リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Persistence of a highly monoandrous mating system despite an extremely male-biased operational sex ratio in the firefly squid Watasenia scintillans」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Persistence of a highly monoandrous mating system despite an extremely male-biased operational sex ratio in the firefly squid Watasenia scintillans

Md. Nur E. Alam 広橋 教貴 島根大学 DOI:10.1007/s00227-023-04204-5

2023.03.29

概要

Broadly, the points at which females choose males as mating partners, referred to as AQ3 female choice, call special attention to
evolutionary biologists (Emlen and Oring 1977 ; Eberhard 1996 ; Rosenthal and Ryan 2022 ). However, how females decide the
number of males to mate, especially single or multiple males, remains largely unknown (Jennions and Petrie 2000 ; Kvarnemo
2018 ). In theory, mate number is disproportionally correlated with offspring number in females (Bateman 1948 ); however,
polyandry (female mating with multiple males) is prevalent in diverse taxa (Taylor et al. 2014 ) owning to direct and indirect
AQ4 benefits gained from multiple mates (Reynolds 1996 ; Arnqvist and Nilsson 2000 ; Firman 2011 ; Matsumura et al. 2021 ). It is
generally considered that the mode of reproduction, either monoandry (female mating with a male) or polyandry, is attributed to
each species as a fixed trait (Whiteman and Cote 2004 ; Hughes et al. 2008 ; Davies and Gardner 2018 ; Young et al. 2019 ).
However, monoandry (or monogamy) is considered to have been adopted to maximize reproductive success for one or both sexes as
the consequences of biparental care (Tumulty et al. 2014) and severe constraints on the accessibility and availability of reproductive
or environmental resources (Komers and Brotherton 1997 ; Stockley 1997 ). Therefore, it is often observed that the choice of
reproductive mode is determined conditionally by environmental, intrasexual, or intersexual contexts, and hence, differently in
populations (Uller and Olsson 2008 ; Brown et al. 2010 ).
In this case, the operational sex ratio (OSR), the ratio of males to females who are ready to mate at any one time (Emlen and Oring
1977 ), may influence the reproductive mode decision in a given population (Arnqvist and Nilsson 2000 ; Kokko and Jennions 2008 ;
Janicke and Morrow 2018 ), but see (Head et al. 2008 ; Plesnar-Bielak et al. 2020 ). If the OSR skews toward one sex, the intensity
of competition for mates increases (Trivers 1972 ), but see (Klug et al. 2010 ), resulting in altered mating behaviors, such as either
an increase or decrease in competitive aggression, courtship, pre- or postcopulatory mate guard, and frequency or duration of
copulation (Kvarnemo and Ahnesjo 1996 ; Weir et al. 2011 ). We assumed that in species without aggression, courtship, mate
guarding and parental care, a possible behavioral change that may occur in response to increased male-biased OSR is a higher
frequency of copulation with higher levels of polyandry (Lode et al. 2004 ; Naud et al. 2004 ). In this regard, the firefly squid
Watasenia scintillans offers a model system suitable for testing this hypothesis because (1) they are semelparous and unlikely to
engage courtship and mate guarding due to a considerable length of time gap between copulation and spawning (Hayashi 1995 ); (2)
females are approximately 5% polyandrous (Sato et al. 2020 ), allowing us to detect any small increase in the rate of polyandry; (3)
adult sex ratio changes greatly from male-biased to female-biased (Sato et al. 2020 ), hence OSR may also change accordingly,
during the mating season in the wild; and (4) the level of polyandry can be estimated at a large population scale with a newly
developed anatomical method (described in the present study). In addition to this question concerning the possible impact of OSR
on monoandry-polyandry decisions, we are intrigued by the highly monoandrous reproductive mode in W. scintillans, because most
cephalopods are thought to adopt a polyandrous mating strategy, as suggested by field observations and paternity tests with DNA
fingerprinting (Hanlon et al. 1997 ; Naud et al. 2004 , 2016 ; Iwata et al. 2005 ; Sato et al. 2014 ). In the wild population, males
mature in advance and await females’ receptivity to mate. Most females copulate once at sexually premature stage during the short
mating period of ∼3 weeks and store male-delivered sperm sacs (spermatangia) for the rest of their life for no longer than 3 months
(Sato et al. 2020 ). Microsatellite DNA-based paternity analysis revealed behavioral monogamy (all sperm sacs stored in the female
were transferred by a single male), and as the consequence, genetic monoandry (all eggs in the same clutch, though investigated
with limited sample size, were fathered by a single male) (Sato et al. 2020 ). From these data, we speculated two possibilities: (1)
polyandry is an alternative common strategy that occurs if certain conditions are met, or (2) polyandry occurs as a consequence of
unusual coincidences or pathological actions. ...

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164.

https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1446

Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in drosophila. Heredity (edinb) 2:349–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1948.21

Brown JL, Morales V, Summers K (2010) A key ecological trait drove the evolution of biparental care and monogamy in an amphi

bian. Am Nat 175:436–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/650727

Burford BP, Robison BH (2020) Bioluminescent backlighting illuminates the complex visual signals of a social squid in the deep s

ea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:8524–8531. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920875117

Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437–456

Davies NG, Gardner A (2018) Monogamy promotes altruistic sterility in insect societies. R Soc Open Sci 5:172190. https://doi.org

/10.1098/rsos.172190

Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223. https://doi.org/

10.1126/science.327542

Firman RC (2011) Polyandrous females benefit by producing sons that achieve high reproductive success in a competitive environ

ment. Proc Biol Sci 278:2823–2831. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2791

Guevara-Fiore P, Skinner A, Watt PJ (2009) Do male guppies distinguish virgin females from recently mated ones? Anim Behav 7

7:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.018

Hanlon RT, Maxwell MR, Shashar N (1997) Behavioral dynamics that would lead to multiple paternity within egg capsules of the

squid Loligo pealei. Biol Bull 193:212–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv193n2p212

Hayashi S (1995) Fishery biological studies of firefly squid, Watasenia scintillans, (Berry) Toyama Bay. Bull Toyama Pref Fish Re

s Inst. 7:1–128

Head ML, Lindholm AK, Brooks R (2008) Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual orn

aments and behavior. Evolution 62:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00277.x

Hughes WO, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FL (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eu

sociality. Science 320:1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156108

Iwata Y, Munehara H, Sakurai Y (2005) Dependence of paternity rates on alternative reproductive behaviors in the squid Loligo bl

eekeri. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298:219–228

Janicke T, Morrow EH (2018) Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals. Ecol

Lett 21:384–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12907

Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:21

–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0006323199005423

Klug H, Heuschele J, Jennions MD, Kokko H (2010) The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J Evol Biol 23:447–462. https://do

i.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01921.x

3/23/23, 10:18 AM

eProofing

9 of 10

https://eproofing.springer.com/ePj/printpage_jnls/bH1xqBLnWBLk3Nbw_fv18uiSM...

Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948. https://doi.org/10.111

1/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x

Komers PE, Brotherton PN (1997) Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proc Biol Sci 264:1261–127

0. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0174

Kubodera T, Koyama Y, Mori K (2007) Observations of wild hunting behaviour and bioluminescence of a large deep-sea, eight-ar

med squid, Taningia danae. Proc Biol Sci 274:1029–1034. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0236

Kvarnemo C (2018) Why do some animals mate with one partner rather than many? A review of causes and consequences of mon

ogamy. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 93:1795–1812. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12421

Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjo I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404–408. h

ttps://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10056-2

Lode T, Holveck MJ, Lesbarreres D, Pagano A (2004) Sex-biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs. Pro

c Biol Sci 271(Suppl 6):S399-401. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0195

Manning A (1962) A sperm factor affecting the receptivity of drosophila melanogaster females. Nature 194:252–253. https://doi.or

g/10.1038/194252a0

Markow TA (2002) Perspective: female remating, operational sex ratio, and the arena of sexual selection in drosophila species. Ev

olution 56:1725–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00186.x

Matsumura K, Miyatake T, Yasui Y (2021) An empirical test of the bet-hedging polyandry hypothesis: female red flour beetles avo

id extinction via multiple mating. Ecol Evol 11:5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7418

Murai R, Shiomi M, Yoshida M-a, Tomano S, Iwata Y, Sugai K, Hirohashi N (2021) All the spermatangia on a female were implan

ted by single-pair copulation in giant squid Architeuthis dux. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 175:103585. https://doi.org/1

0.1016/j.dsr.2021.103585

Naud M-J, Hanlon RT, Hall KC, Shaw PW, Havenhand JN (2004) Behavioural and genetic assessment of reproductive success in a

spawning aggregation of the Australian giant cuttlefish, Sepia apama. Anim Behav 67:1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbeh

av.2003.10.005

Naud MJ, Sauer WH, McKeown NJ, Shaw PW (2016) Multiple mating, paternity and complex fertilisation patterns in the chokka

squid loligo reynaudii. PLoS One 11:e0146995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146995

Nigmatullin CM, Arkhipkin AI, Sabirov RM (1995) Age, growth and reproductive biology of diamond-shaped squid Thysanoteuth

is rhombus (Oegopsida: Thysanoteuthidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:73–87

Pitnick S (1993) Operational sex ratios and sperm limitation in populations of Drosophila pachea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:383–3

91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170253

Plesnar-Bielak A, Sychta K, Gaczorek TS, Palka JK, Prus MA, Prokop ZM (2020) Does operational sex ratio influence relative str

ength of purging selection in males versus females? J Evol Biol 33:80–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13547

Reynolds JD (1996) Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol Evol 11:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81045-7

Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ (2022) Sexual selection and the ascent of women: mate choice research since darwin. Science 375:eabi63

08. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308

Ruther J, Thal K, Blaul B, Steiner S (2010) Behavioural switch in the sex pheromone response of Nasonia vitripennis females is li

nked to receptivity signalling. Anim Behav 80:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.008

Sato N, Kasugai T, Munehara H (2014) Female pygmy squid cryptically favour small males and fast copulation as observed by re

moval of spermatangia. Evol Biol 41:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-013-9261-4

Sato N, Tsuda SI, Nur EAM, Sasanami T, Iwata Y, Kusama S, Inamura O, Yoshida MA, Hirohashi N (2020) Rare polyandry and c

ommon monogamy in the firefly squid, Watasenia Scintillans. Sci Rep 10:10962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68006-1

3/23/23, 10:18 AM

eProofing

10 of 10

https://eproofing.springer.com/ePj/printpage_jnls/bH1xqBLnWBLk3Nbw_fv18uiSM...

Seidou M, Sugahara M, Uchiyama H, Hiraki K, Hamanaka T, Michinomae M, Yoshihara K, Kito Y (1990) On the three visual pig

ments in the retina of the firefly squid, Watasenia scintillans. J Comp Physiol A 166:769–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0018732

Stockley P (1997) Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol Evol 12:154–159. https://doi.org/1

0.1016/s0169-5347(97)01000-8

Taylor ML, Price TA, Wedell N (2014) Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 29:376–383. https://doi.org/10.10

16/j.tree.2014.04.005

Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–

1971. Aldine, Chicago, IL, pp 136–179

Uller T, Olsson M (2008) Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes. Mol Ecol 17:2566–2580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.

1365-294X.2008.03772.x

Wedell N (2005) Female receptivity in butterflies and moths. J Exp Biol 208:3433–3440. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01774

Weir LK, Grant JW, Hutchings JA (2011) The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. Am Nat

177:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1086/657918

Whiteman EA, Cote IM (2004) Monogamy in marine fishes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 79:351–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/s146

4793103006304

Xochipiltecatl D, Baixeras J, Cordero CR (2021) Atypical functioning of female genitalia explains monandry in a butterfly. PeerJ

9:e12499. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12499

Young RL, Ferkin MH, Ockendon-Powell NF, Orr VN, Phelps SM, Pogany A, Richards-Zawacki CL, Summers K, Szekely T, Trai

nor BC, Urrutia AO, Zachar G, O’Connell LA, Hofmann HA (2019) Conserved transcriptomic profiles underpin monogamy across

vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:1331–1336. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813775116

3/23/23, 10:18 AM

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る