1 Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(12):E675-E693. doi:10.1097/ BRS.0000000000000913.
2 Emery SE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(6):376–388. doi:10.5435/00124635-200111000-00003.
3 Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Erwin WM, et al. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22 Suppl 1):S55-S67. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f41d.
4 Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, Ducker TB. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. a prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(6):670–676. doi:10.1097/00007632-200003150-00004.
5 Adogwa O, Huang K, Hazzard M, et al. Outcomes after cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion versus expansile laminoplasty: a propensity matched study of 3185 patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(3):549–553. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.10.001.
6 Liu X, Wang H, Zhou Z, Jin A. Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. Orthopedics. 2014;37(2):e117-e122. doi:10.3928/01477447- 20140124-12.
7 Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, Donaldson W 3rd, Kang J. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):688–695. doi:10.1007/ s11999-010-1653-5.
8 Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. a noticeable complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(17):1969–1973. doi:10.1097/00007632-199609010-00005.
9 Kimura A, Endo T, Inoue H, Seichi A, Takeshita K. Impact of axial neck pain on quality of life after laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(24):E1292-E1298. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001167.
10 Riew KD, Raich AL, Dettori JR, Heller JG. Neck pain following cervical laminoplasty: does preserva- tion of the C2 muscle attachments and/or C7 matter? Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013;4(1):42–53. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1341606.
11 Kato M, Nakamura H, Konishi S, et al. Effect of preserving paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(14):E455-E459. doi:10.1097/ BRS.0b013e318178e607.
12 Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Fujii R, Yoshikawa H. C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(9):1375–1379. doi:10.1007/ s00586-006-0089-9.
13 Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H, Hoshino Y. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxy- apatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):1560–1566. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1724-7.
14 Kimura A, Shiraishi Y, Inoue H, Endo T, Takeshita K. Predictors of persistent axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(1):10–15. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002267.
15 Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, et al. Cross-sectional area of posterior extensor muscles of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):1567–1573. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1774-x.
16 Zhang H, Lu S, Sun T, Yadav SK. Effect of lamina open angles in expansion open-door laminoplasty on the clinical results in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(3):89–94. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182695295.
17 Motosuneya T, Maruyama T, Yamada H, Tsuzuki N, Sakai H. Long-term results of tension-band lamino- plasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):68–72. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24532.
18 Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Yoshida M, Miyata M, Takemoto M, Nakamura T. Neck muscle strength before and after cervical laminoplasty: relation to axial symptoms. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23(3):197–202. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a1a73e.
19 Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep exten- sor muscle-preserving approach: impact on cervical spine function and quality of life. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(5):663–671. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0892-1.
20 Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Aburakawa S, et al. Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3–C7 laminoplasty: a modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis (Presented at the 2004 CSRS Meeting). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(22):2544–2549. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000186332.66490.ba
21 Mori E, Ueta T, Maeda T, Yugué I, Kawano O, Shiba K. Effect of preservation of the C-6 spinous process and its paraspinal muscular attachment on the prevention of postoperative axial neck pain in C3–6 laminoplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(3):221–229. doi:10.3171/2014.11.SPINE131153.
22 Wright EF, Domenech MA, Fischer JR Jr. Usefulness of posture training for patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(2):202–210. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0148.
23 Page P. Shoulder muscle imbalance and subacromial impingement syndrome in overhead athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(1):51–58.
24 Mekhora K, Liston CB, Nanthavanij S, Cole JH. The effect of ergonomic intervention on discomfort in computer users with tension neck syndrome. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;26(3):367–379. doi:10.1016/S0169- 8141(00)00012-3.
25 Park SH, Lee MM. Effects of lower trapezius strengthening exercises on pain, dysfunction, posture align- ment, muscle thickness and contraction rate in patients with neck pain; randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e920208. doi:10.12659/MSM.920208.
26 Kanchanomai S, Janwantanakul P, Pensri P, Jiamjarasrangsi W. Prevalence of and factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms in the spine attributed to computer use in undergraduate students. Work. 2012;43(4):497–506. doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-1387.
27 Falla D, Jull G, Russell T, Vicenzino B, Hodges P. Effect of neck exercise on sitting posture in patients with chronic neck pain. Phys Ther. 2007;87(4):408–417. doi:10.2522/ptj.20060009.
28 Ono A, Tonosaki Y, Yokoyama T, et al. Surgical anatomy of the nuchal muscles in the posterior cervico- thoracic junction: significance of the preservation of the C7 spinous process in cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(11):E349-E354. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817152cc.
29 Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes rather than subaxial deep extensors reduces adverse effects after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(16):E782-E786. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d34614.
30 Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(5):405–408. doi:10.3171/ spi.2005.3.5.0405.