リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Early Detection of Adverse Drug Reaction Signals by Association Rule Mining Using Large-Scale Administrative Claims Data」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Early Detection of Adverse Drug Reaction Signals by Association Rule Mining Using Large-Scale Administrative Claims Data

Yamamoto, Hiroki Kayanuma, Gen Nagashima, Takuya Toda, Chihiro Nagayasu, Kazuki Kaneko, Shuji 京都大学 DOI:10.1007/s40264-023-01278-4

2023.04

概要

INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a leading cause of mortality worldwide and should be detected promptly to reduce health risks to patients. A data-mining approach using large-scale medical records might be a useful method for the early detection of ADRs. Many studies have analyzed medical records to detect ADRs; however, most of them have focused on a narrow range of ADRs, limiting their usefulness. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify methods for the early detection of a wide range of ADR signals. METHODS: First, to evaluate the performance in signal detection of ADRs by data-mining, we attempted to create a gold standard based on clinical evidence. Second, association rule mining (ARM) was applied to patient symptoms and medications registered in claims data, followed by evaluating ADR signal detection performance. RESULTS: We created a new gold standard consisting of 92 positive and 88 negative controls. In the assessment of ARM using claims data, the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and the precision-recall curve were 0.80 and 0.83, respectively. If the detection criteria were defined as lift > 1, conviction > 1, and p-value < 0.05, ARM could identify 156 signals, of which 90 were true positive controls (sensitivity: 0.98, specificity: 0.25). Evaluation of the capability of ARM with short periods of data revealed that ARM could detect a greater number of positive controls than the conventional analysis method. CONCLUSIONS: ARM of claims data may be effective in the early detection of a wide range of ADR signals.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug

reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective

studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–5.

2. FDA (2018). Preventable Adverse Drug Reactions: A Focus on

Drug Interactions. https://​www.​fda.​gov/​drugs/​drug-​inter​actio​ns-​

labeli​ ng/p​ reven​ table-a​ dvers​ e-d​ rug-r​ eacti​ ons-f​ ocus-d​ rug-i​ ntera​ ctio​

ns. Accessed 22 August 2022.

3. Huybrechts KF, Desai RJ, Park M, Gagne JJ, Najafzadeh M,

Avorn J. The potential return on public investment in detecting

adverse drug effects. Med Care. 2017;55:545–51.

4. Downing NS, Shah ND, Aminawung JA, Pease AM, Zeitoun JD,

Krumholz HM, et al. Postmarket safety events among novel therapeutics approved by the US food and drug administration between

2001 and 2010. JAMA. 2017;317:1854–63.

5. Rogers AS. Adverse drug events: identification and attribution.

Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987;21:915–20.

6. Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, Okuno Y. Data mining of the

public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Int J

Med Sci. 2013;10:796–803.

7. Chasioti D, Yao X, Zhang P, Lerner S, Quinney SK, Ning X,

et al. Mining directional drug interaction effects on myopathy

using the FAERS database. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform.

2019;23:2156–63.

8. Sarangdhar M, Tabar S, Schmidt C, Kushwaha A, Shah K, Dahlquist JE, et al. Data mining differential clinical outcomes associated with drug regimens using adverse event reporting data. Nat

Biotechnol. 2016;34:697–700.

9. Gibbons RD, Amatya AK, Brown CH, Hur K, Marcus SM, Bhaumik DK, et al. Post-approval drug safety surveillance. Annu Rev

Public Health. 2010;31:419–37.

10. Kaneko S, Nagashima T. Drug repositioning and target finding

based on clinical evidence. Biol Pharm Bull. 2020;43:362–5.

H. Yamamoto et al.

11. Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions.

A systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29:385–96.

12. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA,

et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug

reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:239–45.

13. Gallagher RM, Kirkham JJ, Mason JR, Bird KA, Williamson

PR, Nunn AJ, et al. Development and inter-rater reliability of the

Liverpool adverse drug reaction causality assessment tool. PLoS

ONE. 2011;6: e28096.

14. Harpaz R, Vilar S, Dumouchel W, Salmasian H, Haerian K, Shah

NH, et al. Combing signals from spontaneous reports and electronic health records for detection of adverse drug reactions. J Am

Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:413–9.

15. Li Y, Ryan PB, Wei Y, Friedman CA. Method to combine signals

from spontaneous reporting systems and observational healthcare

data to detect adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf. 2015;38:895–908.

16. Wang L, Rastegar-Mojarad M, Ji Z, Liu S, Liu K, Moon S, et al.

Detecting pharmacovigilance signals combining electronic medical records with spontaneous reports: a case study of conventional

disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.

Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:875.

17. West SL, Johnson W, Visscher W, Kluckman M, Qin Y, Larsen

A. The challenges of linking health insurer claims with electronic

medical records. Health Inform J. 2014;20:22–34.

18. Lai EC, Pratt N, Hsieh CY, Lin SJ, Pottegård A, Roughead EE,

et al. Sequence symmetry analysis in pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32:567–82.

19. Hallas J, Wang SV, Gagne JJ, Schneeweiss S, Pratt N, Pottegård

A. Hypothesis-free screening of large administrative databases

for unsuspected drug-outcome associations. Eur J Epidemiol.

2018;33:545–55.

20. Takada M, Fujimoto M, Hosomi K. Association between benzodiazepine use and dementia: data mining of different medical

databases. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13:825–34.

21. Adimadhyam S, Schumock GT, Calip GS, Smith Marsh DE,

Layden BT, Lee TA. Increased risk of mycotic infections associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol.

2019;85:160–8.

22. Li XX, Cheng YC, Zhai SD, Yao P, Zhan SY, Shi LW. Risk of

liver injury associated with intravenous lipid emulsions: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:

589091.

23. Wahab IA, Pratt NL, Wiese MD, Kalisch LM, Roughead EE.

The validity of sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) for adverse

drug reaction signal detection. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.

2013;22:496–502.

24. Zhan C, Roughead E, Liu L, Pratt N, Li J. A data-driven method

to detect adverse drug events from prescription data. J Biomed

Inform. 2018;85:10–20.

25. Hoang T, Liu J, Roughead E, Pratt N, Li J. Supervised signal

detection for adverse drug reactions in medication dispensing

data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;161:25–38.

26. Zhan C, Roughead E, Liu L, Pratt N, Li J. Detecting potential

signals of adverse drug events from prescription data. Artif Intell

Med. 2020;104: 101839.

27. Banda JM, Evans L, Vanguri RS, Tatonetti NP, Ryan PB, Shah

NH. A curated and standardized adverse drug event resource to

accelerate drug safety research. Sci Data. 2016;3: 160026.

28. Coloma PM, Avillach P, Salvo F, Schuemie MJ, Ferrajolo C, Pariente A, et al. A reference standard for evaluation of methods for

drug safety signal detection using electronic healthcare record

databases. Drug Saf. 2013;36:13–23.

389

Early Detection for ADR Signals by Data-Mining

29. Ryan PB, Schuemie MJ, Welebob E, Duke J, Valentine S,

Hartzema AG. Defining a reference set to support methodological research in drug safety. Drug Saf. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S33-47.

30. Harpaz R, Odgers D, Gaskin G, DuMouchel W, Winnenburg

R, Bodenreider O, et al. A time-indexed reference standard of

adverse drug reactions. Sci Data. 2014;1: 140043.

31. Ietswaart R, Arat S, Chen AX, Farahmand S, Kim B, DuMouchel

W, et al. Machine learning guided association of adverse drug

reactions with in vitro target-based pharmacology. EBioMedicine.

2020;57: 102837.

32. Agrawal R, Srikant R. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association

Rules. In J. B. Bocca, M. Jarke, and C. Zaniolo, editors, Proc. 20th

Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, 1994; pages 487–499.

33. Harpaz R, Chase HS, Friedman C. Mining multi-item drug

adverse effect associations in spontaneous reporting systems.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(Suppl 9):S7.

34. Fujiwara M, Kawasaki Y, Yamada H. A pharmacovigilance

approach for post-marketing in Japan using the Japanese adverse

drug event report (JADER) database and association analysis.

PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0154425.

35. Yildirim P. Association patterns in open data to explore ciprofloxacin adverse events. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6:728–47.

36. Jorge AM, Azevedo PJ. An Experiment with association rules and

classification: post-bagging and conviction. Proceedings of the

8th international conference on Discovery Science. 2005; Pages

137–149.

37. Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin

Epidemiol. 2005;58:323–37.

38. Idema DL, Wang Y, Biehl M, Horvatovich PL, Hak E. Effect

estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry

39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: a systematic

review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0208389.

Morris EJ, Hollmann J, Hofer AK, Bhagwandass H, Oueini R,

Adkins LE, et al. Evaluating the use of prescription sequence symmetry analysis as a pharmacovigilance tool: a scoping review. Res

Soc Adm Pharm. 2022;18:3079–93.

Takeuchi Y, Shinozaki T, Matsuyama Y. A comparison of estimators from self-controlled case series, case-crossover design, and

sequence symmetry analysis for pharmacoepidemiological studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:4.

Wang CH, Nguyen PA, Jack Li YC, Islam MM, Poly TN, Tran

QV, et al. Improved diagnosis-medication association mining to

reduce pseudo-associations. Comput Methods Programs Biomed.

2021;207:1066181.

Schotland P, Racz R, Jackson D, Levin R, Strauss DG, Burkhart

K. Target-adverse event profiles to augment pharmacovigilance: a

pilot study with six new molecular entities. CPT Pharmacometrics

Syst Pharmacol. 2018;7:809–17.

Schotland P, Racz R, Jackson DB, Soldatos TG, Levin R, Strauss

DG, et al. Target adverse event profiles for predictive safety in the

postmarket setting. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109:1232–43.

Lee S, Han J, Park RW, Kim GJ, Rim JH, Cho J, et al. Development of a controlled vocabulary-based adverse drug reaction

signal dictionary for multicenter electronic health record-based

pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2019;42:657–70.

Koutkias V. From data silos to standardized, linked, and FAIR

data for pharmacovigilance: current advances and challenges with

observational healthcare data. Drug Saf. 2019;42:583–6.

Arfè A, Corrao G. The lag-time approach improved drug-outcome

association estimates in presence of protopathic bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;78:101–7.

...

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る