1. Mur, L.A.; Kenton, P.; Lloyd, A.J.; Ougham, H.; Prats, E. The hypersensitive response; the centenary is upon us but how much do we know? J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 501–520. [CrossRef]
2. Künstler, A.; Bacsó, R.; Gullner, G.; Hafez, Y.M.; Király, L. Staying alive—Is cell death dispensable for plant disease resistance during the hypersensitive response? Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 93, 75–84. [CrossRef]
3. Hofius, D.; Schultz-Larsen, T.; Joensen, J.; Tsitsigiannis, D.I.; Petersen, N.H.; Mattsson, O.; Jørgensen, L.B.; Jones, J.D.; Mundy, J.; Petersen, M. Autophagic components contribute to hypersensitive cell death in Arabidopsis. Cell 2009, 137, 773–783. [CrossRef]
4. Hofius, D.; Tsitsigiannis, D.I.; Jones, J.D.; Mundy, J. Inducible cell death in plant immunity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2007, 17, 166–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Richael, C.; Gilchrist, D. The hypersensitive response: A case of hold or fold? Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1999, 55, 5–12.[CrossRef]
6. Hull, R. Plant Virology, 5th ed.; Academic Press: Salt Lake, UT, USA, 2013.
7. Goodman, R.N.; Novacky, A.J. The Hypersensitive Reaction in Plants to Pathogens: A Resistance Phenomenon; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1994.
8. Pontier, D.; Balagué, C.; Roby, D. The hypersensitive response. A programmed cell death associated with plant resistance. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Ser. III Sci. 1998, 321, 721–734. [CrossRef]
9. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Lam, E.; Kato, N.; Lawton, M. Programmed cell death, mitochondria and the plant hypersensitive response. Nature 2001, 411, 848. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Fomicheva, A.S.; Tuzhikov, A.I.; Beloshistov, R.E.; Trusova, S.V.; Galiullina, R.A.; Mochalova, L.V.; Chichkova, N.V.; Vartapetian, A.B. Programmed cell death in plants. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2012, 77, 1452–1464. [CrossRef]
12. Morel, J.-B.; Dangl, J.L. The hypersensitive response and the induction of cell death in plants. Cell Death Differ. 1997, 4, 671. [CrossRef]
13. Greenberg, J.T.; Yao, N. The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant–pathogen interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 201–211. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Heath, M.C. Hypersensitive response-related death. In Programmed Cell Death in Higher Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 77–90.
15. Canto, T.; Palukaitis, P. The hypersensitive response to cucumber mosaic virus in Chenopodium amaranticolor requires virus movement outside the initially infected cell. Virology 1999, 265, 74–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Wright, K.M.; Duncan, G.H.; Pradel, K.S.; Carr, F.; Wood, S.; Oparka, K.J.; Santa Cruz, S. Analysis of the N gene hypersensitive response induced by a fluorescently tagged tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1375–1386. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Murphy, A.M.; Carr, J.P. Salicylic acid has cell-specific effects on tobacco mosaic virus replication and cell-to-cell movement. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 552–563. [CrossRef]
18. Lukan, T.; Baebler, Š.; Pompe-Novak, M.; Gucˇek, K.; Zagoršcˇak, M.; Coll, A.; Gruden, K. Cell death is not sufficient for the restriction of potato virus Y spread in hypersensitive response-conferred resistance in potato. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 168. [CrossRef]
19. Inaba, J.; Kim, B.M.; Shimura, H.; Masuta, C. Virus-induced necrosis is a consequence of direct protein-protein interaction between a viral RNA-silencing suppressor and a host catalase. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 2026–2036. [CrossRef]
20. Palukaitis, P.; García-Arenal, F. Cucumber Mosaic Virus; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2018.
21. Rozanov, M.N.; Koonin, E.V.; Gorbalenya, A.E. Conservation of the putative methyltransferase domain: A hallmark of the ‘Sindbis-like’ supergroup of positive-strand RNA viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1992, 73, 2129–2134. [CrossRef]
22. Habili, N.; Symons, R.H. Evolutionary relationship between luteoviruses and other RNA plant viruses based on sequence motifs in their putative RNA polymerases and nucleic acid helicases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 9543–9555. [CrossRef]
23. O’Reilly, E.K.; Wang, Z.; French, R.; Kao, C.C. Interactions between the structural domains of the RNA replication proteins of plant-infecting RNA viruses. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 7160–7169. [CrossRef]
24. Hayes, R.J.; Buck, K.W. Complete replication of a eukaryotic virus RNA in vitro by a purified RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Cell 1990, 63, 363–368. [CrossRef]
25. Guo, H.S.; Ding, S.W. A viral protein inhibits the long range signaling activity of the gene silencing signal. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 398–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Mlotshwa, S.; Voinnet, O.; Mette, M.F.; Matzke, M.; Vaucheret, H.; Ding, S.W.; Pruss, G.; Vance, V.B. RNA silencing and the mobile silencing signal. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S289–S301. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Zhang, X.; Yuan, Y.-R.; Pei, Y.; Lin, S.-S.; Tuschl, T.; Patel, D.J.; Chua, N.-H. Cucumber mosaic virus-encoded 2b suppressor inhibits Arabidopsis Argonaute1 cleavage activity to counter plant defense. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 3255–3268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. González, I.; Martínez, L.; Rakitina, D.V.; Lewsey, M.G.; Atencio, F.A.; Llave, C.; Kalinina, N.O.; Carr, J.P.; Palukaitis, P.; Canto, T. Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein subcellular targets and interactions: Their significance to RNA silencing suppressor activity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 294–303. [CrossRef]
29. Schwinghamer, M.W.; Symons, R.H. Fractionation of cucumber mosaic virus RNA and its translation in a wheat embryo cell-free system. Virology 1975, 63, 252–262. [CrossRef]
30. Ding, B.; Li, Q.; Nguyen, L.; Palukaitis, P.; Lucas, W.J. Cucumber mosaic virus 3a protein potentiates cell-to-cell trafficking of CMV RNA in tobacco plants. Virology 1995, 207, 345–353. [CrossRef]
31. Ding, S.W.; Anderson, B.J.; Haase, H.R.; Symons, R.H. New overlapping gene encoded by the cucumber mosaic virus genome. Virology 1994, 198, 593–601. [CrossRef]
32. Ando, S.; Miyashita, S.; Takahashi, H. Plant defense systems against cucumber mosaic virus: Lessons learned from CMV–Arabidopsis interactions. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2019, 85, 174–181. [CrossRef]
33. Sekine, K.; Kawakami, S.; Hase, S.; Kubota, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Shah, J.; Kang, H.G.; Klessig, D.F.; Takahashi, H. High level expression of a virus resistance gene, RCY1, confers extreme resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 1398–1407. [CrossRef]
34. Takahashi, H.; Goto, N.; Ehara, Y. Hypersensitive response in cucumber mosaic virus-inoculated Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1994, 6, 369–377. [CrossRef]
35. Tomaru, K.; Hidaka, Z. Strains of cucumber mosaic virus isolated from tobacco plants. II. A mild strain. Bull. Hatano Tob. Exp. Stn. 1960, 46, 143–149. [CrossRef]
36. Suzuki, M.; Kuwata, S.; Kataoka, J.; Masuta, C.; Nitta, N.; Takanami, Y. Functional analysis of deletion mutants of cucumber mosaic virus RNA3 using an in vitro transcription system. Virology 1991, 183, 106–113. [CrossRef]
37. Sambrook, J.; Russel, D. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
38. Takahashi, H.; Ehara, Y. Severe chlorotic spot symptoms in cucumber mosaic virus strain Y-infected tobaccos are induced by a combination of the virus coat protein gene and two host recessive genes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1993, 6, 182–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [CrossRef]
40. Koenig, R. Indirect ELISA methods for the broad specificity detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1981, 55, 53–62. [CrossRef]
41. Bowling, S.A.; Guo, A.; Cao, H.; Gordon, A.S.; Klessig, D.F.; Dong, X. A mutation in Arabidopsis that leads to constitutive expression of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1845–1857.
42. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [CrossRef]
43. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [CrossRef]
44. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [CrossRef]
45. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 289–300. [CrossRef]
46. Chen, H.; Boutros, P.C. VennDiagram: A package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Zhou, Y.; Zhou, B.; Pache, L.; Chang, M.; Khodabakhshi, A.H.; Tanaseichuk, O.; Benner, C.; Chanda, S.K. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1523. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Yu, G.; Wang, L.-G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2012, 16, 284–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Diveki, Z.; Salanki, K.; Balazs, E. The necrotic pathotype of the cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ns strain is solely determined by amino acid 461 of the 1a protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 837–845. [CrossRef]
50. Salánki, K.; Gellért, Á.; Náray-Szabó, G.; Balázs, E. Modeling-based characterization of the elicitor function of amino acid 461 of cucumber mosaic virus 1a protein in the hypersensitive response. Virology 2007, 358, 109–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Kang, W.H.; Seo, J.K.; Chung, B.N.; Kim, K.H.; Kang, B.C. Helicase domain encoded by cucumber mosaic virus RNA1 determines systemic infection of Cmr1 in pepper. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43136. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Seo, J.K.; Kwon, S.J.; Choi, H.S.; Kim, K.H. Evidence for alternate states of cucumber mosaic virus replicase assembly in positive-and negative-strand RNA synthesis. Virology 2009, 383, 248–260. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Fujisaki, K.; Hagihara, F.; Azukawa, Y.; Kaido, M.; Okuno, T.; Mise, K. Identification and characterization of the SSB1 locus involved in symptom development by spring beauty latent virus infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 967–975. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Chen, H.; Adam Arsovski, A.; Yu, K.; Wang, A. Deep sequencing leads to the identification of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A as a key element in Rsv1-mediated lethal systemic hypersensitive response to soybean mosaic virus infection in soybean. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 391–404. [CrossRef]
55. Kim, B.M.; Suehiro, N.; Natsuaki, T.; Inukai, T.; Masuta, C. The P3 protein of turnip mosaic virus can alone induce hypersensitive response-like cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana carrying TuNI. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 144–152. [CrossRef]
56. Hajimorad, M.; Eggenberger, A.; Hill, J. Loss and gain of elicitor function of soybean mosaic virus G7 provoking Rsv1-mediated lethal systemic hypersensitive response maps to P3. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 1215–1222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Komatsu, K.; Hashimoto, M.; Ozeki, J.; Yamaji, Y.; Maejima, K.; Senshu, H.; Himeno, M.; Okano, Y.; Kagiwada, S.; Namba, S. Viral-induced systemic necrosis in plants involves both programmed cell death and the inhibition of viral multiplication, which are regulated by independent pathways. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 283–293. [CrossRef]
58. Hashimoto, M.; Komatsu, K.; Iwai, R.; Keima, T.; Maejima, K.; Shiraishi, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Yoshida, T.; Kitazawa, Y.; Okano, Y. Cell death triggered by a putative amphipathic helix of radish mosaic virus helicase protein is tightly correlated with host membrane modification. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 675–688. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
59. Chen, P.; Buss, G.; Roane, C.; Tolin, S. Inheritance in soybean of resistant and necrotic reactions to soybean mosaic virus strains. Crop Sci. 1994, 34, 414–422. [CrossRef]
論文の公開元へ
