Virtual reality-based action observation facilitates the acquisition of body-powered prosthetic control skills

1. Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb

prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(6):346–57.

2. Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with

proximal upper limb deficiency--acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil. 2004;

18(2):172–7.

3. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey

of the last 25 years. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):236–57.

4. Kejlaa GH. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to

upper limb amputees. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 1993;17(3):157–63.

5. Huinink LHB, Bouwsema H, Plettenburg DH, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM.

Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and

kinematics. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:90.

6. Bouwsema H, Van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Changes in performance over

time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil.

2014;11:16.

7. Cattaneo L, Rizzolatti G. The mirror neuron system. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:

557–60.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

Page 11 of 12

Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, Buccino G. Action observation has

a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke.

Neuroimage. 2007;36(Suppl 2):164–73.

Buccino G, Arisi D, Gough P, Aprile D, Fazzi E. Improving upper limb motor

functions through action observation treatment: a pilot study in children

with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(9):822–8.

Pelosin E, Avanzino A, Bove M, Stramesi P, Nieuwboer A, Abbruzzese G.

Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson's

disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(8):746–52.

Bellelli G, Buccino G, Bernardini B, Padovani A, Trabucchi M. Action

observation treatment improves recovery of postsurgical orthopedic

patients: evidence for a top-down effect? Arch Phys MedRehabil. 2010;

91(10):1489–94.

Cusack WF, Cope M, Nathanson S, Pirouz N, Wheaton LA. Neural Activation

Differences in Amputees During Imitation of Intact Versus Amputee

Movements. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;29;6:182.

Weiss PL, Jessel AS. Virtual reality applications to work. Work. 1998;11(3):

277–93.

Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, Tonin P, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Kiper P, Prion

L. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after

stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:85.

Kiper P, Szczudlik A, Agostini M, Opara J, Nowobilski R, Ventura L, Tonin P,

Turolla A. Virtual reality for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute and

chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;

99(5):834–42.

Cikajlo I, Potisk KP. Advantages of using 3D virtual reality based training in

persons with Parkinson's disease: a parallel study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;

16:119.

Perez-Marcos D, Bieler-Aeschlimann M, Serino A. Virtual reality as a

vehicle to empower motor-cognitive Neurorehabilitation. Front Psychol.

2018;2(9):2120.

Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh

inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.

Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the box

and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386–91.

Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the box and

block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and

norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751–5.

Crosbie J, Lennon S, Mcneill M, Mcdonough S. Virtual reality in the

rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: the user's perspective.

CyberPsychol Behav. 2006;9(2):137–41.

Lohse KR, Boyd LA, Hodges NJ. Engaging environments enhance motor skill

learning in a computer gaming task. J Mot Behav. 2016;48(2):172–82.

Rohrbach N, Chicklis E, Levac DE. What is the impact of user affect on

motor learning in virtual environments after stroke? A scoping review J

Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16:79.

Lewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, McPherson KM. Virtual reality games for

rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil

Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):453–63.

Levin MF, Weiss PL, Keshner EA. Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for

upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor

learning principles. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):415–25.

Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. Neural circuits involved in imitation and

perspective-taking. Neuroimage. 2006:15;31(1):429–39.

Hotz-Boendermaker S, Funk M, Summers P, Brugger P, Kollias SS.

Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by

attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage. 2008:1;39(1):

383–94.

Villiger M, Estévez N, Hepp-Reymond MC, Kiper D, Hotz-Boendermaker

S. Enhanced activation of motor execution networks using action

observation combined with imagination of lower limb movements.

PLoS One. 2013;28:8(8).

Kyberd PJ. The influence of control format and hand design in single axis

myoelectric hands: assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using

the Southampton hand assessment procedure. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2011;

35(3):285–93.

Resnik L, Borgia M. Reliability and validity of outcome measures for upper

limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2012;24(4):192–201.

Haverkate L, Smit G, Plettenburg DH. Assessment of body-powered upper

limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the box and blocks test and

the nine-hole peg test. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2016;40(1):109–16.

Yoshimura et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

(2020) 17:113

32. Bloomer C, Wang S, Kontson K. Creating a standardized, quantitative

training protocol for upper limb bypasss prostheses. Phys Med Rehabil Res.

2018;3(6):1–8.

33. Gokeler A, Bisschop M, Myer GD, Benjaminse A, Otten E. Immersive virtual

reality improves movement patterns in patients after ACL reconstruction:

implications for enhanced criteria-based return-to-sport rehabilitation. Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(7):2280–6.

34. Cummings JJ, Bailenson JN. How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of

the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol. 2016;

19(2):271–309.

35. Shu Y, Huang YZ, Chang SH, Chen MY. Do virtual reality head-mounted

displays make a difference? A comparison of presence and self-efficacy

between head-mounted displays and desktop computer-facilitated virtual

environments. Virtual Reality. 2019;23:437–46.

36. Chadwell A, Kenney L, Granat MH, Thies S. Upper limb activity in

myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears

unrelated to goal-directed task performance. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11084.

37. Cusack WF, Patterson R, Thach S, Kistenberg RS, Wheaton LA. Motor

performance benefits of matched limb imitation in prosthesis users. Exp

Brain Res. 2014;232(7):2143–54.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in

published maps and institutional affiliations.

Page 12 of 12

...