論文の公開元へ

書き出し

Refer/BibIX

RIS

BibTeX

TSV

The Advantages of Robotic Gastrectomy over Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer

Matsunaga, Tomoyuki Miyauchi, Wataru Kono, Yusuke Shishido, Yuji Miyatani, Kozo Hanaki, Takehiko Watanabe, Joji Kihara, Kyoichi Yamamoto, Manabu Fukumoto, Yoji Tokuyasu, Naruo Takano, Shuichi Sakamoto, Teruhisa Honjo, Soichiro Saito, Hiroaki Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki 鳥取大学 DOI:10.33160/yam.2020.05.005

2020.05.18

概要

Background: We compared short- and long-term clinical outcomes including inflammatory marker levels between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) to define the advantages of RG over LG. Methods: We enrolled 209 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative distal gastrectomy. We compared short- and long-term clinical outcomes including inflammatory marker levels between RG and LG to define the advantages of RG over LG. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels; the CRP-to-albumin, neutrophil-tolymphocyte, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios; and the prognostic nutritional index were compared as systemic inflammatory markers. Results: RG was associated with a longer operative time. The incidence of postoperative infectious complications of grade II or higher according to the Clavien?Dindo classification was not significantly different between the two groups. Amylase levels in drainage fluid on postoperative days 1 and 3 were significantly lower in the RG group than in the LG group. The incidence of pancreatic fistula in the RG group (4.3%) was lower than that in the LG group (7.5%), albeit without significance. There were no significant differences in inflammatory marker levels either before or after surgery between the two groups. The 3-year overall survival rate did not significantly differ between the RG and LG groups (91.1% vs. 91.1%). Similar results were observed regarding the 3-year disease-specific survival rate (100% vs. 97.1%). Conclusion: RG might be feasible and safe for treating gastric cancer from both surgical and oncological perspectives. The use of robotic assistance is associated with decreased amylase levels in drainage fluid, which may reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula and prevent pancreatic injury.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C,

Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide:

Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210,

PMID: 25220842

2 Yakoub D, Athanasiou T, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Laparoscopic

assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an

alternative to the open approach? Surg Oncol. 2009;18:322-33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.08.006, PMID: 18922689

3 Katai H. Current status of a randomized controlled trial examining laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan.

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8:125-9. DOI: 10.1111/ases.12171,

PMID: 25676458

4 Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu

SW, et al.; Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal

Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Decreased Morbidity of

Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open

Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term

Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

(KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263:28-35. DOI: 10.1097/

SLA.0000000000001346, PMID: 26352529

5 Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Morita S, Yamada

T, Bando E, et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopyassisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy

with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric

cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3

randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol.

2020;5:142-51. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30332-2, PMID:

31757656

6 Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery.

Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:1429-44. DOI: 10.1016/S00396109(03)00158-0, PMID: 14712877

7 Delgado S, Lacy AM, Filella X, Castells A, García-Valdecasas

JC, Pique JM, et al. Acute phase response in laparoscopic and

open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study. Dis Colon

Rectum. 2001;44:638-46. DOI: 10.1007/BF02234558, PMID:

11357021

8 Pilka R, Marek R, Adam T, Kudela M, Ondrová D, Neubert D,

et al. Systemic Inflammatory Response After Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Patients.

Anticancer Res. 2016;36:2909-22. PMID: 27272805

9 Hikage M, Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y,

Bando E, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between

Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric

Cancer. World J Surg. 2018;42:1803-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00268017-4345-4, PMID: 29134310

10 Shen W, Xi H, Wei B, Cui J, Bian S, Zhang K, et al.

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer:

comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc.

2016;30:574-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4241-7, PMID:

26208497

11 Shin HJ, Son SY, Wang B, Roh CK, Hur H, Han SU. Longterm Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy

for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis

of 2084 Consecutive Patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;1. DOI:

10.1097/SLA.0000000000003845, PMID: 32187032

12 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer

treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:119. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4, PMID: 27342689

13 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification

of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer.

2011;14:101-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5, PMID:

21573743

14 Fairclough E, Cairns E, Hamilton J, Kelly C. Evaluation of a

modified early warning system for acute medical admissions

and comparison with C-reactive protein/albumin ratio as

a predictor of patient outcome. Clin Med (Northfield Ill).

2009;9:30-3. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-30, PMID:

19271597

15 Duan H, Zhang X, Wang FX, Cai MY, Ma GW, Yang H, et

al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in operable

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol.

2015;21:5591-7. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5591, PMID:

25987784

16 Liaw FY, Huang CF, Chen WL, Wu LW, Peng TC, Chang

YW, et al. Higher Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Increased

the Risk of Sarcopenia in the Community-Dwelling Older

Adults. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-01716924-y, PMID: 29192175

17 Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. [Prognostic nutritional index

in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients].

Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85:1001-5. PMID: 6438478

18 Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu

Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of

surgical complications: japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668-85.

DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x, PMID: 26289837

19 Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Nohara K, Sano T,

et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and the risk factors of

laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:115-21. DOI: 10.1245/s10434011-1893-y, PMID: 21739317

20 Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y.

Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph

node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of

pancreas-related complications. Surgery. 2011;149:15-21. DOI:

10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.014, PMID: 20627337

21 Ojima T, Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Hayata K, Katsuda

M, Maruoka S, et al. Robotic radical lymphadenectomy

without touching the pancreas during gastrectomy for gastric

cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e15091. DOI: 10.1097/

MD.0000000000015091, PMID: 30921243

22 Nakauchi M, Suda K, Susumu S, Kadoya S, Inaba K, Ishida

Y, et al. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic

radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort

study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5444-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00464016-4904-z, PMID: 27129542

23 Wang S, Xu L, Wang Q, Li J, Bai B, Li Z, et al. Postoperative

complications and prognosis after radical gastrectomy for

gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of

observational studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17:52. DOI:

10.1186/s12957-019-1593-9, PMID: 30885211

24 Kuwada K, Kuroda S, Kikuchi S, Yoshida R, Nishizaki M,

Kagawa S, et al. Sarcopenia and Comorbidity in Gastric Cancer Surgery as a Useful Combined Factor to Predict Eventual

Death from Other Causes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1160-6.

DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6354-4, PMID: 29404820

105

T. Matsunaga et al.

25 Suda K, Man-i M, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama

I. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for

gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional

laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective

comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:673-85. DOI:

10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0, PMID: 25030478

26 Bobo Z, Xin W, Jiang L, Quan W, Liang B, Xiangbing D, et

al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for

gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of

prospective observational studies. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:103348. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06648-z, PMID: 30719561

27 Son T, Hyung WJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J

Surg Oncol. 2015;112:271-8. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23926, PMID:

26031408

28 Ypsilantis P, Didilis V, Tsigalou C, Pitiakoudis M,

Karakatsanis A, Margioulas A, et al. Systemic inflammatory

response after single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus

standard laparoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:21-4. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea5c,

PMID: 22318054

29 Shishido Y, Fujitani K, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, Tsujinaka T,

Sekimoto M. C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 as a

predictor of infectious complications following gastric cancer

resection. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:293-301. DOI: 10.1007/

s10120-014-0455-y, PMID: 25560875

106

...

参考文献をもっと見る

分野

大学

学位論文種類・取得年

言語

The Advantages of Robotic Gastrectomy over Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer

概要

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

Clinical Implications of Naples Prognostic Score in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer

Impact of thoracic esophageal displacement after lobectomy on the continuity of oral adjuvant chemotherapy.

Statin Use Influence on the Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Effectiveness of tolvaptan and long-term prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

Predictors and clinical impact of postoperative diarrhea after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, multicenter, observational study (SHISA-1602)

参考文献

分野

大学

学位論文種類・取得年

言語

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

The Advantages of Robotic Gastrectomy over Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer

概要

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

Clinical Implications of Naples Prognostic Score in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer

Impact of thoracic esophageal displacement after lobectomy on the continuity of oral adjuvant chemotherapy.

Statin Use Influence on the Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Effectiveness of tolvaptan and long-term prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

Predictors and clinical impact of postoperative diarrhea after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, multicenter, observational study (SHISA-1602)

参考文献