Non-perturbative Aspects of Higgs Physics in the Standard Model and Beyond

[1] M. Eto, Y. Hamada, M. Kurachi and M. Nitta, Topological Nambu monopole in two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Lett. B802 (2020) 135220 [1904.09269]. (Cited on pages iii, 26, 30, and 36.)

[2] M. Eto, Y. Hamada and M. Nitta, Topological structure of a Nambu monopole in two-Higgs-doublet models: Fiber bundle, Dirac’s quantization, and a dyon, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 105018 [2007.15587]. (Cited on pages iii, 15, 22, and 33.)

[3] M. Eto, Y. Hamada, M. Kurachi and M. Nitta, Dynamics of Nambu monopole in two Higgs doublet models – Cosmological Monopole Collider –, 2003.08772. (Cited on pages iii, 36, 49, 55, 56, 57, 58, and 60.)

[4] Y. Hamada and K. Kikuchi, Obtaining the sphaleron field configurations with gradient flow, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 096014 [2003.02070]. (Cited on pages iii, 68, 72, and 73.)

[5] Y. Hamada and H. Kawai, Axial U(1) current in Grabowska and Kaplan’s formulation, PTEP 2017 (2017) 063B09 [1705.01317].(Cited on pages iii and 81.)

[6] Y. Hamada, K. Tsumura and M. Yamada, Scalegenesis and fermionic dark matters in the flatland scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 368 [2002.03666]. (Cited on pages iii, 103, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, and 112.)

[7] CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30 [1207.7235]. (Cited on page 1.)

[8] ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1 [1207.7214]. (Cited on page 1.)

[9] G. Apollinari, O. Bru¨ning, T. Nakamoto and L. Rossi, High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider HL-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. (2015) 1 [1705.08830]. (Cited on pages 1 and 112.)

[10] ILC collaboration, ILC Reference Design Report Volume 1 - Executive Summary, 0712.1950. (Cited on pages 1 and 112.)

[11] Y. Nambu, String-Like Configurations in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Nucl. Phys. B130 (1977) 505. (Cited on pages 2, 5, 11, 12, 14, 22, 46, 61, 65, and 119.)

[12] T. Vachaspati, Vortex solutions in the Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1977. (Cited on pages 2, 5, 11, and 13.)

[13] N. S. Manton, Topology in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 2019. (Cited on pages 2, 65, 67, 71, and 73.)

[14] F. R. Klinkhamer and N. Manton, A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2212. (Cited on pages 2, 65, and 67.)

[15] N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2004, 10.1017/CBO9780511617034. (Cited on pages 2, 71, and 73.)

[16] M. Barriola, T. Vachaspati and M. Bucher, Embedded defects, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 2819 [hep-th/9306120]. (Cited on pages 2 and 65.)

[17] T. Vachaspati and G. B. Field, Electroweak string configurations with baryon number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 373 [hep-ph/9401220]. (Cited on pages 2 and 65.)

[18] M. Hindmarsh and M. James, The Origin of the sphaleron dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 6109 [hep-ph/9307205]. (Cited on pages 2, 22, and 65.)

[19] D. M. Grabowska and D. B. Kaplan, Nonperturbative Regulator for Chiral Gauge Theories?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 211602 [1511.03649]. (Cited on pages 2, 75, 76, 91, and 114.)

[20] D. M. Grabowska and D. B. Kaplan, Chiral solution to the Ginsparg-Wilson equation, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 114504 [1610.02151]. (Cited on pages 2, 75, 76, 91, and 114.)

[21] S. Iso and Y. Orikasa, TeV Scale B-L model with a flat Higgs potential at the Planck scale: In view of the hierarchy problem, PTEP 2013 (2013) 023B08 [1210.2848]. (Cited on page 2.)

[22] M. Hashimoto, S. Iso and Y. Orikasa, Radiative symmetry breaking at the Fermi scale and flat potential at the Planck scale, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 016019 [1310.4304]. (Cited on pages 2 and 101.)

[23] E. J. Chun, S. Jung and H. M. Lee, Radiative generation of the Higgs potential, Phys. Lett. B725 (2013) 158 [1304.5815]. (Cited on page 2.)

[24] M. Hashimoto, S. Iso and Y. Orikasa, Radiative symmetry breaking from flat potential in various U(1)’ models, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 056010 [1401.5944]. (Cited on page 2.)

[25] N. Haba and T. Yamada, Strong dynamics in a classically scale invariant extension of the standard model with a flat potential, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 115016 [1701.02146]. (Cited on pages 2 and 96.)

[26] F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs Boson Mass and New Physics, JHEP 10 (2012) 140 [1205.2893]. (Cited on page 2.)

[27] G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [1205.6497]. (Cited on pages 2, 93, and 105.)

[28] S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi and S. Moch, The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 214 [1207.0980]. (Cited on page 2.)

[29] Y. Hamada, H. Kawai and K.-y. Oda, Bare Higgs mass at Planck scale, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 053009 [1210.2538]. (Cited on page 2.)

[30] F. Jegerlehner, The Standard model as a low-energy effective theory: what is triggering the Higgs mechanism?, Acta Phys. Polon. B 45 (2014) 1167 [1304.7813]. (Cited on page 2.)

[31] F. Jegerlehner, The hierarchy problem of the electroweak Standard Model revisited, 1305.6652. (Cited on page 2.)

[32] D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, G. F. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [1307.3536]. (Cited on page 2.)

[33] S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, Chap. 16 in General Relativity ed. by Hawking, S.W. and Israel, W. (1979) . (Cited on pages 2 and 93.)

[34] M. Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 971 [hep-th/9605030]. (Cited on pages 2 and 93.)

[35] W. Souma, Nontrivial ultraviolet fixed point in quantum gravity, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102 (1999) 181 [hep-th/9907027]. (Cited on pages 2 and 93.)

[36] S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 1888. (Cited on pages 3, 93, and 96.)

[37] P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A133 (1931) 60. (Cited on page 5.)

[38] T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Concept of Nonintegrable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 3845. (Cited on pages 5 and 9.)

[39] G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B79 (1974) 276. (Cited on pages 5, 46, and 120.)

[40] A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett. 20 (1974) 194. (Cited on pages 5, 46, and 120.)

[41] H. Georgi and S. Glashow, Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438. (Cited on page 5.)

[42] B. Julia and A. Zee, Poles with Both Magnetic and Electric Charges in Nonabelian Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2227.(Cited on page 5.)

[43] Y. Nambu, Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 4262. (Cited on page 5.)

[44] N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD, Nucl. Phys. B431 (1994) 484 [hep-th/9408099]. (Cited on page 5.)

[45] N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B426 (1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087]. (Cited on page 5.)

[46] C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature 451N7174 (2008) 42 [0710.5515]. (Cited on page 5.)

[47] M. W. Ray, E. Ruokokoski, S. Kandel, M. Mo¨tto¨nen and D. S. Hall, Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field, Nature 505 (2014) 657 [1408.3133]. (Cited on page 5.)

[48] T. Vachaspati, Estimate of the primordial magnetic field helicity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 251302 [astro-ph/0101261]. (Cited on page 5.)

[49] R. Poltis and D. Stojkovic, Can primordial magnetic fields seeded by electroweak strings cause an alignment of quasar axes on cosmological scales?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 161301 [1004.2704]. (Cited on page 5.)

[50] T. Vachaspati, Electroweak dyons, Nucl. Phys. B439 (1995) 79 [hep-ph/9405285]. (Cited on pages 5, 36, 38, and 39.)

[51] T. Vachaspati, Electroweak strings, Nucl. Phys. B397 (1993) 648. (Cited on page 5.)

[52] A. Achucarro and T. Vachaspati, Semilocal and electroweak strings, Phys. Rept. 327 (2000) 347 [hep-ph/9904229]. (Cited on pages 5, 11, 12, and 65.)

[53] R. H. Brandenberger and A.-C. Davis, Electroweak baryogenesis with electroweak strings, Phys. Lett. B308 (1993) 79 [astro-ph/9206001]. (Cited on page 5.)

[54] M. Barriola, Electroweak strings that produce baryons, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 300 [hep-ph/9403323]. (Cited on page 5.)

[55] M. Eto, K. Konishi, M. Nitta and Y. Ookouchi, Brane Realization of Nambu Monopoles and Electroweak Strings, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 045006 [1211.2971]. (Cited on page 5.)

[56] M. James, L. Perivolaropoulos and T. Vachaspati, Stability of electroweak strings, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) R5232. (Cited on page 5.)

[57] M. James, L. Perivolaropoulos and T. Vachaspati, Detailed stability analysis of electroweak strings, Nucl. Phys. B395 (1993) 534 [hep-ph/9212301]. (Cited on page 5.)

[58] Y. M. Shnir, Magnetic Monopoles, Text and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005, 10.1007/3-540-29082-6.(Cited on page 6.)

[59] A. A. Abrikosov, On the Magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group, Sov. Phys. JETP 5 (1957) 1174. (Cited on pages 12, 13, and 25.)

[60] H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings, Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 45. (Cited on pages 12, 13, and 25.)

[61] J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide, Front. Phys. 80 (2000) 1. (Cited on page 17.)

[62] G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [1106.0034]. (Cited on page 17.)

[63] MOEDAL collaboration, Magnetic Monopole Search with the Full MoEDAL Trapping Detector in 13 TeV pp Collisions Interpreted in Photon-Fusion and Drell-Yan Production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 021802 [1903.08491]. (Cited on page 17.)

[64] M. Trodden, Electroweak baryogenesis, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 1463 [hep-ph/9803479]. (Cited on page 17.)

[65] S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Yagyu, Fingerprinting the extended Higgs sector using one-loop corrected Higgs boson couplings and future precision measurements, Nucl. Phys. B896 (2015) 80 [1502.07716]. (Cited on page 17.)

[66] S. Kanemura, K. Tsumura, K. Yagyu and H. Yokoya, Fingerprinting nonminimal Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 075001 [1406.3294]. (Cited on page 17.)

[67] F. Kling, J. M. No and S. Su, Anatomy of Exotic Higgs Decays in 2HDM, JHEP 09 (2016) 093 [1604.01406]. (Cited on page 17.)

[68] J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mo¨nig, T. Peiffer and J. Stelzer, Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 675 [1803.01853]. (Cited on page 17.)

[69] H. La, Vortex solutions in two Higgs systems and tan Beta, hep-ph/9302220. (Cited on page 17.)

[70] M. A. Earnshaw and M. James, Stability of two doublet electroweak strings, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 5818 [hep-ph/9308223]. (Cited on page 17.)

[71] L. Perivolaropoulos, Existence of double vortex solutions, Phys. Lett. B316 (1993) 528 [hep-ph/9309261]. (Cited on page 17.)

[72] G. Bimonte and G. Lozano, Vortex solutions in two Higgs doublet systems, Phys. Lett. B326 (1994) 270 [hep-ph/9401313]. (Cited on page 17.)

[73] I. P. Ivanov, Minkowski space structure of the Higgs potential in 2HDM. II. Minima, symmetries, and topology, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 015017 [0710.3490]. (Cited on page 17.)

[74] Y. Brihaye, Sphaleron-Bisphaleron bifurcations in a custodial-symmetric two-doublets model, J. Phys. A41 (2008) 405401 [hep-th/0412276]. (Cited on page 17.)

[75] J. Grant and M. Hindmarsh, Sphalerons in two Higgs doublet theories, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 016002 [hep-ph/0101120]. (Cited on page 17.)

[76] J. Grant and M. Hindmarsh, Sphalerons with CP violating Higgs potentials, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 116014 [hep-ph/9811289].(Cited on page 17.)

[77] C. Bachas, P. Tinyakov and T. N. Tomaras, On spherically symmetric solutions in the two Higgs standard model, Phys. Lett. B385 (1996) 237 [hep-ph/9606348]. (Cited on page 17.)

[78] R. A. Battye, G. D. Brawn and A. Pilaftsis, Vacuum Topology of the Two Higgs Doublet Model, JHEP 08 (2011) 020 [1106.3482].(Cited on pages 17 and 24.)

[79] G. D. Brawn, Symmetries and Topological Defects of the Two Higgs Doublet Model, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Manchester, 2011. (Cited on page 17.)

[80] M. Eto, M. Kurachi and M. Nitta, Non-Abelian strings and domain walls in two Higgs doublet models, JHEP 08 (2018) 195 [1805.07015]. (Cited on pages 17, 24, 25, 43, and 54.)

[81] M. Eto, M. Kurachi and M. Nitta, Constraints on two Higgs doublet models from domain walls, Phys. Lett. B785 (2018) 447 [1803.04662]. (Cited on pages 17, 24, 25, 39, and 43.)

[82] C. Bachas and T. N. Tomaras, Membranes in the two Higgs standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 356 [hep-ph/9508395].(Cited on page 17.)

[83] A. Riotto and O. Tornkvist, CP violating solitons in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 3917 [hep-ph/9704371]. (Cited on page 17.)

[84] G. R. Dvali and G. Senjanovic, Topologically stable electroweak flux tubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 2376 [hep-ph/9305278].(Cited on pages 17 and 24.)

[85] G. R. Dvali and G. Senjanovic, Topologically stable Z strings in the supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B331 (1994) 63 [hep-ph/9403277]. (Cited on pages 17 and 24.)

[86] C. Bachas, B. Rai and T. N. Tomaras, New string excitations in the two Higgs standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 2443 [hep-ph/9801263]. (Cited on page 17.)

[87] B. Grzadkowski, M. Maniatis and J. Wudka, The bilinear formalism and the custodial symmetry in the two-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP 11 (2011) 030 [1011.5228]. (Cited on pages 18 and 19.)

[88] A. Pomarol and R. Vega, Constraints on CP violation in the Higgs sector from the rho parameter, Nucl. Phys. B413 (1994) 3 [hep-ph/9305272]. (Cited on page 19.)

[89] H. E. Haber and D. O’Neil, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model III: The CP-conserving limit, custodial symmetry, and the oblique parameters S, T, U, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 055017 [1011.6188]. (Cited on page 19.)

[90] O. Tornkvist, Definition of the electromagnetic field in the broken symmetry phase of the electroweak theory, hep-ph/9805255.(Cited on pages 22 and 120.)

[91] D. Tong, Monopoles in the higgs phase, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 065003 [hep-th/0307302]. (Cited on page 38.)

[92] M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and N. Sakai, Solitons in the Higgs phase: The Moduli matrix approach, J. Phys. A39 (2006) R315 [hep-th/0602170]. (Cited on page 38.)

[93] R. Auzzi, S. Bolognesi, J. Evslin and K. Konishi, NonAbelian monopoles and the vortices that confine them, Nucl. Phys. B686 (2004) 119 [hep-th/0312233]. (Cited on page 38.)

[94] M. Shifman and A. Yung, NonAbelian string junctions as confined monopoles, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 045004 [hep-th/0403149].(Cited on page 38.)

[95] A. Hanany and D. Tong, Vortex strings and four-dimensional gauge dynamics, JHEP 04 (2004) 066 [hep-th/0403158]. (Cited on page 38.)

[96] M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and N. Sakai, Instantons in the Higgs phase, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 025011 [hep-th/0412048]. (Cited on page 38.)

[97] D. Tong, TASI lectures on solitons: Instantons, monopoles, vortices and kinks, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Many Dimensions of String Theory (TASI 2005) Boulder, Colorado, June 5-July 1, 2005, 2005, hep-th/0509216. (Cited on page 38.)

[98] M. Shifman and A. Yung, Supersymmetric Solitons and How They Help Us Understand Non-Abelian Gauge Theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 1139 [hep-th/0703267]. (Cited on page 38.)

[99] M. Shifman and A. Yung, Supersymmetric solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2009, 10.1017/CBO9780511575693. (Cited on page 38.)

[100] A. Gorsky, M. Shifman and A. Yung, Confined Magnetic Monopoles in Dense QCD, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 085027 [1101.1120]. (Cited on page 38.)

[101] M. Eto, M. Nitta and N. Yamamoto, Confined Monopoles Induced by Quantum Effects in Dense QCD, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 085005 [1101.2574]. (Cited on page 38.)

[102] E. Witten, Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi, Phys. Lett. B 86 (1979) 283. (Cited on page 39.)

[103] C. G. Callan, Jr., Dyon-Fermion Dynamics, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 2058. (Cited on page 39.)

[104] K. Hashimoto and D. Tong, Reconnection of non-Abelian cosmic strings, JCAP 09 (2005) 004 [hep-th/0506022]. (Cited on page 61.)

[105] M. Eto, K. Hashimoto, G. Marmorini, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and W. Vinci, Universal Reconnection of Non-Abelian Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 091602 [hep-th/0609214]. (Cited on page 61.)

[106] T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A9 (1976) 1387. (Cited on page 61.)

[107] T. W. B. Kibble, Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition, Phys. Rept. 67 (1980) 183. (Cited on page 61.)

[108] A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 2082. (Cited on page 61.)

[109] T. W. B. Kibble, Evolution of a system of cosmic strings, Nucl. Phys. B252 (1985) 227. (Cited on page 61.)

[110] D. P. Bennett, The evolution of cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 872. (Cited on page 61.)

[111] D. P. Bennett, Evolution of cosmic strings. 2., Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 3592. (Cited on page 61.)

[112] W. H. Zurek, Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?, Nature 317 (1985) 505. (Cited on page 61.)

[113] P. Langacker and S.-Y. Pi, Magnetic Monopoles in Grand Unified Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 1. (Cited on page 62.)

[114] V. Berezinsky and A. Vilenkin, Cosmic necklaces and ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 5202 [astro-ph/9704257]. (Cited on page 62.)

[115] X. Siemens, X. Martin and K. D. Olum, Dynamics of cosmic necklaces, Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 402 [astro-ph/0005411].(Cited on page 62.)

[116] N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, Cosmological Collider Physics, 1503.08043. (Cited on page 62.)

[117] X. Chen and Y. Wang, Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities, JCAP 1004 (2010) 027 [0911.3380]. (Cited on page 62.)

[118] X. Chen and Y. Wang, Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 063511 [0909.0496]. (Cited on page 62.)

[119] T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi and D. Yokoyama, Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields, JHEP 06 (2013) 051 [1211.1624]. (Cited on page 62.)

[120] D. Baumann and D. Green, Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 103520 [1109.0292]. (Cited on page 62.)

[121] V. Kuzmin, V. Rubakov and M. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 36. (Cited on page 65.)

[122] M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 45. (Cited on page 65.)

[123] T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, The νMSM, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Phys. Lett. B 620 (2005) 17 [hep-ph/0505013]. (Cited on page 65.)

[124] S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, Bounce Configuration from Gradient Flow, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135115 [1906.10829].(Cited on pages 65, 66, and 73.)

[125] R. Sato, Simple Gradient Flow Equation for the Bounce Solution, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 016012 [1907.02417]. (Cited on pages 65 and 66.)

[126] D. L. J. Ho and A. Rajantie, Classical production of ’t Hooft-Polyakov monopoles from magnetic fields, 1911.06088. (Cited on pages 65 and 66.)

[127] R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory. 3. Four-Dimensional Nonabelian Models, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 4138. (Cited on page 67.)

[128] L. G. Yaffe, Static Solutions of SU(2) Higgs Theory, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 3463. (Cited on pages 67, 68, 71, and 73.)

[129] B. Ratra and L. G. Yaffe, Spherically Symmetric Classical Solutions in SU(2) Gauge Theory With a Higgs Field, Phys. Lett. B 205 (1988) 57. (Cited on page 68.)

[130] D. B. Kaplan, A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 288 (1992) 342 [hep-lat/9206013]. (Cited on page 75.)

[131] H. Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 417 (1998) 141 [hep-lat/9707022]. (Cited on page 75.)

[132] R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, A Construction of lattice chiral gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 305 [hep-th/9411108]. (Cited on page 75.)

[133] K. Jansen, Domain wall fermions and chiral gauge theories, Phys. Rept. 273 (1996) 1 [hep-lat/9410018]. (Cited on page 75.)

[134] Y. Shamir, Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 90 [hep-lat/9303005]. (Cited on page 75.)

[135] V. Furman and Y. Shamir, Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 439 (1995) 54 [hep-lat/9405004]. (Cited on page 75.)

[136] S. Aoki and H. Hirose, Perturbative analysis for Kaplan’s lattice chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2604 [hep-lat/9309014]. (Cited on pages 75 and 79.)

[137] R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, Infinitely many regulator fields for chiral fermions, Phys. Lett. B 302 (1993) 62 [hep-lat/9212019]. (Cited on pages 75 and 79.)

[138] M. F. Golterman, K. Jansen and D. B. Kaplan, Chern-Simons currents and chiral fermions on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 301 (1993) 219 [hep-lat/9209003]. (Cited on page 75.)

[139] M. Luscher, Weyl fermions on the lattice and the nonAbelian gauge anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 162 [hep-lat/9904009]. (Cited on page 75.)

[140] J. Callan, Curtis G. and J. A. Harvey, Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 427. (Cited on pages 75, 76, and 87.)

[141] S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, Topologically Massive Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 140 (1982) 372. (Cited on pages 75, 76, and 87.)

[142] K.-i. Okumura and H. Suzuki, Fermion number anomaly with the fluffy mirror fermion, PTEP 2016 (2016) 123B07 [1608.02217]. (Cited on pages 75 and 76.)

[143] H. Makino and O. Morikawa, Lorentz symmetry violation in the fermion number anomaly with the chiral overlap operator, PTEP 2016 (2016) 123B06 [1609.08376]. (Cited on pages 75 and 76.)

[144] H. Fukaya, T. Onogi, S. Yamamoto and R. Yamamura, Six-dimensional regularization of chiral gauge theories on a lattice, PoS LATTICE2016 (2017) 330 [1612.00096]. (Cited on page 76.)

[145] H. Makino, O. Morikawa and H. Suzuki, One-loop perturbative coupling of A and A? through the chiral overlap operator, PTEP 2017 (2017) 063B08 [1704.04862]. (Cited on page 76.)

[146] Y. Hamada, H. Kawai and K. Sakai, A novel regularization of chiral gauge theory, 1806.00349. (Cited on page 76.)

[147] T. Ago, A calculation of the gauge anomaly with the chiral overlap operator, PTEP 2018 (2018) 113B01 [1808.02701]. (Cited on page 76.)

[148] T. Ago and Y. Kikukawa, On the infinite gradient-flow for the domain-wall formulation of chiral lattice gauge theories, JHEP 03 (2020) 044 [1911.10925]. (Cited on page 76.)

[149] R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, Infinite N phase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators, JHEP 03 (2006) 064 [hep-th/0601210]. (Cited on page 76.)

[150] M. Lu¨scher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08 (2010) 071 [1006.4518]. (Cited on page 76.)

[151] M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, JHEP 02 (2011) 051 [1101.0963]. (Cited on page 76.)

[152] S. L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426. (Cited on page 90.)

[153] J. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0 γγ in the σ model, Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47. (Cited on page 90.)

[154] M. Holthausen, K. S. Lim and M. Lindner, Planck scale Boundary Conditions and the Higgs Mass, JHEP 02 (2012) 037 [1112.2415]. (Cited on page 93.)

[155] K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 240. (Cited on page 94.)

[156] K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion, Phys. Rept. 12 (1974) 75. (Cited on page 94.)

[157] J. Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B231 (1984) 269. (Cited on page 94.)

[158] C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 90. (Cited on page 94.)

[159] J. Berges, N. Tetradis and C. Wetterich, Nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rept. 363 (2002) 223 [hep-ph/0005122]. (Cited on page 94.)

[160] J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisation group, Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 2831 [hep-th/0512261]. (Cited on page 94.)

[161] H. Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge theories, Lect.Notes Phys. 852 (2012) 287 [hep-ph/0611146]. (Cited on page 94.)

[162] M. Niedermaier and M. Reuter, The Asymptotic Safety Scenario in Quantum Gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 9 (2006) 5. (Cited on page 95.)

[163] M. Niedermaier, The Asymptotic safety scenario in quantum gravity: An Introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) R171 [gr-qc/0610018]. (Cited on page 95.)

[164] A. Codello, R. Percacci and C. Rahmede, Investigating the Ultraviolet Properties of Gravity with a Wilsonian Renormalization Group Equation, Annals Phys. 324 (2009) 414 [0805.2909]. (Cited on page 95.)

[165] M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Einstein Gravity, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 055022 [1202.2274]. (Cited on page 95.)

[166] R. Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, vol. 3 of 100 Years of General Relativity. World Scientific, 2017, 10.1142/10369. (Cited on page 95.)

[167] A. Eichhorn, Status of the asymptotic safety paradigm for quantum gravity and matter, Found. Phys. 48 (2018) 1407 [1709.03696]. (Cited on page 95.)

[168] A. Eichhorn, An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5 (2019) 47 [1810.07615].(Cited on page 95.)

[169] M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group. Cambridge University Press, 2019. (Cited on page 95.)

[170] A. Codello, R. Percacci and C. Rahmede, Ultraviolet properties of f(R)-gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23 (2008) 143 [0705.1769].(Cited on page 95.)

[171] P. F. Machado and F. Saueressig, On the renormalization group flow of f(R)-gravity, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 124045 [0712.0445]. (Cited on page 95.)

[172] D. Benedetti, P. F. Machado and F. Saueressig, Asymptotic safety in higher-derivative gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A24 (2009) 2233 [0901.2984]. (Cited on page 95.)

[173] D. Benedetti, P. F. Machado and F. Saueressig, Taming perturbative divergences in asymptotically safe gravity, Nucl. Phys. B824 (2010) 168 [0902.4630]. (Cited on page 95.)

[174] K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede, A bootstrap towards asymptotic safety, 1301.4191. (Cited on page 95.)

[175] K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede, Further evidence for asymptotic safety of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 104022 [1410.4815]. (Cited on page 95.)

[176] H. Gies, B. Knorr, S. Lippoldt and F. Saueressig, Gravitational Two-Loop Counterterm Is Asymptotically Safe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 211302 [1601.01800]. (Cited on page 95.)

[177] N. Christiansen, Four-Derivative Quantum Gravity Beyond Perturbation Theory, 1612.06223. (Cited on page 95.)

[178] T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Towards apparent convergence in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 336 [1612.07315]. (Cited on page 95.)

[179] Y. Hamada and M. Yamada, Asymptotic safety of higher derivative quantum gravity non-minimally coupled with a matter system, JHEP 08 (2017) 070 [1703.09033]. (Cited on pages 95 and 97.)

[180] K. Falls, C. R. King, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede, Asymptotic safety of quantum gravity beyond Ricci scalars, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 086006 [1801.00162]. (Cited on page 95.)

[181] K. G. Falls, D. F. Litim and J. Schro¨der, Aspects of asymptotic safety for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 126015 [1810.08550]. (Cited on page 95.)

[182] G. P. De Brito, N. Ohta, A. D. Pereira, A. A. Tomaz and M. Yamada, Asymptotic safety and field parametrization dependence in the f (R) truncation, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 026027 [1805.09656]. (Cited on page 95.)

[183] A. Eichhorn, Y. Hamada, J. Lumma and M. Yamada, Quantum gravity fluctuations flatten the Planck-scale Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 086004 [1712.00319]. (Cited on pages 95 and 96.)

[184] J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Higgs scalar potential in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 086010 [1811.11706]. (Cited on pages 95 and 96.)

[185] C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Gauge hierarchy problem in asymptotically safe gravity–the resurgence mechanism, Phys. Lett. B770 (2017) 268 [1612.03069]. (Cited on page 96.)

[186] C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Variable Planck mass from the gauge invariant flow equation, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 066017 [1906.01721]. (Cited on page 96.)

[187] C. Wetterich, Fine Tuning Problem and the Renormalization Group, Phys. Lett. B140 (1984) 215. (Cited on page 96.)

[188] W. A. Bardeen, On naturalness in the standard model, in Ontake Summer Institute on Particle Physics Ontake Mountain, Japan, August 27-September 2, 1995, 1995. (Cited on page 96.)

[189] H. Aoki and S. Iso, Revisiting the Naturalness Problem – Who is afraid of quadratic divergences? –, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 013001 [1201.0857]. (Cited on page 96.)

[190] K. A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal Symmetry and the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B648 (2007) 312 [hep-th/0612165].(Cited on page 96.)

[191] R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K. L. McDonald and R. R. Volkas, A Solution to the hierarchy problem from an almost decoupled hidden sector within a classically scale invariant theory, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 035006 [0709.2750]. (Cited on page 96.)

[192] F. Grabowski, J. H. Kwapisz and K. A. Meissner, Asymptotic safety and Conformal Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 115029 [1810.08461]. (Cited on page 96.)

[193] J. H. Kwapisz, Asymptotic safety, the Higgs boson mass, and beyond the standard model physics, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115001 [1907.12521]. (Cited on page 96.)

[194] T. Hur and P. Ko, Scale invariant extension of the standard model with strongly interacting hidden sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 141802 [1103.2571]. (Cited on page 96.)

[195] M. Holthausen, J. Kubo, K. S. Lim and M. Lindner, Electroweak and Conformal Symmetry Breaking by a Strongly Coupled Hidden Sector, JHEP 12 (2013) 076 [1310.4423]. (Cited on page 96.)

[196] J. Kubo, K. S. Lim and M. Lindner, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking via QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091604 [1403.4262]. (Cited on page 96.)

[197] N. Haba, H. Ishida, N. Kitazawa and Y. Yamaguchi, A new dynamics of electroweak symmetry breaking with classically scale invariance, Phys. Lett. B755 (2016) 439 [1512.05061]. (Cited on page 96.)

[198] J. Kubo and M. Yamada, Genesis of electroweak and dark matter scales from a bilinear scalar condensate, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 075016 [1505.05971]. (Cited on page 96.)

[199] H. Hatanaka, D.-W. Jung and P. Ko, AdS/QCD approach to the scale-invariant extension of the standard model with a strongly interacting hidden sector, JHEP 08 (2016) 094 [1606.02969]. (Cited on page 96.)

[200] N. Haba and T. Yamada, Multiple-point principle realized with strong dynamics, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 115015 [1703.04235].(Cited on page 96.)

[201] J. Kubo and M. Yamada, Scale and confinement phase transitions in scale invariant SU (N) scalar gauge theory, JHEP 10 (2018) 003 [1808.02413]. (Cited on page 96.)

[202] R. Ouyang and S. Matsuzaki, Enhanced di-Higgs signal from hidden scalar QCD at leading-order in the scale-symmetry limit, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 075030 [1809.10009]. (Cited on page 96.)

[203] H. Ishida, S. Matsuzaki and R. Ouyang, Unified Interpretation of Scalegenesis in Conformally Extended Standard Models, 1907.09176. (Cited on page 96.)

[204] N. Christiansen, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 106012 [1710.04669]. (Cited on page 97.)

[205] U. Harst and M. Reuter, QED coupled to QEG, JHEP 05 (2011) 119 [1101.6007]. (Cited on pages 97 and 100.)

[206] A. Eichhorn and F. Versteegen, Upper bound on the Abelian gauge coupling from asymptotic safety, JHEP 01 (2018) 030 [1709.07252]. (Cited on pages 97 and 100.)

[207] A. Eichhorn, A. Held and J. M. Pawlowski, Quantum-gravity effects on a Higgs-Yukawa model, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 104027 [1604.02041]. (Cited on page 97.)

[208] G. P. De Brito, Y. Hamada, A. D. Pereira and M. Yamada, On the impact of Majorana masses in gravity-matter systems, JHEP 08 (2019) 142 [1905.11114]. (Cited on page 97.)

[209] B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. 166B (1986) 196. (Cited on page 97.)

[210] S. Benic and B. Radovcic, Electroweak breaking and Dark Matter from the common scale, Phys. Lett. B732 (2014) 91 [1401.8183]. (Cited on page 99.)

[211] S. Benic and B. Radovcic, Majorana dark matter in a classically scale invariant model, JHEP 01 (2015) 143 [1409.5776].(Cited on page 99.)

[212] Y. G. Kim and K. Y. Lee, The Minimal model of fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 115012 [hep-ph/0611069]. (Cited on page 99.)

[213] S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP Dark Matter overcome the Nightmare Scenario?, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 055026 [1005.5651]. (Cited on page 99.)

[214] A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs–portal dark matter, Phys. Lett. B709 (2012) 65 [1112.3299]. (Cited on page 99.)

[215] L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter, and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 179 [1203.2064]. (Cited on page 99.)

[216] A. De Simone, G. F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2014) 081 [1402.6287]. (Cited on page 99.)

[217] S. Matsumoto, S. Mukhopadhyay and Y.-L. S. Tsai, Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter: a comprehensive analysis in effective field theory, JHEP 10 (2014) 155 [1407.1859]. (Cited on page 99.)

[218] A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo and F. S. Queiroz, Dirac-fermionic dark matter in U(1)X models, JHEP 10 (2015) 076 [1506.06767]. (Cited on page 99.)

[219] M. Escudero, A. Berlin, D. Hooper and M.-X. Lin, Toward (Finally!) Ruling Out Z and Higgs Mediated Dark Matter Models, JCAP 1612 (2016) 029 [1609.09079]. (Cited on page 99.)

[220] J. Kearney, N. Orlofsky and A. Pierce, Z boson mediated dark matter beyond the effective theory, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 035020 [1611.05048]. (Cited on page 99.)

[221] A. Alves, G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini, S. Profumo and F. S. Queiroz, Augury of darkness: the low-mass dark Z ′ portal, JHEP 04 (2017) 164 [1612.07282]. (Cited on page 99.)

[222] G. Arcadi, M. D. Campos, M. Lindner, A. Masiero and F. S. Queiroz, Dark sequential Z’ portal: Collider and direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 043009 [1708.00890]. (Cited on page 99.)

[223] H. Han, H. Wu and S. Zheng, Effective field theory of the Majorana dark matter, Chin. Phys. C43 (2019) 043103 [1711.10097]. (Cited on page 99.)

[224] PARTICLE DATA GROUP collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 030001. (Cited on pages 100, 109, and 132.)

[225] PLANCK collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, 1807.06209. (Cited on pages 100 and 109.)

[226] A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Mass difference for charged quarks from asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 151302 [1803.04027]. (Cited on page 100.)

[227] A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Top mass from asymptotic safety, Phys. Lett. B 777 (2018) 217 [1707.01107]. (Cited on page 100.)

[228] M. Reichert and J. Smirnov, Dark Matter meets Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 063015 [1911.00012]. (Cited on page 100.)

[229] J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 405 [1002.0329]. (Cited on page 101.)

[230] J. Jaeckel, M. Jankowiak and M. Spannowsky, LHC probes the hidden sector, Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 111 [1212.3620].(Cited on page 101.)

[231] M. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa and H. Nakano, Improving the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 83 [hep-ph/9210228]. (Cited on page 103.)

[232] J. Kubo and M. Yamada, Scale and electroweak first-order phase transitions, PTEP 2015 (2015) 093B01 [1506.06460]. (Cited on page 105.)

[233] V. Martin Lozano, J. M. Moreno and C. B. Park, Resonant Higgs boson pair production in the hh bb WW bbl+νl−ν decay channel, JHEP 08 (2015) 004 [1501.03799]. (Cited on page 105.)

[234] A. Falkowski, C. Gross and O. Lebedev, A second Higgs from the Higgs portal, JHEP 05 (2015) 057 [1502.01361]. (Cited on pages 105 and 107.)

[235] F. D’Eramo and J. Thaler, Semi-annihilation of Dark Matter, JHEP 06 (2010) 109 [1003.5912]. (Cited on page 108.)

[236] G. Belanger and J.-C. Park, Assisted freeze-out, JCAP 1203 (2012) 038 [1112.4491]. (Cited on page 108.)

[237] G. Belanger, K. Kannike, A. Pukhov and M. Raidal, Impact of semi-annihilations on dark matter phenomenology - an example of ZN symmetric scalar dark matter, JCAP 1204 (2012) 010 [1202.2962]. (Cited on page 108.)

[238] M. Aoki, M. Duerr, J. Kubo and H. Takano, Multi-Component Dark Matter Systems and Their Observation Prospects, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 076015 [1207.3318]. (Cited on pages 108 and 110.)

[239] J. Kubo, Q. M. B. Soesanto and M. Yamada, Non-perturbative electroweak-scalegenesis on the test bench of dark matter detection, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 218 [1712.06324]. (Cited on page 108.)

[240] K. Kainulainen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen, Self-interacting dark matter and cosmology of a light scalar mediator, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 015016 [1507.04931]. (Cited on page 109.)

[241] G. Krnjaic, Probing Light Thermal Dark-Matter With a Higgs Portal Mediator, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 073009 [1512.04119].(Cited on page 109.)

[242] S. Matsumoto, Y.-L. S. Tsai and P.-Y. Tseng, Light Fermionic WIMP Dark Matter with Light Scalar Mediator, JHEP 07 (2019) 050 [1811.03292]. (Cited on page 109.)

[243] B. Brahmachari and A. Raychaudhuri, Kinetic mixing and symmetry breaking dependent interactions of the dark photon, Nucl. Phys. B887 (2014) 441 [1409.2082]. (Cited on page 109.)

[244] R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall and V. S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: An Alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 015007 [hep-ph/0603188]. (Cited on page 110.)

[245] P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud, Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 114510 [1301.1114]. (Cited on page 111.)

[246] A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and M. Procura, Accurate evaluation of hadronic uncertainties in spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering: Disentangling two- and three-flavor effects, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 054021 [1312.4951]. (Cited on page 111.)

[247] M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner, High-Precision Determination of the Pion-Nucleon σ Term from Roy-Steiner Equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 092301 [1506.04142]. (Cited on page 111.)

[248] XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [1805.12562]. (Cited on pages 111 and 112.)

[249] LUX collaboration, Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [1608.07648]. (Cited on page 111.)

[250] PANDAX-II collaboration, Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181302 [1708.06917]. (Cited on page 111.)

[251] P. Ko, Y. Omura and C. Yu, A Resolution of the Flavor Problem of Two Higgs Doublet Models with an Extra U (1)H Symmetry for Higgs Flavor, Phys. Lett. B717 (2012) 202 [1204.4588]. (Cited on page 114.)

[252] M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199. (Cited on page 114.)

[253] A. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260.(Cited on page 114.)

[254] Y. Abe, Y. Hamada and K. Yoshioka, Electroweak axion string and superconductivity, 2010.02834. (Cited on page 114.)

[255] O. Tornkvist, On the electroweak origin of cosmological magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 043501 [hep-ph/9707513].(Cited on page 120.)

[256] L. Basso, S. Moretti and G. M. Pruna, A Renormalisation Group Equation Study of the Scalar Sector of the Minimal B-L Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 055018 [1004.3039]. (Cited on page 131.)