リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Impact of maintenance of postoperative performance status on survival in elderly patients over 70 with high-grade astrocytoma」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Impact of maintenance of postoperative performance status on survival in elderly patients over 70 with high-grade astrocytoma

Deguchi, Shoichi Mitsuya, Koichi Oishi, Takuma Nakasu, Yoko Sugino, Takashi Hayashi, Nakamasa 名古屋大学

2020.08

概要

This study aimed to identify the elderly generation with the worst prognoses for high-grade astrocytoma and find independent predictors of good outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 91 patients, ≥65 years old, with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test or multivariate Cox regression analysis. We included 21 (23%) and 70 (77%) patients aged 65–69 years and ≥70 years. In the two generations, significant differences were found in the Charlson comorbidity index, extent of resection, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as adjuvant therapy, and radiation dose (all P < 0.05). The median PFS was 9.9 and 6.9 months in patients aged 65–69 and ≥70 years (P = 0.10). The median OS was 22.8 and 11.6 months in patients aged 65–69 and ≥70 years (P = 0.009). In the multivariate analyzes in patients ≥70 years, only postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores ≥70 were significantly related to prolonged PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48, P = 0.04), and postoperative KPS, CRT as adjuvant therapy, and salvage therapy were significantly related to prolonged OS (HR: 0.45, P = 0.03, HR: 0.38, P = 0.002, and HR: 0.43, P = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, in patients ≥70 with high-grade astrocytoma, OS was significantly shorter compared to those aged 65–69. Postoperative KPS score was significantly related to prolonged PFS and OS. Postoperative CRT and salvage therapy at recurrence may be effective in the selected elderly.

関連論文

参考文献

1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide

for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–996.

2. Heiland DH, Haaker G, Watzlawick R, et al. One decade of glioblastoma multiforme surgery in 342 elderly

patients: what have we learned? J Neurooncol. 2018;140(2):385–391.

3. Palmer JD, Bhamidipati D, Mehta M, et al. Treatment recommendations for elderly patients with newly

diagnosed glioblastoma lack worldwide consensus. J Neurooncol. 2018;140(2):421–426.

4. Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C, et al. Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(7):707–715.

5. Malmstrom A, Gronberg BH, Marosi C, et al. Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus

hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised,

phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(9):916–926.

6. Gorlia T, van den Bent MJ, Hegi ME, et al. Nomograms for predicting survival of patients with newly

diagnosed glioblastoma: prognostic factor analysis of EORTC and NCIC trial 26981-22981/CE.3. Lancet

Oncol. 2008;9(1):29–38.

7. Yin AA, Zhang LH, Cheng JX, et al. The predictive but not prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation status in elderly glioblastoma patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85102.

8. Perry JR, Laperriere N, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. Short-course radiation plus temozolomide in elderly patients

with glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1027–1037.

9. Gallego PL, Ducray F, Chinot O, et al. Temozolomide in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

and poor performance status: an ANOCEF phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(22):3050–3055.

10. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous

system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008–2012. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(suppl 4):iv1–iv62.

11. Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma

multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(2):190–198.

12. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas:

response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963–1972.

13. Watanabe R, Nakasu Y, Tashiro H, et al. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor

cells predicts outcome of radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide therapy in patients with

primary glioblastoma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011;28(2):127–135.

14. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow

Transplant. 2013;48(3):452–458.

15. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide

vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(23):2535–2543.

16. Babu R, Komisarow JM, Agarwal VJ, et al. Glioblastoma in the elderly: the effect of aggressive and modern

therapies on survival. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(4):998–1007.

17. Iwamoto FM, Cooper AR, Reiner AS, Nayak L, Abrey LE. Glioblastoma in the elderly: the Memorial

Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Experience (1997–2007). Cancer. 2009;115(16):3758–3766.

18. Morgan ER, Norman A, Laing K, Seal MD. Treatment and outcomes for glioblastoma in elderly compared

with non-elderly patients: a population-based study. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(2):e92–e98.

19. Tanaka S, Meyer FB, Buckner JC, Uhm JH, Yan ES, Parney IF. Presentation, management, and outcome

of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in elderly patients. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(4):786–798.

20. Tsang DS, Khan L, Perry JR, et al. Survival outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma. Clin Oncol

(R Coll Radiol). 2015;27(3):176–183.

543

The elderly with high grade astrocytoma

21. Karsy M, Yoon N, Boettcher L, et al. Surgical treatment of glioblastoma in the elderly: the impact of

complications. J Neurooncol. 2018;138(1):123–132.

22. D’Amico RS, Cloney MB, Sonabend AM, et al. The safety of surgery in elderly patients with primary and

recurrent glioblastoma. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(4):913–919.

23. Di Cristofori A, Zarino B, Fanizzi C, et al. Analysis of factors influencing the access to concomitant

chemo-radiotherapy in elderly patients with high grade gliomas: role of MMSE, age and tumor volume. J

Neurooncol. 2017;134(2):377–385.

24. Amsbaugh MJ, Yusuf MB, Gaskins J, Burton EC, Woo SY. Patterns of care and predictors of adjuvant

therapies in elderly patients with glioblastoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer.

2017;123(17):3277–3284.

25. Gately L, Collins A, Murphy M, Dowling A. Age alone is not a predictor for survival in glioblastoma. J

Neurooncol. 2016;129(3):479–485.

26. Huang J, Samson P, Perkins SM, et al. Impact of concurrent chemotherapy with radiation therapy for elderly

patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a review of the National Cancer Data Base. J Neurooncol.

2017;131(3):593–601.

27. Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA, et al. New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in

patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II

clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(8):1176–1184.

28. Zanello M, Roux A, Ursu R, et al. Recurrent glioblastomas in the elderly after maximal first-line

treatment: does preserved overall condition warrant a maximal second-line treatment? J Neurooncol.

2017;135(2):285–297.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る