リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Risk factors for cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury: A pilot study on the usefulness of genetic variants for predicting nephrotoxicity in clinical practice」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Risk factors for cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury: A pilot study on the usefulness of genetic variants for predicting nephrotoxicity in clinical practice

ODA HIROYASU 三重大学

2021.04.08

概要

Several studies have reported risk factors for predicting cisplatin induced acute kidney injury (AKI), including old age, female sex, smoking, hypoalbuminemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, a high body surface area, advanced cancer and the total dose of cisplatin administered. Recently, some studies have focused on the associations between genetic alterations in the genes coding for renal drug transporters, such as organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2), and the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin. However, genetic variants have not been fully elucidated for clinical use. Patients who had received cisplatin (≥50 mg/m2)-containing chemotherapy as a first line treatment were considered as eligible for the present study. The occurrence of AKI and its associations with baseline characteristics, conventional biomarkers and single nucle¬otide variants (SNV) were assessed. AKI was defined as an increase in the serum creatinine level of >0.3 mg/dl or to 1.5 2 times the baseline level. Genotyping was conducted using the DMET platform (DMET Plus), which characterizes 1,936 genetic variants (1,931 SNV and 5 copy number variations) in 231 genes. Between April 2014 and June 2016, a total of 28 patients (22 men and 6 women) were enrolled. AKI occurred in 8 of the 28 enrolled patients (28.6%). Univariate analyses demonstrated that the urinary β2-microglobulin level and body surface area were significantly higher in the AKI group (P<0.05). As regards the associations between AKI and SNV, none of the examined SNV were found to be associated with cisplatin-induced AKI. The findings of the present study suggested that certain clinical factors were associated with the onset of AKI, but no associations were identified with genetic factors, including OCT2. Although this was a small pilot study, the findings indicated that genetic factors may not be of value for predicting AKI in clinical practice.

参考文献

1. Pabla N and Dong Z: Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: Mechanisms and

renoprotective strategies. Kidney Int 73: 994‑1007, 2008.

2. Perazella MA and Moeckel GW: Nephrotoxicity from chemo‑

therapeutic agents: Clinical manifestations, pathobiology and

prevention/therapy. Semin Nephrol 30: 570‑581, 2010.

3. Didier Portilla, A Mazin Safar and Melissa L Shannon: Cisplatin

nephrotoxicity. Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA:

UptoDate Inc. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/cisplatinnephrotoxicity. Accessed February 26, 2019.

4. Dobyan DC, Levi J, Jacobs C, Kosek J and Weiner MW:

Mechanism of cis‑platinum nephrotoxicity: II. Morphologic

observations. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 213: 551‑556, 1980.

5. Sobrero A, Guglielmi A, Aschele C and Rosso R: Current strate‑

gies to reduce cisplatin toxicity. J Chemother 2: 3‑7, 1990.

6. de Jongh FE, van Veen RN, Veltman SJ, de Wit R,

van der Burg ME, van den Bent MJ, Planting AS, Graveland WJ,

Stoter G and Verweij J: Weekly high‑dose cisplatin is a feasible

treatment option: Analysis on prognostic factors for toxicity in

400 patients. Br J Cancer 88: 1199‑1206, 2003.

7. Hinai Y, Motoyama S, Niioka T and Miura M: Absence of effect

of SLC22A2 genotype on cisplatin‑induced nephrotoxicity in

oesophageal cancer patients receiving cisplatin and 5‑fluoro‑

uracil: Report of results discordant with those of earlier studies.

J Clin Pharm Ther 38: 498‑503, 2013.

8. Zhang J and Zhou W: Ameliorative effects of SLC22A2 gene

polymorphism 808 G/T and cimetidine on cisplatin‑induced

nephrotoxicity in Chinese cancer patients. Food Chem

Toxicol 50: 2289‑2293, 2012.

9. Iwata K, Aizawa K, Kamitsu S, Jingami S, Fukunaga E,

Yoshida M, Yoshimura M, Hamada A and Saito H: Effects

of genetic variants in SLC22A2 organic cation transporter 2

and SLC47A1 multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 transporter on

cisplatin‑induced adverse events. Clin Exp Nephrol 16: 843‑851,

2012.

10. Filipski KK, Mathijssen RH, Mikkelsen TS, Schinkel AH and

Sparreboom A: Contribution of organic cation transporter 2

(OCT2) to cisplatin‑induced nephrotoxicity. Clin Pharmacol

Ther 86: 396‑402, 2009.

11. Tzvetkov MV, Behrens G, O'Brien VP, Hohloch K, Brockmöller J

and Benöhr P: Pharmacogenetic analyses of cisplatin‑induced

nephrotoxicity indicate a renoprotective effect of ERCC1 poly‑

morphisms. Pharmacogenomics 12: 1417‑1427, 2011.

12. Windsor RE, Strauss SJ, Kallis C, Wood NE and Whelan JS:

Germline genetic polymorphisms may influence chemotherapy

response and disease outcome in osteosarcoma: A pilot study.

Cancer 118, 1856‑1867, 2012.

13. Chang C, Hu Y, Hogan SL, Mercke N, Gomez M, O'Bryant C,

Bowles DW, George B, Wen X, Aleksunes LM and Joy MS:

Pharmacogenomic variants may influence the urinary excretion

of novel kidney injury biomarkers in patients receiving cisplatin.

Int J Mol Sci 18: 1333, 2017.

14. Zazuli Z, Vijverberg S, Slob E, Liu G, Carleton B, Veltman J,

Baas P, Masereeuw R and Maitland‑van der Zee AH: Genetic

variations and cisplatin nephrotoxicity: A systematic review.

Front Pharmacol 9: 1111, 2018.

15. Pavlidis P and Nobel WS: Analysis of strain and regional

variation in gene expression in mouse brain. Genome Biol 2:

Research0042, 2001.

16. Howe EA, Sinha R, Schlauch D and Quackenbush J: RNA‑Seq

analysis in MeV. Bioinformatics 27: 3209‑3210, 2011.

17. Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Basch E, Bohlke K, Barbour SY,

Clark‑Snow R A, Danso MA, Dennis K, Dupuis LL,

Dusetzina SB, et al: Antiemetics: American society of clinical

oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 35:

3240‑3261, 2017.

18. Dilruba S and Kalayda GV: Platinum‑based drugs: Past, present

and future. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77: 1103‑1124, 2016.

19. Innocenti F, Schilsky RL, Ramírez J, Janisch L, Undevia S,

House LK, Das S, Wu K, Turcich M, Marsh R, et al: Dose-finding

and pharmacokinetic study to optimize the dosing of irinotecan

according to the UGT1A1 genotype of patients with cancer.

J Clin Oncol 32: 2328‑2334, 2014.

20. Henricks LM, Opdam FL, Beijnen JH, Cats A and Schellens JHM:

DPYD genotype-guided dose individualization to improve

patient safety of fluoropyrimidine therapy: Call for a drug label

update. Ann Oncol 28: 2915‑2922, 2017.

21. Relling MV, Gardner EE, Sandborn WJ, Schmiegelow K, Pui

CH, Yee SW, Stein CM, Carrillo M, Evans WE and Klein TE;

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium: Clinical

pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for

thiopurine methyltransferase genotype and thiopurine dosing.

Clin Pharmacol Ther 89: 387‑391, 2011.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.

...

参考文献をもっと見る