[1] D.J. Gross and E. Witten, Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice
Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 446 [INSPIRE].
[2] N. Seiberg, Topology in Strong Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 637 [INSPIRE].
[3] E. Witten, Theta dependence in the large N limit of four-dimensional gauge theories, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 2862 [hep-th/9807109] [INSPIRE].
[4] D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, Theta, Time Reversal and
Temperature, JHEP 05 (2017) 091 [arXiv:1703.00501] [INSPIRE].
[5] M. Levin and C.P. Nave, Tensor renormalization group approach to 2D classical lattice
models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 120601 [cond-mat/0611687] [INSPIRE].
[6] Y. Shimizu, Tensor renormalization group approach to a lattice boson model, Mod. Phys.
Lett. A 27 (2012) 1250035 [INSPIRE].
[7] Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi, Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to
one-flavor lattice Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 014508 [arXiv:1403.0642]
[INSPIRE].
–8–
JHEP04(2020)089
We have applied the TRG method to study the 2D pure U(1) gauge theory with a θ term.
The continuous degrees of freedom are discretized with the Gauss quadrature method. We
have confirmed that this model has a first-order phase transition at θ = π as predicted
from the analytical calculation. The successful analysis of the model demonstrates an effectiveness of the Gauss quadrature approach to the gauge theories. It should be interesting
to apply the TRG-based methods with the Gauss quadrature to higher dimensional gauge
theories with θ term which have been hardly investigated by the Monte Carlo approach
because of the sign problem. Another interesting research direction is to include fermionic
degrees of freedom following the Grassmann TRG method developed in ref. [7]. This is a
necessary ingredient toward investigation of the phase structure of QCD at finite density.
[8] Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi, Critical behavior of the lattice Schwinger model with a
topological term at θ = π using the Grassmann tensor renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D
90 (2014) 074503 [arXiv:1408.0897] [INSPIRE].
[9] Y. Shimizu and Y. Kuramashi, Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in lattice Schwinger
model with one flavor of Wilson fermion, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 034502
[arXiv:1712.07808] [INSPIRE].
[10] S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Grassmann tensor renormalization group for the one-flavor
lattice Gross-Neveu model with finite chemical potential, PTEP 2015 (2015) 043B01
[arXiv:1412.7855] [INSPIRE].
[12] D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Tensor
network formulation for two-dimensional lattice N = 1 Wess-Zumino model, JHEP 03
(2018) 141 [arXiv:1801.04183] [INSPIRE].
[13] R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Higher order tensor renormalization group for
relativistic fermion systems, PTEP 2017 (2017) 063B07 [arXiv:1705.07764] [INSPIRE].
[14] Y. Yoshimura, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, S. Takeda and R. Sakai, Calculation of
fermionic Green functions with Grassmann higher-order tensor renormalization group, Phys.
Rev. D 97 (2018) 054511 [arXiv:1711.08121] [INSPIRE].
[15] J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zhang, A. Bazavov, Y. Meurice and S.-W. Tsai, Universal features of
the Abelian Polyakov loop in 1+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 094511
[arXiv:1807.09186] [INSPIRE].
[16] D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura, Tensor
network analysis of critical coupling in two dimensional φ4 theory, JHEP 05 (2019) 184
[arXiv:1811.12376] [INSPIRE].
[17] Y. Kuramashi and Y. Yoshimura, Three-dimensional finite temperature Z2 gauge theory with
tensor network scheme, JHEP 08 (2019) 023 [arXiv:1808.08025] [INSPIRE].
[18] N. Butt, S. Catterall, Y. Meurice and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Tensor network formulation of the
massless Schwinger model, arXiv:1911.01285 [INSPIRE].
[19] D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura,
Investigation of complex φ4 theory at finite density in two dimensions using TRG, JHEP 02
(2020) 161 [arXiv:1912.13092] [INSPIRE].
[20] S.R. Coleman, More About the Massive Schwinger Model, Annals Phys. 101 (1976) 239
[INSPIRE].
[21] L. Funcke, K. Jansen and S. K¨
uhn, Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model
with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054507 [arXiv:1908.00551] [INSPIRE].
[22] U.J. Wiese, Numerical Simulation of Lattice θ Vacua: The 2-d U(1) Gauge Theory as a Test
Case, Nucl. Phys. B 318 (1989) 153 [INSPIRE].
[23] Y. Liu et al., Exact Blocking Formulas for Spin and Gauge Models, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013)
056005 [arXiv:1307.6543] [INSPIRE].
[24] A.S. Hassan, M. Imachi and H. Yoneyama, Real space renormalization group analysis of U(1)
gauge theory with Theta term in two-dimensions, Prog. Theor. Phys. 93 (1995) 161
[hep-lat/9410003] [INSPIRE].
–9–
JHEP04(2020)089
[11] H. Kawauchi and S. Takeda, Tensor renormalization group analysis of CP (N − 1) model,
Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 114503 [arXiv:1603.09455] [INSPIRE].
[25] A.S. Hassan, M. Imachi, N. Tsuzuki and H. Yoneyama, Character expansion, zeros of
partition function and theta term in U(1) gauge theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. 94 (1995) 861
[hep-lat/9508011] [INSPIRE].
[26] J.C. Plefka and S. Samuel, Monte Carlo studies of two-dimensional systems with a theta
term, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 44 [hep-lat/9704016] [INSPIRE].
JHEP04(2020)089
– 10 –
...