リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Characterization of disease suppression activity of Bacillus cyclic lipopeptide depended on the induced disease resistance in plants」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Characterization of disease suppression activity of Bacillus cyclic lipopeptide depended on the induced disease resistance in plants

Carla Suzuki Altrao 東京農業大学

2022.09.01

概要

Background
 A number of Bacillus strains have been reported to be biological control agents against several kinds of plant diseases. Most of the beneficial strains produce cyclic lipopeptides (cLPs), and cLPs, well-known antimicrobial compounds, are considered to play key roles in the suppression of plant diseases. A few papers have characterized the induced disease resistance elicited by cLPs so far, however, it is still unclear about the specificity to induce the disease resistance among the combinations of cLP molecules and host plants, and the signaling pathways in the innate immune system in planta.
 Surfactin and iturin A are Bacillus cLPs. Iturin A is composed of the heptapeptide NYNQPNS linked to a β-amino fatty acid, and surfactin is composed of the heptapeptide ELLVDLL linked to a β-hydroxy fatty acid. In the previous studies in my lab, both purified surfactin and iturin A show disease suppression against soil-borne diseases caused by Fusarium oxysporum on tatsoi and lettuce, respectively. However, excess amounts of cLP amendments in soil negate the disease suppression for both of surfactin and iturin A.
In my PhD thesis, I aimed to characterize the effect of surfactin and iturin A to suppress disease via induced disease resistance in various edible plants and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Comparative study of disease suppression on various edible host plants by Bacillus cyclic lipopeptides
 To evaluate disease suppression activities of purified cLPs via induced disease resistance, I conducted a bioassay system by hydroponic culture of host plants. Brassica oleracea (cabbage), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Oryza sativa (rice), Glycine max (soybean) and Cucumis sativus (cucumber) were used as host plants. Seedlings of host plants were treated with purified surfactin or iturin A on their roots by addition of cLP to hydroponic culture. Two-days after cLP-treatment, the bacterial pathogen suspension with sterilized 10 mM MgSO4 was inoculated on the abaxial side of leaves by infiltration method.
 Most of the studied host plants were elicited by both cLPs treatment on roots to suppress diseases through induced disease resistance, except tomato and cucumber. On tomato, only surfactin showed significantly disease suppression at a range of 1 to 4 µM, whereas no disease suppressions were observed at a range of 0.25 to 32 µM of iturin A. On cucumber, although significantly disease suppressions were observed by iturin A treatments, surfactin treatments enhanced disease comparing with disease control. It was notable that the effective disease-suppressing concentrations varied by host and cLP, and the negation of disease suppressive activity that was observed at excess concentrations of either surfactin or iturin A for all host plants was confirmed to be through loss of disease suppression.
 These findings strongly suggested that cLPs elicit induced disease resistance on a variety of edible host plants.

Insights on conferring of disease suppression by Bacillus cyclic lipopeptides via induced disease resistance on Arabidopsis thaliana
 Induced disease resistance in plants is characterized into two systems; systemic acquired resistance, SAR, is an immune system triggered by pathogen recognition, which uses salicylic acid (SA) as a signaling molecule, whereas induced systemic resistance, ISR, triggered by rhizobacteria recognition, which uses jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene. These two systems are inducible and strictly regulate the expression of distinct defense genes in planta.
 To identify the signaling system in induced disease resistance elicited by cLPs treatments, A. thaliana Col-0 and its mutants were used as host plants. As well as described above on edible host plants, I conducted a bioassay system by hydroponic culture.
On A. thaliana Col-0 wild type, significant disease suppression against the bacterial disease on leaves was observed following root-treatments of purified surfactin and iturin A, respectively. However, the ranges of concentration to show disease suppressions differed between cLPs. Surfactin conferred significant disease suppression at a range of 4 to 16 µM in hydroponic culture, whereas iturin A conferred suppression at a range of 0.5 to 2 µM. Moreover, the disease suppression was negated at 32 µM surfactin and 4 µM iturin A, respectively, whereas no abnormalities were observed at 32 µM surfactin and 4 µM iturin A without bacterial pathogen inoculations.
To evaluate the signaling pathways in A. thaliana conferring disease suppression by cLP treatments, a series of A. thaliana Col-0 mutants.
 NPR1, nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related protein 1, has been identified as a mediator for the expression in both of SA signaling and JA signaling pathways in A. thaliana. In npr1 mutants, no disease suppression was observed using either surfactin- or iturin A-treatments, suggesting that the induced disease resistance elicited by cLPs was conferred through NPR1-dependent pathway.
ICS1, isochorismate synthase 1, is a biosynthetic enzyme for SA via isochorismate pathway. Generated SA is an important plant hormone, and acts as a regulatory component during SA signaling of induced disease resistance in Arabidopsis. In an Arabidopsis ics1 mutant, no disease suppression was observed following treatment with surfactin or iturin A, suggesting that SA biosynthesis through the ICS pathway is important in the induced disease resistance elicited by surfactin and iturin A.
 JAR1, jasmonate resistant 1, is a jasmonate-amido synthetase in the biosynthesis of jasmonate-isoleucine conjugate which activates the JA signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. In jar1 mutants, significant disease suppression was observed following treatments of 8 µM surfactin and 1 µM iturin A, similar to as was observed in wild type Col-0, suggesting that the JA signaling pathway does not confer the disease suppression by induced disease resistance elicited by cLPs.
 Those findings revealed that SA acid signaling pathway via isochorismate pathway was the major signaling pathway in the induced disease resistance elicited by both cLPs. Moreover, negations of disease suppression were observed by excess amount of surfactin or iturin A treatment, and the negation of disease suppression was not correlated to the antagonistic effect by induction of JA signaling pathway in host plants.

Conclusion
 In my PhD thesis, I characterized disease suppression activities of Bacillus cLPs depended on induced disease resistance. The cLPs, surfactin and iturin A, showed disease suppressive activities against bacterial leaf diseases by eliciting of induced disease resistance on a variety of edible host plants. On the other hand, the specificity to induce the disease resistance among the combinations of cLP molecules and host plants were observed on a particular host plants, tomato and cucumber. Moreover, under the excess amount of cLP treatments, the disease suppression were negated for both of cLPs whereas no abnormalities were observed without bacterial pathogen inoculations.
 On A. thaliana, the signaling pathway in induced disease resistance elicited by Bacillus cLPs was SA acid signaling pathway via isochorismate pathway. Moreover, negations of disease suppression were observed by excess amount of surfactin or iturin A treatment, and the negation of disease suppression was not correlated to the antagonistic effect by induction of JA signaling pathway in host plants.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

Alina et al., (2015) Biodiversity of Bacillus subtilis group and beneficial traits of Bacillus species useful in plant protection. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, v. 20, n. 5, p. 10737-10750.

Alonso et al., (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301:653-657.

Aranda et al., (2005) Further aspects on the hemolytic activity of the antibiotic lipopeptide iturin A. Biochim Biophys Acta 1713:51–6.

Arima et al., 1968. Surfactin, a crystalline peptidelipid surfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis: Isolation, characterization and its inhibition of fibrin clot formation. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 31, 488-494.

Asaka and Shoda, 1996. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping off of tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 62, p. 4081- 4085.

Backer et al., (2019) The nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related genes 1 (NPR1) and related Family: mechanistic insights in plant disease resistance. Front Plant Sci 10:102.

Bais et al., (2004) Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol 134:307-319.

Baltrus et al., (2017) Evolution, genomics and epidemiology of Pseudomonas syringae: challenges in bacterial molecular plant pathology. Molecular plant pathology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 152-168.

Bender et al., (1999) Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins: mode of action, regulation, and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews, v. 63, n. 2, p. 266-292.

Boller and Felix, 2009. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol, v. 60, p. 379–406.

Cao et al., (1997) The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell 88:57-63.

Cawoy et al., 2011. Bacillus-based biological control of plant diseases. Pesticides in the modern world-pesticides use and management, p. 273-302.

Cazorla et al., 2002. Copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae strains isolated from mango is encoded mainly by plasmids. Phytopathology, v. 92, n. 8, p. 909-916.

Chandler et al., 2015. Role of cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis in mounting induced immunity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiological and molecular plant pathology, v. 91, p. 20-30.

Choudhary et al., 2009. Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants–with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiological research, v. 164, n. 5, p. 493-513.

Conrath, U., 2006. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant signaling & behavior, v. 1, n. 4, p. 179-184.

Cooksey, D.A., 1994. Molecular mechanisms of copper resistance and accumulation in bacteria. FEMS microbiology reviews, v. 14, n. 4, p. 381-386.

Dempsey et al., 2012. SOS–too many signals for systemic acquired resistance?. Trends in plant science, v. 17, n. 9, p. 538-545, 2012.

Dodds and Rathjen, 2010. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant– pathogen interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics, v. 11, n. 8, p. 539-548.

Delaney et al., 1994. A central role of salicylic acid in plant disease resistance. Science, v. 266, n. 5188, p. 1247-1250.

Dufour et al., 2005. Hemolytic activity of new linear surfactin analogs in relation to their physico-chemical properties. Biochim Biophys Acta – Gen Subjects 1726:87– 95

Durrant and Dong, 2004. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev.Phytopathol. 42, 185–209.

Driks, A. (2004) The Bacillus spore coat. Phytopathology, v. 94, p. 1249-1252.

Dye, D.W. (1953) Control of Pseudomonas syringae with streptomycin. Nature, v. 172, n. 4380, p. 683-684.

Farace et al., (2015) Cyclic lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis activate distinct patterns of defence responses in grapevine. Molecular plant pathology, 16, 177-187.

Fujita and Yokota (2019) Disease suppression by the cyclic lipopeptides iturin A and surfactin from Bacillus spp. against Fusarium wilt of lettuce. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 85, 44-48.

García-Gutiérrez et al., (2013) The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF 6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate‐and salicylic acid‐dependent defence responses. Microbial Biotechnology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 264-274.

Gao et al., (2015) Signal regulators of systemic acquired resistance. Frontiers in plant science, v. 6, p. 228.

Gond et al., (2015) Endophytic Bacillus spp. produce antifungal lipopeptides and induce host defence gene expression in maize. Microbiological research, v. 172, p. 79-87.

Grau et al., (2001) Aggregational behavior of aqueous dispersions of the antifungal lipopeptide iturin A. Peptides, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-5.

Haas and Défago (2005) Biological control of soilborne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Ver Microbiol, v. 3, p. 307–319.

Hakkem and Akhtar (2016) Plant, Soil and Microbes: Volume 2: Mechanisms and Molecular Interactions. Springer.

Hashem et al., (2019) Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi journal of biological sciences, v. 26, n. 6, p. 1291-1297, 2019.

Hoagland and Arnon (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular. California agricultural experiment station 347(2nd edit).

Hoofann, M.H. (2002) Biogeography of Arabidopsis thaliana. (L.) Heynh. (Brassicaceae). Journal Biogeography, v.4, p. 125–34.

Horst, R.K. (2013) Westcott's plant disease handbook. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

Hsieh et al. (2008) Comparing methods for identifying Bacillus strains capable of producing the antifungal lipopeptide iturin A. Current Microbiology, v. 56, n. 1, p. 1-5.

Huang et al., (2008) Optimization of inactivation of endospores of Bacillus cereus in milk by surfactin and fengycin using a response surface method. Intl J Pept Res Ther 14:89–95.

Igarashi et al., (2010) Glutamate Fermentation By‐product Activates Plant Defence Responses and Confers Resistance Against Pathogen Infection. J phytopathol 158:668-675.

Jacques, P. (2011) Surfactin and other lipopeptides from Bacillus spp. In: Biosurfactants: from genes to application, vol 20. Springer, Münster.

Jakok et al., (2002) Pseudomonas viridiflava and P. syringae natural pathogens of Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1195- 1203.

Jones and Dangl (2006) The plant immune system. nature, v. 444, n. 7117, p. 323-329, 2006.

Jourdan et al. (2009) Insights into the defense-related events occurring in plant cells following perception of surfactin-type lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, v. 22, n. 4, p. 456-468.

Kakinuma et al. (1969) Determination of fatty acid in surfactin and elucidation of the total structure of surfactin. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 33, 973-976.

Kasugai, S. (1939) Studies on the hydroponic cultures. Journal of the Science of Soil and Manure, 13, 669-822. (In Japanese).

Kinkema et al. (2000) Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. The plant cell, v. 12, n. 12, p. 2339-2350.

Kracht et al., (1999) Antiviral and hemolytic activities of surfactin isoforms and their methyl ester derivatives. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 52:613–619.

Kuwata, H. (1985) Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae pv. nov., causal agent of bacterial halo blight of rice. Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, 51, 212-218.

Lefevere et al., (2020.)Salicylic acid biosynthesis in plants. Frontiers in plant science, v. 11.

Li et al., (2019) Surfactin and fengycin contribute to the protection of a Bacillus subtilis strain against grape downy mildew by both direct effect and defence stimulation. Molecular plant pathology, v. 20, n. 8, p. 1037-1050.

Lugtenberg and Kamilova (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual review of microbiology, v. 63, p. 541-556.

Manjula and Podile (2005) Increase in seedling emergence and dry weight of pigeon pea in the field with chitin-supplemented formulations of Bacillus subtilis AF 1. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, v.21, p.1057–1062.

Meinke et al. (1998) Arabidopsis thaliana: A Model Plant for Genome Analysis. Science, v. 282, p. 662-682.

Ongena et al. (2005) Bacillus subtilis M4 decreases plant susceptibility towards fungal pathogens by increasing host resistance associated with differential gene expression. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 67, n. 5, p. 692-698.

Ongena et al. (2007) Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environ Microbiol 9:1084–1090.

Ongena and Jacques (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends in microbiology, v. 16, n. 3, p. 115-125.

Ongena et al. (2010) The Roles of Cyclic Lipopeptides in the Biocontrol Activity of Bacillus subtilis. In: Gisi U., Chet I., Gullino M. (eds) Recent Developments in Management of Plant Diseases. Plant Pathology in the 21st Century (Contributions to the 9th International Congress), vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht.

Phae et al., (1990) Suppressive effect of Bacillus subtilis and its products on phytopathogenic microorganisms. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 69,1–7.

Pel et al., (2013) Microbial recognition and evasion of host immunity. Journal of experimental botany, v. 64, n. 5, p. 1237-1248, 2013.

Persello et al., (2003) Tales from the underground: Molecular plant-rhizobacteria interactions. Plant Cell and Environment, v.26, p.186–199, 2003.

Peypoux et al., (1978) Structure of iturine A, a peptidolipid antibiotic from Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry, 17, 3992-3996.

Piterse et al., 1998. A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, v. 10, n. 9, p. 1571-1580.

Pieterse et al., 2012. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual review of cell and developmental biology, v. 28, p. 489-521.

Pieterse et al., 2014. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annual review of phytopathology, v. 52.

Pieterse et al., (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52.

Rédei, G.P. (1975) Arabidopisis as a genetic tool. Annual of review of genetics. v. 9, p. 11-127,

Romero et al., (2006) Bacillus subtilis inhibits growth of Cladophialophora carrionii in vitro. Journal de Mycologie Médicale, v. 16, n. 2, p. 92-94.

Romero et al., (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptidesare key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20:430–440.

Ross, A. (1961) Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology, v. 14, n. 3, p. 340-358.

Ryals et al., (1996) Systemic acquired resistance. The plant cell, v. 8, n. 10, p. 1809.

Ryu et al., (2003) Different signaling pathways of induced resistance by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae. New Phytologist, v. 160, n. 2, p. 413-420.

Shah, J., (2009) Plants under attack: systemic signals in defence. Current opinion in plant biology, v. 12, n. 4, p. 459-464.

Shah and Zeier (2013) Long-distance communication and signal amplification in systemic acquired resistance. Frontiers in plant science, v. 4, p. 30.

Su et al., (2020) Bacillus subtilis: a universal cell factory for industry, agriculture, biomaterials and medicine. Microbial Cell Factories, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-12.

Suza and Staswick (2008) The role of JAR1 in jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine production during Arabidopsis wound response. Planta 227:1221-1232.

Stein (2005) Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Molecular microbiology, 56, 845-857.

Thomma et al., (2001) Different micro-organisms differentially induce Arabidopsis disease response pathways. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, v. 39, n. 7-8, p. 673-680.

Tsavkelova et al., (2006) Microbial Producers of Plant Growth Stimulators and Their Practical Use: A Review. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, v.42, p.117– 126.

Todorova and Kozhuharova (2010) Characteristics and antimicrobial activity of Bacillus subtilis strains isolated from soil. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, v. 26, n. 7, p. 1207-1216.

Tunsagool et al., (2019) Targeted transcriptional and proteomic studies explicate specific roles of Bacillus subtilis iturin A, fengycin, and surfactin on elicitation of defensive systems in mandarin fruit during stress. PloS one, v. 14, n. 5, p. e0217202, 2019.

Turnbull, P.C.B. (1996) Bacillus. In Medical microbiology, Galveston: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.

Vallad and Goodman (2004) Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop science, v. 44, n. 6, p. 1920-1934.

Van Loon et al., (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual review of phytopathology, v. 36, n. 1, p. 453-483, 1998.

Van Loon, L.C. (2007) Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. In: New perspectives and approaches in plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria research. Springer, Dordrecht, p. 243-254.

Van Peer et al., (1991) Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS 417 r. Phytopathology, v. 81, n. 7, p. 728-734.

Wei et al., (1991) Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology, v. 81, n. 11, p. 1508-1512.

Wildermuth et al., (2001) Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature, v. 414, n. 6863, p. 562-565.

Yamamoto et al., (2015) Are cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S13‐3 responsible for the plant defence response in strawberry against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides?. Letters in applied microbiology, v. 60, n. 4, p. 379-386.

Yokota and Hayakawa (2015) Impact of antimicrobial lipopeptides from Bacillus sp. on suppression of Fusarium yellows of tatsoi. Microbes and environments, 30, 281- 283

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る