リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium clinical isolates from Japan and development of diagnostic tools [an abstract of entire text]」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium clinical isolates from Japan and development of diagnostic tools [an abstract of entire text]

Akapelwa, Mwangala Lonah 北海道大学

2022.03.24

概要

Mycobacterium avium (M. avium), an environmental bacterium, is the leading cause of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung diseases worldwide. The increasing trend of M. avium infections in the recent decades poses a threat to the public health of not only the vulnerable populations such as the immunocompromised individuals, the elderly, and children but also in apparently healthy individuals. M. avium as well as other NTM infections represent some of the most difficult infections to eradicate due to their intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and common disinfectants. Hence, early detection is paramount for the timely management of infections because it allows for the institution of appropriate intervention measures since late interventions are associated with poor prognoses. There are several diagnostic tools currently available for the detection of M. avium, however, these tools are limited by low sensitivities, are time-consuming and associated with high costs. Hence, there is a sustained need for practical, accurate and rapid diagnostic tools to aid in the rapid diagnosis of M. avium infections.

 On the other hand, the emergence of drug resistant M. avium strains has rendered the few available antimicrobials such as macrolides which form the cornerstone of M. avium therapy ineffective. Consequently, second-line drugs such as fluoroquinolones (FQ) have been used to treat drug resistant M. avium infections, unfortunately, FQ resistance has been increasing. In mycobacteria, resistance to FQ has been largely attributed to alterations in DNA gyrase, which is the target for FQ. FQ resistance mechanisms have been extensively studied in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and reports have shown that over 90% of FQ resistant isolates have mutations in the two DNA gyrase subunits; GyrA and GyrB encoded by gyrA and gyrB. However, in M. avium, there is still very limited information on FQ resistance mechanisms.

 Considering the above, in Chapter I, an IS1245 LAMP assay for the rapid detection of M. avium was developed. Secondly, due to the high geographic and host-related genetic diversity known to exist among M. avium strains, the influence of this diversity on the applicability of the

 LAMP assay was assessed using human and pig samples from Japan. In Chapter II, the role of MfpA in levofloxacin resistance among M. avium clinical isolates was investigated by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination and sequencing FQ resistance associating genes.

 In Chapter I, Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technology was utilized to develop a rapid diagnostic assay targeting a widely used species-specific marker, IS1245. The applicability of this assay in Japan were further assessed using extracted DNA from human (n = 137) and pig (n = 91) M. avium isolates. LAMP reactions were performed in 25uL reaction volumes and results were obtained by observing rising curves on the LoopAmp turbidimeter. The sensitivity of the assay was evaluated by 10-fold serial dilutions of genomic DNA of M. avium HP 22 strain and to confirm the specificity, the assay was assessed against 22 Nontuberculous mycobacterial type strains, 2 MTBC reference strains, 14 MTBC clinical isolates, and an additional 5 closely related non-mycobacterial species that cause respiratory infections.

 The sensitivity analysis showed that the assay was able to detect up to 6 fg (equivalent to 1 genome copy) of M. avium DNA within 30 minutes of the reaction. Furthermore, the assay was specific to M. avium and did not amplify any other bacterial species. When evaluated with Japanese isolates, all 91 (100%) M. avium isolates from pigs were detected positive, interestingly, among the 137 clinical M. avium isolates, 41 (30%) were undetectable with this LAMP assay. The negative isolates all lacked the IS1245, the absence of which was revealed by PCR and whole- genome sequencing.

 The discrepancy in the IS1245 carriage rates between M. avium isolates from humans and pigs underscores one of the possibly many molecular aspects whereby Japanese M. avium clinical strains may be genetically distinct from the pig strains. Moreover, M. avium clinical isolates in Japan have been previously reported to have high relatedness with the genotypic profiles of environmental strains, whereas pig-derived M. avium strains in Japan were similar genetically to strains isolated from the European human population.

 IS1245 marker is known as a gold standard for the detection of M. avium, however, the evaluation showed that M. avium genetic diversity has a major influence on the applicability of the diagnostic tool across different geographical areas. Due to low IS1245 carriage rates in the circulating M. avium strains, the newly developed IS1245 LAMP system may not be very ideal for the Japanese human population. Nevertheless, the assay will be highly suitable for use in Euro- American countries that have a high IS1245 prevalence and routinely use IS1245 as a marker of M. avium for both detection and differentiation. The findings of this study are a classic example of how genetic diversity in M. avium can directly affect the application of a diagnostic tool globally especially those tools targeting non-conserved genes like IS1245. This subsequently limits rapid diagnosis and ultimately prevents timely management of M. avium infections.

 In conclusion, the incidences of M. avium infections have been increasing especially in industrialized countries causing higher burdens than M. tuberculosis. Unlike, M. tuberculosis, M. avium is especially harder to treat due to the lack of effective treatment regimens and high drug resistance rates. Therefore, early detection before full disease progression is paramount for the timely control of M. avium infections. Hence, in Chapter I, an accurate and cost-effective LAMP assay targeting IS1245 for the rapid detection of M. avium was established, and the effects of genotypic diversity on the applicability of this tool in Japan was also explored.

 The newly developed IS1245 LAMP assay exhibited high sensitivity and specificity, thereby making it a fast, cost-friendly alternative method of M. avium detection especially in the Euro Americas which have reported very high IS1245 carriage rates. Despite IS1245 marker been known as a gold standard for the detection of M. avium, the application of the IS1245-based LAMP assay was limited in Japan due to the absence of IS in about a third of the Japanese M. avium clinical isolates. This demonstrated how genetic diversity among M. avium strains limits the applicability of diagnostic tools across different geographical areas. Thus, placing an emphasis of the importance of understanding the local genetic make-up of a pathogen population before adopting internationally set standards.

 Chapter II was focused on elucidating FQ resistance mechanisms in M. avium. FQ are broad-spectrum antimicrobials that are used for the treatment of macrolide-resistant cases. FQ target DNA gyrase, an essential enzyme that is involved in DNA replication, transcription, and stress responses. DNA gyrase is a type II topoisomerase composed of two GyrA and two GyrB subunits, GyrA binds DNA, while GyrB is an ATPase. Many structural studies have demonstrated that mutations in gyrA and gyrB conferring quinolone resistance, play important roles in drug- protein interactions, however, the correlation between antibiotic resistance and particular mutation sites in M. avium clinical isolates is not strong. This phenomenon suggests that there are other yet unknown mechanisms that may also be important contributing factors to resistance and that the DNA gyrase mechanisms may not be the only factor determining drug resistance.

 The most recently described mechanism of FQ resistance is DNA mimicry by pentapeptide repeat proteins and the most notable examples are Mycobacterium fluoroquinolone resistance protein A (MfpA) and plasmid mediated quinolone resistance protein (Qnr) in mycobacteria and Gram-negative bacteria respectively. So far, MfpA has been associated with inducing intrinsic FQ resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis exclusively. Particularly, in M. smegmatis, mfpA reportedly played a role in determining the innate MICs of FQ in the mfpA mutant strain which had a two to four-fold decrease in the level of FQ resistance. MfpA has been shown to limit the efficacy of FQ by decreasing the FQ-induced DNA cleavage, and thereby protecting DNA gyrase from the inhibitory activity of FQ. Consequently, mutations that alter or increase the expression of MfpA could lead to the development of FQ resistance. However, the role of MfpA in FQ resistance in M. avium clinical strains has not yet been investigated.

 Hence the objective of Chapter II was to investigate the role of MfpA in levofloxacin (a representative FQ) resistance among M. avium clinical isolates. This was done by first determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of a total of 88 M. avium isolates from Japan by using the broth microdilution method. Thereafter, the FQ resistance associating genes (gyrA, gyrB, mfpA, and mfpB) of these isolates were sequenced and analyzed in BioEdit software.

 Among the isolates, 21.6 % (19/88) were susceptible to LVX, whereas 78.4 % (69/88), were resistant. Only four of the resistant isolates (4/69, 5.8 %) harbored resistance-conferring mutations (D94Y or D94G) within the QRDR of gyrA, and no resistance-associating mutations were found in gyrB as well as mfpB. Sequencing of the mfpA revealed two distinct mfpA genotypes among the M. avium isolates. Specifically, some isolates harbored mfpA with a C170frameshift deletion hereby referred to as “C170deleted mfpA” while other isolates had an “Intact-mfpA”, where the frameshift mutation was absent. Owing to this finding, a multiplex PCR for rapid differentiation of the above described mfpA genotypes in M. avium was developed to simplify genotype differentiation of all isolates. The multiplex had good diagnostic accuracy because all the results agreed with Sanger sequencing results.

 From the total 88 isolates analyzed in this study, 58 had the Intact-mfpA genotype while 30 had C170deleted mfpA type. Among the resistant isolates, 53/69 (76.8%) had an intact mfpA, whilst 16/69 (23.2%) had a C170deleted mfpA. On the other hand, 73.7% (14/19) of the susceptible isolates had C170deleted mfpA and the remaining 26.3% (5/19) were of the Intact-mfpA genotype. A high proportion (53/58, 91.4%) of isolates with the Intact-mfpA were also LVX resistant. Furthermore, MIC determination revealed a significant association (p < 0.001) between isolates with Intact-mfpA genotype and decreased LVX susceptibility in comparison with isolates bearing the C170deleted mfpA. This observation although preliminary, suggests that mfpA has some contributory role in either inducing and/or enhancing LVX resistance in M. avium thereby warranting more attention in future studies.

 In conclusion, fluoroquinolones are considered important alternative therapy for M. avium pulmonary infections when the recommended regimen is insufficient. However, the resistance to fluoroquinolones is increasing and this has impacted the effective management of M. avium infections. In this chapter, the basis for levofloxacin resistance in 88 M. avium isolates from Japan was investigated through MIC determination and sequencing of gyrA, gyrB, mfpA, and mfpB. Moreover, there was little correlation of mutations in gyrA and gyrB with LVX resistance and instead a statistically significant (p-value <0.001) association was observed between mfpA (Intact- mfpA genotype) and resistance to LVX. The results of this study will form the basis on which further studies can be conducted to further elucidate MfpA’s mechanism of resistance in M. avium and the resultant knowledge should be helpful in the effective management of M. avium infections.

 Overall, the findings of this research work are a new addition to the existing scientific knowledge which will continue to deepen our understanding of M. avium in order to institute effective control measures and put a stop to the rising M. avium- related pulmonary infections worldwide.

参考文献

[1] Whittington RJ, Windsor PA. In utero infection of cattle with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: A critical review and meta-analysis. Veterinary Journal 2009;179:60–9.

[2] To K, Cao R, Yegiazaryan A, Owens J, Venketaraman V. General Overview of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Opportunistic Pathogens: Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium abscessus. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020;9:2541.

[3] Johnson MM, Odell JA. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infections. Journal of Thoracic Diseases 2014;6:210-20.

[4] Brode SK, Daley CL, Marras TK. The epidemiologic relationship between tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial disease: A systematic review. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2014;18:1370-7.

[5] Chin’ombe N, Muzividzi B, Munemo E, Nziramasanga P. Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Humans in Zimbabwe Using 16S Ribosequencing. Open Microbiology Journal. 2016;10:113-23.

[6] Fordham Von Reyn C, Waddell RD, Eaton T, Arbeit RD, Maslow JN, Barber TW. Isolation of Mycobacterium avium Complex from Water in the United States, Finland, Zaire, and Kenya. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993;31:3227-3230.

[7] Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F. An official ATS/IDSA statement: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2007;175:367-416.

[8] Tortoli E. Microbiological Features and Clinical Relevance of New Species of the Genus Mycobacterium. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2014;27(4):727-52.

[9] Rebecca D, Marras TK. Epidemiology of Human Pulmonary Infection with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria A Review. Clinic Chest Medicine. 2015;10:002.

[10] Namkoong H, Kurashima A, Morimoto K, Hoshino Y, Hasegawa N, Ato M. Epidemiology of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease, Japan. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2016;22:1116-7.

[11] Rindi L, Garzelli C. Increase in non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans in Tuscany, Italy, from 2004 to 2014. BMC Infectious Diseases 2016;16:1-5.

[12] Hermansen TS, Ravn P, Svensson E, Lillebaek T. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in Denmark, incidence and clinical importance during the last quarter-century. Scientific Reports 2017;7:1-8.

[13] Fetene T, Kebede N, Alem G. Tuberculosis infection in animal and human populations in three districts of Western Gojam, Ethiopia. Zoonoses and Public Health 2011;58:47-53.

[14] Ichikawa K, van Ingen J, Koh WJ, Wagner D, Salfinger M, Inagaki T. Genetic diversity of clinical Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis and Mycobacterium intracellulare isolates causing pulmonary diseases recovered from different geographical regions. Infections Genetics and Evolution. 2015;36:250-5.

[15] Field SK, Fisher D, Cowie RL. Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease in patient without HIV infection. Chest 2004;126:566-81.

[16] Schorey JS, Sweet L. The mycobacterial glycopeptidolipids: Structure, function, and their role in pathogenesis. Glycobiology. 2008;18:832-41.

[17] Falkinham JO. Environmental sources of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clinic in Chest Medicine 2015;36:35-41.

[18] Mijs W, de Haas P, Rossau R, Van der Laan T, Rigouts L, Portaels F. Molecular evidence to support a proposal to reserve the designation Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium for bird-type isolates and “M. avium subsp. hominissuis” for the human/porcine type of M. avium. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology. 2002;52:1505-18.

[19] Thorel MF, Krichevsky M, Levy-Frebault V V. Numerical taxonomy of mycobactin- dependent mycobacteria, emended description of Mycobacterium avium, and description of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium subsp. nov., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis subsp. nov., and Mycobacterium avium subsp. silvaticum subsp. nov. International journal of systemic bacteriology. 1990;40:254-60.

[20] Ayele WY, Bartos M, Svastova P, Pavlik I. Distribution of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in organs of naturally infected bull-calves and breeding bulls. Journal of Veterinary Microbiology 2004;103:209–17.

[21] Abubakar I, Myhill D, Aliyu SH, Hunter PR. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratubercubsis from patients with Crohn’s disease using nucleic acid-based techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2008;14:401–10.

[22] Rose SJ, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium Biofilm Attenuates Mononuclear Phagocyte Function by Triggering Hyperstimulation and Apoptosis during Early Infection. Infection and Immunity 2014;82:405-12.

[23] Yano H, Iwamoto T, Nishiuchi Y, Nakajima C, Starkova DA, Mokrousov I. Population structure and local adaptation of MAC lung disease agent Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis. Genome Biology and Evolution 2017;9:2403-2417.

[24] Ichikawa K, Yagi T, Moriyama M, Inagaki T, Nakagawa T, Uchiya KI. Characterization of Mycobacterium avium clinical isolates in Japan using subspecies- specific insertion sequences, and identification of a new insertion sequence, ISMav6. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2009;58:945-50.

[25] Adachi T, Ichikawa K, Inagaki T, Moriyama M, Nakagawa T, Ogawa K. Molecular typing and genetic characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis isolates from humans and swine in Japan. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2016;65:1295-95.

[26] Chanda-Kapata P, Kapata N, Klinkenberg E, Mulenga L, Tembo M, Katemangwe P. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in Zambia: Prevalence, clinical, radiological and microbiological characteristics. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2015;15.500.

[27] Barrow WW. Treatment of mycobacterial infections. Revue scientifique et technique. International Office of Epizootics 2001;20:55-70.

[28] Iwamoto T, Sonobe T, Hayashi K. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003;41:2616-22.

[29] Aryan E, Makvandi M, Farajzadeh A, Huygen K, Bifani P, Mousavi SL. A novel and more sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay targeting IS6110 for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Microbiology Research 2010;165:211-20.

[30] Turenne CY, Wallace R, Behr MA. Mycobacterium avium in the Postgenomic Era. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2007;20:205-29.

[31] Matlova L, Dvorska L, Ayele WY, Bartos M, Amemori T, Pavlik I. Distribution of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates in tissue samples of pigs fed peat naturally contaminated with mycobacteria as a supplement. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005;43:1261-8.

[32] Simner PJ, Khare R, Wengenack NL. Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. Molecular Medical Microbiology 2014;3:1679-90.

[33] Hoza AS, Mfinanga SGM, Rodloff AC, Moser I, König B. Increased isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria among TB suspects in Northeastern, Tanzania: Public health and diagnostic implications for control programmes. BMC Research Notes 2016;9:1-9.

[34] Uchiya KI, Tomida S, Nakagawa T, Asahi S, Nikai T, Ogawa K. Comparative genome analyses of Mycobacterium avium reveal genomic features of its subspecies and strains that cause progression of pulmonary disease. Scientific Reports 2017;7:1–14.

[35] Guerrero C, Bernasconi C, Burki D, Bodmer T, Telenti A. A novel insertion element from Mycobacterium avium, IS1245 , is a specific target for analysis of strain relatedness. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1995;33:304-7.

[36] Pavlik I, Matlova L, Dvorska L, Shitaye JE, Parmova I. Mycobacterial infections in cattle and pigs caused by Mycobacterium avium complex members and atypical mycobacteria in the Czech Republic during 2000-2004. Veterinary Medicine 2005;50:281- 90.

[37] Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N. Loop- mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 2000;28:e26.

[38] Kunze ZM, Portaels F, McFadden JJ. Biologically distinct subtypes of Mycobacterium avium differ in possession of insertion sequence IS901. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992;30:2366-72.

[39] Nishiuchi Y, Tamaru A, Suzuki Y, Kitada S, Maekura R, Tateishi Y. Direct detection of Mycobacterium avium in environmental water and scale samples by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Journal of Water and Health 2014;12:211-9.

[40] Roiz MP, Palenque E, Guerrero C, Garcia MJ. Use of restriction fragment length polymorphism as a genetic marker for typing Mycobacterium avium strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995;33:1389-91.

[41] Hosek J, Svastova P, Moravkova M, Pavlik I, Bartos M. Methods of mycobacterial DNA isolation from different biological material: A review. Veterinary Medicine 2006;51:180-92.

[42] Hoefsloot W, van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Ängeby K, Bauriaud R, Bemer P. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. European Respiratory Journal 2013;42:1604-1613.

[43] Iwamoto T, Arikawa K, Nakajima C, Nakanishi N, Nishiuchi Y, Yoshida S. Intra- subspecies sequence variability of the MACPPE12 gene in Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis. Infections, Genetics and Evolution 2014;21:479-83.

[44] Brown-Elliott BA, Nash KA, Wallace RJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Review 2012;25:545-82.

[45] Griffith DE. Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC). Seminars in Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2018;39:351-61.

[46] Gellert M, Mizuuchi K, O’Dea MH, Itoh T, Tomizawa JI. Nalidixic acid resistance: A second genetic character involved in DNA gyrase activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1977;74:4772-6.

[47] Klostermeier D. Why two? On the role of (A-)symmetry in negative supercoiling of DNA by gyrase. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2018;19:1489.

[48] Kim S-Y, Woo Jhun B, Mi Moon S, Hye Shin S, Jeon K, Jung Kwon O. Mutations in gyrA and gyrB in Moxifloxacin-Resistant Mycobacterium avium Complex and Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Clinical Isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2018;62:e00527-18.

[49] Yamaba Y, Ito Y, Suzuki K, Kikuchi T, Ogawa K, Fujiuchi S. Moxifloxacin resistance and genotyping of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare isolates in Japan. Journal of Infections and Chemotherapy 2019;25:995–1000.

[50] Pang H, Wan K, Wei L. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside resistance in mycobacterium avium isolates. Infections and Drug Resistance 2018;11:515–21.

[51] Hegde SS, Vetting MW, Roderick SL, Mitchenall LA, Maxwell A, Takiff HE. Biochemistry: A fluoroquinolone resistance protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis that mimics DNA. Science 2005;308:1480-3.

[52] Hegde SS, Vetting MW, Mitchenall LA, Maxwell A, Blanchard JS. Structural and biochemical analysis of the pentapeptide repeat protein EfsQnr, a potent DNA gyrase inhibitor. Antimicrobial Agents and Chermotheraphy 2011;55:110-7.

[53] Feng L, A Mundy JE, M Stevenson CE, Mitchenall LA, Lawson DM, Mi K ,Maxwell A. The pentapeptide-repeat protein, MfpA, interacts with mycobacterial DNA gyrase as a DNA T-segment mimic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2021;118.

[54] Falco A, Aranaga C, Ocampo I, Takiff H. Overexpression of mfpA gene increases ciprofloxacin resistance in mycobacterium smegmatis. International Journal of Microbiology 2021; 2021:6689186.

[55] Busatto C, Silveira Vianna J, Vieira Da L, Junior S, Ramis IB, Almeida Da Silva PE. Mycobacterium avium: an overview. Tuberculosis 2019;114:127-134.

[56] Gubaev A, Klostermeier D. DNA-induced narrowing of the gyrase N-gate coordinates T- segment capture and strand passage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011;108:14085-14090.

[57] Van Soolingen D, Bauer J, Ritacco V, Leão SC, Pavlik I, Vincent V. IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of Mycobacterium avium isolates: Proposal for standardization. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1998;36:3051-4.

[58] Bartos M, Hlozek P, Svastova P, Dvorska L, Bull T, Matlova L. Identification of members of Mycobacterium avium species by Accu-Probes, serotyping, and single IS900, IS901, IS1245 and IS901-flanking region PCR with internal standards. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2006;64(3):333-45.

[59] Johansen TB, Djønne B, Jensen MR, Olsen I. Distribution of IS1311 and IS1245 in Mycobacterium avium subspecies revisited. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2005;43:2500-2.

[60] Suzuki Y, Katsukawa C, Inoue K, Yin Y, Tasaka H, Ueba N. Mutations in rpoB gene of rifampicin resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Japan. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1995;69:413-9.

[61] Mukai T, Miyamoto Y, Yamazaki T, Makino M. Identification of Mycobacterium species by comparative analysis of the dnaA gene. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2006;254:232–9.

[62] Pandey BD, Poudel A, Yoda T, Tamaru A, Oda N, Fukushima Y. Development of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and evaluation in sputum samples of Nepalese patients. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2008;57(4):439-443.

[63] Slana I, Kaevska M, Kralik P, Horvathova A, Pavlik I. Distribution of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and M. avium. hominissuis in artificially infected pigs studied by culture and IS901 and IS1245 quantitative real time PCR. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;144:437-43.

[64] Adhikari BR, Dev Pandey B, Ghimire P, Shrestha B, Khadka M, Yoda T. Loop- Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for the Direct Detection of Human Pulmonary Infections with Environmental (Nontuberculosis) Mycobacteria. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;62:212-14.

[65] Hayashida K, Kajino K, Hachaambwa L, Namangala B, Sugimoto C. Direct Blood Dry LAMP: A Rapid, Stable, and Easy Diagnostic Tool for Human African Trypanosomiasis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2015;9:e0003578.

[66] Lapierre SG, Drancourt M. rpoB targeted loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for consensus detection of mycobacteria associated with pulmonary infections. Frontiers in Medicine 2018;5:332.

[67] Bauer J, Andersen ÅB, Askgaard D, Giese SB, Larsen B. Typing of Clinical Mycobacterium avium Complex Strains Cultured during a 2-Year Period in Denmark by Using IS1245. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1999;37:600-605.

[68] Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Henostroza G, Raqib R, Rahim Z, Gerhardt M. Operational feasibility of using loop-mediated isothermal amplification for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in microscopy centers of developing countries. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007;456:1936-40.

[69] Yashiki N, Yamazaki Y, Subangkit M, Okabayashi T, Yamazaki W, Goto Y. Development of a LAMP assay for rapid and sensitive detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and subsp. hominissuis. Letters Applied Microbiology 2019;69:155-60.

[70] Koh WJ, Chang B, Jeong BH, Jeon K, Kim SY, Lee NY. Increasing recovery of nontuberculous mycobacteria from respiratory specimens over a 10-year period in a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. Tuberculous Respiratory Diseases 2013;75:199-204.

[71] Vluggen C, Soetaert K, Duytschaever L, Denoël J, Fauville-Dufaux M, Smeets F. Genotyping and strain distribution of Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis isolated from humans and pigs in Belgium, 2011–2013. Eurosurveillance 2016;21:30111.

[72] Iwamoto T, Nakajima C, Nishiuchi Y, Kato T, Yoshida S, Nakanishi N. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis strains isolated from humans, pigs, and human living environment. Infections, Genetics and Evolution 2012;12:846-52.

[73] Subangkit M, Yamamoto T, Ishida M, Nomura A, Yasiki N, Sudaryatma PE. Genotyping of swine Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis isolates from Kyushu, Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2019;81:1074-9.

[74] Yoder S, Argueta C, Holtzman A, Aronson T, Berlin OGW, Tomasek P. PCR Comparison of Mycobacterium avium Isolates Obtained from Patients and Foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.1999;65.2650-3.

[75] Dvorska L, Bartos M, Ostadal O, Kaustova J, Matlova L, Pavlik I. IS1311 and IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses, serotypes, and drug susceptibilities of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates obtained from a human immunodeficiency virus- negative patient. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002;40:3712-9.

[76] Oliveira RS, Sircili MP, Oliveira EMD, Balian SC, Ferreira-Neto JS, Leão SC. Identification of Mycobacterium avium genotypes with distinctive traits by combination of IS1245-based restriction fragment length polymorphism and restriction analysis of hsp65. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003;41:44-9.

[77] Tirkkonen T, Pakarinen J, Rintala E, Ali-Vehmas T, Marttila H, Peltoniemi OAT. Comparison of Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Markers typing and IS1245 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism fingerprinting of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis from human and porcine origins. Acta Veterinaria Scandanavia 2010;52.

[78] Aldred KJ, Kerns RJ, Osheroff N. Mechanism of quinolone action and resistance. Biochemistry 2014;53:1565-74.

[79] Aubry A, Mark Fisher L, Jarlier V, Cambau E. First functional characterization of a singly expressed bacterial type II topoisomerase: The enzyme from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2006;348:158–65.

[80] Mérens A, Matrat S, Aubry A, Lascols C, Jarlier V, Soussy CJ. The pentapeptide repeat proteins MfpAMt and QnrB4 exhibit opposite effects on DNA gyrase catalytic reactions and on the Ternary gyrase-DNA-quinolone complex. Journal of Bacteriology 2009;191:1587-94.

[81] Montero C, Mateu G, Rodriguez R, Takiff H. Intrinsic resistance of Mycobacterium smegmatis to fluoroquinolones may be influenced by new pentapeptide protein MfpA. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2001;45:3387-292.

[82] Turenne CY, Semret M, Cousins DV, Collins DM, Behr MA. Sequencing of hsp65 distinguishes among subsets of the Mycobacterium avium complex. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006;44:433-40.

[83] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes; Approved Standard—Second Edition. CLSI document M24-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-746-4). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087 USA, 2011.

[84] Shimomura H, Ono A, Imanaka K, Majima T, Masuyama H, Sato T. Retrospective investigation of combination therapy with clarithromycin and levofloxacin for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease. Journal of Pharmacological Health Care Science 2015;1:24.

[85] Zhang YJ, Li XJ, Mi KX. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Yi Chuan 2016;38:918-27.

[86] Tao J, Han J, Wu H, Hu X, Deng J, Fleming J. Mycobacterium fluoroquinolone resistance protein B, a novel small GTPase, is involved in the regulation of DNA gyrase and drug resistance. Nucleic Acids Research 2013;41:2370-81.

[87] Chien J-Y, Chiu W-Y, Chien S-T, Chiang C-J, Yu C-J, Hsueh P-R. Mutations in gyrA and gyrB among Fluoroquinolone- and Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2016;60:290-96.

[88] Suzuki Y, Nakajima C, Tamaru A, Kim H, Matsuba T, Saito H. Sensitivities of ciprofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates to fluoroquinolones: Role of mutant DNA gyrase subunits in drug resistance. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2012;39:435-9.

[89] Bakuła Z, Modrzejewska M, Pennings L, Proboszcz M, Safianowska A, Bielecki J. Drug susceptibility profiling and genetic determinants of drug resistance in Mycobacterium kansasii. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2018;62.

[90] Wang JY, Lee LN, Lai HC, Wang SK, Jan IS, Yu CJet . Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates: Associated genetic mutations and relationship to antimicrobial exposure. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007;59:860-5.

[91] Maruri F, Sterling TR, Kaiga AW, Blackman A, van der Heijden YF, Mayer C. A systematic review of gyrase mutations associated with fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and a proposed gyrase numbering system. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2012;67:819-31.

[92] Hooper DC. Emerging mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Emerging Infectious Diseases 2001;7;337-41.

[93] Rossi E De, Aínsa JA, Riccardi G. Role of mycobacterial efflux transporters in drug resistance: An unresolved question. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2006;30:36-52.

[94] Van Ingen J, Boeree MJ, Van Soolingen D, Mouton JW. Resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Drug Resistance Updates 2012;15:149-61.

[95] Hooper DC, Jacoby GA. Topoisomerase inhibitors: Fluoroquinolone mechanisms of action and resistance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Medicine 2016;6:a025320.

[96] Rindi L. Efflux pump inhibitors against nontuberculous mycobacteria. International Journal of Molecular Science 2020;21:1-13.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る