リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Opportunities for Interactive Communication in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Video-Based Observational Study」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Opportunities for Interactive Communication in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Video-Based Observational Study

Yamaguchi, Akiko Ishii, Atsue Fukushige, Haruna Inoue, Yoshiaki Akada, Izumi Mitani, Rie Ito, Akiko Hosona, Mio Suga, Sayaka Yamada, Akiko Arima, Yoko 神戸大学

2022.07.14

概要

Background. Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients need the opportunity to communicate their physical and psychosocial concerns to nurses. However, these patients face the unique problem of lacking even the opportunity to communicate. Aims. The study aimed to describe the characteristics of communication opportunities for critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Methods. The study was designed as a video-based descriptive observational study. Participants included seven mechanically ventilated critically ill patients at the intensive care unit, coronary care unit, or high care unit who were conscious and seven registered nurses (seven pairs). Videos were recorded continuously from 8 am to 4 pm, and the footage was then descriptively analyzed. Data collection took place between July 2019 and June 2020. Results. The total recording time was 668.0 minutes. Of these 668.0 minutes, nurses stayed in the Conversation Area of the Patient for 279.6 minutes, and of these 279.6 minutes, two-way face-to-face communication between nurse and patient occurred for 78.0 minutes. Of these 78.0 minutes, communications were started by nurses for 47.2 minutes (174 scenes) and by patients for 24.2 minutes (36 scenes). The patient-started two-way communication scenes included 37 instances of Patient-Intentional-Action that triggered the start of communication. Actions using the upper limbs were observed in 20 instances and represented the most frequently used body part. The head/face, lower limbs, or trunk were also used in some of the actions. Gestures were the most commonly used action type (14 instances). Other types included lip movement, grimace, leg flex/extension, and cough. Conclusions. We found that nurses tended to start communication more frequently than patients did and that patients demonstrated Patient-Intentional-Action with a variety of actions using various body parts. Communication opportunities for patients were created when nurses took the initiative to start communication or when they noticed and responded to the Patient-Intentional-Action. Our findings demonstrate that nurses need to recognize and always respond to Patient-Intentional-Action and to take the initiative in communicating rather than waiting for the patient to do so.

参考文献

[1] K. M. Yorkston, Augmentative Communication in the Medical Setting, Kyodo-Isho, Tokyo, Japan, 1996.

[2] V. A. Sitzer, “Enhancing communication with critically ill patients and families,” Critical Care Nursingpp. 74–88, Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2 edition, 1996.

[3] T. B. Hafsteind´ottir, “Patient’s experiences of communication during the respirator treatment period,” Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 261–271, 1996.

[4] S. M. Carroll, “Nonvocal ventilated patients perceptions of being understood,” Western Journal of Nursing Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 85–103, 2004.

[5] A. Yamaguchi, K. Egawa, and K. Yoshinaga, “Nurses’ experience of communication difficulties and practices with mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs,” Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 48–60, 2013.

[6] G. B. Campbell and M. B. Happ, “Symptom identification in the chronically critically ill,” AACN Advanced Critical Care, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 64–79, 2010.

[7] D. T. Li and K. Puntillo, “A pilot study on coexisting symptoms in intensive care patients,” Applied Nursing Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 216–219, 2006.

[8] K. A. M. Samuelson, “Unpleasant and pleasant memories of intensive care in adult mechanically ventilated patientsFindings from 250 interviews,” Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 76–84, 2011.

[9] R. M. Fink, M. B. F. Makic, A. W. Poteet, and K. S. Oman, “The ventilated patient’s experience,” Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 301–308, 2015.

[10] A. Noguchi and T. Inoue, “The life experience of patients conscious on light sedated being mechanically ventilated in an ICU,” Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2016.

[11] A. Yamaguchi, K. Egawa, and K. Yoshinaga, “The experience of communication difficulties in patients with mechanical ventilation and their communication strategies,” Journal of Japan Academy of Critical Care Nursing, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 45–55, 2015.

[12] V. Karlsson, A. Forsberg, and I. Bergbom, “Communication when patients are conscious during respirator treatment-a hermeneutic observation study,” Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 197–207, 2012.

[13] M. M. Wallander Karlsen, K. Heggdal, A. Finset, and L. G. Heyn, “Attention-seeking actions by patients on mechanical ventilation in intensive care units: a phenomenological-hermeneutical study,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 28, pp. 66–79, 2019.

[14] J. A. Spiers, M. Costantino, and J. Faucett, “Video technology,” AAOHN Journal, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 119–124, 2000.

[15] K. Caldwell and A. Atwal, “Non-participant observation: using video tapes to collect data in nursing research,” Nurse Researcher, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 42–54, 2005.

[16] K. Hashimoto, K. Nishide, K. Takahashi, and T. Takahashi, “A study on the psychological territory based on experiments of interpersonal horizontal distance,” Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), vol. 61, no. 485, pp. 135–142, 1996.

[17] M. B. Happ, K. Garrett, D. D. V. Thomas et al., “Nurse-patient communication interactions in the intensive care unit,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. e28–e40, 2011.

[18] M. B. Happ, P. Tuite, K. Dobbin, D. DiVirgilio-Thomas, and J. Kitutu, “Communication ability, method, and content among nonspeaking nonsurviving patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 210–218, 2004.

[19] R. Khalaila, W. Zbidat, K. Anwar, A. Bayya, D. M. Linton, and S. Sviri, “Communication difficulties and psychoemotional distress in patients receiving mechanical ventilation,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 470–479, 2011.

[20] J. W. Devlin, Y. Skrobik, C. G´elinas et al., “Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. e825–e873, 2018.

[21] E. Laerkner, I. Egerod, F. Olesen, and H. P. Hansen, “A sense of agency: an ethnographic exploration of being awake during mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 75, pp. 1–9, 2017.

[22] J. Alasad and M. Ahmad, “Communication with critically ill patients,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 356–362, 2005.

[23] M. Lawrence, “The unconscious experience,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 227–232, 1995.

[24] K. K. Haidet, J. Tate, D. Divirgilio-Thomas, A. Kolanowski, and M. B. Happ, “Methods to improve reliability of videorecorded behavioral data,” Research in Nursing & Health, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 465–474, 2009.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る