for ecosystem services in Hoa Binh province, Vietnam: An institutional analysis. Ecosystem Services, 22(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.001
Ubukata, F., & Truong, Q. H. (2019). Local struggles for the coproduction of natural capital. In J. F. Devlin (Ed.), Social Movements Contesting Natural Resource Development (First Edit, pp. 83–97). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/Devlin, J. (Ed.). (2020). Social Movements Contesting Natural Resource Development. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160139
Uchida, E., Xu, J., & Rozelle, S. (2005). Grain for green: Cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China’s conservation set-aside program. Land Economics, 81(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.81.2.247
Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
Vatn, A. (2015). Markets in environmental governance. From theory to practice. Ecological Economics, 117(1), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.017
Vietnam Forests and Deltas Program. (2021). Báo cáo tổng kết 10 năm thực hiện chính sách dịch vụ chi trả môi trường rừng 2011-2020.
Wegner, G. I. (2016). Payments for ecosystem services (PES): a flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(3), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7
Weyerhaeuser, H., Wilkes, A., & Kahrl, F. (2005). Local impacts and responses to regional forest conservation and rehabilitation programs in China’s northwest Yunnan province. Agricultural Systems, 85(3 SPEC. ISS.), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.008
Willaarts, B. A., Fedorova, O., Uribe, D. A., De La Mora, G., Echavarría, M., López-Gunn, E., Chang, P. P., & Rica, M. (2014). Legal framework and economic incentives for managing ecosystem services. Water for Food Security and Well-Being in Latin America and the Caribbean: Social and Environmental Implications for a Globalized Economy, March, 365–384. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315883137-30
Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. In Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts (Issue 42). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001765
Wunder, S. (2008a). Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, 213–224.
Wunder, S. (2008b). Chapter 17 reduce deforestation and forest degradation ? July, 213–224.
Wunder, S. (2008c). Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics, 13(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004282
Wunder, S., Engel, S., & Pagiola, S. (2008). Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010
Zbinden, S., & Lee, D. R. (2005). Paying for Environmental Services: An analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA program. World Development, 33(2 SPEC. ISS.), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012
論文の公開元へ
