1. Clough TM, Alvi F, Majeed H (2018) Total ankle arthroplasty:
what are the risks?: a guide to surgical consent and a review of
the literature. Bone Joint J 100-b:1352–1358. https://doi.org/10.
1302/0301-620x.100b10.bjj-2018-0180.r1
2. Cody EA, Scott DJ, Easley ME (2018) Total ankle arthroplasty:
a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 6:e8. https://doi.org/10.2106/
jbjs.rvw.17.00182
3. Raikin SM, Rasouli MR, Espandar R, Maltenfort MG (2014)
Trends in treatment of advanced ankle arthropathy by total ankle
replacement or ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int 35:216–224. https://
doi.org/10.1177/1071100713517101
4. Stavrakis AI, SooHoo NF (2016) Trends in complication rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 98:1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01341
5. Espinosa N, Klammer G, Wirth SH (2017) Osteolysis in total
ankle replacement: how does it work? Foot Ankle Clin 22:267–
275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2017.01.001
6. Rodriguez D, Bevernage BD, Maldague P, Deleu PA, Tribak K,
Leemrijse T (2010) Medium term follow-up of the AES ankle
prosthesis: High rate of asymptomatic osteolysis. Foot Ankle Surg
16:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.05.013
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology (2023) 33:2987–2993 7. Yoon HS, Lee J, Choi WJ, Lee JW (2014) Periprosthetic osteolysis
after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 35:14–21. https://d oi.
org/10.1177/1071100713509247
8. Kohonen I, Koivu H, Pudas T, Tiusanen H, Vahlberg T, Mattila
K (2013) Does computed tomography add information on radiographic analysis in detecting periprosthetic osteolysis after total
ankle arthroplasty? Foot Ankle Int 34:180–188. https://doi.org/
10.1177/1071100712460224
9. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Ohgushi H (2004)
Ankle arthroplasty using three generations of metal and ceramic
prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 097/0 1.b lo.
0000131246.79993.ec
10. Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H et al
(2005) Development and reliability of a standard rating system for
outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development
of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci 10:457–465. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00776-005-0936-2
11. Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C (2009) Clinical evaluation and
radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle
replacement. Foot Ankle Int 30:964–975. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.3 113/
fai.2009.0964
12. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K (2006) Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis
of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:909–913. https://doi.org/10.
1302/0301-620x.88b7.17325
13. Frigg A, Germann U, Huber M, Horisberger M (2017) Survival of
the Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR): results of ten to
nineteen years follow-up. Int Orthop 41:2075–2082. https://d oi.
org/10.1007/s00264-017-3583-2
14. Raikin SM, Sandrowski K, Kane JM, Beck D, Winters BS (2017)
Midterm outcome of the agility total ankle arthroplasty. Foot
Ankle Int 38:662–670. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 177/1 07110 0717
701232
15. Stewart MG, Green CL, Adams SB Jr, DeOrio JK, Easley ME,
Nunley JA 2nd (2017) Midterm results of the salto talaris total
ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 38:1215–1221. https://doi.org/
10.1177/1071100717719756
16. Law TY, Sabeh KG, Rosas S, Hubbard Z, Altajar S, Roche MW
(2018) Trends in total ankle arthroplasty and revisions in the
Medicare database. Ann Transl Med 6:112. https://doi.org/10.
21037/atm.2018.02.06
17. Hobson SA, Karantana A, Dhar S (2009) Total ankle replacement
in patients with significant pre-operative deformity of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:481–486. https://doi.org/10.1302/
0301-620x.91b4.20855
2993
18. Mehta N, Serino J, Hur ES, Smith S, Hamid KS, Lee S et al (2021)
Pathogenesis, evaluation, and management of osteolysis following
total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 42:230–242. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1071100720978426
19. Lee GW, Seo HY, Jung DM, Lee KB (2021) Comparison of
preoperative bone density in patients with and without periprosthetic osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int
42:575–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100720976096
20. Harnroongroj T, Volpert LG, Ellis SJ, Sofka CM, Deland JT,
Demetracopoulos CA (2019) Comparison of tibial and talar bone
density in patients undergoing total ankle replacement vs nonankle arthritis matched controls. Foot Ankle Int 40:1408–1415.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719868496
21. Lee GW, Seon JK, Kim NS, Lee KB (2019) Comparison of intermediate-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in patients
younger and older than 55 years. Foot Ankle Int 40:762–768.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719840816
22. Queen RM, Adams SB Jr, Viens NA, Friend JK, Easley ME,
Deorio JK et al (2013) Differences in outcomes following total
ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am
95:1927–1934. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.l.00404
23. Najefi AA, Ghani Y, Goldberg AJ (2021) bone cysts and osteolysis
in ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 42:55–61. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.
1177/1071100720955155
24. Nunley JA, Adams SB, Easley ME, DeOrio JK (2019) Prospective randomized trial comparing mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing
total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 40:1239–1248. https://d oi.
org/10.1177/1071100719879680
25. Oliver SM, Coetzee JC, Nilsson LJ, Samuelson KM, Stone RM,
Fritz JE et al (2016) Early patient satisfaction results on a modern
generation fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int
37:938–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716648736
26. Kohonen I, Koivu H, Tiusanen H, Kankare J, Vahlberg T, Mattila
K (2017) Are periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankle worth bone
grafting? Foot Ankle Surg 23:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
fas.2017.01.010
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
13
...
論文の公開元へ
