リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Comparison of the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Multivessel Cohort With the Historical CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Comparison of the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Multivessel Cohort With the Historical CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3

Yamamoto, Ko Shiomi, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Watanabe, Hiroki Miyazawa, Akiyoshi Yamaji, Kyohei Ohya, Masanobu Nakamura, Sunao Mitomo, Satoru Suwa, Satoru Domei, Takenori Tatsushima, Shojiro Ono, Koh Sakamoto, Hiroki Shimamura, Kiyotaka Shigetoshi, Masataka Taniguchi, Ryoji Nishimoto, Yuji Okayama, Hideki Matsuda, Kensho Nakatsuma, Kenji Takayama, Yohei Kuribara, Jun Kirigaya, Hidekuni Yoneda, Kohei Imai, Yuta Kaneko, Umihiko Ueda, Hiroshi Komiyama, Kota Okamoto, Naotaka Sasaki, Satoru Tanabe, Kengo Abe, Mitsuru Hibi, Kiyoshi Kadota, Kazushige Ando, Kenji Kimura, Takeshi 京都大学 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0837

2023.10.25

概要

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the effect of optimal intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with standard PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with multivessel disease.Methods and Results: The OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter single-arm study enrolling 1, 021 patients undergoing multivessel PCI including the left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS aiming to meet the prespecified criteria for optimal stent expansion. We conducted propensity score matching analyses between the OPTIVUS group and historical PCI or CABG control groups from the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-3 (1, 565 and 899 patients) fulfilling the inclusion criteria for this study. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. In the propensity score-matched cohort (OPTIVUS vs. historical PCI control: 926 patients in each group; OPTIVUS vs. historical CABG control: 436 patients in each group), the cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the OPTIVUS group than in the historical PCI control group (10.4% vs. 23.3%; log-rank P<0.001) or the historical CABG control group (11.8% vs. 16.5%; log-rank P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-guided PCI targeting the OPTIVUS criteria combined with contemporary clinical practice was associated with superior clinical outcomes at 1 year compared with not only the historical PCI control, but also the historical CABG control.

関連論文

参考文献

1. Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Watanabe H, Miyazawa

A, Yamaji K, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound-guided

percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel

disease. JACC Asia 2023 (in press).

2. Watanabe H, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa

Y, Ando K, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus

coronary arterial bypass grafting in patients with multi-vessel

coronary revascularization (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG

Registry/Cohort-2). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 96: 42 – 51.

3. Watanabe H, Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Kato E,

Matsumura Y, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention using

new-generation drug-eluting stents versus coronary arterial

bypass grafting in stable patients with multi-vessel coronary

artery disease: From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry

Cohort-3. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0267906.

4. Hong SJ, Kim BK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, et al.

Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided

everolimus-eluting stent implantation: The IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314: 2155 – 2163.

5. Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, Johnson TW, Holm NR,

Onuma Y, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1:

Guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert

consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous

Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3281 – 3300.

6. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es

GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: A case for

standardized definitions. Circulation 2007; 115: 2344 – 2351.

Circulation Journal Vol.87, November 2023

1702

YAMAMOTO K et al.

7. Matsumura-Nakano Y, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Yamaji K,

Ehara N, Sakamoto H, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass

grafting among patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease

in the new-generation drug-eluting stents era (from CREDOKyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3). Am J Cardiol 2021; 145:

25 – 36.

8. Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J, Terashima M, Hassan AH, Bonneau

HN, et al. Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results

following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol

2004; 43: 1959 – 1963.

9. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park DW, Choi BR, Park KH,

et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J

2006; 27: 1305 – 1310.

10. Song HG, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Park DW, et al.

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of optimal stent area to

prevent in-stent restenosis after zotarolimus-, everolimus-, and

sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

2014; 83: 873 – 878.

11. Katagiri Y, De Maria GL, Kogame N, Chichareon P, Takahashi

K, Chang CC, et al. Impact of post-procedural minimal stent

area on 2-year clinical outcomes in the SYNTAX II trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 93: E225 – E234.

Supplementary Files

Please find supplementary file(s);

https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0837

Circulation Journal Vol.87, November 2023

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る