1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Tomoyasu, Y. What crustaceans can tell us about the evolution of insect wings
and other morphologically novel structures. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 69, 48–55
(2021).
Clark-Hachtel, C. M. & Tomoyasu, Y. Two sets of candidate crustacean wing
homologues and their implication for the origin of insect wings. Nat. Ecol.
Evol. 4, 1694–1702 (2020).
Bruce, H. S. & Patel, N. H. Knockout of crustacean leg patterning genes
suggests that insect wings and body walls evolved from ancient leg segments.
Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1703–1712 (2020).
Bruce, H. S. How to align arthropod leg segments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://
doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.20.427514 (2021).
Damen, W. G. M., Saridaki, T. & Averof, M. Diverse adaptations of an
ancestral gill: a common evolutionary origin for wings, breathing organs, and
spinnerets. Curr. Biol. 12, 1711–1716 (2002).
Shiga, Y. et al. Repeated co-option of a conserved gene regulatory module
underpins the evolution of the crustacean carapace, insect wings and other
flat outgrowths. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/160010
(2017).
Bruce, H. S. The Daphnia carapace and the origin of novel structures. Preprint
at Preprints https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202102.0221.v1 (2021).
Truman, J. W. & Riddiford, L. M. The evolution of insect metamorphosis.
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 29, R1252–R1268 (2019).
Averof, M. & Cohen, S. M. Evolutionary origin of insect wings from ancestral
gills. Nature 385, 627–630 (1997).
Niwa, N. et al. Evolutionary origin of the insect wing via integration of two
developmental modules. Evol. Dev. 12, 168–176 (2010).
Ohde, T., Yaginuma, T. & Niimi, T. Insect morphological diversification
through the modification of wing serial homologs. Science 340, 495–498
(2013).
Clark-Hachtel, C. M., Linz, D. M. & Tomoyasu, Y. Insights into insect wing
origin provided by functional analysis of vestigial in the red flour beetle,
Tribolium castaneum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16951–16956 (2013).
Hu, Y., Linz, D. M. & Moczek, A. P. Beetle horns evolved from wing serial
homologs. Science 366, 1004–1007 (2019).
Williams, J. A., Bell, J. B. & Carroll, S. B. Control of Drosophila wing and
haltere development by the nuclear vestigial gene product. Genes Dev. 5,
2481–2495 (1991).
Kim, J. et al. Integration of positional signals and regulation of wing formation
and identity by Drosophila vestigial gene. Nature 382, 133–138 (1996).
Williams, J. A., Paddock, S. W., Vorwerk, K. & Carroll, S. B. Organization of
wing formation and induction of a wing-patterning gene at the dorsal/ventral
compartment boundary. Nature 368, 299–305 (1994).
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. & Cohen, S. M. Serrate signals through Notch to
establish a Wingless-dependent organizer at the dorsal/ventral compartment
boundary of the Drosophila wing. Development 121, 4215–4225 (1995).
Kim, J., Irvine, K. D. & Carroll, S. B. Cell recognition, signal induction, and
symmetrical gene activation at the dorsal-ventral boundary of the developing
Drosophila wing. Cell 82, 795–802 (1995).
Zecca, M. & Struhl, G. Control of Drosophila wing growth by the vestigial
quadrant enhancer. Development 134, 3011–3020 (2007).
Mashimo, Y. & Machida, R. Embryological evidence substantiates the
subcoxal theory on the origin of pleuron in insects. Sci. Rep. 7, 12597 (2017).
Niwa, N. et al. Correlation of diversity of leg morphology in Gryllus
bimaculatus (cricket) with divergence in dpp expression pattern during leg
development. Development 127, 4373–4381 (2000).
Tomoyasu, Y., Arakane, Y., Kramer, K. J. & Denell, R. E. Repeated co-options
of exoskeleton formation during wing-to-elytron evolution in beetles. Curr.
Biol. 19, 2057–2065 (2009).
Nijhout, H. F. Insect Hormones. (Princeton University Press, 1994).
Furukawa, N., Tomioka, K. & Yamaguchi, T. Functional anatomy of the
musculature and innervation of the neck and thorax in the cricket, Gryllus
bimaculatus. Zool. Mag. 92, 371–385 (1983).
Miyawaki, K. et al. Involvement of Wingless/Armadillo signaling in the
posterior sequential segmentation in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus
(Orthoptera), as revealed by RNAi analysis. Mech. Dev. 121, 119–130 (2004).
Snodgrass, R. E. Principles of Insect Morphology. (McGraw-Hill Book
Company, 1935).
Nijhout, H. F. & Grunert, L. W. Bombyxin is a growth factor for wing imaginal
disks in Lepidoptera. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15446–15450 (2002).
Nijhout, H. F., Laub, E. & Grunert, L. W. Hormonal control of growth in the
wing imaginal disks of Junonia coenia: the relative contributions of insulin and
ecdysone. Development 145, dev160101 (2018).
29. Ashburner, M. & Richards, G. Sequential gene activation by ecdysone in
polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Consequences of
ecdysone withdrawal. Dev. Biol. 54, 241–255 (1976).
30. Li, T., White, K. P. & Haven, N. Tissue-specific gene expression and ecdysoneregulated genomic networks in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 5, 59–72 (2003).
31. Zecca, M. & Struhl, G. A feed-forward circuit linking Wingless, Fat-Dachsous
signaling, and the Warts-Hippo pathway to Drosophila wing growth. PLoS
Biol. 8, e1000386 (2010).
32. Hamaratoglu, F., Affolter, M. & Pyrowolakis, G. Dpp/BMP signaling in flies:
from molecules to biology. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 128–136 (2014).
33. Dabour, N. et al. Cricket body size is altered by systemic RNAi against insulin
signaling components and epidermal growth factor receptor. Dev. Growth
Differ. 53, 857–869 (2011).
34. Medved, V. et al. Origin and diversification of wings: Insights from a
neopteran insect. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15946–15951 (2015).
35. Prokop, J. et al. Paleozoic nymphal wing pads support dual model of insect
wing origins. Curr. Biol. 27, 263–269 (2017).
36. Linz, D. M. & Tomoyasu, Y. A dual evolutionary origin of insect wings
supported by an investigation of the abdominal wing serial homologs in
Tribolium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. US A 9, E658–E667 (2018).
37. Kukalová-Peck, A. Origin of the insect wing and wing articulation from the
arthropodan leg. Can. J. Zool. 61, 1618–1669 (1983).
38. Zecca, M. & Struhl, G. Recruitment of cells into the Drosophila wing
primordium by a feed-forward circuit of vestigial autoregulation. Development
134, 3001–3010 (2007).
39. Clark-Hachtel, C., Fernandez-Nicolas, A., Belles, X. & Tomoyasu, Y. Tergal and
pleural wing-related tissues in the German cockroach and their implication to the
evolutionary origin of insect wings. Evol. Dev. 23, 100–116 (2021).
40. Niwa, N., Saitoh, M., Ohuchi, H., Yoshioka, H. & Noji, S. Correlation between
Distal-less expression patterns and structures of appendages in development of
the two-spotted cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool. Sci. 14, 115–125 (1997).
41. Donoughe, S. & Extavour, C. G. Embryonic development of the cricket Gryllus
bimaculatus. Dev. Biol. 411, 1–16 (2015).
42. Ylla, G. et al. Insights into the genomic evolution of insects from cricket
genomes. Commun. Biol. 4, 1–12 (2021).
43. Watanabe, T., Noji, S. & Mito, T. Genome editing in the cricket, Gryllus
bimaculatus. In: Hatada I. (eds) Genome Editing in Animals. Methods in
Molecular Biology, vol 1630. (Humana Press, 2017).
44. Matsuoka, Y. et al. Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in in a
hemimetabolous insect: targeted gene tagging in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.
Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.10.441399 (2021).
45. Zhang, H. et al. Extrachromosomal transposition of the transposable element
Minos in embryos of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Dev. Growth Differ. 44,
409–417 (2002).
46. Dahlem, T. J. et al. Simple methods for generating and detecting locus-specific
mutations induced with TALENs in the zebrafish genome. PLoS Genet 8,
e1002861 (2012).
47. Ho, J., Tumkaya, T., Aryal, S., Choi, H. & Claridge-Chang, A. Moving beyond P
values: data analysis with estimation graphics. Nat. Methods 16, 565–566 (2019).
48. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput
sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
49. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data
without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).
50. Seppey M., Manni M. & Zdobnov E. M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly
and annotation completeness. In: Kollmar M. (eds) Gene Prediction. Methods
in Molecular Biology, vol 1962. (Humana Press, 2019).
51. Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon
provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat.
Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
52. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and
dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
53. Dennis, G. Jr. et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and
Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 4, P3 (2003).
54. Blighe, K., Rana, S. & Lewis, M. EnhancedVolcano: Publication-ready volcano
plots with enhanced colouring and labeling. R package version 1.7.10, https://
github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano (2020).
55. R. Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.Rproject.org/ (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Tetsuya Bando and Sumihare Noji for their help in preliminary analysis
of Gryllus vg and sd function. We thank Dr. Toshiya Ando, and Dr. Takaaki Daimon and
his lab members for helpful discussion. We also thank Drs. Yuji Matsuoka, Takahito
Watanabe, Yohei Katoh, Taro Nakamura, Shinichi Morita, Hajime Ono, Miki Sugimoto,
and Mr. Takahisa Yamashita for technical supports. The computational resource for the
RNA-seq analysis was provided by NIG supercomputer system. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (16K18825 and 19H02970 for T.O., 16H02596 for T.N.).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2022)13:979 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28624-x | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
A Self-archived copy in
Kyoto University Research Information Repository
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28624-x
ARTICLE
Author contributions
Reprints and permission information is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints
T.O.—conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original
draft preparation, visualization, project administration, funding acquisition; T.M.—
methodology, validation, resources, writing—review and editing; T.N.—conceptualization, validation, resources, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material
available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28624-x.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Takahiro Ohde.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Aleksandar Popadić and the
other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer
reviewer reports are available.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative
Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party
material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2022
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2022)13:979 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28624-x | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
...
論文の公開元へ
