リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in non-metastatic prostate cancer」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in non-metastatic prostate cancer

木村, 章嗣 東京慈恵会医科大学 DOI:info:doi/10.1007/s00345-019-03038-5

2020.10.21

概要

Purpose:
To investigate the prognostic role of expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system members, such as urokinase-type activator (uPA), uPA-receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods:
Immunohistochemical staining for uPA system was performed on a tissue microarray of specimens from 3,121 patients who underwent RP. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of overexpression of these markers alone or in combination with biochemical recurrence (BCR). Decision curve analysis was used to assess the clinical impact of these markers.

Results:
uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 were overexpressed in 1,012 (32.4%), 1,271 (40.7%) and 1,311 (42%) patients, respectively. uPA overexpression was associated with all clinicopathologic characteristics of biologically aggressive PCa. On multivariable analysis, uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 overexpression were all three associated with BCR (HR: 1.75, p<0.01, HR: 1.22, p=0.01 and HR: 1.20, p=0.03, respectively). Moreover, the probability of BCR increased incrementally with increasing cumulative number of overexpressed markers. Decision curve analysis showed that addition of uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 resulted in a net benefit compared to a base model comparing standard clinicopathologic features across the entire threshold probability range. In subgroup analyses, overexpression of all three markers remained associated with BCR in patients with favorable pathologic characteristics.

Conclusion:
Overexpression of uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 in PCa tissue were each associated with worse BCR. Additionally, overexpression of all three markers is informative even in patients with favorable pathologic characteristics potentially helping clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy and/or intensified follow-up.

参考文献

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 68 (1):7-30. doi:10.3322/caac.21442

2. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. European urology 71 (4):618-629. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003

3. Gallina A, Chun FK, Suardi N, Eastham JA, Perrotte P, Graefen M, Hutterer G, Huland H, Klein EA, Reuther A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Shariat SF, Roehrborn CG, de la Taille A, Salomon L, Karakiewicz PI (2008) Comparison of stage migration patterns between Europe and the USA: an analysis of 11 350 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. BJU international 101 (12):1513-1518. doi:10.1111/j.1464- 410X.2008.07519.x

4. Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, De Santis M, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Wiegel T, Mottet N (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. European urology 71 (4):630-642. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.002

5. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC (1999) Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. Jama 281 (17):1591-1597

6. Lughezzani G, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, Kattan MW, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Vickers AJ (2010) Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature. European urology 58 (5):687-700. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.034

7. Shariat SF, Kattan MW, Vickers AJ, Karakiewicz PI, Scardino PT (2009) Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools. Future oncology (London, England) 5 (10):1555-1584. doi:10.2217/fon.09.121

8. Shariat SF, Semjonow A, Lilja H, Savage C, Vickers AJ, Bjartell A (2011) Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 50 Suppl 1:61-75. doi:10.3109/0284186x.2010.542174

9. Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Wheeler TM, Slawin KM (2004) Improved detection of clinically significant, curable prostate cancer with systematic 12-core biopsy. The Journal of urology 171 (3):1089-1092. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000112763.74119.d4

10. Mekkawy AH, Pourgholami MH, Morris DL (2014) Involvement of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in cancer: an overview. Medicinal research reviews 34 (5):918-956. doi:10.1002/med.21308

11. Halamkova J, Kiss I, Pavlovsky Z, Jarkovsky J, Tomasek J, Tucek S, Hanakova L, Moulis M, Cech Z, Zavrelova J, Penka M (2011) Clinical relevance of uPA, uPAR, PAI 1 and PAI 2 tissue expression and plasma PAI 1 level in colorectal carcinoma patients. Hepato-gastroenterology 58 (112):1918-1925. doi:10.5754/hge10232

12. Look MP, van Putten WL, Duffy MJ, Harbeck N, Christensen IJ, Thomssen C, Kates R, Spyratos F, Ferno M, Eppenberger-Castori S, Sweep CG, Ulm K, Peyrat JP, Martin PM, Magdelenat H, Brunner N, Duggan C, Lisboa BW, Bendahl PO, Quillien V, Daver A, Ricolleau G, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Manders P, Fiets WE, Blankenstein MA, Broet P, Romain S, Daxenbichler G, Windbichler G, Cufer T, Borstnar S, Kueng W, Beex LV, Klijn JG, O'Higgins N, Eppenberger U, Janicke F, Schmitt M, Foekens JA (2002) Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 94 (2):116-128

13. Nakanishi K, Kawai T, Torikata C, Aurues T, Ikeda T (1998) Urokinase-type plasminogen activator, its inhibitor, and its receptor in patients with upper urinary tract carcinoma. Cancer 82 (4):724-732

14. Janicke F, Prechtl A, Thomssen C, Harbeck N, Meisner C, Untch M, Sweep CG, Selbmann HK, Graeff H, Schmitt M (2001) Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial in high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93 (12):913-920

15. Shariat SF, Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Park S, Alam N, Wheeler TM, Slawin KM (2007) Association of the circulating levels of the urokinase system of plasminogen activation with the presence of prostate cancer and invasion, progression, and metastasis. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 25 (4):349-355. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.05.6853

16. Gupta A, Lotan Y, Ashfaq R, Roehrborn CG, Raj GV, Aragaki CC, Montorsi F, Shariat SF (2009) Predictive value of the differential expression of the urokinase plasminogen activation axis in radical prostatectomy patients. European urology 55 (5):1124-1133. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.054

17. Kumano M, Miyake H, Muramaki M, Furukawa J, Takenaka A, Fujisawa M (2009) Expression of urokinase- type plasminogen activator system in prostate cancer: correlation with clinicopathological outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urologic oncology 27 (2):180-186. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.01.012

18. Bensalah K, Montorsi F, Shariat SF (2007) Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling. European urology 52 (6):1601-1609. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.036

19. Shariat SF, Khoddami SM, Saboorian H, Koeneman KS, Sagalowsky AI, Cadeddu JA, McConnell JD, Holmes MN, Roehrborn CG (2004) Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. The Journal of urology 171 (3):1122-1127. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000113249.82533.28

20. Mahmood N, Mihalcioiu C, Rabbani SA (2018) Multifaceted Role of the Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator (uPA) and Its Receptor (uPAR): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications. Frontiers in oncology 8:24. doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00024

21. Pappot H, Pedersen AN, Brunner N, Christensen IJ (2006) The complex between urokinase (uPA) and its type-1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: relation to prognosis. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 51 (2):193-200. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.10.002

22. Shin SJ, Kim KO, Kim MK, Lee KH, Hyun MS, Kim KJ, Choi JH, Song HS (2005) Expression of E-cadherin and uPA and their association with the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Japanese journal of clinical oncology 35 (6):342-348. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyi094

23. Taubert H, Wurl P, Greither T, Kappler M, Bache M, Lautenschlager C, Fussel S, Meye A, Eckert AW, Holzhausen HJ, Magdolen V, Kotzsch M (2010) Co-detection of members of the urokinase plasminogen activator system in tumour tissue and serum correlates with a poor prognosis for soft-tissue sarcoma patients. British journal of cancer 102 (4):731-737. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605520

24. Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (1999) Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 17 (5):1499-1507. doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1499

25. Walz J, Chun FK, Klein EA, Reuther A, Saad F, Graefen M, Huland H, Karakiewicz PI (2009) Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The Journal of urology 181 (2):601-607; discussion 607-608. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.033

26. Parker C, Sydes MR, Catton C, Kynaston H, Logue J, Murphy C, Morgan RC, Mellon K, Morash C, Parulekar W, Parmar MK, Payne H, Savage C, Stansfeld J, Clarke NW (2007) Radiotherapy and androgen deprivation in combination after local surgery (RADICALS): a new Medical Research Council/National Cancer Institute of Canada phase III trial of adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy. BJU international 99 (6):1376-1379. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06844.x

27. Pearse M, Fraser-Browne C, Davis ID, Duchesne GM, Fisher R, Frydenberg M, Haworth A, Jose C, Joseph DJ, Lim TS, Matthews J, Millar J, Sidhom M, Spry NA, Tang CI, Turner S, Williams SG, Wiltshire K, Woo HH, Kneebone A (2014) A Phase III trial to investigate the timing of radiotherapy for prostate cancer with high-risk features: background and rationale of the Radiotherapy -- Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) trial. BJU international 113 Suppl 2:7-12. doi:10.1111/bju.12623

28. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Cote K, Loffredo M, Schultz D, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Wein A, Richie JP (2002) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer 95 (2):281-286. doi:10.1002/cncr.10657

29. Verze P, Scuzzarella S, Martina GR, Giummelli P, Cantoni F, Mirone V (2013) Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team's experience on 1,600 consecutive cases. World journal of urology 31 (3):529-534. doi:10.1007/s00345-013-1052-0

参考文献をもっと見る