リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Accuracy of a Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Accuracy of a Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Nakagawa, Yasushi Hirota, Yushi Yamamoto, Akane Takayoshi, Tomofumi Takeuchi, Takehito Hamaguchi, Tetsushi Matsuoka, Atsuko Sakaguchi, Kazuhiko Ogawa, Wataru 神戸大学

2022

概要

Among continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, which continuously measure glucose concentration in subcutaneous interstitial fluid for comprehensive monitoring of blood glucose profile, only FreeStyle Libre Pro® (Abbott Diabetes Care) is currently available in Japan as a professional system. FreeStyle Libre Pro® is easy to use because it does not require calibration by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), but information on its accuracy has been insufficient. To evaluate the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro®, we have now compared blood glucose levels determined by this device with those measured by SMBG in 40 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for FreeStyle Libre Pro® measurements compared with SMBG measurements was calculated as an index of CGM accuracy. Overall blood glucose values measured by SMBG were 167.0 ± 60.1 mg/dL, and those determined by FreeStyle Libre Pro® were 155.0 ± 60.7 mg/dL, with this difference being statistically significant. The MARD for FreeStyle Libre Pro® relative to SMBG was 12.7 ± 9.3%. It was substantially higher in 2 of the 40 patients, at 49.2% and 47.5%, than in the other 38 individuals. MARD values did not differ significantly between before and 2 h after meals. However, the MARD was significantly higher for SMBG values of <100 mg/dL than for those of ≥250 mg/dL. Our results thus indicate that the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro® is relatively good, but that some cases in which values determined by the device deviate from SMBG values require caution in interpretation.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1.

2.

3.

Boland E, Monsod T, Delucia M, Brandt CA, Fernando S, Tamborlane WV. Limitations of conventional

methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in

pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(11):1858-1862.

Rodbard D. Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Diabetes

Technol Ther. 2016;18:S3-S13.

Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, Klaff LJ, Alva S. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated

flash glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(11):787-794.

E9

Y. NAKAGAWA et al.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

E10

Bonora B, Maran A, Ciciliot S, Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Head-to-head comparison between flash and

continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;

39(12):1391-1399.

Ólafsdóttir AF, Attvall S, Sandgren U, Dahlqvist S, Pivodic A, Skrtic S, et al. A clinical trial of the accuracy

and treatment experience of the flash glucose monitor FreeStyle Libre in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes

Technol Ther. 2017;19(3):164-172.

Murata T, Nirengi S, Kawaguchi Y, Sukino S, Watanabe T, Sakane N. Accuracy of a novel “factorycalibrated” continuous glucose monitoring device in normal glucose levels: a pilot study. Biomed Sci. 2017;

3:109-113.

Ida S, Goto H, Ida S, Watanabe M, Okuda M, Takeuchi T, et al. Accuracy of a factory calibrated retrospective

CGM device and the comparison to a conventionally calibrated retrospective CGM device: a pilot study.

Biomed Sci. 2018;4:32-36.

Kumagai R, Muramatsu A, Fujii M, Katakura Y, Ito K, Fujie K, et al. Comparison of glucose monitoring

between Freestyle Libre Pro and iPro2 in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(3):851856.

Rodbard D. Characterizing accuracy and precision of glucose sensors and meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol.

2014;8(5):980-985.

Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care.

2005;28(5):1231-1239.

Fokkert MJ, van Dijk PR, Edens MA, Abbes S, de Jong D, Slingerland RJ, et al. Performance of the FreeStyle

Libre flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open Diabetes

Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000320.

Ji L, Guo X, Guo L, Ren Q, Yu N, Zhang J. A multicenter evaluation of the performance and usability of a

novel glucose monitoring system in Chinese adults with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(2):290295.

Charleer S, Mathieu C, Nobels F, Gillard P. Accuracy and precision of flash glucose monitoring sensors

inserted into the abdomen and upper thigh compared with the upper arm. Diabetes Obes Metab.

2018;20(6):1503-1507.

Piona C, Dovc K, Mutlu GY, Grad K, Gregorc P, Battelino T, et al. Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring

system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: the Free-Summer Study. Pediatr Diabetes.

2018;19(7):1285-1293.

Sato T, Oshima H, Nakata K, Kimura Y, Yano T, Furuhashi M, et al. Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring

in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(3):846-850.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る