リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Precise Neutron Lifetime Measurement Using Pulsed Neutron Beams」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Precise Neutron Lifetime Measurement Using Pulsed Neutron Beams

長倉, 直樹 東京大学 DOI:10.15083/0002001861

2021.10.04

概要

The neutron beta-decay lifetime (τn〜880 s) is an important parameter in the Standard Model of particle physics, cosmology, and astrophysics. For example, τn is a parameter which can be used to determine the Vud parameter of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa quark mixing matrix. The neutron lifetime is also one of the input parameters for the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, which predicts the light element synthesis in the early universe.

Since the discovery of a neutron by James Chadwick in 1932, various experiments have been conducted to measure τn. They are mainly divided into two independent methods. One is to measure the number of protons from neutron beta-decays, which was conducted at National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research. The other is to store ultra cold neutrons (UCNs) in a chamber and count the number of remaining UCNs after a certain period of time. The average result of the in- flight method gives (888.0±2.2) s, while that of the UCN storage method gives (879.6±0.6) s. As a result, there exists a significant discrepancy of 8.4 s (corresponding to 4.0σ) between the results of these two methods, which is recognized as the “neutron lifetime puzzle”.

In order to resolve this problem, we conducted a new type of experiment using the pulsed neutron beams at Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC). We set our eventual precision of 1 second for measuring τn, which is comparable to the current best precision measurement. The experiment was carried out at the polarized beam branch of the beamline BL05 in Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility at J- PARC. The neutron beams from the polarization beam branch first enter a spin flip chopper, which is composed of radio-frequency coils and magnetic super mirrors. The magnetic super mirror can selectively reflect neutrons depending on the neutron polarization direction. By adjusting the radio-frequency coil operation, a neutron bunch with an arbitrary length can be formed.

A time projection chamber (TPC) made of polyether ether ketone is developed for a beta-decay counter to realize the low-background condition. The inside walls are completely covered by 6LiF plates to absorb scattered neutrons without prompt γ-ray emission. There is a two-dimensional multi wire proportional chamber in the upper part of the TPC, which can reconstruct the three-dimensional track of charged particles. Helium and CO2 gases are used as an operation gas. In addition to these gases, a small amount of 3He gas, which typically amounts to 100 mPa pressure, is injected into the TPC. The neutron flux can be evaluated by counting the number of the 3He(n, p)3H events in the TPC. Since the length of each neutron bunch is about half of the TPC length, the TPC can detect both beta-decays and the 3He(n, p)3H reactions with a 4π solid angle acceptance and the good signal-to-noise ratio. The neutron lifetime can be expressed using the number of beta-decays (Sβ)and the 3He(n, p)3H events (S3He) as
τn =1/ρσ0ν0 S3He/Sβ/εβ,
where ε3He and εβ are the respective selection efficiencies, σ0=(5333±7) barn is the 3He(n, p)3H cross section for a neutron with a velocity of v0 = 2200 m/s, and ρ is the 3He number density in the TPC.

The detector response is simulated using the Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation software. The simulation result is used to evaluate the signal selection efficiencies and expected background amount in the signal region. The difference of the signal selection efficiencies between beta-decays and the 3He(n, p)3H events can be corrected. The simulation procedure is divided into two processes: the particle simulation and the detector response simulation. In the particle simulation process, the detector setup at the BL05 polarization beam branch is implemented. The particle transportation and the ionization process in the TPC is simulated, and the corresponding energy deposit from charged particles is calculated as a function of its position. In the detector simulation, the energy deposit is converted into anode, field, and cathode wire waveforms.

We started the data acquisition in May 2014, and we have continuously taken data every year through 2018. In total, we obtained 1094 hours of beam-incident data, and 6.6 × 1011 neutron have entered the TPC. The overall combined data gives a statistical error of about a few seconds on the neutron lifetime. The signal events are counted only when each of the neutron bunches are completely inside the TPC sensitive region. As a result, the systematic uncertainties originating from the TPC insensitive region can be eliminated.

There are several kinds of backgrounds expected for the neutron beta-decay events. The constant background, such as cosmic rays and environmental radiation, can be subtracted using the shutter-closed data. In the shutter-closed data, the neutron beams are stopped by a 6LiF plate at the entrance of the TPC, thus the TPC events without the presence of the neutron beams can be obtained. There also exists the backgrounds related the neutron beams. For example, scattered neutrons interact with the TPC wall, which emits prompt γ-rays and undergoes Compton scattering in the TPC. This kind of backgrounds cannot be subtracted using the shutter-closed data. Since the background mainly originates at the TPC wall, it can be separated based on how far the track starting point is from the TPC center. Using this parameter, the simulated background events are normalized, and the total background amount in the signal region is subtracted. Finally, the result combining all the data is evaluated to be 894.6 ± 4.4 (stat.) +7.6 (sys.) s. This is the first result of the neutron lifetime measurement that obtaining a 1%-level of the precision using the pulsed neutron beams.

Although our result is closer to the averaged result of the in-flight method, it is also consistent with the averaged result of the UCN storage method. We do not yet know what causes the discrepancy between the in-flight method and the UCN storage method: whether it is simply caused by missing some systematic effects or it indicates new physics beyond our understanding. Our result is not precise enough to give any indication of the discrepancy puzzle, hence further precise measurement is required. Several upgrade plans to reduce both the statistical and systematic uncertainties are ongoing, such as the spin flip chopper upgrade and the low-pressure operation of the TPC.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

[1] M. Pospelov and J. Pradler. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis as a Probe of New Physics. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, Vol. 60, pp. 539–568, 2010.

[2] A. Peimbert, M. Peimbert, and V. Luridiana. The primordial helium abundance and the number of neutrino families. Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, Vol. 52, pp. 419–424, 2016.

[3] E. Aver, K. A. Olive, and E. D. Skillman. The effects of He I λ 10830 on helium abundance determinations. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2015, No. 07, p. 011, 2015.

[4] Y. I. Izotov, T. X. Thuan, and N. G. Guseva. A new determination of the primordial He abundance using the He I λ10830Å emission line: cosmological implications. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 445, No. 1, pp. 778–793, 2014.

[5] PAR Ade et al. Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy and Astro- physics, Vol. 594, pp. 1–63, 2016.

[6] M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group). Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 98, p. 030001, Aug 2018.

[7] J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner. Nuclear beta decays and CKM unitarity. In 13th Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics (CIPANP 2018) Palm Springs, California, USA, May 29-June 3, 2018, 2018.

[8] A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Sirlin. Precision measurements and CKM unitarity. Physical Review, Vol. D70, p. 093006, 2004.

[9] J. Chadwick. The existence of a neutron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 136, No. 830, pp. 692–708, 1932.

[10] S. Arzumanov et al. A measurement of the neutron lifetime using the method of storage of ultracold neutrons and detection of inelastically up-scattered neutrons. Physics Letters, Vol. B745, pp. 79–89, 2015.

[11] J. S. Nico et al. Measurement of the neutron lifetime by counting trapped protons in a cold neutron beam. Physcal Review C, Vol. 71, p. 055502, 2005.

[12] A. T. Yue et al. Improved Determination of the Neutron Lifetime. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 111, No. 22, p. 222501, 2013.

[13] R. Kossakowski et al. Neutron lifetime measurement with a helium-filled time projection chamber. Nuclear Physics A, Vol. 503, No. 2, pp. 473 – 500, 1989.

[14] J. Als-Nielsen and O. Dietrich. Slow Neutron Cross Sections for He3, B, and Au. Phys. Rev., Vol. 133, pp. B925–B929, Feb 1964.

[15] R. B. Firestone and V. S. Shirley. Table of Isotopes. Wiley-Interscience, 1.0 edition, March 1996.

[16] P. Grivot et al. A helium-filled time projection chamber for a neutron lifetime measurement. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 127 – 134, 1988.

[17] J-PARC official website. http://j-parc.jp/.

[18] T. Ino et al. Measurement of the neutron beam polarization of BL05/NOP beamline at J- PARC. Physica B: Condensed Matter, Vol. 406, No. 12, pp. 2424 – 2428, 2011. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Polarised Neutrons for Condensed Matter Investigation.

[19] K. Mishima. J-PARC 中性子基礎物理ビームライン(BL05/NOP). Neutron network news (Hamon), Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 156–160, 2015.

[20] Y. Arimoto et al. Development of time projection chamber for precise neutron lifetime measurement using pulsed cold neutron beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 799, pp. 187 – 196, 2015.

[21] H. Otono. New detector system for the precise neutron lifetime measurement using pulsed cold neutron beams. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Tokyo, December 2011.

[22] T. Ino et al. Precision neutron flux measurement with a neutron beam monitor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 528, No. 1, p. 012039, 2014.

[23] Garfield official website. http://garfield.web.cern.ch/garfield.

[24] A. R. Siddiq and A. R. Kennedy. Porous poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) manufactured by a novel powder route using near-spherical salt bead porogens: Characterisation and mechanical properties. Materials Science and Engineering: C, Vol. 47, pp. 180 – 188, 2015.

[25] Y. Lee. Physical properties of poly(ether ether ketone). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1988.

[26] Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections. http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/ n-lengths/.

[27] Magboltz official website. http://magboltz.web.cern.ch/magboltz/.

[28] Y. Igarashi et al. A common data acquisition system for high-intensity beam experiments. Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2 2005.

[29] Japan Radioisotope Association. アイトソープ手帳 11 版. Maruzen Publishing, 2012.

[30] H. Sumino, K. Nagao, and K. Notsuji. Highly sensitive and precise measurement of he- lium isotopes using a mass spectrometer with double collector system. Journal of the Mass Spectrometry Society of Japan, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 61–68, 2001.

[31] S. Ieki. Measurement of the Neutron Lifetime by Counting the Beta Decay at J-PARC. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Tokyo, December 2017.

[32] S. Agostinelli et al. Geant4―a simulation toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 506, No. 3, pp. 250 – 303, 2003.

[33] R. Grossman, D. Hanley, and Xiao Qin. Caching and migration for multilevel persistent object stores. In Proceedings of IEEE 14th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, pp. 127–135, Sept 1995.

[34] J. Allison et al. Recent developments in Geant4. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 835, pp. 186 – 225, 2016.

[35] K. Hirota et al. Development of a neutron detector based on a position-sensitive photomulti- plier. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 7, pp. 1836–1838, 2005.

[36] N. Z. Alcock and D. G. Hurst. Neutron diffraction by the gases N2, CF4, and CH4. Physical Review, Vol. 83, pp. 1100–1105, Sep 1951.

[37] N. Z. Alcock and D. G. Hurst. Neutron diffraction by gases. Physical Review, Vol. 75, pp. 1609–1610, May 1949.

[38] Prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis. https://www-nds.iaea.org/pgaa/ pgaa7/index.html.

[39] Phits official website. https://phits.jaea.go.jp/indexj.html.

[40] Nuclear data evaluation project. http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/.

[41] N. Nagakura et al. Experimental verification of a gain reduction model for the space charge effect in a wire chamber. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 013C01, 2018.

[42] S. Ramo. Currents induced by electron motion. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 584–585, Sept 1939.

[43] ANSYS official website. https://www.ansys.jp/index.html.

[44] G. Bradski. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, 2000.

[45] J. Matsuda et al. The 3He/4He ratio of the new internal He standard of Japan (HESJ). Geochemical journal GJ, Vol. 36, pp. 191–195, 01 2002.

[46] K. Mishima et al. Accurate Determination of the Absolute 3He/4He Ratio of a Synthesized Helium Standard Gas (Helium Standard of Japan, HESJ): Toward Revision of the Atmospheric 3He/4He Ratio. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 3995–4005, 2018.

[47] W. Blum, W. Riegler, and L. Rolandi. Particle Detection with Drift Chambers. Springer, 2008.

[48] E. Waibel and B. Grosswendt. Degradation of low-energy electrons in carbon dioxide: energy loss and ionization. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 239–250, 1991.

[49] G. Willems, W. Y. Baek, and B. Grosswendt. Energy dependence of w values of protons in water. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 99, No. 1-4, pp. 347–350, 2002.

[50] Japan Ship and Boat Manufacturers’ Association. 通信教育造船科講座テキスト「船殻設計」学習指導書. 2000.

[51] D. Cook. The second virial coefficient of carbon dioxide at low temperatures. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 268–275, 1957.

[52] G. S. Kell, G. E. McLaurin, and E. Whalley. Second virial coefficient of helium from 0 to 500◦C by the two-temperature gas-expansion method. The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 2199–2205, 1978.

[53] D. Sekiba et al. Installation of high-resolution ERDA in UTTAC at the University of Tsukuba: Determination of the energy resolution and the detection limit for hydrogen. Nuclear Instru- ments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 401, pp. 29 – 32, 2017.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る