232
1.
Argenson JN, Boisgard S, Parratte S, Descamps S, Bercovy M, Bonnevialle P,
233
Briard JL, Brilhault J, Chouteau J, Nizard R, Saragaglia D, Servien E, French
234
Society of Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery (SOFCOT). Survival analysis
235
of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter
236
French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.
237
2013 Jun;99(4):385-390.
238
2.
Jauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Pierce TP, Beaver WB, Issa K, Mont MA. Long-Term
239
Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. J
240
Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2164-2166.
241
3.
Victor J, Ghijselings S, Tajdar F, Van Damme G, Deprez P, Arnout N, Van Der
242
Straeten C. Total knee arthroplasty at 15-17 years: does implant design affect
243
outcome? Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):235-241, Feb 2014
244
4.
Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T. Maximizing flexion after total
245
knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl
246
1):59-62, Jun 2002
247
248
5.
Devers BN, Conditt MA, Jamieson ML, Driscoll MD, Noble PC, Parsley BS. Does
greater knee flexion increase patient function and satisfaction after total knee
18
249
250
arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(2):178-186, Feb 2011
6.
Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R. Knee joint kinematics in gait and
251
other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how
252
much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture.
253
2000;12(2):143-155, Oct 2000
254
7.
Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of
255
motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and
256
regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(7):1278-1285, Jul 2003
257
8.
Pasquier G, Tillie B, Parratte S, Catonné Y, Chouteau J, Deschamps G, Argenson
258
JN, Bercovy M, J Salleron. Influence of preoperative factors on the gain in
259
flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.
260
2015;101(6):681-685, Oct 2015
261
9.
Goldstein WM, Raab DJ, Gleason TF, Branson JJ, Berland K. Why posterior
262
cruciate-retaining and substituting total knee replacements have similar
263
ranges of motion. The importance of posterior condylar offset and cleanout
264
of posterior condylar space. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 4:182-188,
265
Dec 2006
266
10.
Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope,
19
267
and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.
268
2006;21(6):889-896, Sep 2006
269
11.
Mizu-uchi H, Colwell CW, Jr., Matsuda S, Flores-Hernandez C, Iwamoto Y,
270
D'Lima DD. Effect of total knee arthroplasty implant position on flexion angle
271
before implant-bone impingement. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(5):721-727, Aug
272
2011
273
12.
274
275
Offierski CM, MacNab I. Hip-spine syndrome. Spine. 1983;8(3):316-321, Apr
1983
13.
Murata Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Hanaoka E, Moriya H. The knee-spine
276
syndrome. Association between lumbar lordosis and extension of the knee. T
277
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(1):95-99, Jan 2003
278
14.
Tsubosaka M, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Nakano N, Kuroda R. Two cases of
279
late medial instability of the knee due to hip disease after total knee
280
arthroplasty. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;37:200-204, 2017
281
15.
Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An
282
anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat
283
Res. 2004;420:213-219, Mar 2004
284
16.
Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Postoperative
20
285
alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat
286
Res. 2013;471(1):127-133, Jan 2013
287
17.
Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kubo S, Shiba R, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S. Influence
288
of hip position on knee flexion angle in patients undergoing total knee
289
arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(5):669-673, Aug 2005
290
18.
291
292
Ritter MA. High-flexion knee designs: more hype than hope? In the affirmative.
J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(4 Suppl 1):40-41, Jun 2006
19.
Schirm AC, Jeffcote BO, Nicholls RL, Jakob H, Kuster MS. Sensitivity of knee
293
soft-tissues to surgical technique in total knee arthroplasty. Knee.
294
2011;18(3):180-184, Jun 2011
295
20.
296
297
systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:132-137, Jan 2005
21.
298
299
Schurman DJ, Rojer DE. Total knee arthroplasty: range of motion across five
Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F, Jr., Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total
knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:87-92, Oct 1996
22.
Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of
300
movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint
301
Surg Br. 1997;79(4):626-629, Jul 1997
302
23.
Delp SL, Hess WE, Hungerford DS, Jones LC. Variation of rotation moment
21
303
304
arms with hip flexion. J Biomech. 1999;32(5):493-501, May 1999
24.
305
306
Dostal WF, Soderberg GL, Andrews JG. Actions of hip muscles. Phys Ther.
1986;66(3):351-361, Mar 1986
25.
Kittl C, El-Daou H, Athwal KK, Gupte CM, Weiler A, Williams A, Amis AA. The
307
Role of the Anterolateral Structures and the ACL in Controlling Laxity of the
308
Intact and ACL-Deficient Knee: Response. Am J Sport Med. 2016;44(4):15-18,
309
Apr 2016
310
26.
Matsuzaki T, Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Kawakami Y,
311
Ishida K, Oka S, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Kinematic factors affecting
312
postoperative knee flexion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Int
313
Orthop. 2013;37(5):803-808, May 2013
314
27.
Adhia DB, Tumilty S, Mani R, Milosavljevic S, Bussey MD. Can hip abduction
315
and external rotation discriminate sacroiliac joint pain? Man Ther. 2016;21:191-
316
197, Feb 2016
317
28.
Nakano N, Khanduja V. Femoroacetabular impingement: the past, current
318
controversies and future perspectives. Phys Sportsmed. 2018;46(3):270-272,
319
Sep 2018
320
29.
Nakano N, Yip G, Khanduja V. Current concepts in the diagnosis and
22
321
management of extra-articular hip impingement syndromes. Int Orthop.
322
2017;41(7):1321-1328, Jul 2017
323
23
324
Figure captions
325
326
Figure 1
327
Vanguard Posterior-Stabilized; Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA
328
329
24
Figure 1
Table 1
Exclusion criteria of the study
TKA: total knee arthroplasty
TKA for valgus deformity of the knee (femorotibial angle by long leg X-ray <
170°)
Simultaneous bilateral TKA
Patients who had surgery in the ipsilateral knee or hip (e.g., total hip
arthroplasty, high tibial osteotomy, fracture surgery, and hip osteotomy)
Patients with severe bony defect requiring bone graft or augmentation
Revision TKA
TKA using other prostheses (i.e., not Vanguard Posterior-Stabilized)
TKA not due to osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis,
trauma, and tumour)
Patients with active knee joint infection
Patients who had postoperative rehabilitation with different protocols
Table 2
Results of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the preoperative data
and the knee flexion angle at three months after total knee arthroplasty
SD: standard deviation
Postoperative
knee
angle
flexion
Mean ± SD
Correlation
p-value
(range)
coefficient
(*: < 0.05)
.797
.001*
.223
.0332
.616
.007*
- .226
.325
- .009
.337
- .192
.403
.576
.012*
121.2 ± 7.2 °
(95 - 130)
Preoperative values
Knee flexion
124.8 ± 11.1 °
(90 - 140)
Knee extension
-7.6 ± 4.4 °
(-15 - 0)
Hip flexion
124.8 ± 11.1 °
(100 - 135)
Hip extension
7.6 ± 5.8 °
(-5 - 20)
Hip abduction
33.3 ± 6.4 °
(25 - 50)
Hip adduction
8.8 ± 5.2 °
(0 - 20)
Hip external rotation
24.3 ± 9.1 °
(5 - 45)
Hip internal rotation
27.4 ± 11.7 °
.128
.582
- .034
.780
.003
.989
.098
.672
.342
.130
(5 - 45)
Age
74.4 ± 6.7 years
(62 - 83)
Body Mass Index
26.7 ± 2.8 kg/m2
(22.3 - 32.8)
Serum albumin
4.0 ± 0.3 g/dl
(3.5 - 4.7)
HbA1c
5.7 ± 0.4 %
(5.1 - 6.6)
Kellgren-Lawrence grade
III: 1, IV: 20
.038
.871
Knee extension strength
14.3 ± 30.3 N/kg
.295
.194
178.5 ± 5.0 °
- .185
.423
Femorotibial angle
(170 - 186)
...
論文の公開元へ
