A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

1 Eden CG. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic

junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results. Eur Urol.

2007;52:983-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.047, PMID:

17629395

2 Notley RG, Beaugie JM. The long-term follow-up of

Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis. Br J Urol.

1973;45:464-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1973.tb06804.x,

PMID: 4748391

3 Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL. Initial complications and

late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1977;118:1625. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57936-7, PMID: 875213

4 Gill IS, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Advances in urological

laparoscopy. J Urol. 1995;154:1275-94. DOI: 10.1016/S00225347(01)66839-3, PMID: 7658522

5 Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P. Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal

and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach.

Eur Urol. 1998;33:489-96. DOI: 10.1159/000019640, PMID:

9643669

6 Miyake H, Kawabata G, Gotoh A, Fujisawa M, Okada H,

Arakawa S, et al. Comparison of surgical stress between

laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by

measurement of humoral mediators. Int J Urol. 2002;9:329-33.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00473.x, PMID: 12110097

7 Si m fo r o o s h N, B a si r i A , Ta bi bi A , D a n e s h A K ,

Sharifi-Aghdas F, Ziaee SA, et al. A comparison between

laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urol J. 2004;1:165-9. PMID:

17914681

8 Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger

GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol.

1993;150:1795-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35898-6,

PMID: 8230507

9 Gupta NP, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Mukherjee S, Kumar R,

Dogra PN. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large

single-centre experience. BJU Int. 2010;105:980-3. DOI:

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08983.x, PMID: 19874304

10 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo

D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of

surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg.

2009;250:187-96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2,

PMID: 19638912

11 Ellenbogen PH, Scheible FW, Talner LB, Leopold GR.

Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract

obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:731-3. DOI:

10.2214/ajr.130.4.731, PMID: 416685

12 Isoyama T, Iwamoto H, Inoue S, Morizane S, Hinata N, Yao A,

et al. Hydronephrosis after retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in adult patients with

ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A longitudinal analysis.

Cent European J Urol. 2014;67:101-5. PMID: 24982795

13 Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, Guazzoni G, Buffi

N, Peters CA, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair

of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review

and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:430-52. DOI: 10.1016/

j.eururo.2013.06.053, PMID: 23856037

14 Jarrett TW, Chan D, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi

LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol.

2002;167:1253-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65276-7,

PMID: 11832708

15 Tasian GE, Casale P. The robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: gateway to advanced reconstruction. Urol Clin North

Am. 2015;42:89-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.008, PMID:

25455175

16 Boysen WR, Gundeti MS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic

pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique,

outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33:925-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00383017-4082-7, PMID: 28365863

17 Braga LHP, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic

review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic

junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of

hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.

Eur Urol. 2009;56:848-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.063,

PMID: 19359084

18 Light A, Karthikeyan S, Maruthan S, Elhage O, Danuser H,

Dasgupta P. Peri-operative outcomes and complications after

laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a

systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018;122:18194. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14170, PMID: 29453902

19 Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg.

2006;243:486-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000205626.71982.32,

PMID: 16552199

20 Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. AndersonHynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da

Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60:509-13. DOI: 10.1016/

S0090-4295(02)01761-2, PMID: 12350499

21 Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Sforza S, Farina A,

Cerulo M, et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty

in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO):

technical considerations and results. J Pediatr Urol.

2019;15:667.e1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018

22 Lucas SM, Sundaram CP, Wolf JS Jr, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG,

Aziz M, et al. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally

invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group. J

Urol. 2012;187:522-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.158, PMID:

22177178

23 Patel V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered

pyeloplast y. Urolog y. 2005;66:45-9. DOI: 10.1016/

j.urology.2005.01.053, PMID: 15992879

131

© 2022 Tottori University Medical Press

...