1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Statistical analysis and reproducibility
The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant
changes were analysed using Student’s t tests or one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s tests using Microsoft Excel
(version 16.66) or GraphPad Prism (version 9) (GraphPad, Inc.). Each
value determined from the dose–response curve was calculated using
GraphPad Prism (version 9). All experiments were repeated more than
twice, and the number of replications is described in the figure
legends.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature
Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Nature Communications | (2023)14:4683
21.
Bartlett, J. B., Dredge, K. & Dalgleish, A. G. The evolution of thalidomide and its IMiD derivatives as anticancer agents. Nat. Rev.
Cancer 4, 314–322 (2004).
Palumbo, A. & Anderson, K. Multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 364,
1046–1060 (2011).
List, A. et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with
chromosome 5q deletion. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1456–1465 (2006).
Ito, T. et al. Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity. Science 327, 1345–1350 (2010).
Krönke, J. et al. Lenalidomide causes selective degradation of IKZF1
and IKZF3 in multiple myeloma cells. Science 343, 301–305 (2014).
Lu, G. et al. The myeloma drug lenalidomide promotes the
cereblon-dependent destruction of Ikaros proteins. Science 343,
305–309 (2014).
Krönke, J. et al. Lenalidomide induces ubiquitination and degradation of CK1α in del(5q) MDS. Nature 523, 183–188 (2015).
Matyskiela, M. E. et al. SALL4 mediates teratogenicity as a
thalidomide-dependent cereblon substrate. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14,
981–987 (2018).
Donovan, K. A. et al. Thalidomide promotes degradation of SALL4, a
transcription factor implicated in Duane Radial syndrome. eLife 7,
e38430 (2018).
Yamanaka, S. et al. Thalidomide and its metabolite
5-hydroxythalidomide induce teratogenicity via the cereblon neosubstrate PLZF. EMBO J. 40, e105375 (2021).
Lai, A. C. & Crews, C. M. Induced protein degradation: an emerging
drug discovery paradigm. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 101–114 (2017).
Schneider, M. et al. The PROTACtable genome. Nat. Rev. Drug
Discov. 20, 789–797 (2021).
Surka, C. et al. CC-90009, a novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator,
targets acute myeloid leukemia blasts and leukemia stem cells.
Blood 137, 661–677 (2021).
Hagner, P. R. et al. CC-122, a pleiotropic pathway modifier, mimics
an interferon response and has antitumor activity in DLBCL. Blood
126, 779–789 (2015).
Sakamoto, K. M. et al. Protacs: Chimeric molecules that target
proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and
degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 17, 8554–8559 (2001).
Winter, G. E. et al. Phthalimide conjugation as a strategy for in vivo
target protein degradation. Science 348, 1376–1381 (2015).
Bondeson, D. P. et al. Catalytic in vivo protein knockdown by smallmolecule PROTACs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 611–617 (2015).
Silva, M. C. et al. Targeted degradation of aberrant tau in frontotemporal dementia patient-derived neuronal cell models. eLife 8,
e45457 (2019).
Sun, X. et al. PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and
industry. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 4, 64–33 (2019).
Donovan, K. A. et al. Mapping the degradable kinome provides a
resource for expedited degrader development. Cell 183,
1714–1731 (2020).
Dale, B. et al. Advancing targeted protein degradation for cancer
therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 638–654 (2021).
16
Article
22. Békés, M., Langley, D. R. & Crews, C. M. PROTAC targeted protein
degraders: the past is prologue. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21,
181–200 (2022).
23. Lee, J. et al. Discovery of E3 ligase ligands for target protein
degradation. Molecules 27, 6515 (2021).
24. Buckley, D. L. et al. Targeting the von Hippel-Lindau E3 ubiquitin
ligase using small molecules to disrupt the VHL/HIF-1α interaction.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4465–4468 (2012).
25. Itoh, Y., Ishikawa, M., Naito, M. & Hashimoto, Y. Protein knockdown
using methyl bestatin−ligand hybrid molecules: design and synthesis of inducers of ubiquitination-mediated degradation of cellular
retinoic acid-binding proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132,
5820–5826 (2010).
26. Schneekloth, A. R., Pucheault, M., Tae, H. S. & Crews, C. M. Targeted
intracellular protein degradation induced by a small molecule: En
route to chemical proteomics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18,
5904–5908 (2008).
27. Zhang, X., Crowley, V. M., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Dix, M. M. & Cravatt, B. F. Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by
engaging DCAF16. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 737–746 (2019).
28. Zhang, X. et al. DCAF11 supports targeted protein degradation by
electrophilic proteolysis-targeting chimeras. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143,
5141–5149 (2021).
29. Dobrovolsky, D. et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase degradation as a
therapeutic strategy for cancer. Blood 133, 952–961 (2019).
30. Yamanaka, S. et al. A proximity biotinylation-based approach to
identify protein-E3 ligase interactions induced by PROTACs and
molecular glues. Nat. Commun. 13, 183 (2022).
31. Fischer, E. S. et al. Structure of the DDB1-CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase in
complex with thalidomide. Nature 512, 49–53 (2014).
32. Chamberlain, P. P. et al. Structure of the human
cereblon–DDB1–lenalidomide complex reveals basis for responsiveness to thalidomide analogs. Nat. Struc. Mol. Biol. 21,
803–809 (2014).
33. Petzold, G., Fischer, E. S. & Thomä, N. H. Structural basis of
lenalidomide-induced CK1α degradation by the CRL4CRBN ubiquitin
ligase. Nature 532, 127–130 (2016).
34. Matyskiela, M. E. et al. A novel cereblon modulator recruits GSPT1 to
the CRL4(CRBN) ubiquitin ligase. Nature 535, 252–257 (2016).
35. Furihata, H. et al. Structural bases of IMiD selectivity that emerges
by 5-hydroxythalidomide. Nat. Commun. 11, 4578 (2020).
36. Yamamoto, J. et al. ARID2 is a pomalidomide-dependent
CRL4(CRBN) substrate in multiple myeloma cells. Nat. Chem. Biol.
16, 1208–1217 (2020).
37. Martinez-Høyer, S. et al. Loss of lenalidomide-induced megakaryocytic differentiation leads to therapy resistance in del(5q)
myelodysplastic syndrome. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 526–533 (2020).
38. Kido, K. et al. AirID, a novel proximity biotinylation enzyme, for
analysis of protein-protein interactions. eLife 9, e54983 (2020).
39. Sievers, Q. L. et al. Defining the human C2H2 zinc finger degrome
targeted by thalidomide analogs through CRBN. Science 362,
eaat0572 (2018).
40. Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the seed and
accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).
41. An, J. et al. pSILAC mass spectrometry reveals ZFP91 as IMiDdependent substrate of the CRL4CRBN ubiquitin ligase. Nat. Commun. 8, 15398 (2017).
42. Renneville, A. et al. Avadomide induces degradation of ZMYM2
fusion oncoproteins in hematologic malignancies. Blood Cancer
Discov 2, 250–265 (2021).
43. Wang, E. S. et al. Acute pharmacological degradation of Helios
destabilizes regulatory T cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 711–717 (2021).
Nature Communications | (2023)14:4683
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40385-9
44. Bonazzi, S. et al. Discovery and characterization of a selective IKZF2
glue degrader for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Chem. Biol. 30,
235–247 (2023).
45. Neubert, D., Heger, W., Merker, H. J., Sames, K. & Meister, R.
Embryotoxic effects of thalidomide derivatives in the non-human
primate Callithrix jacchus. II. Elucidation of the susceptible period
and of the variability of embryonic stages. Arch. Toxicol 61,
180–191 (1988).
46. Vickers, T. H. The thalidomide embryopathy in hybrid rabbits. Br. J.
Exp. Pathol. 61, 180–191 (1988).
47. Fratta, I. D., Sigg, E. B. & Maiorana, K. Teratogenic effects of thalidomide in rabbits, rats, hamsters, and mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 7, 268–286 (1965).
48. Okumura-Asatsuma, T. et al. p63 is a cereblon substrate involved in
thalidomide teratogenicity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1077–1084 (2019).
49. Mahony, C. et al. Pomalidomide is nonteratogenic in chicken and
zebrafish embryos and nonneurotoxic in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 110, 12703–12708 (2013).
50. Puissant, A. et al. Targeting MYCN in neuroblastoma by BET bromodomain inhibition. Cancer Discov. 3, 309–323 (2013).
51. Prinjha, R. K., Witherington, J. & Lee, K. Place your BETs: The therapeutic potential of bromodomains. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33,
146–153 (2012).
52. Matyskiela, M. E. et al. A cereblon modulator (CC-220) with
improved degradation of ikaros and aiolos. J. Med. Chem. 61,
535–542 (2018).
53. Hansen, J. D. et al. A discovery of CRBN E3 ligase modulator CC92480 for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. J. Med. Chem. 63, 6648–6676 (2020).
54. Reichermeier, K. M. et al. PIKES analysis reveals response to
degraders and key regulatory mechanisms of the CRL4 network.
Moll. Cell 77, 1092–1106 (2020).
55. Goracci, L. et al. Understanding the metabolism of proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs): the next step toward pharmaceutical
applications. J. Med. Chem. 63, 11615–11638 (2020).
56. Nguyen, T. T. L. et al. Development of an LC-MS/MS method for
ARV-110, a PROTAC molecule, and applications to pharmacokinetic
studies. Molecules 27, 1977 (2022).
57. Troup, R. I., Fallan, C. & Baud, M. G. J. Current strategies for the
design of PROTAC linkers: a critical review. Explor. Target. Antitumor Ther. 1, 273–312 (2020).
58. Sawasaki, T., Ogasawara, T., Morishita, R. & Endo, Y. A cell-free
protein synthesis system for high-throughput proteomics. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 14652–14657 (2002).
59. Nagase, T. et al. Exploration of human ORFeome- high-throughput
preparation of ORF clones and efficient characterization of their
protein products. DNA Res. 15, 137–149 (2008).
60. Nakamura, S. et al. Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR) cDNA into MDS
cells and induction of their differentiation by G-CSF. Cytokines Cell
Mol. Ther. 6, 61–70 (2000).
61. Yano, T. et al. AGIA tag system based on a high affinity rabbit
monoclonal antibody against human dopamine receptor D1 for
protein analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0156716 (2016).
62. Sawasaki, T. et al. Arabidopsis HY5 protein functions as a DNAbinding tag for purification and functional immobilization of proteins on agarose/DNA microplate. FEBS Lett 582, 221–228 (2008).
63. Schüttelkopf, A. W. & Aalten, Van D.M.F. PRODRG: a tool for highthroughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta
Crystallogr. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 1355–1363 (2004).
64. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for
exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25,
1605–1625 (2004).
17
Article
65. Brenes, A. J. et al. Erosion of human X chromosome inactivation
causes major remodeling of the iPSC proteome. Cell Rep. 35,
109032 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40385-9
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank C. Takahashi, Y. Horiuchi and T. Nakagawa for technical assistance and the Applied Protein Research Laboratory of Ehime
University. We also thank Prof. K. Tohyama (Kawasaki Medical School) for
providing the MDS-L cell line. We also thank Prof. F. Tokunaga and Dr D.
Oikawa (Osaka Metropolitan University) for providing the B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL cell lines. This work was mainly supported by the
Project for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Evolution (P-CREATE) from
the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under
grant number JP21cm0106181h0006 (S.Yamanaka), Project for Promotion of Cancer Research and Therapeutic Evolution (P-PROMOTE) from
AMED under grant number JP22cm0106181h0002 (S.Yamanaka), the
Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science
Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research [BINDS]) from AMED under Grant Number
22ama121010j0001 (T.S.), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on
Innovative Areas (21H00285 for S.Yamanaka, JP16H06579 for T.S. and
JP19H04966 for H.K.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). This work was also partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI
(21K15076 for S.Y., JP19H03218 for T.S., and JP17H06112 for N.S.), Takeda
Science Foundation, and Joint Usage and Joint Research Programs of the
Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University (T.S).
Author contributions
S.Yamanaka, K.N. and Y.S. performed the biochemical, molecular, and
cellular biology experiments. H.F., M.T. and T.M. performed ITC experiments and docking simulation. A.T., T.N., M.U. and N.S. synthesised and
analysed the thalidomide derivatives and PROTACs. S.Yamanaka, Y.Y.,
S.Yoshida, and Y.I. analysed anti-proliferative effect of PROTACs. K.N.
and H.K. performed TMT-based proteomics analyses. S.Yamanaka and
T.S. analysed the data, designed the study, and wrote the paper, and all
authors contributed to the manuscript.
Nature Communications | (2023)14:4683
Supplementary information The online version contains
supplementary material available at
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40385-9.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to
Tatsuya Sawasaki.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A
peer review file is available.
Reprints and permissions information is available at
http://www.nature.com/reprints
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as
long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended
use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted
use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright
holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2023
18
...