リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Design and performance of long buckling-restrained braces with rectangular cores」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Design and performance of long buckling-restrained braces with rectangular cores

Sitler Benjamin Jacob 竹内 徹 B.Sitler T.Takeuchi 東京工業大学

2020.09.01

概要

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are often used in tall and large buildings. These applications tend to require exceptionally long BRBs, with 10~20m workpoint lengths (Lwp) and commensurate core yield lengths (Lp). However, the influence of the core and debonding interface dimensions on the compressive overstrength factor (B) and the low-cycle fatigue capacity is not yet clear for long BRBs. Previous experiments have indicated that longer BRBs exhibit greater compressive overstrength factors and lower cumulative inelastic deformations (CID) at fracture. This is due to friction at the higher mode buckling wavecrests between the core and restrainer assembly, which generates a highly nonuniform axial strain distribution and may have a significant effect on performance.

This paper investigates the adverse effects of the core yield length on the compressive overstrength, axial strain, and fatigue demands using finite element analysis. Simplified 2D shell models are used to parametrically analyze a range of core dimensions with yield lengths up to 14m, while detailed 3D solid models are used to examine the performance for representative long BRBs. Higher mode buckling and friction are shown to significantly amplify the compressive strain at the core ends, increasing the potential for core binding. Midspan tensile strains during the subsequent tensile cycles are also amplified due to strain ratcheting, reducing the fatigue capacity. From these results, the effect of the core dimensions and debonding interface properties on B are discussed, leading to the following findings:

1 The friction component of compressive overstrength (Br) is confirmed to increase linearly with the friction coefficient (a), debonding gap-to-core thickness ratio (Sw / tc), and core slenderness (L), while the associated compressive strain amplification increases the susceptibility of long BRB to friction-induced core binding.

2 Compressive strains (sc) at the core ends increase linearly with the average axial strain (E) and Br. The associated

3 Poison expansion may cause the core to locally bind to the restrainer in long BRBs, greatly increasing as a function of the confining strength and stiffness of the restrainer. Therefore, a thicker strong axis debonding gap is required in long BRBs in order to prevent friction-induced core binding. Tensile strains (Er) at mid-span during the subsequent tensile cycle increase linearly with Be, but with the square of
§. When Be is large this may result in premature necking at midspan and is considered to be the primary cause of the reduced fatigue capacity observed in long BRBs.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

[1] Joseph L, Gulec K, Schwaiger J (2016): Wilshire Grand: Outrigger designs and details for a highly seismic site. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 5 (1), 1-12.

[2] Almufti I, Krolicki J, Crowther A (2016): The resilience-based design of the 181 Fremont Tower. Structure Mag.

[3] Takeuchi T, Wada A (2017): Buckling-restrained braces and applications. Japan Society of Seismic Isolation.

[4] AISC (2016): Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, AISC/SEI 341-16.

[5] Yoshikawa H, Nishimoto K, Konishi H, Watanabe A (2010): Fatigue properties of unbonded braces and u-shaped steel dampers. Nippon Steel Technical Report, 1, 84-91. (in Japanese)

[6] Tsai KC, et al. (2014): Welded end-slot connections and debonding layers for buckling-restrained braces. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43, 1785-1807.

[7] Terashima M (2018): Ductile fracture simulation and risk quantification of buckling-restrained braces under earthquakes. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.

[8] Richards PW, Saxey B (2017): Quantifying length-effects on buckling-restrained braces that are considerably longer than the associated qualification tests. 2017 NZSEE Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

[9] Midorikawa M, et al. (2014): Buckling-mode number and compressive-to-tensile strength ratio of buckling-restrained braces. 10 US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Los Angeles, United States.

[10] Dehghani M, Tremblay R (2017): An analytical model for estimating restrainer design forces in bolted buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 138, 608-620.

[11]Budaházy V, Dunai L (2015): Numerical analysis of concrete filled buckling restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 115, 92-105.

[12] Smith M (2017): ABAQUS/Explicit User's Manual, Version 2017. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.

[13]Nguyen NH, Whittaker AS (2017): Numerical modelling of steel-plate concrete composite shear walls. Engineering Structures, 150, 1-11.

[14]JIS (2012): Rolled steels for building structures, JIS G 3136. Japanese Industrial Standards. (in Japanese)

[15JAIJ (2014): Recommended provisions for seismic damping systems applied to steel structures, Chapter 3: Buckling- restrained braces. Architectural Institute of Japan. (in Japanese)

[16]Ono T, Sato A (2000): Modeling of stress-strain relationships of metallic materials. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AlJ), 65 (532), 177-184. (in Japanese)

[17] Lemaitre J, Chaboche JIL (1992): Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る