1 World Health Organization. Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19 – 13 July 2022. https://www.
who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---13-july-2022. Published July 2022.
Accessed July 22, 2022.
2 World Health Organization. China: The current COVID-19 situation. https://www.who.int/countries/chn/.
Published July 2022. Accessed July 22, 2022.
3 The State Council Joint Prevention and Control Mechanism. Guideline on regular prevention and control
of COVID-19 [in Chinese]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2020-05/08/content_5509896.htm. Published
May 2020. Accessed February 10, 2022.
4 Babyak M, Blumenthal JA, Herman S, et al. Exercise treatment for major depression: maintenance of
therapeutic benefit at 10 months. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(5):633–638. doi:10.1097/00006842-20000900000006.
5 Herring MP, O’Connor PJ, Dishman RK. The effect of exercise training on anxiety symptoms among
patients: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):321–331. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.530.
6 Mammen G, Faulkner G. Physical activity and the prevention of depression: a systematic review of
prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(5):649–657. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.001.
7 Rodgers B, Korten AE, Jorm AF, Christensen H, Henderson S, Jacomb PA. Risk factors for depression
and anxiety in abstainers, moderate drinkers and heavy drinkers. Addiction. 2000;95(12):1833–1845.
doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9512183312.x.
8 Taylor G, McNeill A, Girling A, Farley A, Lindson-Hawley N, Aveyard P. Change in mental health after
smoking cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g1151. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1151.
9 Madianou M, Miller D. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication.
Int J Cult Stud. 2012;16(2):169–187. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486.
10 Hu Y, Xu CL, Tu MW. Family-mediated migration infrastructure: Chinese international students and parents
navigating (im)mobilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chin Social Rev. 2020;54(1):62–87. doi:10.108
0/21620555.2020.1838271.
11 Hossain MM, Sultana A, Purohit N. Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection
prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020038.
doi:10.4178/epih.e2020038.
12 Elmer T, Mepham K, Stadtfeld C. Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 476–489, 2023
484
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.3.476
Social contact pattern and mental health
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236337.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236337.
Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):510–512.
doi:10.1056/NEJMp2008017.
Dajpratham P, Pukrittayakamee P, Atsariyasing W, Wannarit K, Boonhong J, Pongpirul K. The validity
and reliability of the PHQ-9 in screening for post-stroke depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):291.
doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02699-6.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen
Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Zaleski Z, Sobol-Kwapinska M, Przepiorka A, Meisner M. Development and validation of the Dark Future
scale. Time Soc. 2017;28(1):107–123. doi:10.1177/0961463X16678257.
Fan AP, Eaton WW. Longitudinal study assessing the joint effects of socio-economic status and birth risks
on adult emotional and nervous conditions. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2001;40:s78-s83. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.40.
s78.
Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys:
Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655–672. doi:10.1177/0164027504268574.
Fung SF. Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale and Brief Resilient Coping Scale in a Chinese Sample. Int
J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1265. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041265.
Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial
Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int
J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729.
Gao J, Zheng P, Jia Y, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak.
PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231924. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231924.
Lee CM, Cadigan JM, Rhew IC. Increases in Loneliness Among Young Adults During the COVID-19
Pandemic and Association With Increases in Mental Health Problems. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(5):714–717.
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.009.
Jacques-Aviñó C, López-Jiménez T, Medina-Perucha L, et al. Gender-based approach on the social
impact and mental health in Spain during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open.
2020;10(11):e044617. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044617.
Hwang TJ, Rabheru K, Peisah C, Reichman W, Ikeda M. Loneliness and social isolation during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(10):1217–1220. doi:10.1017/S1041610220000988.
Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students
in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934.
Tull MT, Edmonds KA, Scamaldo KM, Richmond JR, Rose JP, Gratz KL. Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Life. Psychiatry Res.
2020;289:113098. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113098.
Chaturvedi SK. Covid-19, Coronavirus and Mental Health Rehabilitation at Times of Crisis. J Psychosoc
Rehabil Ment Health. 2020;7(1):1–2. doi:10.1007/s40737-020-00162-z.
Bolger N, Eckenrode J. Social relationships, personality, and anxiety during a major stressful event. J Pers
Soc Psychol. 1991;61(3):440–449. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.440.
Teo AR, Choi H, Andrea SB, et al. Does Mode of Contact with Different Types of Social Relationships
Predict Depression in Older Adults? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc.
2015;63(10):2014–2022. doi:10.1111/jgs.13667.
Liu J, Duan C, Lummaa V. Parent-offspring conflict over family size in current China. Am J Hum Biol.
2017;29(3):e22946. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22946.
Hu Y, Qian Y. COVID-19, Inter-household Contact and Mental Well-Being Among Older Adults in the US
and the UK. Front Sociol. 2021;6:714626. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2021.714626.
Frías VM, Fortuny JR, Guzmán S, Santamaría P, Martínez M, Pérez V. Stigma: The relevance of social
contact in mental disorder [in English, Spanish]. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2018;28(2):111–117. doi:10.1016/j.
enfcli.2017.05.007.
Zhang Q, Zhang X, Cui Q, et al. The Unequal Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Labour Market
and Income Inequality in China: A Multisectoral CGE Model Analysis Coupled with a Micro-Simulation
Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1320. doi:10.3390/ijerph19031320.
Wang HM, Ma AL, Guo TT. Gender Concept, Work Pressure, and Work-Family Conflict. Am J Mens
Health. 2020;14(5):1557988320957522. doi:10.1177/1557988320957522.
Erol A, Karpyak VM. Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: Contemporary knowledge and future research considerations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 476–489, 2023
485
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.3.476
Jingya Zhang et al
drugalcdep.2015.08.023.
36 Stanton R, To QG, Khalesi S, et al. Depression, Anxiety and Stress during COVID-19: Associations with
Changes in Physical Activity, Sleep, Tobacco and Alcohol Use in Australian Adults. Int J Environ Res
Public Health. 2020;17(11):4065. doi:10.3390/ijerph17114065.
37 Rolland B, Haesebaert F, Zante E, Benyamina A, Haesebaert J, Franck N. Correction: Global Changes
and Factors of Increase in Caloric/Salty Food Intake, Screen Use, and Substance Use During the Early
COVID-19 Containment Phase in the General Population in France: Survey Study. JMIR Public Health
Surveil. 2021;7(7):e31906. doi:10.2196/31906.
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 476–489, 2023
486
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.3.476
Social contact pattern and mental health
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
Table s1 Results of the covariates in the Poisson regression analyses examining the associations
between social contact pattern changes and mental health status, 2021, China
Depression
Covariates
Anxiety
n/N
(%)
PR
95%CI
0.99
0.97,
0.99
Male
1103/1453
(75.9)
Ref
Female
1364/2058
(66.3)
0.95
Employed
1643/2349
(69.9)
Ref
Not employed
824/1162
(70.9)
0.97
Primary school or lower
538/663
(81.1)
Ref
High school
557/746
(74.7)
0.97
1372/2102
(65.3)
0.87
≤6000
1134/1781
(63.7)
Ref
>6000
1333/1730
(77.1)
1.19
Married
1101/1532
(71.9)
Ref
Not married
1366/1979
(69.0)
0.97
Urban
1961/2793
(70.2)
Ref
Rural
506/718
(70.5)
0.99
Yes
794/932
(85.2)
Ref
No
1673/2579
(64.9)
0.86
Age (continuous)
Loneliness
n/N
(%)
PR
95%CI
n/N
(%)
PR
95%CI
0.99
0.99,
1.00
0.99
0.98,
0.99
685/1453
(47.1)
Ref
882/1453
(60.7)
Ref
917/2058
(44.6)
1.05
1028/2058
(50.0)
0.94
1172/2349
(49.9)
Ref
1223/2349
(52.1)
Ref
430/1162
(37.0)
0.80
687/1162
(59.1)
1.04
363/663
(54.8)
Ref
455/663
(68.6)
Ref
0.85,
1.10
359/746
(48.1)
0.91
0.78,
1.06
452/746
(60.6)
0.96
0.84,
1.11
0.77,
0.98
880/2102
(41.9)
0.89
0.77,
1.03
1003/2102
(47.7)
0.78
0.69,
0.89
707/1781
(39.7)
Ref
876/1781
(49.2)
Ref
895/1730
(51.7)
1.15
1034/1730
(59.8)
1.22
656/1532
(42.8)
Ref
874/1532
(57.0)
Ref
946/1979
(47.8)
0.99
1036/1979
(52.3)
0.95
1297/2793
(46.4)
Ref
1498/2793
(53.6)
Ref
305/718
(42.5)
1.02
412/718
(57.4)
1.00
629/932
(67.5)
Ref
633/932
(67.9)
Ref
973/2579
(37.7)
0.70
1277/2579
(49.5)
0.84
Sex
0.88,
1.04
0.95,
1.16
0.85,
1.03
Occupation
0.88,
1.07
0.71,
0.91
0.94,
1.16
Education
College
Monthly income (RMB)
1.09,
1.29
1.04,
1.29
1.11,
1.35
Marital status
0.88,
1.06
0.89,
1.12
0.85,
1.05
Urban-rural
0.89,
1.10
0.89,
1.17
0.89,
1.13
Chronic illness
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 476–489, 2023
0.78,
0.94
487
0.62,
0.78
0.75,
0.93
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.3.476
Jingya Zhang et al
Self-rated health
Very good
979/1519
(64.5)
Ref
Good
758/1068
(71.0)
1.05
Not good
730/924
(79.0)
1.14
<2
841/1168
(72.0)
Ref
2–3
781/1049
(74.5)
1.02
>3
845/1294
(65.3)
0.97
427/609
(70.1)
Ref
1–2
1288/1736
(74.2)
1.04
≥3
752/1166
(64.5)
0.92
Very good
929/1440
(64.5)
Ref
Good
805/1114
(72.3)
1.11
Not good
733/957
(76.6)
761/1519
(50.1)
Ref
0.95,
1.17
455/1068
(42.6)
0.92
1.02,
1.27
386/924
(41.8)
0.95
633/1168
(54.2)
Ref
0.92,
1.12
550/1049
(52.4)
1.04
0.87,
1.08
419/1294
(32.4)
0.77
290/609
(47.6)
Ref
0.93,
1.16
869/1736
(50.1)
1.01
0.82,
1.08
443/1166
(38.0)
0.84
762/1440
(52.9)
Ref
1.01,
1.23
451/1114
(40.5)
0.88
1.24
1.11,
1.39
389/957
(40.6)
0.97
0.96,
0.98
743/1519
(48.9)
Ref
0.82,
1.17
560/1068
(52.4)
1.02
0.91,
1.15
0.82,
1.09
607/924
(65.7)
1.21
1.07,
1.36
639/1168
(54.7)
Ref
0.92,
1.17
598/1049
(57.0)
1.02
0.91,
1.15
0.67,
0.88
673/1294
(52.0)
1.05
0.93,
1.18
336/609
(55.2)
Ref
0.88,
1.16
970/1736
(55.9)
1.02
0.90,
1.16
0.72,
0.98
604/1166
(51.8)
0.96
0.83,
1.10
723/1440
(50.2)
Ref
0.78,
1.00
611/1114
(54.8)
1.07
0.95,
1.20
0.97
0.85,
1.12
576/957
(60.2)
1.22
1.08,
1.39
0.97
0.96,
0.98
0.96
0.95,
0.97
Daily screen time(h)
Physical activity (day/week)
Never
Sleep quality
Mental resilience
(continuous)
n: the number of participants having the condition (depression, anxiety, or loneliness)
N: the number of participants with a particular characteristic
PR: prevalence ratio
CI: confidence interval
Ref: reference
Prevalence ratios and the 95% confidence intervals for depression, dark future anxiety, and loneliness were
estimated from Poisson regression model including sex, age (continuous), occupation (employed, not employed),
education (primary school or lower, high school, college), monthly income (≤6000RMB/ >6000 RMB), marital
status (married, not married), urban/rural dwelling (urban, rural), chronic illness (yes, no), self-rated health status
(very good, good, not good), daily screen-time (<2h, 2–3h, >3h), physical activity (never, 1–2 days per week,
3 days or more per week), sleep quality (very good, good, not good), mental resilience (continuous), and social
contact pattern changes (no change, in-person communication increased, online-communication increased). Results
of social contact pattern changes with mental health status are presented in Table 2.
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 476–489, 2023
488
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.3.476
Social contact pattern and mental health
Table s2 Poisson regression analysis of changes of social contact patterns and mental health status
among the participants who did not report any chronic disease
Depression
n/N
(%)
PR
1043/1647
(63.3)
Ref
In-person communication
increased
292/364
(80.2)
1.15
Online communication
increased
338/568
(59.5)
0.95
Anxiety
n/N
(%)
PR
621/1647
(37.7)
Ref
0.99,
1.31
179/364
(49.2)
1.21
0.84,
1.08
173/568
(30.5)
0.87
95%CI
Loneliness
n/N
(%)
PR
815/1647
(49.5)
Ref
1.01,
1.43
220/363
(60.4)
1.02
0.87,
1.20
0.73,
1.03
242/568
(42.6)
0.87
0.75,
1.01
95%CI
95%CI
Social contact pattern changes
No change
n: the number of participants having the condition (depression, anxiety, or loneliness)
N: the number of participants with a particular social contact pattern
PR: prevalence ratio
CI: confidence interval
Ref: reference
Prevalence ratios and the 95% confidence intervals for depression, anxiety, and loneliness were estimated from
Poisson regression model adjusted for sex, age (continuous), occupation (employed, not employed), education
(primary school or lower, high school, college), monthly income (≤6000RMB/ >6000 RMB), marital status
(married, not married), urban/rural dwelling (urban, rural), chronic illness (yes, no), self-rated health status (very
good, good, not good), daily screen-time (<2h, 2–3h, >3h), physical activity (never, 1–2 days per week, 3 days
or more per week), sleep quality (very good, good, not good), and mental resilience (continuous).
References End
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 85. 476–489, 2023
489
doi:10.18999/nagjms.85.3.476
...