リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Utility of the HYBRID Method Incorporating the Advantages of Both Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion in Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Utility of the HYBRID Method Incorporating the Advantages of Both Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion in Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy

岩本 秀人 森實 修一 Yamamoto, Atsushi Shimizu, Ryutaro 西川 涼馬 Yamaguchi Noriya 引田 克弥 本田 正史 武中 篤 鳥取大学 DOI:10.33160/yam.2022.11.004

2022.11.28

概要

Background: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is a well-known standard procedure for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, it remains controversial whether extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) or intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) is superior in this technique. We have developed a HYBRID method that combines ECUD and ICUD to retain the advantages of each. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes between HYBRID and ECUD in RARC and to evaluate the usefulness of the HYBRID method.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative outcomes of 36 consecutive bladder cancer patients who underwent RARC with ileal conduit at our institution between March 2013 and December 2021. Propensity-score matching was used to align patient backgrounds between the HYBRID and ECUD groups.

Results: After matching, 12 cases were selected for each group. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the groups except for the rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mean console time was significantly longer in the HYBRID group due to intracorporeal manipulation; however, a relatively favorable trend of mean blood loss was observed in this group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of positive surgical margin, mean number of lymph node removed, or positive lymph node. The incidences of complications associated and non-associated with the urinary tract and grade ≥III complications at postoperative day (POD) 0–30 and 31–90 were similar between the groups. In the HYBRID group, no complications non-associated with the urinary tract or grade ≥III complications were observed at POD 31–90.

Conclusion: The HYBRID method takes advantage of the benefits of both ICUD and ECUD and is a highly applicable technique that can be used in a variety of patient backgrounds.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

1 Huang GJ, Stein JP. Open radical cystectomy with lymphad- enectomy remains the treatment of choice for invasive blad- der cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:369-75. DOI: 10.1097/ MOU.0b013e3282dc95b5, PMID: 17762633

2 Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, Gonzalgo ML, Woods ME, Svatek RS, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non- inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2525-36. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(18)30996-6, PMID: 29976469

3 Carrion A, Piñero A, Raventós C, Lozano F, Díaz F, Morote J. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2019;43:277-83. DOI: 10.1016/ j.acuroe.2019.01.009, PMID: 31036392

4 Pyun JH, Kim HK, Cho S, Kang SG, Cheon J, Lee JG, et al. Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Total Intra- corporeal Urinary Diversion: Comparative Analysis with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26:349-55. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0543, PMID: 26907506

5 Lenfant L, Verhoest G, Campi R, Parra J, Graffeille V, Masson-Lecomte A, et al. Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study. World J Urol. 2018;36:1711-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8, PMID: 29744571

6 Bertolo R, Agudelo J, Garisto J, Armanyous S, Fergany A, Kaouk J. Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Robotic Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal or Extra- corporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: Head-to-head Comparison From a Single-Institutional Prospective Study. Urology. 2019;129:98-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.059, PMID: 30707964

7 Katayama S, Mori K, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Schuettfort VM, Quhal F, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26:1587-99. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01972-2, PMID: 34146185

8 Tanneru K, Jazayeri SB, Kumar J, Alam MU, Norez D, Nguyen S, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta- analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2021;15:321-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01174-4, PMID: 33222043

9 Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH, Agarwal PK, Badani KK, Balbay MD, et al. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystec- tomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2014;65:340-7. DOI: 10.1016/ j.eururo.2013.09.042, PMID: 24183419

10 Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Aldhaam NA, Jing Z, Peabody JO, Wijburg CJ, et al. A comparative propensity score‐matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystec- tomy Consortium. BJU Int. 2020;126:265-72. DOI: 10.1111/ bju.15083, PMID: 32306494

11 Hussein AA, May PR, Jing Z, Ahmed YE, Wijburg CJ, Canda AE, et al.; Collaborators. Outcomes of Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystec- tomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol. 2018;199:1302-11. DOI: 10.1016/ j.juro.2017.12.045, PMID: 29275112

12 Iwamoto H, Morizane S, Koie T, Shiroki R, Kawakita M, Gondo T, et al. Peri-operative efficacy and long-term survival benefit of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in septuagenarian patients compared with younger patients: a nationwide multi-institutional study in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24:1588-95. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01470-6, PMID: 31123937

13 Hong JY, Oh YJ, Rha KH, Park WS, Kim YS, Kil HK. Pulmonary edema after da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a case report. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22:370-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.05.010, PMID: 20650386

14 Pridgeon S, Bishop CV, Adshead J. Lower limb compartment syndrome as a complication of robot-assisted radical prosta-tectomy: the UK experience. BJU Int. 2013;112:485-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12201, PMID: 23879906

15 Masumori N, Fukuta F. Development of combined method for construction of continent urinary diversion: studer neo- bladder. Int J Urol. 2019;26:1158-60. DOI: 10.1111/iju.14100, PMID: 31497893

16 Milenkovic U, Akand M, Moris L, Demaegd L, Muilwijk T, Bekhuis Y, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term complications and survival following radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2019;37:1857-66. DOI: 10.1007/ s00345-018-2584-0, PMID: 30519746

17 Arora A, Zugail AS, Pugliesi F, Cathelineau X, Macek P, Barbé Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase peri-operative morbidity following radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2022;40:1697-705. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04012-4, PMID: 35488914

18 Yumioka T, Iwamoto H, Masago T, Morizane S, Yao A, Honda M, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in an initial Japanese series: the impact of prior abdominal surgery on surgical outcomes. Int J Urol. 2015;22:278-82. DOI: 10.1111/iju.12678, PMID: 25422166

19 Iwamoto H, Yumioka T, Yamaguchi N, Masago T, Morizane S, Honda M, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is a promising alternative to open surgery in the Japanese population with a high rate of octogenarians. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:756-63. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-016-0950-8, PMID: 26792433

20 Jeglinschi S, Carlier M, Denimal L, Guillonneau B, Chevallier D, Tibi B, et al. Intracorporeal urinary diversion during robot-assisted radical cystectomy using indocyanine green. Can J Urol. 2020;27:10394-401. PMID: 33049193

21 Dal Moro F, Zattoni F. Lighting from the urethral cystoscope side: A novel technique to safely manage bowel division during intracorporeal robotic urinary diversion. Int J Urol. 2016;23:344-5. DOI: 10.1111/iju.13035, PMID: 26790379

22 Baradnay G, Kiss A, Scultéty A. The results and failures of creating a pelvic reservoir in oncology (surgery, urology). Acta Chir Hung. 1995-1996-1996;35:119-27. PMID: 8659229

23 Ahmadi N, Clifford TG, Miranda G, Cai J, Aron M, Desai MM, et al. Impact of body mass index on robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2017;120:689-94. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13916, PMID: 28544311

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文
を
一発検索！

この論文の関連論文を見る