リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Influence of the Preoperative Duration of Symptoms on Patients' Clinical Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Diseases」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Influence of the Preoperative Duration of Symptoms on Patients' Clinical Outcomes after Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Diseases

Hiranaka, Yoshiaki Miyazaki, Shingo Yurube, Takashi Kuroshima, Kohei Ryu, Masao Inoue, Shinichi Kakutani, Kenichiro Tadokoro, Ko 神戸大学

2023.01

概要

Background and Objectives:
The impact of the duration of symptoms (DOS) on postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases is important for determining the optimal timing of surgical intervention; however, the timing remains controversial. This prospective case–control study aimed to investigate the influence of the preoperative DOS on surgical outcomes in minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

Materials and Methods:
Patients who underwent single-level TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases between 2017 and 2018 were reviewed. Only patients with full clinical data during the 1-year follow-up period were included. The patients were divided into two groups (DOS < 12 months, group S; DOS ≥ 12 months, group L). The clinical outcomes, including the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for lower back pain, leg pain, and numbness, were investigated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months, as well as 1 year, after surgery. Furthermore, postoperative patient satisfaction 1 year after surgery was also surveyed.

Results:
A total of 163 patients were assessed: 60 in group S and 103 in group L. No differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were found. The ODI and VAS significantly improved from the baseline to each follow-up period (all p < 0.01). Group S had significantly lower ODI scores at 3 months (p = 0.019) and 6 months (p = 0.022). In addition, group S had significantly lower VAS scores for leg pain at 3 months (p = 0.027). In a comparison between both groups, only the patients with cauda equina symptoms showed that ODI and leg pain VAS scores at 3 months after surgery were significantly lower in group S (19.9 ± 9.1 vs. 14.1 ± 12.5; p = 0.037, 7.4 ± 13.9 vs. 14.7 ± 23.1; p = 0.032, respectively). However, the clinical outcomes were not significantly different between both groups 1 year after surgery. Patient satisfaction was also not significantly different between both groups.

Conclusions:
Patients with a shorter DOS tended to have a significantly slower recovery; however, clinical outcomes 1 year after surgery were good, regardless of the DOS.

論文の公開元へ

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

1. Amundsen, T.; Weber, H.; Nordal, H.J.; Magnaes, B.; Abdelnoor, M.; Lilleâs, F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. Spine 2000, 25, 1424–1436. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Tadokoro, K.; Miyamoto, H.; Sumi, M.; Shimomura, T. The prognosis of conservative treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis: Analysis of patients over 70 years of age. Spine 2005, 30, 2458–2463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3. Ng, L.C.L.; Tafazal, S.; Sell, P. The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur. Spine J. 2007, 16, 199–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Johnsson, K.E.; Rosén, I.; Udén, A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1992, 279, 82–86. [CrossRef]

5. Movassaghi, K.; Basques, B.A.; Louie, P.K.; Khan, J.M.; Derman, P.B.; Nolte, M.T.; Paul, J.C.; Goldberg, E.J.; An, H.S. The Duration of Symptoms Does Not Impact Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery. Spine 2019, 44, 305–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Foley, K.T.; Holly, L.T.; Schwender, J.D. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003, 28, S26–S35. [CrossRef]

7. Peng, C.W.B.; Yue, W.M.; Poh, S.Y.; Yeo, W.; Tan, S.B. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2009, 34, 1385–1389. [CrossRef]

8. Parker, S.L.; Mendenhall, S.K.; Shau, D.N.; Zuckerman, S.L.; Godil, S.S.; Cheng, J.S.; McGirt, M.J. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: Comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg. 2014, 82, 230–238. [CrossRef]

9. Parker, S.L.; Adogwa, O.; Witham, T.F.; Aaronson, O.S.; Cheng, J.; McGirt, M.J. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): Literature review and cost analysis. Minim. Invasive Neurosurg. 2011, 54, 33–37. [CrossRef]

10. Lv, Y.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Chu, Z.; Sheng, L.; Qin, R.; Chen, M. Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation. Minim. Invasive Allied Technol. 2017, 26, 168–176. [CrossRef]

11. Radcliff, K.E.; Rihn, J.; Hilibrand, A.; DiIorio, T.; Tosteson, T.; Lurie, J.D.; Zhao, W.; Vaccaro, A.R.; Albert, T.J.; Weinstein, J.N. Does the duration of symptoms in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis affect outcomes? Analysis of the Spine Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 2011, 36, 2197–2210. [CrossRef]

12. Spivak, J.M. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1998, 80, 1053–1066. [CrossRef]

13. Kornblum, M.B.; Fischgrund, J.S.; Herkowitz, H.N.; Abraham, D.A.; Berkower, D.L.; Ditkoff, J.S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: A prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 2004, 29, 726–734. [CrossRef]

14. Jönsson, B.; Annertz, M.; Sjöberg, C.; Strömqvist, B. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 1997, 22, 2938–2944. [CrossRef]

15. Nygaard, O.P.; Kloster, R.; Solberg, T. Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2000, 92, 131–134. [CrossRef]

16. McGregor, A.H.; Hughes, S.P.F. The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain: Part 2: Patient expectations and satisfaction. Spine 2002, 27, 1471–1477. [CrossRef]

17. Watanabe, R.; Parke, W.W. Vascular and neural pathology of lumbosacral spinal stenosis. J. Neurosurg. 1986, 64, 64–70. [CrossRef]

18. Rydevik, B. Neurophysiology of cauda equina compression. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1993, 251, 52–55. [CrossRef]

19. Simotas, A.C.; Dorey, F.J.; Hansraj, K.K.; Cammisa, F., Jr. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 2000, 25, 197–204. [CrossRef]

20. Olmarker, K.; Holm, S.; Rydevik, B. Importance of compression onset rate for the degree of impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression injury of the porcine cauda equina. Spine 1990, 15, 416–419. [CrossRef]

21. Gaetani, P.; Aimar, E.; Panella, L.; Debernardi, A.; Tancioni, F.; Rodriguez y Baena, R. Surgery for herniated lumbar disc disease: Factors influencing outcome measures. An analysis of 403 cases. Funct. Neurol. 2004, 19, 43–49. [PubMed]

22. Paulsen, R.T.; Bouknaitir, J.B.; Fruensgaard, S.; Carreon, L.; Andersen, M. Prognostic Factors for Satisfaction After Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Neurosurgery 2018, 82, 645–651. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23. Iversen, M.D.; Daltroy, L.H.; Fossel, A.H.; Katz, J.N. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ. Couns. 1998, 34, 169–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Katz, J.N.; Stucki, G.; Lipson, S.J.; Fossel, A.H.; Grobler, L.J.; Weinstein, J.N. Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1999, 24, 2229–2233. [CrossRef]

25. Abtahi, A.M.; Brodke, D.S.; Lawrence, B.D.; Zhang, C.; Spiker, W.R. Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2015, 97, 824–828. [CrossRef]

26. Postacchini, F.; Cinotti, G.; Gumina, S.; Perugia, D. Long-term results of surgery in lumbar stenosis. 8-year review of 64 patients. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1993, 251, 78–80. [CrossRef]

27. Katz, J.N.; Lipson, S.J.; Chang, L.C.; Levine, S.A.; Fossel, A.H.; Liang, M.H. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996, 21, 92–98. [CrossRef]

28. Caputy, A.J.; Luessenhop, A.J. Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J. Neurosurg. 1992, 77, 669–676. [CrossRef]

29. Fujiwara, A. Japanese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. J. Jpn. Soc. Lumbar. Spine Disord. 2009, 15, 11–16. [CrossRef]

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文
を
一発検索！

この論文の関連論文を見る