1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Edwards RC, Kiely KD. Resorbable fixation of Le Fort I osteotomies. J Craniofac Surg. 1998;9(3):210–214.
doi:10.1097/00001665-199805000-00005.
Norholt SE, Pedersen TK, Jensen J. Le Fort I miniplate osteosynthesis: a randomized, prospective
study comparing resorbable PLLA/PGA with titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(3):245–252.
doi:10.1006/ijom.2003.0505.
Ueki K, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Alam S, Yamamoto E. Maxillary stability following Le
Fort I osteotomy in combination with sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy:
a comparative study between titaniumminiplate and poly-L-lactic acid plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2006;64(1):74–80. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.015.
Dhol WS, Reyneke JP, Tompson B, Sándor GK. Comparison of titanium and resorbable copolymer fixation
after Le Fort I maxillary impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(1):67–73. doi:10.1016/j.
ajodo.2006.04.049.
Kotaniemi KVM, Heliövaara A, Kotaniemi M, et al. Comparison of postoperative skeletal stability of
maxillary segments after Le Fort I osteotomy, using patient-specific implant versus mini-plate fixation. J
Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(7):1020–1030. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.04.003.
Murray RA, Upton LG, Rottman KR. Comparison of the postsurgical stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy
using 2- and 4-plate fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(5):574–579. doi:10.1053/joms.2003.50111.
Yoon HJ, Rebellato J, Keller EE. Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone:
a case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(5):629–634. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.013.
Solano-Hernández B, Antonarakis GS, Scolozzi P, Kiliaridis S. Combined orthodontic and orthognathic
surgical treatment for the correction of skeletal anterior open-bite malocclusion: a systematic review on
vertical stability. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;71(1):98–109. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.016.
Kurohara K, Tomomatsu N, Nakakuki K, Arai N, Yoda T. Skeletal stability after maxillary step osteotomy
compared with original Le Fort I osteotomy during one-year of follow-up. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9742.
doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46233-5.
Ataç MS, Erkmen E, Yücel E, Kurt A. Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le
Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA. Part 1: advancement surgery. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(12):1117–1124. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.004.
Ataç MS, Erkmen E, Yücel E, Kurt A. Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort
I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA. Part 2: impaction surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2009;38(1):58–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.005.
Erkmen E, Ataç MS, Yücel E, Kurt A. Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 70–78, 2023
77
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.1.70
Masahito Fujio et al
Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3DFEA Part 3: inferior and anterior repositioning
surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(2):173–179. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.006.
13 Pozzer L, Olate S, Cavalieri-Pereira L, Navarro P, de Albergaría Barbosa JR. Mechanical stability of 2-plate
versus 4-plate osteosynthesis in advancement Le Fort I osteotomy. An in vitro study. J Stomatol Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2017;118(1):2–4. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2016.03.001.
14 Hibi H, Sakai K, Oda T, Hattori H, Ueda M, Sakai M. Stability of a locking plate and self-drilling
screws as orthodontic skeletal anchorage in the maxilla: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2010;68(8):1783–1787. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.020.
15 Trevisiol L, Lanaro L, Favero V, Lonardi F, Vania M, D’Agostino A. The effect of subspinal Le Fort
I osteotomy and alar cinch suture on nasal widening. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020;48(9):832–838.
doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2020.06.009.
References End
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 70–78, 2023
78
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.1.70
...