1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma
H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2324 – 2336.
2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert
E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary
computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary
artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery
disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY
(Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography
of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography)
trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1724 – 1732.
3. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A,
Pugliese F, Mollet NR, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: Computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation
with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am
Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 636 – 643.
4. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, Becker A, Becker CR, Schmidt B,
et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast
dual-source CT with alternating table positions: Initial experience. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1168 – 1173.
5. Dwivedi G, Dowsley TF, Chow BJ. Assessment of cardiac computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging: Promise and
challenges. Circ J 2012; 76: 544 – 552.
6. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, Davies LC, van Geuns RJ,
Anagnostopoulos C, et al. Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed
tomography: Does it predict functionally significant coronary
lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15: 85 – 94.
7. Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A, Hildebrandt K, Bauner K,
Schwarz F, et al. Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for
evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 267 – 277.
8. Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, Tittus J, Schwarz F,
D’Anastasi M, et al. CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of
haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by
FFR. Heart 2013; 99: 1004 – 1011.
9. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic
myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-
Circulation Journal Vol.81, October 2017
Diagnostic Accuracy of Relative MBF by Dynamic CTP
attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
2010; 3: 811 – 820.
10. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, Zeng Y, Jing H, Schoepf UJ, et al.
Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with
second-generation dual-source CT: Comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 521 – 529.
11. Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a
physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;
15: 459 – 474.
12. Chareonthaitawee P, Kaufmann PA, Rimoldi O, Camici PG.
Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow
in healthy humans. Cardiovasc Res 2001; 50: 151 – 161.
13. Liga R, Rovai D, Sampietro T, Vecoli C, Todiere G, Caselli C,
et al. Insulin resistance is a major determinant of myocardial
blood flow impairment in anginal patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol
Imaging 2013; 40: 1905 – 1913.
14. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE, Harms HJ, de Haan S,
van den Oever ML, et al. Coronary risk factors and myocardial
blood flow in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: A
quantitative [15O]H2O PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol
Imaging 2012; 39: 102 – 112.
15. Kaufmann PA, Camici PG. Myocardial blood flow measurement
by PET: Technical aspects and clinical applications. J Nucl Med
2005; 46: 75 – 88.
16. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1: Myocardial infarct
size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;
56: 786 – 794.
17. Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Lowrey TB,
Aletras AH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR
in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: Fully
quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. JACC
Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 14 – 22.
18. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society
for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task
Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular
magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc
Magn Reson 2013; 15: 91.
19. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ.
ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 2016; 23:
606 – 639.
20. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von
Ziegler F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary
artery stenosis: Incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based
myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011; 260: 689 – 698.
21. Greess H, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Baum U, Lell M, Bowing B, et al.
Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuationbased on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur Radiol
2002; 12: 1571 – 1576.
22. Fujita M, Kitagawa K, Ito T, Shiraishi Y, Kurobe Y, Nagata M,
et al. Dose reduction in dynamic CT stress myocardial perfusion
imaging: Comparison of 80-kV/370-mAs and 100-kV/300-mAs
protocols. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 748 – 755.
23. Kurobe Y, Kitagawa K, Ito T, Kurita Y, Shiraishi Y, Nakamori
S, et al. Myocardial delayed enhancement with dual-source CT:
Advantages of targeted spatial frequency filtration and image
averaging over half-scan reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Comput
Tomogr 2014; 8: 289 – 298.
24. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, Schmidt B, Allmendinger T,
Haberland U, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT
imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary
artery stenosis: Preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol 2010;
45: 298 – 305.
25. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang
HJ, Bluemke DA, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging:
A pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion
abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 174 – 182.
26. Kim RJ, Albert TS, Wible JH, Elliott MD, Allen JC, Lee JC, et
al. Performance of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance
imaging with gadoversetamide contrast for the detection and
assessment of myocardial infarction: An international, multi-
1483
center, double-blinded, randomized trial. Circulation 2008; 117:
629 – 637.
27. Schelbert EB, Cao JJ, Sigurdsson S, Aspelund T, Kellman P,
Aletras AH, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of unrecognized
myocardial infarction determined by cardiac magnetic resonance
in older adults. JAMA 2012; 308: 890 – 896.
28. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, Nasis A,
et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging
in patients considered for revascularization: A comparison with
fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 67 – 77.
29. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar
MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity
of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow
reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2010; 55: 2816 – 2821.
30. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden
C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of
stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society
of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2949 – 3003.
31. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek
B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous
Coronary Intervention: A report of the American College of
Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task
Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular
Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:
e44 – e122.
32. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t
Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for
guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;
360: 213 – 224.
33. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the
areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:
837 – 845.
34. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under
a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;
143: 29 – 36.
35. Tanabe Y, Kido T, Kurata A, Uetani T, Fukuyama N, Yokoi T,
et al. Optimal scan time for single-phase myocardial computed
tomography perfusion to detect myocardial ischemia- derivation
cohort from dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion. Circ J 2016; 80: 2506 – 2512.
36. Hautvast GL, Chiribiri A, Lockie T, Breeuwer M, Nagel E, Plein
S. Quantitative analysis of transmural gradients in myocardial
perfusion magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2011;
66: 1477 – 1487.
37. Wichmann JL, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ, Lo GG, Choe YH,
Wang Y, et al. Absolute versus relative myocardial blood flow by
dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with
anatomic coronary artery disease. Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205:
W67 – W72.
38. Kono AK, Coenen A, Lubbers M, Kurata A, Rossi A, Dharampal
A, et al. Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed
tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow. Invest
Radiol 2014; 49: 801 – 807.
39. Rief M, Zimmermann E, Stenzel F, Martus P, Stangl K, Greupner
J, et al. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial
computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary
stents: Prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional
coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1476 – 1485.
40. Matsuo H, Watanabe S, Kadosaki T, Yamaki T, Tanaka S,
Miyata S, et al. Validation of collateral fractional flow reserve by
myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 2002; 105: 1060 – 1065.
Supplementary Files
Supplementary File 1
Figure S1. MBF map analysis using in-house software written in
MATLAB.
Please find supplementary file(s);
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1319
Circulation Journal Vol.81, October 2017
...
論文の公開元へ
