Rapid Whole-Body FDG PET/MRI in Oncology Patients: Utility of Combining Bayesian Penalised Likelihood PET Reconstruction and Abbreviated MRI

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

Huellner, M.W.; Appenzeller, P.; Kuhn, F.P.; Husmann, L.; Pietsch, C.M.; Burger, I.A.; Porto, M.; Delso, G.; von Schulthess,

G.K.; Veit-Haibach, P. Whole-body nonenhanced PET/MR versus PET/CT in the staging and restaging of cancers: Preliminary

observations. Radiology 2014, 273, 859–869. [CrossRef]

Nakamoto, Y.; Kitajima, K.; Toriihara, A.; Nakajo, M.; Hirata, K. Recent topics of the clinical utility of PET/MRI in oncology and

neuroscience. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2022, 36, 798–803. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Chilcott, A.K.; Bradley, K.M.; McGowan, D.R. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared with

Ordered Subset Expectation Maximisation on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.

2018, 210, 153–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Teoh, E.J.; McGowan, D.R.; Macpherson, R.E.; Bradley, K.M.; Gleeson, F.V. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian

Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 1447–1452.

[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Lindstrom, E.; Sundin, A.; Trampal, C.; Lindsjo, L.; Ilan, E.; Danfors, T.; Antoni, G.; Sorensen, J.; Lubberink, M. Evaluation

of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for (18)F-FDG Whole-Body

Examinations. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 1152–1158. [CrossRef]

Tian, D.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Cui, B.; Lu, J. The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG

PET in simultaneous PET/MR. EJNMMI Phys. 2022, 9, 1. [CrossRef]

Kim, S.Y.; Cho, N.; Hong, H.; Lee, Y.; Yoen, H.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, A.R.; Ha, S.M.; Lee, S.H.; Chang, J.M.; et al. Abbreviated

Screening MRI for Women with a History of Breast Cancer: Comparison with Full-Protocol Breast MRI. Radiology 2022, 305,

213310. [CrossRef]

Yokoo, T.; Masaki, N.; Parikh, N.D.; Lane, B.F.; Feng, Z.; Mendiratta-Lala, M.; Lee, C.H.; Khatri, G.; Marsh, T.L.; Shetty, K.; et al.

Multicenter Validation of Abbreviated MRI for Detecting Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology 2023, 307, e220917.

[CrossRef]

Yamaguchi, T.; Sofue, K.; Ueshima, E.; Ueno, Y.; Tsujita, Y.; Yabe, S.; Shirakawa, S.; Toyama, H.; Hori, M.; Fukumoto, T.;

et al. Abbreviated Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients with Potentially Resectable

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 56, 725–736. [CrossRef]

Kang, Z.; Min, X.; Weinreb, J.; Li, Q.; Feng, Z.; Wang, L. Abbreviated Biparametric Versus Standard Multiparametric MRI for

Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2019, 212, 357–365. [CrossRef]

Grant, A.M.; Deller, T.W.; Khalighi, M.M.; Maramraju, S.H.; Delso, G.; Levin, C.S. NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the

SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system. Med. Phys. 2016, 43, 2334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Fukukita, H.; Suzuki, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Terauchi, T.; Daisaki, H.; Ikari, Y.; Shimada, N.; Senda, M. Japanese guideline for

the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: Synopsis of Version 2.0. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2014, 28, 693–705. [CrossRef]

[PubMed]

Kurita, Y.; Ichikawa, Y.; Nakanishi, T.; Tomita, Y.; Hasegawa, D.; Murashima, S.; Hirano, T.; Sakuma, H. The value of Bayesian

penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on (18)F-FDG PET/CT: Comparison with ordered subset expectation maximisation reconstruction incorporating time-of-flight model and point spread function

correction. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2020, 34, 272–279. [CrossRef]

Miwa, K.; Wagatsuma, K.; Nemoto, R.; Masubuchi, M.; Kamitaka, Y.; Yamao, T.; Hiratsuka, S.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yoshii, T.;

Kobayashi, R.; et al. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized

likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2020, 34, 762–771. [CrossRef]

Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1871

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

16 of 16

Zanoni, L.; Argalia, G.; Fortunati, E.; Malizia, C.; Allegri, V.; Calabro, D.; Civollani, S.; Campana, D.; Fanti, S.; Ambrosini, V. Can

Q.Clear reconstruction be used to improve [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT image quality in overweight NEN patients? Eur. J.

Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 1607–1612. [CrossRef]

Caribe, P.; Koole, M.; D’Asseler, Y.; Van Den Broeck, B.; Vandenberghe, S. Noise reduction using a Bayesian penalized-likelihood

reconstruction algorithm on a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner. EJNMMI Phys. 2019, 6, 22. [CrossRef]

Te Riet, J.; Rijnsdorp, S.; Roef, M.J.; Arends, A.J. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for

low-count clinical (18)F-FDG PET/CT. EJNMMI Phys. 2019, 6, 32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Ribeiro, D.; Hallett, W.; Howes, O.; McCutcheon, R.; Nour, M.M.; Tavares, A.A.S. Assessing the impact of different penalty factors

of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [(11)C]PHNO brain PET-MR studies.

EJNMMI Res. 2022, 12, 11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Texte, E.; Gouel, P.; Thureau, S.; Lequesne, J.; Barres, B.; Edet-Sanson, A.; Decazes, P.; Vera, P.; Hapdey, S. Impact of the Bayesian

penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear(R)) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images.

EJNMMI Phys. 2020, 7, 28. [CrossRef]

Svirydenka, H.; Muehlematter, U.J.; Nagel, H.W.; Delso, G.; Ferraro, D.A.; Kudura, K.; Burger, I.A.; Ter Voert, E. (68)Ga-PSMA-11

dose reduction for dedicated pelvic imaging with simultaneous PET/MR using TOF BSREM reconstructions. Eur. Radiol. 2020,

30, 3188–3197. [CrossRef]

Yoshii, T.; Miwa, K.; Yamaguchi, M.; Shimada, K.; Wagatsuma, K.; Yamao, T.; Kamitaka, Y.; Hiratsuka, S.; Kobayashi, R.; Ichikawa,

H.; et al. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for (18)F-NaF bone PET/CT images acquired over

shorter durations using a custom-designed phantom. EJNMMI Phys. 2020, 7, 56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Matti, A.; Lima, G.M.; Pettinato, C.; Pietrobon, F.; Martinelli, F.; Fanti, S. How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms

Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images? Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 53, 216–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Wu, Z.; Guo, B.; Huang, B.; Zhao, B.; Qin, Z.; Hao, X.; Liang, M.; Xie, J.; Li, S. Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian

penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography

computed tomography? J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 2021, 22, 224–233. [CrossRef]

Rijnsdorp, S.; Roef, M.J.; Arends, A.J. Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood

(Q.Clear) Reconstructions of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Scans. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 847. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual

author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to

people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

...