リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Factors associated with acceptance of a digital contact tracing application for COVID-19 in the Japanese working-age population」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Factors associated with acceptance of a digital contact tracing application for COVID-19 in the Japanese working-age population

Ishimaru, Tomohiro Ibayashi, Koki Nagata, Masako Tateishi, Seiichiro Hino, Ayako Tsuji, Mayumi Ando, Hajime Muramatsu, Keiji Fujino, Yoshihisa for the CORoNaWork Project 名古屋大学

2023.02

概要

Digital contact tracing (DCT) has been used in many countries in response to the coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. DCT apps implemented in mobile devices (eg smartphones)
can be employed to detect close contact with infected individuals and prevent the spread of
COVID-19.1 Although the method of contact tracing has been used for a long time, traditional
paper-based surveys are complicated and time-consuming, and are affected by loss of questionnaires and huge amounts of data entry.2 With the recent development of digital technology and
the widespread use of mobile devices, DCT has overcome the shortcomings of traditional paperbased surveys and made it possible to conduct surveys more quickly. In recent years, DCT has
been associated with effective control of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in Sierra Leone, tuberculosis
in Botswana, and whooping cough in the United States.3
Ensuring that large numbers of people install DCT apps is essential for effective operation
of DCT against COVID-19.4-6 Previous studies revealed that demographic, behavioral, psychological, and COVID-19-related factors all influence the installation of DCT apps.1,3,7-9 From the
demographic aspect, ethnic minorities, migrants, low-income people, and elderly people were less
likely to install the apps.3 From the behavioral aspect, non-smoking status was associated with
high app acceptance, while lack of information technology skills and not having a smartphone
were associated with low app acceptance.1,8 From the psychological aspect, low app acceptance
was associated with doubts about the effectiveness of DCT apps, anxiety about the collection of
personal information, and distrust of the government and app developers.8,9 From the COVID19-related aspect, acceptance of new lifestyles under the COVID-19 epidemic such as use of hand
sanitizers, avoidance of public transportation, and wearing masks was associated with app use.7,8
Because the working-age population is at the epicenter of COVID-19 infections, it is important
to increase the acceptance of DCT apps in this population.10 In other words, the public health
benefits of adopting these apps need to be particularly recognized by the working-age population.9,11 In countries where installation of DCT apps is optional, such as North America, Europe,
Oceania, and Japan, the installation rates tend to be lower compared with countries where it is
mandatory.1,7,12 However, few studies have evaluated the factors associated with acceptance of
DCT apps using sufficient sample sizes of workers.13 The purpose of the present study was to
evaluate the factors associated with acceptance of a DCT app for COVID-19 in the working-age
population of Japan, where app installation is optional. The findings provide insights that can
help to facilitate the adoption of DCT apps among workers. ...

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1 Elkhodr M, Mubin O, Iftikhar Z, et al. Technology, Privacy, and user opinions of COVID-19 mobile

apps for contact tracing: systematic search and content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e23467.

doi:10.2196/23467.

2 Kouliaridis V, Kambourakis G, Chatzoglou E, Geneiatakis D, Wang H. Dissecting contact tracing apps in

the Android platform. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251867. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251867.

3 Anglemyer A, Moore TH, Parker L, et al. Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;8(8):CD013699. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013699.

4 Oldeweme A, Märtins J, Westmattelmann D, Schewe G. The role of transparency, trust, and social influence

on uncertainty reduction in times of pandemics: empirical study on the adoption of COVID-19 tracing apps.

J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e25893. doi:10.2196/25893.

5 Rodríguez P, Graña S, Alvarez-León EE, et al. A population-based controlled experiment assessing the

epidemiological impact of digital contact tracing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):587. doi:10.1038/s41467-02020817-6.

6 Nakamoto I, Jiang M, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation of the design and implementation of a peer-to-peer

COVID-19 contact tracing mobile app (COCOA) in Japan. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(12):e22098.

doi:10.2196/22098.

7 Saw YE, Tan EY, Liu JS, Liu JC. Predicting public uptake of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19

pandemic: results from a nationwide survey in Singapore. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e24730.

doi:10.2196/24730.

8 von Wyl V, Höglinger M, Sieber C, et al. Drivers of acceptance of COVID-19 proximity tracing apps in

Switzerland: panel survey analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(1):e25701. doi:10.2196/25701.

9 Garrett PM, White JP, Lewandowsky S, et al. The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for

COVID-19 in Australia. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244827. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244827.

10 Ishimaru T, Ibayashi K, Nagata M, et al. Industry and workplace characteristics associated with the

downloading of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in Japan: a nation-wide cross-sectional study. Environ

Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):94. doi:10.1186/s12199-021-01016-1.

11 Garrett PM, Wang Y, White JP, et al. Young adults view smartphone tracking technologies for COVID-19

as acceptable: the case of Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1332. doi:10.3390/

ijerph18031332.

12 Salathé M, Althaus C, Anderegg N, et al. Early evidence of effectiveness of digital contact tracing for

SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20457. doi:10.4414/smw.2020.20457.

13 Kolasa K, Mazzi F, Leszczuk-Czubkowska E, Zrubka Z, Péntek M. State of the art in adoption of contact

tracing apps and recommendations regarding privacy protection and public health: systematic review. JMIR

Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(6):e23250. doi:10.2196/23250.

14 Fujino Y, Ishimaru T, Eguchi H, et al. Protocol for a nationwide Internet-based health survey of workers

during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. J UOEH. 2021;43(2):217–225. doi:10.7888/juoeh.43.217.

15 Ishimaru T, Okawara M, Ando H, et al. Gender differences in the determinants of willingness to get the

COVID-19 vaccine among the working-age population in Japan. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(11):3975–

3981. doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1947098.

16 Machida M, Nakamura I, Kojima T, et al. Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Japan during the

COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(3):210. doi:10.3390/vaccines9030210.

17 Lewandowsky S, Dennis S, Perfors A, et al. Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address

the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0245740. doi:10.1371/journal.

pone.0245740.

18 Zhang B, Kreps S, McMurry N, McCain RM. Americans’ perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the

COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0242652. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242652.

19 Kawakami N, Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, Imamura K. The effects of downloading a government-issued

COVID-19 contact tracing app on psychological distress during the pandemic among employed adults:

prospective study. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(1):e23699. doi:10.2196/23699.

20 Tomczyk S, Barth S, Schmidt S, Muehlan H. Utilizing health behavior change and technology acceptance

models to predict the adoption of COVID-19 contact tracing apps: cross-sectional survey study. J Med

Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e25447. doi:10.2196/25447.

21 Rahman A, Sathi NJ. Risk factors of the severity of COVID-19: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract.

2021;75(7):e13916. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13916.

22 Paul CL, Ross S, Bryant J, Hill W, Bonevski B, Keevy N. The social context of smoking: a qualitative

Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 59–69, 2023

68

doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.1.59

Acceptance of the COCOA in Japan

study comparing smokers of high versus low socioeconomic position. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:211.

doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-211.

23 Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare. COVID-19 Contact-Confirming Application [computer program].

https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/cocoa_00138.html. Accessed July 14, 2021.

References End

Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 59–69, 2023

69

doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.1.59

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る