リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Strength of Flocs Formed by the Complexation of Proteins and Humic Acid」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Strength of Flocs Formed by the Complexation of Proteins and Humic Acid

WAN KHAIRUNNISA BINTI, WAN ABDUL KHODIR 筑波大学

2021.07.27

概要

1.1 Colloidal particles in the environment
Colloidal substances are roughly from nanometer to micrometer in size and exist in dynamic systems (Lead and Wilkinson, 2007). In soil and water environments, most of the colloidal substances are clays and organic materials (Bünemann et al. 2018). These natural colloidal materials usually bear electrical charges on their surfaces. The amount of positive and/or negative charges depends on the environmental conditions such as pH of the medium, ionic strength, and concentration of the substances. The soil colloidal substances (e.g., humic substances, protein, and polysaccharides) have a property of binding to the different colloidal substances such as synthetic particles through several physical and chemical processes. These processes are referred to adsorption, coagulation, aggregation, and dispersion which could amplify the chemical activity, transportation action, and hydraulic properties of the substances (Giachin et al. 2017).

Electrostatic interaction, van der Waals forces, hydration phenomenon, and hydrodynamic interaction are the interactions involved in maintaining the stability of colloid. In meanwhile, an attractive force between colloidal substances can form aggregation. Considering the van der Waals force and diffuse double - layer interaction in determining the stability of colloids is referred to as classical DLVO (Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, Overbeek) theory (Verwey 1947; Trefalt and Borkovec 2014a).

One of the characteristics of colloids in the natural environmental condition is charging behavior of the substances. This is an important aspect of controlling the aggregation and dispersion of colloidal suspensions. For example is the adsorption induced by charged ions, polyelectrolytes, clay and, surfactant (Kobayashi 2008; Beltrán-Heredia and Sánchez-Martín 2009). Reaching the point of zero charges, known as an isoelectric point (IEP), points out the start of the aggregation process. Charge reversal also known as overcharging usually occurs because of saturated adsorption of oppositely charged substances. There are additional attractive interactions, such as hydrophobic or van der Waals force, that occurs between the substances. Therefore, the interaction between colloidal substrate in the soil and water environment must be paid attention to consider especially when these interactions could affect the mobility of substances.

1.2 Transportation of colloidal matter in soil and water environment
Colloidal substances with pollutants in the environment have the potential to move with the water flow. In the worst-case scenario, the unsupervised situation can enhance the transport of pollutants, which leads to further contamination. The movement of such colloidal substances through soil pore entirely depends on the size of the substances (Hajra et al. 2002; Li et al. 2018; Oladoja and Pan 2015; Kobayashi 2005). For colloids to be mobile in soil pore, they must be stable, and the pore is larger than the colloid substances. Meanwhile, larger substances easily settle and deposit to the soil matrix. Other than the size of substances, the size of soil pore is also the factor in the mobilization of colloid (Enfield and Bengtssona 1988). The interaction between the substances also plays an important role in the aggregation of substances. The collision between primary substances and their interaction depends on the flow field (Kobayashi 2005; Hakim and Kobayashi 2019). The high shear flow would cause the breakage of the aggregated complex and permits the mobilization of substances in the soil environment. In a meanwhile, if the shear flow is low, the aggregated substances would not break and are retained in the pore.

1.3 Floc breakage and floc strength
The strength of flocs depends on the inter-substance binding forces in the aggregates to hold the flocs together (Parker 1972; Bache et al. 1997). The floc strength is also referring to the number of individual bonds and their strength within the flocs. The floc strength study was conducted through a converging flow field. The floc strength method can provide an insight into the strength of the binding forces between the flocs and controlling its parameter in the environment

1.4 Humic substances
Humic substances (HSs) are the significant fraction of natural organic matter (NOM) in soil and water environments comprised of degraded matters of bacterial matter, plant, and animal products. The HSs play an essential aspect in the nutrient sequence system and the transportation of pollutant or hydrophobic organic contaminants, metal ion, and radionuclides in the soil and water environment (Giachin et al. 2014, 2017).

The HSs are easily bound with the mineral surfaces (Ma et al. 2018), ions (Brigante et al. 2009; Hakim et al. 2019), organic molecules (Tan et al. 2008; Khodir et al. 2020; Santos et al. 2011), oxides (Pota et al. 2020), and polymer (Xu et al. 2011). HSs such as humic acid (HA) and fulvic acid (FA) are high molecular mass polymer. These HSs are considered a supramolecular organization composed of functional groups (carboxylic acid, phenolic acid), aliphatic carbon, polymethylenes (-CH2-), O, N, S, and P atoms, and others. The HSs composition has led to various interactions such as electrostatic interaction, hydrophobic interaction, van der Waals interaction, and hydrogen bonding (Brigante et al. 2009; Avena and Wilkinson, 2002). The composition of carboxyl, phenolic, and carbon content of LHA obtained from International Humic Substances Society (IHSS) is displayed in Table 1.1 below.

1.5 Lysozyme protein
To explore the relationship between HSs and protein, a detailed and well-organized framework is needed. It is essential to use a characterized and readily available such as Lysozyme (LSZ) protein. LSZ is a globular protein with an ellipsoidal shape with a molecular weight of 14.3 kDa and an isoelectric point near pH 11. Moreover, LSZ protein is positively charged substances with the size (radius) around 1.64 nm (Dabkowska et al. 2018). The LSZ is well known for the high structural stability that makes it useful as a model protein for many practical uses and widely studied. Unfortunately, the knowledge of the interaction between the natural particles is lacking. LSZ protein is a weak polyelectrolyte, so do the HSs.

1.6 Moringa oleifera seed protein
Moringa oleifera (MO) is a plant mainly found around the tropical country and currently commercializes in several industries such as food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic. Due to its potential properties, MO seed (Figure 1.4) gains attention from researchers for its coagulating abilities. Unfortunately, a problem of using natural coagulant is the method of extraction and purification. There are several extraction and purification methods used previously. Due to protein solubility, the MO seed powder can use the water or salt solution to extract the protein. Some of the purification methods used are dialysis, free-drying, ion- exchange, delipidation, precipitation, and centrifugation (Yamaguchi et al. 2020). Details on the extraction and purification method and the molecular weight obtained are displayed in Table 1.2.

Therefore, in this study, we focused on the strength of flocs formed by protein and HS. The floc strength depends on the intermolecular binding within and between the aggregates. The interaction between substances influences the inter-and intra- molecular binding of floc. The physicochemical factors such as ionic strength, pH, and mass ratio can influence the interaction between substrates.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Abd Wahid, Muhamad Azhar, Megat Johari Megat Mohd Noor, Masafumi Goto, Norio Sugiura, Nor’azizi Othman, Zuriati Zakaria, Thamer Ahmad Mohammed, Ahmad Jusoh, and Hirofumi Hara. 2017. “Recombinant Protein Expression of Moringa Oleifera Lectin in Methylotrophic Yeast as Active Coagulant for Sustainable High Turbid Water Treatment.” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 81 (8): 1642–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2017.1329617.

Agrawal, Himesh, Chandan Shee, and Ashwani K. Sharma. 2007. “Isolation of a 66 KDa Protein with Coagulation Activity from Seeds of Moringa Oleifera.” Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 3 (5): 418–21.

Avena, Marcelo J., and Kevin J. Wilkinson. 2002. “Disaggregation Kinetics of a Peat Humic Acid: Mechanism and PH Effects.” Environmental Science and Technology 36 (23): 5100–5105. https://doi.org/10.1021/es025582u.

Bache, D. H., C. Johnson, J. F. McGilligan, and E. Rasool. 1997. “A Conceptual View of Floc Structure in the Sweep Floc Domain.” Water Science and Technology 36 (4): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00418-6.

Baptista, Aline Takaoka Alves, Mariana Oliveira Silva, Raquel Guttierres Gomes, Rosângela Bergamasco, Marcelo Fernandes Vieira, and Angélica Marquetotti Salcedo Vieira. 2017. “Protein Fractionation of Seeds of Moringa Oleifera Lam and Its Application in Superficial Water Treatment.” Separation and Purification Technology 180: 114–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.040.

Beltrán-Heredia, J, and J Sánchez-Martín. 2009. “Removal of Sodium Lauryl Sulphate by Coagulation/Flocculation with Moringa Oleifera Seed Extract.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 164 (2–3): 713–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.053.

Blaser, Stefan. 2000. “Break-up of Flocs in Contraction and Swirling Flows.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 166 (1– 3): 215–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00450-1.

Brigante, Maximiliano, Graciela Zanini, and Marcelo Avena. 2009. “Effect of PH, Anions and Cations on the Dissolution Kinetics of Humic Acid Particles.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 347 (1– 3): 180–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.04.003.

Bünemann, Else K., Giulia Bongiorno, Zhanguo Bai, Rachel E. Creamer, Gerlinde De Deyn, Ron de Goede, Luuk Fleskens, et al. 2018. “Soil Quality – A Critical Review.” Soil Biology and Biochemistry 120 (February): 105–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030.

Denny S. Parker, Proj. Engr.; Brown and Caldwell. 1972. “Floc Breakup in Turbulent Flocculation Processes.” Ournal of the Sanitary Engineering Division Vol. 98 (Issue 1): Pg. 79-99. https://cedb.asce.org/CEDBsearch/record.jsp?dockey=0127407.

Gassenschmidt, U, K D Jany, B Tauscher, and H Niebergall. 1995. “Isolation and Characterization of a Flocculating Protein from Moringa Oleifera Lam.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1243 (3): 477–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(94)00176-X.

Ghebremichael, Kebreab A., K. R. Gunaratna, Hongbin Henriksson, Harry Brumer, and Gunnel Dalhammar. 2005. “A Simple Purification and Activity Assay of the Coagulant Protein from Moringa Oleifera Seed.” Water Research 39 (11): 2338–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.012.

Giachin, Gabriele, Joanna Narkiewicz, Denis Scaini, Ai Tran Ngoc, Alja Margon, Paolo Sequi, Liviana Leita, and Giuseppe Legname. 2014. “Prion Protein Interaction with Soil Humic Substances: Environmental Implications.” PLoS ONE 9 (6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100016.

Giachin, Gabriele, Ridvan Nepravishta, Walter Mandaliti, Sonia Melino, Alja Margon, Denis Scaini, Pierluigi Mazzei, et al. 2017. “The Mechanisms of Humic Substances Self-Assembly with Biological Molecules: The Case Study of the Prion Protein.” PLoS ONE 12 (11): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188308.

Hakim, Azizul, and Motoyoshi Kobayashi. 2018. “Aggregation and Charge Reversal of Humic Substances in the Presence of Hydrophobic Monovalent Counter-Ions: Effect of Hydrophobicity of Humic Substances.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 540 (November 2017): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.12.065.

———. 2019. “Charging, Aggregation, and Aggregate Strength of Humic Substances in the Presence of Cationic Surfactants: Effects of Humic Substances Hydrophobicity and Surfactant Tail Length.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 577 (May): 175–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.05.071.

Hakim, Azizul, Tomoharu Suzuki, and Motoyoshi Kobayashi. 2019. “Strength of Humic Acid Aggregates: Effects of Divalent Cations and Solution PH.” Research-article. ACS Omega 4 (5): 8559–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00124.

Hogg, Richard. 2012. “Bridging Flocculation by Polymers.” KONA Powder and Particle Journal 30 (30): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.14356/kona.2013005.

Jarvis, P., B. Jefferson, J. Gregory, and S. A. Parsons. 2005. “A Review of Floc Strength and Breakage.” Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.022.

Katchalsky, Aharon, and Pnina Spitnik. 1947. “Potentiometric Titrations of Polymethacrylic Acid.” Journal of Polymer Science 2 (5): 487–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1947.120020504.

Katre, Uma V., C. G. Suresh, M. Islam Khan, and Sushama M. Gaikwad. 2008. “Structure-Activity Relationship of a Hemagglutinin from Moringa Oleifera Seeds.” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 42 (2): 203–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.10.024.

Khodir, Wan Khairunnisa Wan Abdul, Azizul Hakim, and Motoyoshi Kobayashi. 2020. “Strength of Flocs Formed by the Complexation of Lysozyme with Leonardite Humic Acid.” Polymers 12 (8): 14–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081770.

Kobayashi, Motoyoshi. 2004. “Breakup and Strength of Polystyrene Latex Flocs Subjected to a Converging Flow.” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 235 (1–3): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.01.008.

———. 2005. “Strength of Natural Soil Flocs.” Water Research 39 (14): 3273– 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.037.

———. 2008. “Electrophoretic Mobility of Latex Spheres in the Presence of Divalent Ions: Experiments and Modeling.” Colloid and Polymer Science 286 (8–9): 935–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-008-1851-9.

Kobayashi, Motoyoshi, Yasuhisa Adachi, and Setsuo Ooi. 1999. “Breakup of Fractal Flocs in a Turbulent Flow.” Langmuir 15 (13): 4351–56. https://doi.org/10.1021/la980763o.

Kuehner, Daniel E., Jan Engmann, Florian Fergg, Meredith Wernick, Harvey W. Blanch, and John M. Prausnitz. 1999. “Lysozyme Net Charge and Ion Binding in Concentrated Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 103 (8): 1368–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp983852i.

Li, Yan, Luuk K. Koopal, Juan Xiong, Mingxia Wang, Chenfeng Yang, and Wenfeng Tan. 2018. “Influence of Humic Acid on Transport, Deposition and Activity of Lysozyme in Quartz Sand.” Environmental Pollution 242: 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.096.

Li, Yan, Wenfeng Tan, Luuk K. Koopal, Mingxia Wang, Fan Liu, and Willem Norde. 2013. “Influence of Soil Humic and Fulvic Acid on the Activity and Stability of Lysozyme and Urease.” Environmental Science and Technology 47 (10): 5050–56. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3053027.

Ma, Jie, Huaming Guo, Liping Weng, Yongtao Li, Mei Lei, and Yali Chen. 2018. “Chemosphere Distinct Effect of Humic Acid on Ferrihydrite Colloid- Facilitated Transport of Arsenic in Saturated Media at Different PH.” Chemosphere 212: 794–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.131.

Matilainen, Anu, Mikko Veps??l??inen, and Mika Sillanp???? 2010. “Natural Organic Matter Removal by Coagulation during Drinking Water Treatment: A Review.” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 159 (2): 189–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007.

Ndabigengesere, Anselme, K. Subba Narasiah, and Brian G. Talbot. 1995. “Active Agents and Mechanism of Coagulation of Turbid Waters Using Moringa Oleifera.” Water Research 29 (2): 703–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00161-Y.

Nurul, mas’ud waqiah. 2013. “済無No Title No Title.” Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Perawatan Ortodontik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pihak Non Profesional 53 (9): 1689–99.

Okuda, T., A. U. Baes, W. Nishijima, and M. Okada. 2001. “Isolation and Characterization of Coagulant Extracted from Moringa Oleifera Seed by Salt Solution.” Water Research 35 (2): 405–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00290-6.

Ouyang, Y., D. Shinde, R. S. Mansell, and W. Harris. 1996. “Colloid-Enhanced Transport of Chemicals in Subsurface Environments: A Review.” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 26 (2): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389609388490.

Pota, Giulio, Virginia Venezia, Giuseppe Vitiello, Paola Di Donato, Valentina Mollo, Aniello Costantini, Joshua Avossa, et al. 2020. “Tuning Functional Behavior of Humic Acids through Interactions with Stöber Silica Nanoparticles.” Polymers 12 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040982.

Rigou, Peggy, Human Rezaei, Jeanne Grosclaude, Siobhán Staunton, and Hervé Quiquampoix. 2006. “Fate of Prions in Soil: Adsorption and Extraction by Electroelution of Recombinant Ovine Prion Protein from Montmorillonite and Natural Soils.” Environmental Science and Technology 40 (5): 1497– 1503. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0516965.

Ritchie, Jason D., and E. Michael Perdue. 2003. “Proton-Binding Study of Standard and Reference Fulvic Acids, Humic Acids, and Natural Organic Matter.” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67 (1): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01044-X.

S. Moriguchi. n.d. “Mathematical Formulas (Sugaku Koshikishu).”

Santos, a F S, a C C Argolo, L C B B Coelho, and P M G Paiva. 2005. “Detection of Water Soluble Lectin and Antioxidant Component from Moringa Oleifera Seeds.” Water Research 39 (6): 975–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.016.

Santos, A F S, M G Carneiro-da-Cunha, J A Teixeira, P M G Paiva, L C B B Coelho, and R Nogueira. 2011. “Interaction of Moringa Oleifera Seed Lectin with Humic Acid.” Chemical Papers 65 (4): 406–11. https://doi.org/DOI 10.2478/s11696-011-0025-2.

Santos, Andréa F.S., Luciana a. Luz, Adriana C.C. Argolo, José a. Teixeira, Patrıícia M.G. Paiva, and Luana C.B.B. Coelho. 2009. “Isolation of a Seed Coagulant Moringa Oleifera Lectin.” Process Biochemistry 44 (4): 504–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.01.002.

Tan, W. F., L. K. Koopal, L. P. Weng, W. H. van Riemsdijk, and W. Norde. 2008. “Humic Acid Protein Complexation.” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72 (8): 2090–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.02.009.

Trefalt, Gregor, and Michal Borkovec. 2014. “Overview of DLVO Theory.” Laboratory of Colloid and Surface Chemistry, University of Geneva, 1–10. www.colloid.ch/dlvo.

Ueda Yamaguchi, Natália, Luís Fernando Cusioli, Heloise Beatriz Quesada, Maria Eliana Camargo Ferreira, Márcia Regina Fagundes-Klen, Angélica Marquetotti Salcedo Vieira, Raquel Guttierres Gomes, Marcelo Fernandes Vieira, and Rosângela Bergamasco. 2020. “A Review of Moringa Oleifera Seeds in Water Treatment: Trends and Future Challenges.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection 147: 405–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.044.

Xu, Weiying, Baoyu Gao, Qinyan Yue, and Xiaowen Bo. 2011. “Influence of PH on Flocs Formation , Breakage and Fractal Properties — The Role of Al 13 Polymer.” Journal of Water Sustainability 1 (1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.11912/jws.1.1.45-57.

Yamaguchi, Atsushi, and Motoyoshi Kobayashi. 2016. “Quantitative Evaluation of Shift of Slipping Plane and Counterion Binding to Lysozyme by Electrophoresis Method.” Colloid and Polymer Science 294 (6): 1019–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-016-3852-4.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る