1. Ito, M., Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2008. 9(4): p. 304-13.
2. Matsuda, K., et al., Granule cells control recovery from classical conditioned fear responses in the zebrafish cerebellum. Sci Rep, 2017. 7(1): p. 11865.
3. Stoodley, C.J., et al., Altered cerebellar connectivity in autism and cerebellar-mediated rescue of autism-related behaviors in mice. Nat Neurosci, 2017. 20(12): p. 1744-1751.
4. Altman, J. and S. Bayer, Development of the Cerebellar System in Relation to its Evolution, Structure, and Function. 1997, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5. Bae, Y.K., et al., Anatomy of zebrafish cerebellum and screen for mutations affecting its development. Dev Biol, 2009. 330(2): p. 406-26.
6. Hashimoto, M. and M. Hibi, Development and evolution of cerebellar neural circuits. Dev Growth Differ, 2012. 54(3): p. 373-89.
7. Hibi, M. and T. Shimizu, Development of the cerebellum and cerebellar neural circuits. Dev Neurobiol, 2012. 72(3): p. 282-301.
8. Kani, S., et al., Proneural gene-linked neurogenesis in zebrafish cerebellum. Dev Biol, 2010. 343(1-2): p. 1-17.
9. Hoshino, M., et al., Ptf1a, a bHLH transcriptional gene, defines GABAergic neuronal fates in cerebellum. Neuron, 2005. 47(2): p. 201-13.
10. Ben-Arie, N., et al., Math1 is essential for genesis of cerebellar granule neurons. Nature, 1997. 390(6656): p. 169-72.
11. Butler, A.B. and W. Hodos, Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy Evolution and Adaptation. 1996, New York: Wiley-Liss.
12. Laine, J. and H. Axelrad, The candelabrum cell: a new interneuron in the cerebellar cortex. J Comp Neurol, 1994. 339(2): p. 159-73.
13. Florio, M., et al., Neurogenin 2 regulates progenitor cell-cycle progression and Purkinje cell dendritogenesis in cerebellar development. Development, 2012. 139(13): p. 2308-20.
14. Sudarov, A., et al., Ascl1 genetics reveals insights into cerebellum local circuit assembly. J Neurosci, 2011. 31(30): p. 11055-69.
15. Lundell, T.G., Q. Zhou, and M.L. Doughty, Neurogenin1 expression in cell lineages of the cerebellar cortex in embryonic and postnatal mice. Dev Dyn, 2009. 238(12): p. 3310-25.
16. Fujiyama, T., et al., Inhibitory and excitatory subtypes of cochlear nucleus neurons are defined by distinct bHLH transcription factors, Ptf1a and Atoh1. Development, 2009. 136(12): p. 2049-58.
17. Yamada, M., et al., Origin of climbing fiber neurons and their developmental dependence on Ptf1a. J Neurosci, 2007. 27(41): p. 10924-34.
18. Dupe, V. and A. Lumsden, Hindbrain patterning involves graded responses to retinoic acid signalling. Development, 2001. 128(12): p. 2199-208.
19. Gavalas, A. and R. Krumlauf, Retinoid signalling and hindbrain patterning. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 2000. 10(4): p. 380-6.
20. Marin, F. and P. Charnay, Hindbrain patterning: FGFs regulate Krox20 and mafB/kr expression in the otic/preotic region. Development, 2000. 127(22): p. 4925-35.
21. Maves, L., W. Jackman, and C.B. Kimmel, FGF3 and FGF8 mediate a rhombomere 4 signaling activity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development, 2002. 129(16): p. 3825-37.
22. Maves, L. and C.B. Kimmel, Dynamic and sequential patterning of the zebrafish posterior hindbrain by retinoic acid. Dev Biol, 2005. 285(2): p. 593-605.
23. Begemann, G., et al., The zebrafish neckless mutation reveals a requirement for raldh2 in mesodermal signals that pattern the hindbrain. Development, 2001. 128(16): p. 3081-94.
24. Grandel, H., et al., Retinoic acid signalling in the zebrafish embryo is necessary during pre-segmentation stages to pattern the anteriorposterior axis of the CNS and to induce a pectoral fin bud. Development, 2002. 129(12): p. 2851-65.
25. Niederreither, K., et al., Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo. Development, 2000. 127(1): p. 75-85.
26. Shimizu, T., Y.K. Bae, and M. Hibi, Cdx-Hox code controls competence for responding to Fgfs and retinoic acid in zebrafish neural tissue. Development, 2006. 133(23): p. 4709-19.
27. Kriks, S., et al., Gsh2 is required for the repression of Ngn1 and specification of dorsal interneuron fate in the spinal cord. Development, 2005. 132(13): p. 2991-3002.
28. Mizuguchi, R., et al., Ascl1 and Gsh1/2 control inhibitory and excitatory cell fate in spinal sensory interneurons. Nat Neurosci, 2006. 9(6): p. 770- 8.
29. Satou, C., et al., Transgenic tools to characterize neuronal properties of discrete populations of zebrafish neurons. Development, 2013. 140(18): p. 3927-31.
30. Corbin, J.G., et al., The Gsh2 homeodomain gene controls multiple aspects of telencephalic development. Development, 2000. 127(23): p. 5007-20.
31. Hsieh-Li, H.M., et al., Gsh-2, a murine homeobox gene expressed in the developing brain. Mech Dev, 1995. 50(2-3): p. 177-86.
32. Szucsik, J.C., et al., Altered forebrain and hindbrain development in mice mutant for the Gsh-2 homeobox gene. Dev Biol, 1997. 191(2): p. 230-42.
33. Waclaw, R.R., et al., Distinct temporal requirements for the homeobox gene Gsx2 in specifying striatal and olfactory bulb neuronal fates. Neuron, 2009. 63(4): p. 451-65.
34. Yun, K., et al., Patterning of the lateral ganglionic eminence by the Gsh1 and Gsh2 homeobox genes regulates striatal and olfactory bulb histogenesis and the growth of axons through the basal ganglia. J Comp Neurol, 2003. 461(2): p. 151-65.
35. Asakawa, K., et al., Genetic dissection of neural circuits by Tol2 transposon-mediated Gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008. 105(4): p. 1255-60.
36. Asakawa, K., G. Abe, and K. Kawakami, Cellular dissection of the spinal cord motor column by BAC transgenesis and gene trapping in zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits, 2013. 7: p. 100.
37. Parsons, M.J., et al., Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech Dev, 2009. 126(10): p. 898- 912.
38. Pisharath, H., et al., Targeted ablation of beta cells in the embryonic zebrafish pancreas using E. coli nitroreductase. Mech Dev, 2007. 124(3): p. 218-29.
39. Takeuchi, M., et al., Establishment of Gal4 transgenic zebrafish lines for analysis of development of cerebellar neural circuitry. Dev Biol, 2015. 397(1): p. 1-17
40. Asakawa, K. and K. Kawakami, Protocadherin-Mediated Cell Repulsion Controls the Central Topography and Efferent Projections of the Abducens Nucleus. Cell Rep, 2018. 24(6): p. 1562-1572.
41. Moens, C.B., et al., Equivalence in the genetic control of hindbrain segmentation in fish and mouse. Development, 1998. 125(3): p. 381-91.
42. Reifers, F., et al., Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis. Development, 1998. 125(13): p. 2381- 95.
43. Westerfield, M., The zebrafish book: a guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish. 2000.
44. Hwang, W.Y., et al., Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol, 2013. 31(3): p. 227-9.
45. Mali, P., et al., RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science, 2013. 339(6121): p. 823-6.
46. Nimura, T., et al., Role of Reelin in cell positioning in the cerebellum and the cerebellum-like structure in zebrafish. Dev Biol, 2019. 455(2): p. 393- 408.
47. Ota, S., et al., Efficient identification of TALEN-mediated genome modifications using heteroduplex mobility assays. Genes Cells, 2013. 18(6): p. 450-8.
48. Maves, L., et al., Pbx homeodomain proteins direct Myod activity to promote fast-muscle differentiation. Development, 2007. 134(18): p. 3371-82.
49. Wiellette, E.L. and H. Sive, Early requirement for fgf8 function during hindbrain pattern formation in zebrafish. Dev Dyn, 2004. 229(2): p. 393- 9.
50. Ke, M.T., S. Fujimoto, and T. Imai, SeeDB: a simple and morphologypreserving optical clearing agent for neuronal circuit reconstruction. Nat Neurosci, 2013. 16(8): p. 1154-61.
51. Ke, M.T. and T. Imai, Optical Clearing of Fixed Brain Samples Using SeeDB. Curr Protoc Neurosci, 2014. 66: p. 2 22 1-2 22 19.
52. Akitake, C.M., et al., Transgenerational analysis of transcriptional silencing in zebrafish. Dev Biol, 2011. 352(2): p. 191-201.
53. Xue, H.G., et al., Afferent connections of the corpus cerebelli in holocentrid teleosts. Brain Behav Evol, 2004. 64(4): p. 242-58.
54. Haug, M.F., et al., Phylogeny and expression divergence of metabotropic glutamate receptor genes in the brain of zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Comp Neurol, 2013. 521(7): p. 1533-60.
55. Ferland, R.J., et al., Characterization of Foxp2 and Foxp1 mRNA and protein in the developing and mature brain. J Comp Neurol, 2003. 460(2): p. 266-79.
56. Fujita, H. and I. Sugihara, FoxP2 expression in the cerebellum and inferior olive: development of the transverse stripe-shaped expression pattern in the mouse cerebellar cortex. J Comp Neurol, 2012. 520(3): p. 656-77.
57. Tambalo, M., R. Mitter, and D.G. Wilkinson, A single cell transcriptome atlas of the developing zebrafish hindbrain. Development, 2020. 147(6).
58. Ambrosiani, J., et al., The avian inferior olive derives from the alar neuroepithelium of the rhombomeres 7 and 8: an analysis by using chickquail chimeric embryos. Neuroreport, 1996. 7(7): p. 1285-8.
59. Cambronero, F. and L. Puelles, Rostrocaudal nuclear relationships in the avian medulla oblongata: a fate map with quail chick chimeras. J Comp Neurol, 2000. 427(4): p. 522-45.
60. Kawauchi, D., et al., Direct visualization of nucleogenesis by precerebellar neurons: involvement of ventricle-directed, radial fibreassociated migration. Development, 2006. 133(6): p. 1113-23.
61. Kim, E.J., et al., Ascl1 (Mash1) lineage cells contribute to discrete cell populations in CNS architecture. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2008. 38(4): p. 595- 606.
62. Landsberg, R.L., et al., Hindbrain rhombic lip is comprised of discrete progenitor cell populations allocated by Pax6. Neuron, 2005. 48(6): p. 933-47.
63. Zordan, P., et al., Comparative analysis of proneural gene expression in the embryonic cerebellum. Dev Dyn, 2008. 237(6): p. 1726-35.
64. Grimaldi, P., et al., Origins and control of the differentiation of inhibitory interneurons and glia in the cerebellum. Dev Biol, 2009. 328(2): p. 422- 33.
65. Yamamoto, N. and H. Ito, Fiber connections of the central nucleus of semicircular torus in cyprinids. J Comp Neurol, 2005. 491(3): p. 186-211.
66. Bell, C.C., V. Han, and N.B. Sawtell, Cerebellum-like structures and their implications for cerebellar function. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2008. 31: p. 1- 24.
67. Oertel, D. and E.D. Young, What's a cerebellar circuit doing in the auditory system? Trends Neurosci, 2004. 27(2): p. 104-10.
68. Toresson, H. and K. Campbell, A role for Gsh1 in the developing striatum and olfactory bulb of Gsh2 mutant mice. Development, 2001. 128(23): p. 4769-80.
69. Storm, R., et al., The bHLH transcription factor Olig3 marks the dorsal neuroepithelium of the hindbrain and is essential for the development of brainstem nuclei. Development, 2009. 136(2): p. 295-305.
70. Mohammadi, M., et al., Structures of the tyrosine kinase domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor in complex with inhibitors. Science, 1997. 276(5314): p. 955-60.
71. Russo, J.E., Inhibition of mouse and human class 1 aldehyde dehydrogenase by 4-(N,N-dialkylamino)benzaldehyde compounds. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1997. 414: p. 217-24.
72. Ghosh, P., J.M. Maurer, and C.G. Sagerstrom, Analysis of novel caudal hindbrain genes reveals different regulatory logic for gene expression in rhombomere 4 versus 5/6 in embryonic zebrafish. Neural Dev, 2018. 13(1): p. 13.
73. Waskiewicz, A.J., H.A. Rikhof, and C.B. Moens, Eliminating zebrafish pbx proteins reveals a hindbrain ground state. Dev Cell, 2002. 3(5): p. 723- 33.
74. Johnson, F.B., E. Parker, and M.A. Krasnow, Extradenticle protein is a selective cofactor for the Drosophila homeotics: role of the homeodomain and YPWM amino acid motif in the interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1995. 92(3): p. 739-43.
75. Mann, R.S. and S.K. Chan, Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet, 1996. 12(7): p. 258-62.
76. Shanmugam, K., M.S. Featherstone, and H.U. Saragovi, Residues flanking the HOX YPWM motif contribute to cooperative interactions with PBX. J Biol Chem, 1997. 272(30): p. 19081-7.
77. Maves, L., et al., Pbx acts with Hand2 in early myocardial differentiation. Dev Biol, 2009. 333(2): p. 409-18.
78. Manzanares, M., et al., Segmental regulation of Hoxb-3 by kreisler. Nature, 1997. 387(6629): p. 191-5.
79. Berggren, K., et al., Differential distribution of retinoic acid synthesis in the chicken embryo as determined by immunolocalization of the retinoic acid synthetic enzyme, RALDH-2. Dev Biol, 1999. 210(2): p. 288-304.
80. Blentic, A., E. Gale, and M. Maden, Retinoic acid signalling centres in the avian embryo identified by sites of expression of synthesising and catabolising enzymes. Dev Dyn, 2003. 227(1): p. 114-27.
81. Niederreither, K., et al., Restricted expression and retinoic acid-induced downregulation of the retinaldehyde dehydrogenase type 2 (RALDH-2) gene during mouse development. Mech Dev, 1997. 62(1): p. 67-78.
82. Yamamoto, M., et al., Retinoic acid influences the development of the inferior olivary nucleus in the rodent. Dev Biol, 2005. 280(2): p. 421-33.
83. Begemann, G., et al., Beyond the neckless phenotype: influence of reduced retinoic acid signaling on motor neuron development in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev Biol, 2004. 271(1): p. 119-29.
84. Nolte, C., B. De Kumar, and R. Krumlauf, Hox genes: Downstream "effectors" of retinoic acid signaling in vertebrate embryogenesis. Genesis, 2019. 57(7-8): p. e23306.
85. Ma, L.H., et al., Mosaic hoxb4a neuronal pleiotropism in zebrafish caudal hindbrain. PLoS One, 2009. 4(6): p. e5944.
86. Punnamoottil, B., et al., Enhancer detection in zebrafish permits the identification of neuronal subtypes that express Hox4 paralogs. Dev Dyn, 2008. 237(8): p. 2195-208.
87. Gould, A., N. Itasaki, and R. Krumlauf, Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway. Neuron, 1998. 21(1): p. 39-51.
88. Lukoseviciute, M., et al., From Pioneer to Repressor: Bimodal foxd3 Activity Dynamically Remodels Neural Crest Regulatory Landscape In Vivo. Dev Cell, 2018. 47(5): p. 608-628 e6.
89. Rougeot, J., et al., Maintenance of spatial gene expression by Polycombmediated repression after formation of a vertebrate body plan. Development, 2019. 146(19).
90. Matsuda, K., et al., ChIP-seq analysis of genomic binding regions of five major transcription factors highlights a central role for ZIC2 in the mouse epiblast stem cell gene regulatory network. Development, 2017. 144(11): p. 1948-1958.
91. Jolma, A., et al., Multiplexed massively parallel SELEX for characterization of human transcription factor binding specificities. Genome Res, 2010. 20(6): p. 861-73.
論文の公開元へ
