リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Chirality Generation under Strong Electromagnetic Fields and the Schwinger Mechanism」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Chirality Generation under Strong Electromagnetic Fields and the Schwinger Mechanism

Copinger, Patrick Arthur 東京大学 DOI:10.15083/0002004684

2022.06.22

概要

Anomalies are ubiquitous and of the utmost importance in our understanding of the behavior of quantum field theories (QFT). An anomaly occurs when a symmetry that might be classically conserved is broken by quantum effects [1]. A noteworthy example and basis of this work is the chiral symmetry. Massless theories, it seems, ought to decouple into left and right-handed parts– classically. However due to the anomaly, the chiral symmetry is broken and leads to the generation of mass predicting the bulk of the visible mass in the universe [2, 3]. There exists indirect evidence of the chiral anomaly in QCD through the large pseudoscalar meson mass, however, direct evidence is lacking. And, an important manifestation of the chiral anomaly that might be directly observable is the chiral magnetic effect [4].

The chiral magnetic effect (CME) is the generation of an electromagnetic current in the presence of and parallel to an external magnetic field due to a chirality imbalance. Simply stated in special parity-violating backgrounds the chiral anomaly dictates a non-conservation of chirality. Then the chirality imbalance–for approximately massless fermions–elicits a net current in the direction of the magnetic field due to a polarization effect of the strong field.

The strong magnetic field for the CME is, in fact, a key feature in heavy-ion collisions and hence the CME and anomalous effects should be observable there. Identifying the CME in colliders is a challenging task, however. A relativistic fermionic dispersion relation is producible in condensed matter environments such as Weyl and Dirac semimetals. And, in fact, in such analog environments, the electromagnetic current associated with the CME has been directly observed, such as for a Dirac semimetal [5]. Then it becomes an essential task to verify the CME’s existence in QCD. However, in contrast to the condensed matter system, there are theoretical shortcomings that should be addressed first. These are the CME’s behavior under a finite mass and in and out-of-equilibrium. Furthermore, how might a chirality imbalance be generated in the first place?

An essential feature of the CME is a finite generation of a net chirality. The CME is typically described with a chiral chemical potential, in essence, an insertion of chirality imbalance by hand into the theory. However, it would be desirable to have a chirality imbalance emerge organically. This is critical especially for heavy-ion collisions, as globally there is no net chirality in a collision event. However, locally this may not be the case [6]. The insertion of a chiral chemical potential is likened to an insertion of an out-of-equilibrium quantity into an equilibrated system.

Considering the transient nature of the CME in colliders, it too would be essential to acquire an out-of-equilibrium description of the CME. Moreover, how might one characterize the observables related to the anomalous generation of chirality in and out-of-equilibrium? In colliders, a dense gluonic state forms called the glasma [7, 8], which is thought to give rise to chromo-electromagnetic flux tubes thought to encase parity-violating configuration responsible for the CME [9]. And indeed, the glasma is highly un-equilibrated.

A final issue with the CME in QCD is that quarks have a finite mass, even though small. This has observable consequences we will find out. It is important to address the significance of the fermion mass in applications to the anomaly as well in high-energy applications. Frequently, in fact, the fermion mass is dropped in anomalous physics studies; we will later show that this dismissal is not so trivial.

An answer to the above problems we find can be furnished with a vacuum instability called the Schwinger mechanism. Unstable QFTs have a rich history whose physics underlie significant achievements in the field, including but not limited to spontaneous symmetry breaking [10], Hawking radiation [11], and the topic of this thesis, the Schwinger mechanism [12]. The Schwinger mechanism predicts a spontaneous generation of particle anti-particle pairs from the QFT vacuum due to a vacuum instability in an external electric field. In brief, the electric field of the Schwinger mechanism, from an intuitive classical perspective, is thought to pull apart virtual particle antiparticle pairs, allowing tunneling from the Dirac sea to the QFT continuum. In QCD the process is thought to occur in chromo-electric flux tube breaking leading to hadronization [13].

How then might one foresee a net chirality from the Schwinger mechanism? This occurs with a strong magnetic field parallel to the electric field. When a particle anti-particle pair are produced due to the strong magnetic field, the pairs’ spins will become polarized, in essence setting up a net chirality [9].

A concrete means of calculating the effects of the anomaly with mass effects stemming from the Schwinger mechanism relies on the use of, an exact at the operator level, axial Ward identity [14, 15]. The axial Ward identity predicts a chirality non-conservation not only due to the chiral anomaly but also due to a mass-dependent pseudoscalar term. While the axial Ward identity is well known at the operator level, how it behaves under expectation values is unknown–particularly the case for the Schwinger mechanism. However, a straightforward calculation using traditional QFT methods predicts no effects from the Schwinger mechanism. Moreover, it also predicts a conservation of chirality, in other words, no anomaly! This is, however, in disagreement with the heuristically motivated picture just presented and it has remained a mystery how to reconcile the heuristic picture with expectation values. Furthermore, as the traditional QFT methods are a valid observable, what is it that they are observing?

The solutions to the above-presented problems, we find, are through the identification of vacuum states of the expectation values [16]. In-out or in-in expectation values yield completely different physical outcomes, the former we argue represents a scenario of Euclidean equilibrium and the latter an out-of-equilibrium scenario.

An in-out expectation value represents one found using traditional QFT methods, which describe a matrix element of a scattering state. So long as the in vacuum equal the out vacuum, then the in- in and in-out values would coincide, however, this is not the case for the Schwinger mechanism. We find for the pseudoscalar, and hence axial Ward identity, and CME current using in-out expectation values

There are no effects coming from the anomaly. We can understand this in that the Wick rotated QFT Lagrangian represents a Euclidean one in equilibrium. Thus the anomaly and hence CME does not exist in equilibrium. In other words, the above expectation values simply represent a scenario where no particles are produced in the out state. This is not the case, however, for in-in expectation values. Even so, the above cancellation has profound implications for the study of the anomaly and CME in that we see out-of-equilibrium methods are necessitated.

The anomaly and CME do, however, exist out-of-equilibrium. And one can reliably find outof-equilibrium expectation values using in-in vacuum states–this is also the same as a SchwingerKeldysh contour. A characteristic exponential mass indicative of the Schwinger mechanism is found for such cases. We find (in comparison to the in-out case above)

We find with the inclusion of the Schwinger mechanism in-in observables give rise to the anomaly and CME. What is more, is the exponential suppression of the Schwinger mechanism is indeed strong. This has implications for theories that rely on the anomaly. It is, for example, important for theories of baryogenesis or in heavy-ion colliders.

In light of the new knowledge of the anomaly out-of-equilibrium with mass effects, we also examine related applications such as the chiral condensate, chiral fluctuations, and inhomogeneous parity-violating fields.

In analogy to cooper pairing in a superconductor, the breaking of the chiral symmetry in QCD can be characterized through a non-zero chiral condensate–even for massless QCD. Then, it becomes a natural question to ask what else might give rise to a non-zero condensate. Actually, a background magnetic field can do this; and is referred to as magnetic catalysis [17–19]. While the chiral condensate is well-known under a magnetic field how it behaves under an electric field and with effects stemming from the Schwinger mechanism is unknown. We find an electric fields acts, opposite to the magnetic field, to oppose the formation of condensate–in effect separating it. The emergence of the Schwinger produced pairs can even negate the condensate all together. The melting of the chiral condensate could be impactful in the study of chiral symmetry breaking in QCD.

During the formation of flux tubes in the early stages of heavy-ion collision, a net chirality via the Schwinger mechanism may be producible. However, in the final state of a collision event, one ought to expect a (global) net chirality of zero. Even so, locally this is thought not to be the case. [6, 20]. A measure for the local formation of chirality imbalance is provided through the calculation of chiral density fluctuations. Therefore, it is important that such chiral density fluctuations be addressed using our in-out and in-in formalisms. We, indeed, find in support of other chiral related observables a similar exponential suppression indicative of the Schwinger mechanism. Both the equilibrated and out-of-equilibrium chiral density fluctuations are finite; however, as expected only real-time dependence was seen for the out-of-equilibrium in-in case. Given the highly transient nature of heavy-ion collision events, it is also important to address more relevant inhomogeneous background fields in the generation of chirality due to the Schwinger mechanism.

Inhomogeneous fields are not only important for realistic backgrounds but, in fact, they can also considerably reduce the threshold for Schwinger pair production. Then it would be instructive to apply our above ideas of the generation of chirality in more advanced field types. So that we still have parity-violating fields, we explore the case of temporally inhomogeneous electric fields along with spatially inhomogeneous magnetic fields. The former is well known to reduce the threshold for pair production, culminating in “dynamically assisted electric fields [21].” However, we find, additionally, spatially inhomogeneous magnetic fields may enhance the Schwinger mechanism [22]. This proceeds by a lowering of the excited Landau levels for a Sauter-like pulsed magnetic field.

参考文献

[1] K. Fujikawa, “Path Integral Measure for Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195 (1979).

[2] Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, “Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity I,” Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).

[3] Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, “Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity II,” Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).

[4] K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, “Chiral magnetic eect,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008).

[5] Q. Li, D. E. Kharzeev, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, I. Pletikosic, A. V. Fedorov, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, and T. Valla, “Observation of the chiral magnetic eect in ZrTe5,” Nat. Phys. 12, 550 (2016).

[6] Z. Wang, Y. Sun, X.-Q. Chen, C. Franchini, G. Xu, H. Weng, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, “Dirac semimetal and topological phase transitions in A3Bi (A = Na, K, Rb),” Phys. Rev. B 85, 195320 (2012).

[7] Z. Wang, H. Weng, Q. Wu, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, “Three-dimensional Dirac semimetal and quantum transport in Cd3As2,” Phys. Rev. B 88, 125427 (2013).

[8] M. Neupane, S.-Y. Xu, R. Sankar, N. Alidoust, G. Bian, C. Liu, I. Belopolski, T.-R. Chang, H.-T. Jeng, H. Lin, A. Bansil, F. Chou, and M. Z. Hasan, “Observation of a three-dimensional topological Dirac semimetal phase in highmobility Cd3As2,” Nat. Commun. 5, 3786 (2014).

[9] Z. K. Liu, J. Jiang, B. Zhou, Z. J. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. M. Weng, D. Prabhakaran, S.-K. Mo, H. Peng, P. Dudin, T. Kim, M. Hoesch, Z. Fang, X. Dai, Z. X. Shen, D. L. Feng, Z. Hussain, and Y. L. Chen, “A stable threedimensional topological Dirac semimetal Cd3As2,” Nat. Mater. 13, 677 (2014).

[10] D. Kharzeev, K. Landsteiner, A. Schmitt, and H.-U. Yee, Strongly Interacting Matter in Magnetic Fields (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013).

[11] D. Kharzeev, A. Krasnitz, and R. Venugopalan, “Anomalous chirality fluctuations in the initial stage of heavy ion collisions and parity odd bubbles,” Phys. Lett. B 545, 298 (2002).

[12] T. Lappi and L. McLerran, “Some features of the glasma,” Nucl. Phys. A 772, 200 (2006).

[13] K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, “Real-time dynamics of the Chiral Magnetic Eect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 212001 (2010).

[14] L. Barron, “True and false chirality and parity violation,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 123, 423 (1986).

[15] J. S. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,” Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).

[16] A. Casher, H. Neuberger, and S. Nussinov, “Chromoelectric-flux-tube model of particle production,” Phys. Rev. D 20, 179 (1979).

[17] S. L. Adler, “Axial-Vector Vertex in Spinor Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).

[18] J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: fi0 æ ““ in the ‡ model,” Nuovo Cim. A60, 47 (1969).

[19] P. Copinger, K. Fukushima, and S. Pu, “Axial Ward identity and the Schwinger mechanism – Applications to the real-time chiral magnetic eect and condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 261602 (2018).

[20] V. Domcke, Y. Ema, and K. Mukaida, “Chiral Anomaly, Schwinger Eect, Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, and application to axion inflation,” (2019), arXiv:1910.01205 [hep-ph] .

[21] K. G. Klimenko, “Three-dimensional Gross-Neveu model at nonzero temperature and in an external magnetic field,” Theor. Math. Phys. 90, 1 (1992).

[22] V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, “Catalysis of dynamical flavor symmetry breaking by a magnetic field in (2+1)-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3499 (1994), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.76,1005(1996)].

[23] I. A. Shovkovy, “Magnetic Catalysis: A Review,” Lect. Notes Phys. 871, 13 (2013).

[24] D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, “The eects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: “Event by event P and CP violation”,” Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008).

[25] A. Bzdak and V. Skokov, “Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 710, 171 (2012).

[26] A. D. Sakharov, “Violation of CP invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,” JETP Lett. 5, 24 (1967).

[27] C. A. Baker et al., “An Improved Experimental Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 131801 (2006).

[28] D. E. Kharzeev, “Topologically induced local P and CP violation in QCD x QED,” Annals Phys. 325, 205 (2010).

[29] A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A. Schwartz, and Y. Tyupkin, “Pseudoparticle solutions of the yang-mills equations,” Phys. Lett. B 59, 85 (1975).

[30] K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, “Electric Field Eect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films,” Science 306, 666 (2004).

[31] S. Borisenko, Q. Gibson, D. Evtushinsky, V. Zabolotnyy, B. B¨uchner, and R. J. Cava, “Experimental Realization of a Three-Dimensional Dirac Semimetal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027603 (2014).

[32] Z. K. Liu, B. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, H. M. Weng, D. Prabhakaran, S.-K. Mo, Z. X. Shen, Z. Fang, X. Dai, Z. Hussain, and Y. L. Chen, “Discovery of a Three-Dimensional Topological Dirac Semimetal, Na3Bi,” Science 343, 864 (2014).

[33] D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, “Berry Phase Eects on Electronic Properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010).

[34] M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, “Berry curvature, orbital moment, and eective quantum theory of electrons in electromagnetic fields,” J. of Phys.: Con. Matt. 20, 193202 (2008).

[35] X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and G. Chen, “Observation of the Chiral-AnomalyInduced Negative Magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl Semimetal TaAs,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).

[36] M. A. Stephanov and Y. Yin, “Chiral Kinetic Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 162001 (2012).

[37] D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak, “Chiral Anomaly and Classical Negative Magnetoresistance of Weyl Metals,” Phys. Rev. B 88, 104412 (2013).

[38] Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, “Globally Polarized Quark-Gluon Plasma in Noncentral A + A Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005).

[39] X.-G. Huang, P. Huovinen, and X.-N. Wang, “Quark polarization in a viscous quark-gluon plasma,” Phys. Rev. C 84, 054910 (2011).

[40] D. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. Voloshin, and G. Wang, “Chiral magnetic and vortical eects in high-energy nuclear collisions–a status report,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 88, 1 (2016).

[41] B. I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collaboration), “Azimuthal Charged-Particle Correlations and Possible Local Strong Parity Violation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 251601 (2009).

[42] B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), “Charge separation relative to the reaction plane in pb-pb collisions at ÔsNN =2.76 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012301 (2013).

[43] F. Sauter, “Uber das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen ¨ Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,” Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik 69, 742 (1931).

[44] W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, “Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,” Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).

[45] S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).

[46] W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black-hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).

[47] P. W. Higgs, “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964).

[48] O. Klein, “Die Reflexion von Elektronen an einem Potentialsprung nach der relativistischen Dynamik von Dirac,” Z. Phys. 53, 157 (1929).

[49] R. Schutzhold, H. Gies, and G. Dunne, “Dynamically assisted Schwinger mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130404 (2008).

[50] G. V. Dunne, “The search for the Schwinger eect: Nonperturbative vacuum pair production,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25, 2373 (2010).

[51] A. Yildiz and P. H. Cox, “Vacuum behavior in quantum chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 21, 1095 (1980).

[52] J. Ambjorn and R. J. Hughes, “Canonical quantisation in non-Abelian background fields,” Annals Phys. 145, 340 (1983).

[53] M. Gyulassy and A. Iwazaki, “Quark and gluon pair production in SU(N) covariant constant fields,” Phys. Lett. B 165, 157 (1985).

[54] C. Schubert, “Perturbative quantum field theory in the string-inspired formalism,” Phys. Rept. 355, 73 (2001).

[55] O. Corradini and C. Schubert, “Spinning Particles in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory,” (2015) arXiv:1512.08694 [hep-th] .

[56] D. Sauzin, “Resurgent functions and splitting problems,” (2007), arXiv:0706.0137 [math.DS] .

[57] M. F. Linder, A. Lorke, and R. Sch¨utzhold, “Analog Sauter-Schwinger eect in semiconductors for spacetime-dependent fields,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 035203 (2018).

[58] L. D. Landau, “Zur Theorie der Energieubertragung II,” Phys. Z. Sowjet. 2, 46 (1932).

[59] C. Zener and R. H. Fowler, “Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels,” Proc. R. Soc. (London) A 137, 696 (1932).

[60] J. Kim, S. S. Baik, S. H. Ryu, Y. Sohn, S. Park, B.-G. Park, J. Denlinger, Y. Yi, H. J. Choi, and K. S. Kim, “Observation of tunable band gap and anisotropic Dirac semimetal state in black phosphorus,” Science 349, 723 (2015).

[61] E. Kane, “Zener tunneling in semiconductors,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12, 181 (1960).

[62] D. Allor, T. D. Cohen, and D. A. McGady, “Schwinger mechanism and graphene,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 096009 (2008).

[63] B. D´ora and R. Moessner, “Nonlinear electric transport in graphene: Quantum quench dynamics and the Schwinger mechanism,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 165431 (2010).

[64] S. Vajna, B. D´ora, and R. Moessner, “Nonequilibrium transport and statistics of Schwinger pair production in Weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 085122 (2015).

[65] M. Marklund and J. Lundin, “Quantum vacuum experiments using high intensity lasers,” Eur. Phys. J. D55, 319 (2009).

[66] G. V. Dunne, “New Strong-Field QED Eects at ELI: Nonperturbative Vacuum Pair Production,” Eur. Phys. J. D55, 327 (2009).

[67] A. Ringwald, “Boiling the Vacuum with An X-Ray Free Electron Laser,” in Quantum Aspects of Beam Physics 2003 (2004) pp. 149–163.

[68] T. Heinzl and A. Ilderton, “Exploring high-intensity QED at ELI,” Eur. Phys. J. D55, 359 (2009).

[69] A. Gonoskov, S. Bastrakov, E. Efimenko, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, I. Meyerov, A. Muraviev, A. Sergeev, I. Surmin, and E. Wallin, “Extended particle-in-cell schemes for physics in ultrastrong laser fields: Review and developments,” Phys. Rev. E 92, 023305 (2015).

[70] C. Bamber, S. J. Boege, T. Koas, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, D. A. Reis, W. Ragg, C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, and A. W. Weidemann, “Studies of nonlinear QED in collisions of 46.6 GeV electrons with intense laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 092004 (1999).

[71] M. Ruf, G. R. Mocken, C. Muller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, “Pair Production in Laser Fields Oscillating in Space and Time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 080402 (2009).

[72] D. Kharzeev, E. Levin, and K. Tuchin, “Multi-particle production and thermalization in high-energy QCD,” Phys. Rev. C75, 044903 (2007).

[73] N. Tanji, “Quark pair creation in color electric fields and eects of magnetic fields,” Annals Phys. 325, 2018 (2010).

[74] Y. Zhong, C.-B. Yang, X. Cai, and S.-Q. Feng, “Spatial distributions of magnetic field in the RHIC and LHC energy regions,” Chin. Phys. C 39, 104105 (2015).

[75] L. Keldysh, “IONIZATION IN THE FIELD OF A STRONG ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE,” Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965).

[76] N. B. Narozhnyi and A. I. Nikishov, “The Simplist processes in the pair creating electric field,” Yad. Fiz. 11, 1072 (1970).

[77] H. Gies and K. Klingmuller, “Pair production in inhomogeneous fields,” Phys. Rev. D D72, 065001 (2005).

[78] C. Schneider and R. Schutzhold, “Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous electric fields,” JHEP 02, 164 (2016).

[79] C. Kohlfurst, M. Mitter, G. von Winckel, F. Hebenstreit, and R. Alkofer, “Optimizing the pulse shape for Schwinger pair production,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 045028 (2013).

[80] M. Orthaber, F. Hebenstreit, and R. Alkofer, “Momentum spectra for dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production,” Phys. Lett. B 698, 80 (2011).

[81] K. Enqvist, “Primordial Magnetic Fields,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 7, 331 (1998).

[82] K. Fukushima and C. Sasaki, “The phase diagram of nuclear and quark matter at high baryon density,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 72, 99 (2013).

[83] T. D. Cohen and D. A. McGady, “Schwinger mechanism revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 036008 (2008).

[84] G. V. Dunne, “Heisenberg-Euler eective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions,” in From fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics (2004) pp. 445– 522.

[85] J. Ambjorn, J. Greensite, and C. Peterson, “The axial anomaly and the lattice Dirac sea,” Nuclear Physics B 221, 381 (1983).

[86] P. I. Fomin, V. A. Miransky, and Yu. A. Sitenko, “Infrared problem and boson suppression in massless Abelian gauge theory,” Phys. Lett. B 64, 444 (1976).

[87] J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieer, “Theory of Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).

[88] S. P. Klevansky, “The Nambu—Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).

[89] E. Fradkin, D. Guitman, and S. Shvartsman, Quantum electrodynamics: with unstable vacuum (Springer-Verlag, 1991).

[90] K. Fukushima, F. Gelis, and L. McLerran, “Initial singularity of the little bang,” Nucl. Phys. A 786, 107 (2007).

[91] J. S. Schwinger, “Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,” J. Math. Phys. 2, 407 (1961).

[92] L. V. Keldysh, “Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1515 (1964).

[93] E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008).

[94] A. K. Das, Finite Temperature Field Theory (World Scientific, New York, 1997).

[95] R. D. Jordan, “Eective field equations for expectation values,” Phys. Rev. D 33, 444 (1986).

[96] J. Berges, “Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,” AIP Conf. Proc. 739, 3 (2004).

[97] D. M. Gitman, “Processes of arbitrary order in quantum electrodynamics with a pair creating external field,” J. Phys. A 10, 2007 (1977).

[98] G. Baym and L. P. Kadano, “Conservation Laws and Correlation Functions,” Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961).

[99] F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan, “Particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources, I: Formalism and main results,” Nucl. Phys. A 776, 135 (2006).

[100] F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan, “Particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources, II: Generating functions,” Nucl. Phys. A 779, 177 (2006).

[101] R. P. Feynman, “Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction,” Phys. Rev. 80, 440 (1950).

[102] R. P. Feynman, “An Operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 84, 108 (1951).

[103] I. K. Aeck, O. Alvarez, and N. S. Manton, “Pair production at strong coupling in weak external fields,” Nucl. Phys. B 197, 509 (1982).

[104] G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, “Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogeneous fields,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 105004 (2005).

[105] P. Copinger and K. Fukushima, “Spatially Assisted Schwinger Mechanism and Magnetic Catalysis,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 081603 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.118,099903(2017)].

[106] S. P. Kim and D. N. Page, “Schwinger pair production via instantons in a strong electric fields,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 105002 (2002).

[107] G. V. Dunne, Q.-h. Wang, H. Gies, and C. Schubert, “Worldline instantons and the fluctuation prefactor,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 065028 (2006).

[108] D. Cangemi, E. D’Hoker, and G. V. Dunne, “Eective energy for QED in (2+1)-dimensions with semilocalized magnetic fields: A solvable model,” Phys. Rev. D 52, R3163 (1995).

[109] G. V. Dunne and T. M. Hall, “An exact (3+1)-dimensional QED eective action,” Phys. Lett. B 419, 322 (1998).

[110] T. M. Tritt, N. D. Lowhorn, R. T. Littleton, A. Pope, C. R. Feger, and J. W. Kolis, “Large enhancement of the resistive anomaly in the pentatelluride materials HfTe5 and ZrTe5 with applied magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. B 60, 7816 (1999).

[111] G. N. Kamm, D. J. Gillespie, A. C. Ehrlich, T. J. Wieting, and F. Levy, “Fermi surface, eective masses, and Dingle temperatures of ZrTe5 as derived from the Shubnikov–de Haas eect,” Phys. Rev. B 31, 7617 (1985).

[112] Y. L. Chen, J.-H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, Z. K. Liu, K. Igarashi, H.-H. Kuo, X. L. Qi, S. K. Mo, R. G. Moore, D. H. Lu, M. Hashimoto, T. Sasagawa, S. C. Zhang, I. R. Fisher, Z. Hussain, and Z. X. Shen, “Massive Dirac Fermion on the Surface of a Magnetically Doped Topological Insulator,” Science 329, 659 (2010).

[113] A. A. Burkov, “Chiral Anomaly and Diusive Magnetotransport in Weyl Metals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 247203 (2014).

[114] M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

[115] D. Vasak, M. Gyulassy, and H.-T. Elze, “Quantum transport theory for abelian plasmas,” Annals Phys. 173, 462 (1987).

[116] H.-T. Elze and U. W. Heinz, “Quark-Gluon transport theory,” Phys. Rept. 183, 81 (1989).

[117] A. Yamamoto, “Lattice QCD with Strong External Electric Fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 112001 (2013).

[118] G. V. Dunne, J. Hur, C. Lee, and H. Min, “Precise Quark Mass Dependence of Instanton Determinant,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 072001 (2005).

[119] G. V. Dunne, J. Hur, C. Lee, and H. Min, “Calculation of QCD instanton determinant with arbitrary mass,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 085019 (2005).

[120] H. J. Warringa, “Dynamics of the chiral magnetic eect in a weak magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 085029 (2012).

[121] A. I. Nikishov, “Pair production by a constant external field,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 57, 1210 (1969).

[122] N. Yamamoto, “Generalized Bloch theorem and chiral transport phenomena,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 085011 (2015).

[123] V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, “Dimensional reduction and dynamical chiral symmetry breaking by a magnetic field in (3+1)- dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 349, 477 (1995).

[124] L. Wang, G. Cao, X.-G. Huang, and P. Zhuang, “Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model in a parallel electromagnetic field,” Phys. Lett. B 780, 273 (2018).

[125] D. Boer and J. K. Boomsma, “Spontaneous CP-violation in the strong interaction at ◊=fi,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 054027 (2008)

[126] K. Mameda, “QCD ◊-vacua from the chiral limit to the quenched limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 889, 712 (2014).

[127] S. Vajna, B. Dora, and R. Moessner, “Nonequilibrium transport and statistics of Schwinger pair production in Weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 085122 (2015).

[128] B. Roy and J. D. Sau, “Magnetic catalysis and axionic charge density wave in Weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 125141 (2015).

[129] R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).

[130] O. Gould, A. Rajantie, and C. Xie, “Worldline sphaleron for thermal Schwinger pair production,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 056022 (2018).

[131] A. Ilderton and D. Seipt, “Backreaction on background fields: A coherent state approach,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 016007 (2018).

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る