リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and their association to multidrug resistance in Lusaka, Zambia」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and their association to multidrug resistance in Lusaka, Zambia

Solo, Eddie 北海道大学

2021.09.24

概要

PREFACE
It has been over twenty years after declaring tuberculosis (TB) a disease of public health emergence by WHO in 1993, but TB has continued to inflict mankind. Globally, TB is one of the top 10 causes of death, and the world’s top infectious disease killer (above HIV/AIDS) (1). Geographically, most people who developed TB in 2019 were in the WHO regions of SouthEast Asia (44%), Africa (25%) and the Western Pacific (18%) (Figure 1) (1).

TB claims more than a million lives each year and affects millions more, with enormous impact on families and communities. The disease typically affects the lungs (pulmonary TB) but can also affect other organs of the body (extra pulmonary TB). TB can affect anyone and anywhere, but most people who develop the disease (about 90%) are adults. There are more cases among men than women. Men aged 15 years and above accounted for 56% of the people who developed TB in 2019. Women accounted for 32% while children, aged less than 15 years accounted for 12% (1).

Worldwide TB incidence and deaths are falling. However, the pace is not fast enough to reach global TB targets set by WHO End TB strategy which include 90% and 95% reduction by 2035 in the TB incidence rate and annual TB deaths, respectively (Figure2).

The bacteria that cause TB belong to a group known as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex which comprises of closely related microorganisms. The members of MTBc are as follows; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium canetti, Mycobacterium africanum, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium caprea, Mycobacterium pinnipedii and Mycobacterium microti. The natural host for Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mainly humans and this organism is responsible for the typical human TB disease in most part of the world (2).

TB is curable and preventable. Most people (about 85%) who develop TB disease can be successfully treated with a 6-month drug regimen (1). However, a number of factors have been elucidated as drivers of this disease. These risk factors include HIV infection, drug addition, diabetes, malnutrition, smoking and air pollution (3).

Furthermore, the emergency of drug resistant TB cases (organisms can grow in the presence of one or more anti-TB drugs) is threatening global efforts to control TB and threatens to reverse global progress made in TB control so far (4). While the incidence and mortality of drug susceptible TB is generally on the decline (Figure 2), the incidence of drug resistant TB has been described to be variable by country (1), with increasing incidences observed in some countries across the world (Figure3).

Worldwide in 2019, an estimated 465,000 people developed rifampicin-resistant TB (RRTB), of which 78% had multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) (defined as resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid). An estimated 182,000 deaths resulted from MDR/RR-TB. (10). In rates terms, an estimated 3.3% of new cases and 18% of previously treated cases had MDR/RR-TB globally in 2019 (1).

Factors associated with the emergence of drug resistance in new TB cases have been reported to include poor adherence to treatment, limited effective drugs and inadequate health care systems while primary drug resistance has been attributed to poor infection prevention and control measures leading to increased transmission (5).

In Zambia (a Sub Sahara African country) , despite the implementation of Directly Observed Therapy Short Course (DOTS) program and universal BCG vaccination, TB remains a disease of major public health concern and the country is enlisted among the 30 high TB burden countries by WHO due to its high TB incidence (333/100,000 population) (Figure 4).

Most recently (2021), WHO has reclassified Zambia as one of the high MDR/RR-TB burden countries (6). This is consistent with the in-country trend analyses which have demonstrated increasing threat of MDR-TB burden. For instance, the review of national data by Kapata et al (2013) highlighted four-folds increase in the number of MDR-TB patients notified by National TB control program (NTP) between 2000 and 2011 (7) (Figure 5). By 2019, the number of MDR/RR-TB notified by Zambia National TB control Program had increased to 500 cases per annum (8).

In the region, similar trends have been observed in the neighboring Botswana where the 4th national TB drug resistant survey reported a three-fold increase in MDR-TB rates (among new patients) relative to the preceding surveys (Figure 6) (9). By 2019, the proportion of MDR-TB in new cases in Botswana had risen to 3.6% (8).

Furthermore, high MDR-TB prevalence rates (7.7% in new cases and 33.8% in previously treated patients) have been reported from Swaziland by the national TB drug resistance survey [10]. While HIV/AIDS and social economic determinants have been linked to the high TB burden in Zambia and other countries in the region (11), factors driving the increase in MDRTB burden are still unclear.

Although it is unquestionable that most factors responsible for TB pandemic are related to socioeconomic dynamics and insufficient health care systems among others, factors directly related to the microorganism itself are also significant but they are less studied in the third world countries (12). Molecular understanding of a causative agent (M. tuberculosis) can provide an important study platform to investigate possible association of its strains with clinical and epidemiological characteristics.

Today, several techniques have been developed for molecular epidemiological investigations of M. tuberculosis strain diversity and these include spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping), insertion sequence 6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (IS6110-RFLP) and Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units – Variable Number Of Tandem Repeats (MIRU-VNTR) (13–15). Additionally, next generation whole genome sequencing (WGS) of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates provides invaluable knowledge on genetic diversity and evolution of drug resistance in the M. tuberculosis genomes in circulation (15). Whole genome sequencing is preferred to other typing techniques due to its robustness and high resolution, however, it does not negate the usefulness of other typing tools dueto limitations experienced in resource limited countries.

Although spoligotyping is less discriminatory compared to IS6110-RFLP and MIRUVNTR, this assay is rapid, inexpensive and robust therefore it is often used as a first-line genotyping method. It is the basis for the differentiation of major genotypes of M. tuberculosis such as Beijing, Euro-American sub-lineages, and Central Asian (CAS) families (13).

Some of the spoligotype families are distinctively distributed in specific geographical regions (17). This could signify that they are probably better adapted to certain human populations in those areas (18). For instance, Beijing spoligofamily is predominantly found in far-east Asia whereas Euro-American sub-lineages are predominant in Africa, Europe and the Americas (19).

The Latin-American Mediterranean (LAM) family has been described as the most prevalent M. tuberculosis lineage globally, accounting for approximately 15% of the global TB burden [19]. However, little is known about its epidemiology, biological behavior and disease patterns [12]. Different M. tuberculosis genotypes have been linked to cause drug resistant diseases and TB outbreaks in various regions (20).

There are strong indications that various lineages of M. tuberculosis have different biological characteristics which may influence the TB epidemiology (21). For instance, the Beijing genotype is suggested to be a possibly resistant clone against BCG vaccination, highly pathogenic, transmissible and prone to becoming drug resistant (22). Despite this growing body of knowledge, most TB control strategies are generic with the supposition that all M. tuberculosis strains are equal in terms of transmission dynamics, virulence and drug resistance (22). In various parts of Africa, diverse M. tuberculosis genotypes are driving the epidemiology of drug resistant TB and varied genotypes have been reported across the continent (Figure 7) (23).

M. tuberculosis is intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics, limiting the number of compounds available for treatment. This intrinsic resistance is due to a number of mechanisms including a thick, waxy, hydrophobic cell wall and the presence of drug degrading and modifying enzymes. However, by employing various modes of drug action, a number of drugs including rifampicin and isoniazid (two most powerful first line TB-drugs) have shown efficacious in the treatment of M. tuberculosis disease (Table 1). Eventually, resistance to those drugs (active against M. tuberculosis) has emerged and is conferred mainly by genetic polymorphism (24). For instance, resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid has been associated to mutations in rpoB and katG genes of M. tuberculosis, respectively (25, 26). These chromosomal mutations may confer drug resistance via modification or over-expression of the drug target, as well as by prevention of prodrug activation (24) (Table1).

Furthermore, studies have reported that the rate of mutations causing drug resistance varies according to the lineage to which the strain belongs. For instance, the Beijing family has demonstrated increased mutation rates in vitro compared to the estimated probabilities for the acquisition of resistance by spontaneous mutation which is approximately 1 in 108 bacilli for rifampicin and 1 in 106 bacilli for isoniazid (27).

Broad understanding of those mutations encoding resistance in a specific geographic setting is valuable knowledge for the development and application of new vaccines, drugs and molecular diagnostic tools and understanding the epidemiology of drug resistant TB (28).

Although the overwhelming burden of TB is in developing countries, molecular characteristics of M. tuberculosis have been studied more in industrialized countries than in non-industrialized nations. For instance, in the United States of America nearly each newly identified culture-positive case of tuberculosis is genotyped whereas in the third world countries, where the burden of TB and drug resistant TB is relatively high, genotyping of identified M. tuberculosis strain is not routinely done.

In Zambia, M. tuberculosis genotyping has locally been conducted by two studies, namely; Mulenga et al (2010) in Ndola district and Malama et al (2014) in Namwala district (29, 30). Both studies reported LAM family as the predominant M. tuberculosis genotype circulating in the studied districts. However, neither of those two studies analyzed detailed information relating to the Spoligotype International Types (SIT) of the identified M. tuberculosis families nor did they contextualize identified genotypes in relation to drug resistance. Furthermore, the M. tuberculosis genotypes reported by Mulenga et al and Malama et al were specific for the studied districts. To my knowledge, the M. tuberculosis genotypes isolated in Lusaka (Zambia’s capital city) and their association to multi-drug resistance has not been analyzed. Besides, M. tuberculosis mutational patterns and frequencies encoding drug resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid were un-investigated in Zambia before my study.

For my PhD project, I have utilized spoligotyping to genotype M. tuberculosis cultures isolated from TB patients mainly residing in Lusaka city and stored at the University Teaching Hospital, TB laboratory in Lusaka. Furthermore, I sequenced M. tuberculosis genes associated with drug resistance encoding mutations to rifampicin and isoniazid among MDR-TB isolates from Lusaka and compared the identified mutational frequencies and patterns to those reported in the African region.

Lusaka has the population of 3.3 million people and is both a commercial and administrative town. In addition, it is a getaway connecting the country's four main highways to the neighboring countries on the north, south, east and western part of the continent and hosts the main international airport connecting the country to the globe (Figure 8).

During the 2013 –2014 national TB prevalence survey, Lusaka reported a high prevalence of bacteriologically confirmed TB of 932/100,000 population [31]. Furthermore, Lusaka recorded the highest proportion of MDR-TB patients in the country notified by the national TB program in 2019 (Ministry of Health, 2020).

In chapter I of this thesis, I have described M. tuberculosis sub-lineages and documented their correlation with MDR-TB. Furthermore, I have illustrated gene mutations in rpoB and katG genes and inhA operon conferring resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid, respectively, in chapter II. Additionally, I have shown comparisons in the frequencies of specific mutations identified among M. tuberculosis isolates from Lusaka with those reported by others in the region.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2020 (www.who.int) (accessed 18th February 2021).

2. Van Sooligen D, Hoogenboezem T, de Haas PE, Hermans PW, Koedam MA, et al. Anovel pathogenic taxon of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex canetti:characterization of an exceptional isolate from Africa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997;47:1236-45. doi:10.1099/00207713-47-4-1236.

3. Lo¨nnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, Dye C, Raviglione M. Drivers of tuberculosisepidemics: The role of risk factors and social determinants, Social Science & Medicine(2009), doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.041.

4. Kasozi S, Kirirabwa NS, Kimuli D, Luwaga H, Kizito E, Turyahabwe S. Addressingthe drug-resistant tuberculosis challenge through implementing a mixed model of carein Uganda. PLoS ONE 2020;15(12): e0244451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.

5. Tao N, He X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Yu C, Li H. Trends and characteristics of drug-resistanttuberculosis in rural Shandong, China. Int Journ Infect Dis 2017; 65: 8–14.

6. WHO, 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-06-2021-who-releases-new-globallists-of-high-burden-countries-for-tb-hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb (accessed20th June 2021).

7. Kapata N, Chanda-Kapata P, Bates M, Mwaba P, Cobelens F, Grobusch MP, Zumla A.Multidrug-resistant TB in Zambia. Review of national data from 2000 to 2011. TropMed and Int Health 2013; 18 (11):1386 –91. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12183.

8. STOP TB Partnership and World Health Organization, http://www.stoptb.org (accessed30th May 2021)

9. Menzies HJ, Moalosi G, Anisimova V, Gammino V, Sentle C, Bachhuber MA, BileE, Radisowa K, Kachuwaire K, Basotli J, Maribe T, Makombe R, Shepherd J, Kim B,Samandari T,El-Halabi S, Chirenda J, Cain KP. Increase in anti-tuberculosis drugresistance in Botswana: results from the fourth National Drug Resistance Survey. IntJ Tuberc Lung Dis 2014 18(9):1026–1033 http://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.13.0749.

10. Sanchez-Padilla E, Dlamini T, Ascorra A, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Tefera ZD, Calain P, de laTour R, Jochims F, Richter E, Bonnet M. High Prevalence of Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, Swaziland, 2009–2010. Emerg Infect Dis 2012:18(1) DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1801.110850.

11. Tom A. Yates AT, Ayles H, Leacy PF, Schaap A, Boccia D, Nulda Beyers N, GodfreyFaussett P, Floyd S. Socio-economic gradients in prevalent tuberculosis in Zambia andthe Western Cape of South Africa. Trop Med Int Health 2018; (23): (4) 375–90.doi:10.1111/tmi.13038.

12. Dalla Costa RE, Lazzarini CL, Perizzolo FP, Diaz AC, Spies SF, Costa LL, et al.Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the RDRio Genotype Is the Predominant Cause ofTuberculosis and Associated with Multidrug Resistance in Porto Alegre City, SouthBrazil. J. Clin Microbiol 2013; 51(4): 1071-77. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01511-12.

13. Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, vanAgterveld M, vanSoolingen D, Kuijper S, et al.Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis fordiagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35: 907-14.

14. van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, et al.Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting:recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31(2):406–9.

15. Supply P, Lesjean S, Savine E, Kremer K, van Soolingen D, Locht C. Automated highthroughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacteriumtuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J Clin Microbiol.2001;39:3563–71.

16. Cole S T, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, et al. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 1998; 393:537-44. doi:10.1038/31159.

17. Filliol I, Motiwala A S, Cavatore M, Qi W, Hazbon M H, Bobadilla del Valle M, et al. Global phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis: Insights into tuberculosis evolution, phylogenetic accuracy of other DNA fingerprinting systems and recommendation for a minimal standard SNP set. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188:759-72. doi:10.1128/JB.188.2.759-772.2006.

18. Gagneux S, DeRiemer K, Van T, Kato-Maeda M, de Jong BC, et al. Variable hostpathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PNS. 2006; 103(8):2869-70doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511240103.

19. Brudey ., Drsicoll JR, Rigouts L, Prodinger W M, Gori A, Al-Hajoji SA, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol. 2006; 6:23 dol:10.1186/1471-2180-6-23.

20. Shemyakin IG, Stepanshina VN, Ivanov IY, Lipin MY, Anismova VA, Onasenko, etal. Characterization of drug resistance isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis derived from Russian inmates. Int. J. Tuber. Lung Dis. 2004; 8:1194-03.

21. Al-Hajoj S, Varghese B, Al-Habobe F, Schoukri M, Mulder A, van Soolingen D, Current trends of Mycobacterium tuberculosis molecular epidemiology in Saudi Arabia and associated demographical factors. Infect Genet Evol 2013; 16: 362-68. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.019.

22. Parwati I, Alisjahbana B, Apriani L, Soetikino R D, Ottenholff T H, Van der Zandenet al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype is an independent risk factortuberculosis treatment failure in Indonesia. J. Inf Dis 2010; 201:553-57. doi: 10.1086/650311.

23. Chisompola NK, Streicher EM , Muchemwa CMK , Warren RM, Sampson SL.Molecular epidemiology of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Africa: asystematic review. BMC Infectious Diseases 2020 20:344https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05031-5.

24. Gygli SM, Borrell S, Trauner A , Gagneux S.Antimicrobial resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: mechanistic and evolutionary perspectives. FEMSMicrobiol Rev 2017 1;41(3):354-373.doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux011

25. Zhang Y, Yew WW. Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009;13(11):1320 – 30.

26. Ramaswamy S, Musser JM. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tuberc Lung Dis 1998; 79(1):3-29. doi:10.1054/tuld.1998.0002.

27. Dookie N, Rambaran S, Padayatchi N, Mahomed S, Naidoo K. Evolution of drugresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a reviewon the molecular determinants of resistance and implications forpersonalized care. Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73: 1138–1151

28. Walzl G, McNerney R, du Plessis N, Bates M, McHugh TD, Chegou NN, Zumla A.Tuberculosis: advances and challenges in development of new diagnostics andbiomarkers. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18: e199–210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30111-7.

29. Mulenga C, Shamputa IC, Mwakazanga D, Kapata N, Portaels F, Rigouts L. Diversityof Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes circulating in Ndola, Zambia. BMC InfectDis . 2010;10:177. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/177.

30. Malama S, Muma J, Munyeme M, Mbulo G, Muwonge A, Shamputa I, et al. Isolationand molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from humans and cattlein Namwala District, Zambia. Ecohealth 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10393-014-0940-0.

31. Ministry of Health, Zambia. National tuberculosis prevalence survey 2013-2014.

32. Habeenzu C, Mitarai S, Lubasi D, Mudenda V, Kantenga T, Mwansa J, Maslow JNTuberculosis and multidrug resistance in Zambian prisons, 2000-2001. Int J TubercLung Dis. 2007; 11(11):1216-20.

33. Suchindran S, Brouwer ES, Van Rie A. Is HIV infection a risk factor for multi-drugresistant tuberculosis? A systematic review. PLoS One 2009; 4(5):e5561, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005561.

34. Mesfin YM, Hailemariam D, Biadglign S, Kibret KT. Association between HIV/AIDSand Multi-Drug Resistance Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PLoS ONE 2014; 9(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082235.

35. Patel KB, Belmonte R, Crowe HM. Drug malabsorption and resistant tuberculosis inHIV-infected patients. New Engl J Med 1995;332:336–7, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199502023320518.

36. Demay C, Liens B, Burguiere T, Hill V, Couvin D, Millet J, Mokrousov I, Sola C,Zozio T, Rastogi N. SITVITWEB – A publicly available international multimarkerdatabase for studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity and molecularepidemiology. Infect Genet Evol 2012;12: 755-66. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2012.02.004.

37. Costa ERD, Lazzarini LCO, Perizzolo PF, Díaz CA, Spies FS, Costa LL, et al.Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the RDRio genotype is the predominant cause oftuberculosis and associated with multidrug resistance in Porto Alegre City, SouthBrazil. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:1071–7.

38. Glynn JR, Whitely J, Bifani PJ, Kremer K, van Soolingen D. Worldwide occurrence ofBeijing /W strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review. Emerg InfectDis 2002; 8:843-49. doi:10.3201/eid0805.020002.

39. Pillay M, Sturm AW. Evolution of the extensively drug resistant F15/LAM4/KZN strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:1409-14. doi:10.1086/522987.

40. Ministry of Health. TB manual. Fifth edition Lusaka, Zambia: National TB andLeprosy control program; 2017.

41. Poudel A, Nakajima C, Fukushima Y, Suzuki H, Pandey BD, Maharjan B, Suzuki Y.Molecular Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosisIsolated in Nepal. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2012; 56(6):2831-36. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06418-11.

42. Hall A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysisprogram for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acids Symposium Series (Oxford) 1999;41:95-98.

43. Lowry R. VassarStats. Vassar College, NY USA; 1998–2020; http://vassarstats.net/:(Accessed 19 June 2020).

44. Phelan JE , O’Sullivan DM, Machado D , Ramos J , Oppong YEA , Campino S ,O’Grady J , McNerney R , Hibberd ML , Viveiros M , Huggett JF, Clark TG.Integrating informatics tools and portable sequencing technology for rapid detection ofresistance to anti-tuberculous drugs. Genome Medicine 2019; 11:41https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0650-x.

45. Solo ES, Nakajima C, Kaile T, Bwalya P, Mbulo G, Fukushima Y, et al. Mutations ofrpoB, katG and inhA genes in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolatesfrom Zambia. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020; 22:302–7, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.026.

46. Chihota V, Apers L, Mungofa S, Kasongo W, Nyoni IM, Tembwe R, et al.Predominance of a single genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in regions ofSouthern Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11(3):311–8.

47. Viegas SO, MacHado A, Groenheit R, Ghebremichael S, Pennhag A, Gudo PS, et al.Molecular diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients withpulmonary tuberculosis in Mozambique. BMC Microbiol 2010;10:1–8.

48. Perdigão J, Clemente S, Ramos J, Masakidi P, Machado D, Silva C, et al. Geneticdiversity, transmission dynamics and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis inAngola. Sci Rep 2017;7(February)1–10, doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/srep42814.

49. Mallard K, McNerney R, Crampin AC, Houben R, Ndlovu R, Munthali L, et al.Molecular detection of mixed infections of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains insputum samples from patients in Karonga District, Malawi. J Clin Microbiol2010;48(12):4512–8.

50. Chihota VN, Niehaus A, Streicher EM, Wang X, Sampson SL, Mason P, et al.Geospatial distribution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes in Africa. PLoS One2018;13(8):1–18.

51. Mbugi EV, Katale BZ, Streicher EM, Keyyu JD, Kendall SL, Dockrell HM, et al.Mapping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Genetic Diversity Profiles inTanzania and Other African Countries. PLoS One 2016;11(5). e0154571–e0154571.Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27149626.

52. Glynn JR, Alghamdi S, Mallard K, McNerney R, Ndlovu R, Munthali L, et al. Changesin Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype families over 20 years in a population basedstudy in Northern Malawi. PLoS One 2010;5(8). e12259– e12259. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20808874.

53. Hanekom M, Gey van Pittius NC, McEvoy C, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijinggenotype: a template for success. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2011;91:510–23.

54. Majoor CJ, Magis-Escurra C, van Ingen J, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D. Epidemiologyof Mycobacterium bovis disease in humans, The Netherlands, 1993-2007. Emerg InfectDis 2011;17 (3)457–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/21392437.

55. Pandey GS, Hang’ombe BM, Mushabati F, Kataba A. Prevalence of tuberculosis amongsouthern Zambian cattle and isolation of Mycobacterium bovis in raw milk obtainedfrom tuberculin positive cows. Vet World 2013;6(12):986. Patel KB, Belmonte R,Crowe HM. Drug malabsorption and resistant tuberculosi

56. Bwalya P, Yamaguchi T, Mulundu G, Nakajima C, Mbulo G, Solo ES, et al. Genotypiccharacterization of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolatedfrom Lusaka, Zambia. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2018;109:117–22.

57. Agonafir M, Lemma E, Wolde-Meskel D, Goshu S, Santhanam A, Girmachew F, et al.Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Ethiopia. Int JTuberc Lung Dis 2010;14:1259–65.

58. Gupta R, Amrathlal RS, Prakash R, Jain S, Pramod K, Tiwari KP. Spoligotyping,phenotypic and genotypic characterization of katG, rpoB gene of M. tuberculosisisolates from Sahariya tribe of Madhya Pradesh India. J Infect Public Health 2019; 12:395–02. doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2018.12.009.

59. Kibiki GS, Mulder B, Dolmans WMV, De Beer JL, Boeree M, Sam N, et al. M.tuberculosis genotypic diversity and drug susceptibility pattern in HIV- infected andnon-HIV-infected patients in northern Tanzania. BMC Microbiol 2007;7:1– 8.

60. Perdigão J, Silva H, Machado D, Macedo R, Maltez F, Silva C, et al. UnravelingMycobacterium tuberculosis genomic diversity and evolution in Lisbon, Portugal, ahighly drug resistant setting. BMC Genomics 2014;15(November (1))991. . Availablefrom: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25407810.

61. Lukoye D, Katabazi FA, Musisi K, Kateete DP, Asiimwe BB, Okee M. The T2Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genotype, Predominant in Kampala, Uganda, ShowsNegative Correlation with Antituberculosis Drug Resistance. Antimicrob AgentsChemother 2014;58(7):3853–9, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ AAC.02338-13.

62. Mulenga C, Chonde A, Bwalya IC, Kapata N, Kakungu-Simpungwe M, Docx S, et al.Low occurrence of tuberculosis drug resistance among pulmonary tuberculosis patientsfrom an urban setting, with a long-running DOTS program in Zambia. Tuberc Res Treat2010;2010:938178. . 2010/06/30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22567261.

63. Hillemann D, Kubica T, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Niemann S. Disequilibrium in distribution ofresistance mutations among Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing and nonBeijingstrains isolated from patients in Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2005;49(3):1229–31.

64. Prim RI, Schörner MA, Senna SG, Nogueira CL, Figueiredo ACC, de Oliveira JG, etal. Molecular profiling of drug resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in thestate of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2015;110 5:618–23. .2015/07/07. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/26154743.

65. San LL, Aye KS, Nan Aye TO, Shwe MM, Fukushima Y, Gordon SV, et al. Insightinto multidrug-resistant Beijing genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates inMyanmar. Int J Infect Dis 2018;76:109–19, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.06.009.

66. Lipin MY, Stepanshina VN, Shemyakin IG, Shinnick TM. Association of specificmutations in katG, rpoB, rpsL and rrs genes with spoligotypes of multidrugresistantMycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Russia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007;13 (6):620–

67. Comas I, Borrell S, Roetzer A, Rose G, Malla B, Kato-Maeda M, et al. Whole-genomesequencing of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains identifiescompensatory mutations in RNA polymerase genes. Nat Genet 2012;44 (1):106.

68. de Vos M, Müller B, Borrell S, Black PA, van Helden PD, Warren RM, et al. Putativecompensatory mutations in the rpoC gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacteriumtuberculosis are associated with ongoing transmission. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2013;57 (2) 827–32.

69. Zumla A, Abubakar I, Raviglione M, Hoelscher M, Ditiu L, McHugh TD, et al. Drugresistant tuberculosis—current dilemmas, unanswered questions, challenges, andpriority needs. J Infect Dis 2012;205 (Suppl 2):S228–40.

70. World Health Organization (WHO). Global tuberculosis report 2018. Geneva, Switzerland:WHO; 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274453.

71. Aye KS, Nakajima C, Yamaguchi T, Win MM, Shwe MM, Win AA, et al. Genotypiccharacterization of multi-drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates inMyanmar. J Infect Chemother 2016;22:174–9.

72. Van Rie A, Warren R, Mshanga I, Jordaan AM, van der Spuy GD, Richardson M, et al.Analysis for a limited number of gene codons can predict drug resistance ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in a high-incidence community. J Clin Microbiol2001;39:636–41.

73. Ahmad S, Araj GF, Akbar PK, Fares E, Chugh TD, Mustafa AS. Characterization ofrpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from theMiddle East. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;38:227–32.

74. Unissa AN, Subbian S, Hanna LE, Selvakumar N. Overview on mechanisms ofisoniazid action and resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Genet Evol2016;45:474–92.

75. Jagielski T, Bakuła Z, Roeske K, Kamiński M, Napiórkowska A, AugustynowiczKopeć E, Zwolska Z, Bielecki J. Detection of mutations associated with isoniazidresistance in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. JAntimicrob Chemother 2014; 69: 2369–2375, doi:10.1093/jac/dku161.

76. Spindola de Miranda S, Kritski A, Filliol I, Mabilat C, Panteix G, Drouet E. Mutationsin the rpoB gene of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated inBrazil and France. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2001;96:247–50.

77. Hillemann D, Kubica T, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Niemann S. Disequilibrium in distribution ofresistance mutations among Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing and non-Beijingstrains isolated from patients in Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2005;49:1229–31.

78. Bollela VR, Namburete EI, Feliciano CS, Macheque D, Harrison LH, Caminero JA.Detection of katG and inhA mutations to guide isoniazid and ethionamide use for drugresistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2016;20:1099–104.

79. Soudani A, Hadjfredj S, Zribi M, Masmoudi A, Messaoud T, Tiouri H, etal.Characterization of Tunisian Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampin-resistant clinicalisolates. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:3095–7.

80. Haas WH, Schilke K, Brand J, Amthor B, Weyer K, Fourie PB, et al. Molecular analysisof katG gene mutations in strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from Africa.Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1601–3.

81. Kozhamkulov U, Akhmetova A, Rakhimova S, Belova E, Alenova A, Bismilda V, et al.Molecular characterization of rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacteriumtuberculosis strains isolated in Kazakhstan. Jpn J Infect Dis 2011;64:253–5.

82. Lipin MY, Stepanshina VN, Shemyakin IG, Shinnink TM. Association of specificmutations in katG, rpoB, rpsL and rrs genes with spoligotypes of multidrug-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Russia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007;13:620–6.

83. André E, Goeminne L, Colmant A, Beckert P, Niemann S, Delmee M. Novel rapid PCRfor the detection of Ile491Phe rpoB mutation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, arifampicin-resistance-conferring mutation undetected by commercial assays. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2017;23: 267.e5–7.

84. Ssengooba W, Meehan CJ, Lukoye D, Kasule GW, Musisi K, Joloba ML, et al. Wholegenome sequencing to complement tuberculosis drug resistance surveys in Uganda.Infect Genet Evol 2016;40:8–16.

85. Schilke K, Weyer K, Bretzel G, Amthor B, BrandtJ, Sticht-Groh V, et al. Universalpattern of rpoB gene mutations among multidrug-resistant isolates of Mycobacteriumtuberculosis complex from Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:620–6.

86. Racheal S, Dhlamini Z, Mutetwa R, Duri K, Stray-Pedersen B, Mason P. Diagnosis ofmulti-drug resistant tuberculosis mutations using Hain line probe assay and GeneXpert:a study done in Zimbabwe. Br J Med Res 2015;5:1044–52.

87. Bobadilla-del-Valle M, Ponce-de-Leon A, Arenas-Huertero C, Vargas-Alarcon G, KatoMaeda M, Small PM, et al. rpoB gene mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacteriumtuberculosis identified by polymerase chain reaction single stranded conformationalpolymorphism. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:1010–3.

88. Tekwu EM, Sidze LK,Assam JP, Tedom JC, Tchatchouang S,Makafe GG, et al.Sequence analysis for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex isolates from the Central Region of Cameroon. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:113.

89. WHO, Technical Report on critical concentrations for drug susceptibility testing ofisoniazid and the rifamycins (rifampicin, rifabutin and rifapentine) 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo. (accessed 12th February 2021)

90. Rouse DA, DeVito JA, Li Z, Byer H, Morris SL. Site-directed mutagenesis of the katGgene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: effects on catalase-peroxidase activities andisoniazid resistance. Mol Microbiol 1996;22:583–92.

91. Mokrousov I, Narvskaya O, Otten T, Limeschenko E, Steklova L, Vyshnevskiy B. Highprevalence of katG Ser315Thr substitution among isoniazid-resistant Mycobacteriumtuberculosis clinical isolates from Northwestern Russia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2002;46:1417–24.

92. Bakonyte D, Baranauskaite A, Cicenaite J, Sosnovskaja A, Stakenas P. Molecularcharacterization of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates inLithuania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:2009–11.

93. Hu S, Li G, Li H, Liu X, Miu J, Quan S, et al. Rapid detection of isoniazid resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by use of real-time-PCR-based melting curveanalysis. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:1644–52.

94. Kapata N, Chanda-Kapata P, Ngosa W, Metitiri M, Klinkenberg E, Kalisvaart N, et al.The prevalence of tuberculosis in Zambia: results from the first national TB prevalencesurvey, 2013–2014. PLoS One 2016;11:e0146392.

95. Ghodousi A, Tagliani E, Karunaratne E, Niemann S, Perera J, Köser CU, et al. Isoniazidresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a heterogeneous phenotype composed ofoverlapping MIC distributions with different underlying resistance mechanisms.Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63: pii: e00092-19.

96. Githui WA, Jordaan AM, Juma ES, Kinyanjui P, Karimi FG, Kimwomi J, et al.Identification of MDR-TB Beijing/W and other Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypesin Nairobi, Kenya. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:352–60.

97. Soudani A, Hadjfredj S, Zribi M, Messaadi F, Messaoud T, Masmoudi A, et al.Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Tunisian isoniazid-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J Microbiol 2011;49:413–7.

98. Vijdea R, Stegger M, Sosnovskaja A, Andersen AB, Thomsen VØ, Bang D. Multidrugresistant tuberculosis: rapid detection of resistance to rifampin and high or low levels ofisoniazid in clinical specimens and isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis2008;27:1079–86.

99. Guo H, Seet Q, Denkin S, Parsons L, Zhang Y. Molecular characterization of isoniazidresistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the USA. J MedMicrobiol 2006;55:1527–31.

100. Baker LV, Brown TJ, Maxwell O, Gibson AL, Fang Z, Yates MD, et al. Molecularanalysis of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from England andWales reveals phylogenetic significance of the ahpC–46A polymorphism. AntimicrobAgents Chemother 2005;49:1455–64.

101. Müller B, Streicher EM, Hoek KG, Tait A, Trollip A, Bosman ME, et al. inhA promotermutations: a gateway to extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa? Int JTuberc Lung Dis 2011;15:344–51.

102. Abate D, Tedla Y, Meressa D, Ameni G. Isoniazid and rifampicin resistance mutationsand their effect on second-line anti-tuberculosis treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis2014;18:946–51.

103. Coll F, Phelan J, Hill-Cawthorne GA, Nair MB, Mallard K, Ali S, et al. Genome-wideanalysis of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Genet2018;50:307–16.

104. Chaidir L, Ruesen C, Dutilh BE, Ganiem AR, Andryani A, Apriani L, et al. Use of wholegenome sequencing to predict Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance in Indonesia.J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2019;16:170–7.

105. Mitchison DA. How drug resistance emerges as a result of poor compliance during shortcourse chemotherapy for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:10–5.

106. Kodera T, Yamaguchi T, Fukushima Y, Kobayashi K, Takarada Y, Chizimu JY,Nakajima C, Solo ES, Lungu PS, Kawase M, Suzuki Y. Rapid and simple detection ofisoniazid resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis utilizing DNA chromatography basedtechnique. Jpn J Infect Dis 2020;73:214-9.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る