211
1. Snow AN, Laudadio J. Human papillomavirus detection in head and neck
212
213
214
squamous cell carcinomas. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010; 17:394-403.
2. Bossart GD, Ghim S, Rehtanz M, et al. Orogenital neoplasia in Atlantic bottlenose
dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Aquat Mamm. 2005; 31:473-480.
215
3. March DT, Blyde DJ, Bossart GD, et al. Piroxicam and doxycycline treatment for
216
an oral squamous cell carcinoma in an inshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops
217
aduncus). Aust Vet J. 2016; 94:203-207.
218
4. Navone R, Burlo P, Pich A, et al. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the
219
diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma. Cytopathology. 2007;
220
18:356-360.
221
5. da Silva AD, Daroit NB, Cardoso FB, et al. Epithelial oral mucosal cells: Do they
222
behave differently when exposed to oral carcinogens? Cytopathology. 2018;
223
29:49-57.
224
225
226
6. Wright RG, Halford JA. Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology.
Cytopathology. 2001; 12:306-313.
7. Murphy PG, Henderson DT, Adams MD, et al. Isolation of RNA from cell lines and
227
cervical cytology specimens stored in BD SurePath preservative fluid and
228
downstream detection of housekeeping gene and HPV E6 expression using real
12
229
230
time RT-PCR. J Virol Methods. 2009; 156:138-144.
8. Molony P, Werner R, Martin C, et al. The role of tumour morphology in assigning
231
HPV status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2020;
232
105:104670.
233
9. Jörundsson E, Lumsden JH, Jacobs RM. Rapid staining techniques in
234
cytopathology: a review and comparison of modified protocols for hematoxylin
235
and eosin, Papanicolaou and Romanowsky stains. Vet Clin Pathol. 1999;
236
28:100-108.
237
10. Sawa M, Yabuki A, Miyoshi N, Arai K, Yamato O. Rapid-air-dry Papanicolaou
238
stain in canine and feline tumor cytology: a quantitative comparison with the
239
Giemsa stain. J Vet Med Sci. 2012; 74:1133-1138.
240
11. Siebers AG, van der Linden H, Vedder JEM, Bekkers RLM, Melchers WLG,
241
Bulten J. Presence of koilocytosis in low-grade smears of high-risk HPV-positive
242
women is a negative predictor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or
243
more. Cytopathology. 2018; 29:275-280.
244
12. Chun JW, Lee K, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with
245
conventional smear cytology for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a
246
prospective randomized noninferiority study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;
247
91:837-846.
13
248
13. Rivera C. Essentials of oral cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8:11884-11894.
249
14. Shigeishi H, Sugiyama M. Risk Factors for Oral Human Papillomavirus Infection
250
in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med Res.
251
2016; 8:721-729.
252
15. Rehtanz M, Ghim SJ, Rector A, et al. Isolation and characterization of the first
253
American bottlenose dolphin papillomavirus: Tursiops truncatus papillomavirus
254
type 2. J Gen Virol. 2006; 87:3559-3565.
255
16. Van Bressem MF, Cassonnet P, Rector A, et al. Genital warts in Burmeister's
256
porpoises: characterization of Phocoena spinipinnis papillomavirus type 1
257
(PsPV-1) and evidence for a second, distantly related PsPV. J Gen Virol. 2007;
258
88:1928-1933.
259
260
17. Robles-Sikisaka R, Rivera R, Nollens HH, et al. Evidence of recombination and
positive selection in cetacean papillomaviruses. Virology. 2012; 427:189-197.
261
18. Cortés-Hinojosa G, Subramaniam K, Wellehan JFX Jr, et al. Genomic
262
sequencing of a virus representing a novel type within the species
263
Dyopipapillomavirus 1 in an Indian River Lagoon bottlenose dolphin. Arch Virol.
264
2019; 164:767-774.
265
266
19. Cheah PL, Koh CC, Nazarina AR, Teoh KH, Looi LM. Correlation of p16INK4a
immunoexpression and human papillomavirus (HPV) detected by in-situ
14
267
hybridization in cervical squamous neoplasia. Malays J Pathol. 2016; 38:33-38.
268
20. Cortés-Hinojosa G, Subramaniam K, Wellehan JFX Jr, et al. Genomic
269
sequencing of a virus representing a novel type within the species
270
Dyopipapillomavirus 1 in an Indian River Lagoon bottlenose dolphin. Arch Virol.
271
2019; 164:767-774.
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
15
286
Figure legends
287
Figure 1. SurePath manual method kit. A positively charged slide (arrow) and a
288
settling chamber (arrowhead) set in a slide rack (circle).
289
Figure 2. The dysplastic cells with koilocytosis (arrow) appear as a sheet-like
290
structure. Papanicolaou staining.
291
Figure 3. The non-keratinized SCC cells appear as overlapping structures.
292
Papanicolaou staining.
293
Figure 4. The keratinized SCC cells displayed a polygonal morphology. Papanicolaou
294
staining.
295
Figure 5. Occasionally, the keratinized SCC cells showed an onion-like cluster.
296
Papanicolaou staining.
297
Figure 6. The SCC cells showed intense nuclear reactivity to p53 protein.
298
Immunocytochemistry.
16
Table 1. Procedure for creating the SurePath slides
Step Procedure
Fix the sample with CytoRichTM Red Preservative Fluid* (30 min)
Centrifuge the specimens at 3,000 rpm (2 min) and remove the
supernatant
Add distilled water (1.5 mL) to the sediment and resuspend it
Transfer the specimen (0.5 mL) to a settling chamber* (3 times) and
mount it on the positively charged slide* (15 min)
Invert the slide rack* and discard the supernatant
Remove the settling chamber and immediately soak in 95% ethanol (30
min)
*: Becton Dickinson
...