リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Optimal lymph node dissection in pancreatic tail cancer」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Optimal lymph node dissection in pancreatic tail cancer

瀬尾 信吾 広島大学

2022.02.24

概要

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignant tumors and is the fourth leading
cause of cancer-related deaths in Japan1, the United States2, and Europe3. Surgical resection is the only
curative treatment option for PDAC, and distal pancreatectomy (DP) concomitant with regional lymph
node dissection is generally recommended for left-sided PDAC 4-7. Lymph node metastasis has been
reported to be a strong prognostic factor for patients with PDAC8-11; therefore, optimal regional lymph
node dissection is mandatory to achieve curative resection.
However, the definition of left-sided PDAC and the recommended extent of regional lymph node
dissection differ among the classifications of the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS)12, American Joint
Committee of Cancer (AJCC)13, and International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)14 (Figs. 1
and 2). The AJCC and ISGPS classifications define pancreatic tail cancer as a tumor in which its center is
located on the left side of the aortic left border, whereas the JPS classification defines it as a tumor that is
located completely on the left side of the aorta (Fig. 1). The extent of regional lymph nodes in left-sided
PDAC also differs depending on the classification (Fig. 2). Among the three classifications, the extent is
similar in the JPS and AJCC classifications; however, it is completely different in the ISGPS classification,
wherein, the extent of regional lymph nodes for left-sided PDAC is separated according to pancreatic body
and tail cancers.
The optimal range of lymph node dissection remains unclear in left-sided PDAC; however, a few recent
reports described that the dissection of lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (CHA) and the
celiac artery (CA) might not be necessary because lymph node metastasis around them is rare in pancreatic
tail cancers 15-17. In this study, we evaluated the optimal range of lymph node dissection for resectable
pancreatic tail cancer by investigating the location and frequency of lymph node metastases. ...

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1.

Statistics graph database. Center for Cancer Control and Information Services. Available from

https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/stat/summary.html.

2.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021 CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 7-33.

3.

Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Boffetta P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E, et al. European cancer mortality

predictions for the year 2020 with a focus on prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2020 May; 31: 650-8.

4.

Yamaguchi K, Okusaka T, Shimizu K, Furuse J, Ito Y, Hanada K, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines

for Pancreatic Cancer 2016 From the Japan Pancreas Society: A Synopsis. Pancreas 2017; 46: 595604.

5.

Takaori K, Bassi C, Biankin A, Brunner TB, Cataldo I, Campbell F, et al. International Association of

Pancreatology (IAP) / European Pancreatic Club (EPC) consensus review of guidelines for the

treatment of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2016;16: 14–27.

6.

Yamamoto T, Satoi S, Kawai M, Motoi F, Sho M, Uemura K, et al. Is distal pancreatectomy with enbloc celiac axis resection effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal

adenocarcinoma? -Multicenter surgical group study. Pancreatology 2018; 18: 106-13.

7.

Wei K, Hackert T. Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021;

13: 1971.

8.

Morales-Oyarvide V, Rubinson DA, Dunne RF, Kozak MM, Bui JL, Yuan C, et al. Lymph node

metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and

survival. Br J Cancer 2017; 117: 1874-82.

9.

Fujita T, Nakagohri T, Gotohda N, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kojima M, et al. Evaluation of the

prognostic factors and significance of lymph node status in invasive ductal carcinoma of the body or

tail of the pancreas. Pancreas 2010; 39: e48-54.

10. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hayashidani Y, Hashimoto Y, Nakashima A, et al. Number of

metastatic lymph nodes, but not lymph node ratio, is an independent prognostic factor after resection

of pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211: 196-204.

11. Okada K, Murakami Y, Kondo N, Uemura K, Nakagawa N, Seo S, et al. Prognostic Significance of

Lymph Node Metastasis and Micrometastasis Along the Left Side of Superior Mesenteric Artery in

10

Pancreatic Head Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23: 2100-9.

12. Japan Pancreas Society. Description of Findings. In: Classifcation of pancreatic carcinoma 4th

English ed. Tokyo Kanehara & Co, Ltd 2017; pp. 12-58.

13. Kayker S, Pawlik TM, Allen PJ, Vauthey JN. TNM classification of malignant tumors 8th ed. New

York: Wiley; 2018

14. Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic

ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic

Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014; 156: 591–600

15. Zhou Y, Lin J, Wang W, Chen H, Deng X, Peng C, Cheng D, Shen B. Should a standard

lymphadenectomy include the No. 9 lymph nodes for body and tail pancreatic ductal

adenocarcinoma? Pancreatology 2019; 19: 414-8.

16. Imamura T, Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, Ashida R, et al. Reconsidering the Optimal

Regional Lymph Node Station According to Tumor Location for Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol

2021; 28:1602-11.

17. Hirashita T, Iwashita Y, Fujinaga A, Nakanuma H, Masuda T, Endo Y, et al. Relationship between

the tumor location and clinicopathological features in left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Surg Today 2021; 51: 814-20.

18. Network NC. NCCN clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Version

1. 2021 ed 2021. Available from http://www.vccn.org/professionals/physician gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf.

2021.

19. Unno M, Motoi F, Matsuyama Y, Satoi S, Matsumoto I, Aosasa S, et al. Randomized phase II/III trial

of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable

pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP-05). J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 4 suppl 189.

20. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery

2003; 133: 521–7.

21. Kanda M, Fujii T, Nagai S, Kodera Y, Kanzaki A, Sahin TT, et al. Pattern of lymph node metastasis

spread in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2011; 40: 951–5.

22. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Yuasa Y, Sueda T. Prognostic impact of para-aortic

10

11

lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 2010 Aug; 34: 1900-7.

23. Cesmebasi A, Malefant J, Patel SD, Du Plessis M, Renna S, Tubbs RS, et al. The surgical anatomy of

the lymphatic system of the pancreas. Clin Anat 2015; 28: 527-37.

24. Nagakawa Y, Sahara Y, Hosokawa Y, Murakami Y, Yamaue H, Satoi S, et al. Clinical Impact of

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer:

Analysis of 884 Patients at Facilities Specializing in Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26:

1629-1636.

25. Ocuin LM, Hardacre JM, Ammori JB, Rothermel LD, Mohamed A, Selfridge JE, et al. Neoadjuvant

chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with left-sided pancreatic

adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2020; 122: 1595-1603.

26. Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H, Augustine MM, Porembka MR, Wang SC, et al. Neoadjuvant

Therapy Followed by Resection Versus Upfront Resection for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A

Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 515-522.

27. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, et al. Dutch

Pancreatic Cancer Group. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A

Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 2-9.

28. Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakamura Y, Nagakawa Y, Tanabe M, Gotoh Y, et al. Difficulty scoring system

in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018; 25: 489-97.

29. Wada Y, Aoki T, Murakami M, Fujimori A, Koizumi T, Kusano T, et al. Individualized procedures

for splenic artery dissection during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. BMC Surg. 2020; 20: 32.

30. Deiro G, De Pastena M, Paiella S, Balduzzi A, Montagnini G, Andreotti E, et al. Assessment of

difficulty in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a modification of the Japanese difficulty scoring

system - A single-center high-volume experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021 DOI:

10.1002/jhbp.1010

11

12

Figure Legends

Figure 1. Definition of left-sided pancreatic cancer

A) Definition according to the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS). The border between pancreatic body cancer

and tail cancer is the left edge of the aorta (dotted line). When a tumor exists on both sides of the

border, it is defined as pancreatic body and tail cancer. T, tumor; SMV, superior mesenteric vein; Ao,

Aorta.

B) Definition according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Study Group

of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The border between pancreatic body cancer and tail cancer is the left

edge of the aorta (dotted line).

Figure 2. Recommended extent of lymphadenectomy in distal pancreatectomy

The numeral in the circle indicates the station number of the lymph nodes. Station 7: lymph node along the

left gastric artery; station 8: lymph node along the common hepatic artery; station 9: lymph node around

the celiac axis; station10: lymph node at the splenic hilum; station 11: lymph node along splenic artery;

station 14: lymph node along superior mesenteric artery; station 18: lymph node along the inferior margin

of the pancreas.

JPS, Japan Pancreas Society; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; ISGPS, International Study

Group of Pancreatic Surgery; LGA, left gastric artery; CHA, common hepatic artery; PHA, proper hepatic

artery; CA, celiac axis; SPA, splenic artery; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SMV, superior mesenteric

vein

12

13

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics

Pt

non-Pt

(n = 61)

(n = 35)

72 (44-87)

71 (42-84)

0.964

38 /23

25 /10

0.361

43 (2-20734)

33 (2-1287)

0.237

9 (15%)

3 (9%)

0.366

Operation time, min (median, range)

201 (112-424)

190 (133-405)

0.566

Blood loss, mL (median range)

352 (5-2815)

335 (20-2140)

0.866

4 (7%)

2 (6%)

0.881

20 (33%)

9 (26%)

0.486

25 (10-63)

18 (6-56)

0.028

Histologic type (well/mod/poor), n

19/36/6

17/14/4

0.182

Regional lymph node metastasis, n

28 (46%)

22 (63%)

0.108

R0 resection, n

51 (84%)

29 (83%)

0.925

0 (0%)

1 (3%)

0.154

Age, years (median, range)

Sex (male/female)

p-value

Preoperative factors

CA19-9, U/mL (median, range)

Neoadjuvant therapy, n

Surgery related factors

Blood transfusion, n

POPF Grade B or C, n

Pathological findings

Tumor diameter (mm), (median range)

Lymph node recurrence, n

Pt, pancreatic tail cancer; non-Pt, pancreatic body cancer and pancreatic body and tail cancer; CA19-9,

carbohydrate antigen 19-9; POPF, postoperative pancreatic fistula

13

14

Table 2 The number of patients with regional lymph node metastasis

Pt

non-Pt

(n = 61)

(n = 35)

Station 7: LNs along left gastric artery*

0/53 (0%)

1/32 (3%)

Station 8: LNs along common hepatic artery*

0/59 (0%)

4/34 (12%)

Station 9: LNs around celiac axis*

0/57 (0%)

2/33 (6%)

Station 10: LNs at the splenic hilum*

4/60 (7%)

1/33 (3%)

Station 11: LNs along splenic artery*

18/61 (30%)

18/35 (51%)

2/56 (4%)

3/33 (9%)

10/60 (17%)

6/35 (17%)

Station 14: LNs along superior mesenteric artery*

Station 18: LNs along inferior margin of the pancreas*

* Number of patients with lymph node metastasis/number of patients in whom the lymph nodes were

detected in the resected specimen

LNs, lymph nodes; Pt, pancreatic tail cancer; non-Pt, pancreatic body cancer and pancreatic body and tail

cancer

14

15

Table 3 The number of metastasized lymph nodes.

Station 7: LNs along left gastric artery*

0/92 (0%)

1/60 (2%)

0/157 (0%)

6/78 (8%)

0/98 (0%)

2/56 (4%)

Station 10: LNs at the splenic hilum*

7/140 (5%)

2/58 (3%)

Station 11: LNs along splenic artery*

51/365 (14%)

36/212 (17%)

2/140 (1%)

5/82 (6%)

16/239 (7%)

13/129 (10%)

Station 8: LNs along common hepatic artery*

Station 9: LNs around celiac axis*

Station 14: LNs along superior mesenteric artery*

Station 18: LNs along inferior margin of the pancreas*

*Total number of metastasized lymph nodes/total number of harvested lymph nodes.

LNs, lymph nodes; Pt, pancreatic tail cancer; non-Pt, pancreatic body cancer and pancreatic body

and tail cancer

15

AJCC/

ISGPS

(B)

JPS

Fig. 1 (A)

16

Pancreatic tail cancer

Pancreatic tail cancer

Pancreatic body and tail cancer

Pancreatic body cancer

Pancreatic body cancer

16

ISGPS

AJCC

JPS

Fig. 2

Pancreatic body cancer

17

Pancreatic tail cancer

17

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る