リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Gender Disparities in First Authorship at Three Medical Universities in an Area Affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Gender Disparities in First Authorship at Three Medical Universities in an Area Affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake

Ono, Yuko Saito, Masafumi Shimomura, Kenju Shinohara, Kazuaki Yamada, Naoto Iwasaki, Yudai Inoue, Shigeaki Kotani, Joji 神戸大学

2023

概要

The Great East Japan Earthquake that occurred on March 11, 2011, was one of the largest natural disasters in modern times. Publication in medical journals is important aspects of the academic promotion process, and is thus important for all scientists. However, little is known about whether and how substantial natural disasters affect gender disparities in academic productivity in disaster-affected areas. We hypothesized that the Great East Japan Earthquake widened the existing disparities in scientific publishing between male and female researchers. To test this hypothesis, this retrospective observational study using existing databases was conducted. We extracted from the MEDLINE database all types of biomedical articles published from March 11, 2007, to March 11, 2015, by three medical universities in a disaster-affected area of Japan. Differences in the proportion of female first authorship during the 4 years before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake were compared. A total of 5,873 papers were analyzed. The proportion of female first authors significantly declined after the Great East Japan Earthquake (20.5% vs. 14.1%; odds ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.56–0.73). A similar trend was identified across all prespecified subgroups, including clinical department; original article; public medical university; and prestigious journal with impact factor >6. Reference data from two medical universities minimally affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake showed the opposite trend. These results collectively suggest that large natural disasters can reinforce existing gender disparities in first authorship in biomedicine.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Lin W, Conin M, Moore JC, Chester FM, Nakamura Y, Mori JJ, et al. Stress state in the largest displacement

area of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science. 2013;339(6120):687–690.

Dunbar P, McCullough H, Mungov G, Varner J, Stroker K. 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami data

available from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geophysical Data Center.

Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. 2011;2(4):305–323.

Shibahara S. The 2011 Tohoku earthquake and devastating tsunami. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011;223(4):305–

307.

Christodouleas JP, Forrest RD, Ainsley CG, Tochner Z, Hahn SM, Glatstein E. Short-term and long-term

health risks of nuclear-power-plant accidents. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(24):2334–2341.

Reconstruction Agency [Internet]. Great East Japan Earthquake [Cited 2022 October 23]. Available from:

https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/topics/GEJE/index.html.

Ogawa S, Ishiki M, Nako K, Okamura M, Senda M, Sakamoto T, et al. Effects of the Great East Japan

Earthquake and huge tsunami on glycaemic control and blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BMJ Open. 2012;2(2):e000830.

Ochi S, Murray V, Hodgson S. The great East Japan earthquake disaster: a compilation of published literature

on health needs and relief activities, March 2011-September 2012. PLoS Curr.

2013;5:ecurrents.dis.771beae7d8f41c31cd91e765678c005d.

Thurston AM, Stöckl H, Ranganathan M. Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a

global mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(4):e004377.

Alexander D, Magni M. Mortality in the l'aquila (central Italy) earthquake of 6 april 2009. PLoS Curr.

2013;5:e50585b8e6efd1.

Ardagh M, Standring S, Deely JM, Johnston D, Robinson V, Gulliver P, et al. A Sex Disparity Among

Earthquake Victims. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):67–73.

MacDonald R. How women were affected by the tsunami: a perspective from Oxfam. PLoS Med.

2005;2(6):e178.

Tagliacozzo S, Tullio I. Gender equality plans (GEPs) as a framework to devise gender equality measures for

disaster research. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021;60:102294.

Starmer AJ, Frintner MP, Freed GL. Work-Life Balance, Burnout, and Satisfaction of Early Career

Pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2016;137(4):e20153183.

Chatani Y, Nomura K, Horie S, Takemoto K, Takeuchi M, Sasamori Y, et al. Effects of gaps in priorities

between ideal and real lives on psychological burnout among academic faculty members at a medical

university in Japan: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health Prev Med. 2017;22(1):32.

Yasukawa K, Nomura K. The division of labor by sex among Japanese physicians (In Japanese). Igaku

Kyouiku. 2012;43(4):315–319.

Reed DA, Enders F, Lindor R, McClees M, Lindor KD. Gender differences in academic productivity and

leadership appointments of physicians throughout academic careers. Acad Med. 2011;86(1):43–47.

Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, Henault LE, Chang Y, Starr R, et al. The "gender gap" in authorship of

academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):281–287.

Filardo G, da Graca B, Sass DM, Pollock BD, Smith EB, Martinez MA. Trends and comparison of female

first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014). BMJ. 2016;352:i847.

Lerchenmüller C, Lerchenmueller MJ, Sorenson O. Long-Term Analysis of Sex Differences in Prestigious

GENDER AND FIRST AUTHORSHIP AFTER THE GREAT EARTHQUAKE

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

Authorships in Cardiovascular Research Supported by the National Institutes of Health. Circulation.

2018;137(8):880–882.

Miller J, Chuba E, Deiner S, DeMaria S Jr, Katz D. Trends in Authorship in Anesthesiology Journals. Anesth

Analg. 2019;129(1):306–310.

Bendels MHK, Wanke E, Schöffel N, Bauer J, Quarcoo D, Groneberg DA. Gender equality in academic

research on epilepsy-a study on scientific authorships. Epilepsia. 2017;58(10):1794–1802.

Huang J, Gates AJ, Sinatra R, Barabási AL. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers

across countries and disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(9):4609–4616.

Pinho-Gomes AC, Peters S, Thompson K, Hockham C, Ripullone K, Woodward M, et al. Where are the

women? Gender inequalities in COVID-19 research authorship. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(7):e002922.

Muric G, Lerman K, Ferrara E. Gender Disparity in the Authorship of Biomedical Research Publications

During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e25379.

Andersen JP, Nielsen MW, Simone NL, Lewiss RE, Jagsi R. COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women

first authors than expected. Elife. 2020;9:e58807.

Gabster BP, van Daalen K, Dhatt R, Barry M. Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19

pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1968–1970.

Kawasaki Y, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Ohira T, Satoh H, Suzuki H, et al. The basic data for residents aged 16

years or older who received a comprehensive health check examinations in 2011-2012 as a part of the

Fukushima Health Management Survey after the great East Japan earthquake. Fukushima J Med Sci.

2014;60(2):159–169.

Ouyang D, Harrington RA, Rodriguez F. Association Between Female Corresponding Authors and Female

Co-Authors in Top Contemporary Cardiovascular Medicine Journals. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1127–1129.

Scherer RW, Meerpohl JJ, Pfeifer N, Schmucker C, Schwarzer G, von Elm E. Full publication of results

initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11(11):MR000005.

Ceci SJ, Williams WM. Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proc Natl

Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(8):3157–3162.

Burns KEA, Straus SE, Liu K, Rizvi L, Guyatt G. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding

rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis.

PLoS Med. 2019;16(10):e1002935.

Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the

SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:2.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative.

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for

reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–8.

Okoshi K, Nomura K, Fukami K, Tomizawa Y, Kobayashi K, Kinoshita K, et al. Gender inequality in career

advancement for females in Japanese academic surgery. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014;234(3):221–227.

Ramakrishnan A, Sambuco D, Jagsi R. Women's participation in the medical profession: insights from

experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe. J Womens Health (Larchmt).

2014;23(11):927–934.

Kono K, Watari T, Tokuda Y. Assessment of Academic Achievement of Female Physicians in Japan. JAMA

Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e209957.

Tyler M, Fairbrother P. Bushfires are “men’s business”: the importance of gender and rural hegemonic

masculinity. J Rural Stud. 2013;30:110–119.

Parkinson D, Duncan A, Archer F. Barriers and enablers to women in fire and emergency leadership roles.

Gender in Management. 2019;34(2):78–93.

Danielsson E, Eriksson K. Women's invisible work in disaster contexts: gender norms in speech on women's

work after a forest fire in Sweden. Disasters. 2022;46(1):141–161.

Juran L. The gendered nature of disasters: women survivors in post-tsunami Tamil Nadu. Indian J Gend Stud.

2012;19(1):1–29.

Kowal M, Coll-Martín T, Ikizer G, Rasmussen J, Eichel K, Studzińska A, et al. Who is the Most Stressed

During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Data From 26 Countries and Areas. Appl Psychol Health Well Being.

2020;12(4):946–966.

Craig L, Churchill B. Dual-earner parent couples' work and care during COVID-19. Gend Work Organ.

2021;28(Suppl 1):66–79.

Myers KR, Tham WY, Yin Y, Cohodes N, Thursby JG, Thursby MC, et al. Unequal effects of the COVID-19

pandemic on scientists. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(9):880–883.

Nielsen MW, Alegria S, Börjeson L, Etzkowitz H, Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Joshi A, et al. Opinion: Gender

diversity leads to better science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(8):1740–1742.

E77

Y. ONO et al.

45. Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, Scaramucci A, Barnett RC, Szalacha L, et al. Relation of family

responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med.

1998;129(7):532–538.

46. Ono Y, Goto A, Maejima Y, Maruyama I, Suzuki T, Shikama Y, et al. Work-life conflict, gender-based

discrimination, and their associations among professionals in a medical university and affiliated hospitals in

Japan: A cross-sectional study. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2020;66(1):25–36.

47. Turan, G [Internet]. Why quotas work for gender equality. OECD Forum [Cited 2022 October 23].

Available from: http://www. oecd. org/ social/ quotas- gender- equality.htm.

48. Tohoku university center for gender equality promotion [Internet]. Percentage of Female Researchers [Cited

2022 October 23]. Available from: http://tumug.tohoku.ac.jp/en/blog/2020/06/19/9306/.

49. Iwate Medical University Educational Data Book 2018 [Internet]. Percentage of Female faculty members

[Cited

2023

May

31].

Available

from:

https://www.iwate-med.ac.jp/wp/wpcontent/uploads/8b99eae13d6342b8b08aefcab258ddaf.pdf.

50. Berry E, Kelly S, Hutton J, Harris KM, Smith MA. Identifying studies for systematic reviews. An example

from medical imaging. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):668672.

51. Minoura K, Imamura F, Sugawara D, Kono Y, Iwashita T. The 869 Jogan tsunami deposit and recurrence

interval of large-scale tsunami on the Pacific coast of northeast Japan. J Nat Disast Sci. 2001;23(2):83e8.

E78

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る