リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「片側下肢切断者の屋内義足使用に関連する要因」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

片側下肢切断者の屋内義足使用に関連する要因

手塚, 勇輔 テヅカ, ユウスケ Tezuka, Yusuke 神戸大学

2022.03.25

概要

Background: The rate of indoor prosthetic use in people with lower limb amputation (LLA) is lower than that of outdoor use. Very few studies of indoor prosthetic use have been conducted, and no studies have focused on the perspective of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Objectives: To assess the indoor prosthetic use of individuals with unilateral LLA from the perspective of IADLs.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: A total of 162 people with LLA participated in this study. Based on the information obtained from a questionnaire and medical records, the relationships between each outcome and indoor prosthetic use were assessed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Of the 110 respondents (72.8%), 6 participants did not use the prosthesis or used it for cosmesis. With respect to the prosthetic users (n = 104), 74 (71.2%) used their prosthesis indoors and outdoors and 30 (28.8%) used it only outdoors, but none used it indoors only. On univariate analysis, five items were identified: household size, amputation level, domestic chores and outdoor activities of the Frenchay Activities Index, and difficulty donning/doffing the prosthesis. Small household, transtibial amputation, and a high score on the domestic chores of the Frenchay Activities Index (cutoff value 9.0 points) were independently associated with indoor prosthetic use.

Conclusions: Training of motions that are desirable to use the prosthesis and participation in domestic chores frequently based on IADLs before hospitalization may increase the frequency of prosthesis use in people with transfemoral amputation who use their prosthesis outdoors.

この論文で使われている画像

参考文献

1. Chen MC, Lee SS, Hsieh YL, et al. Influencing factors of outcome after lower-limb amputation: a fiveyear review in a plastic surgical department. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61: 314–318.

2. Bilodeau S, Hébert R, Desrosiers J. Lower limb prosthesis utilisation by elderly amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000; 24: 126–132.

3. Hagberg K, Brånemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25: 186–194.

4. Zidarov D, Swaine B, Gauthier-Gagnon C. Life habits and prosthetic profile of persons with lower-limb amputation during rehabilitation and at 3-month follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1953–1959.

5. Hayashi Y, Mori Y, Kawamura J. Epidemiological study on the lower limb amputees. Jpn Soc Prosthet Orthot 1999; 15: 163–170.

6. Houghton AD, Taylor PR, Thurlow S, et al. Success rates for rehabilitation of vascular amputees: implications for preoperative assessment and amputation level. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 753–755.

7. Gunawardena NS. Factors affecting functional outcome of lower limb amputee soldiers in two Districts of Sri Lanka. Thesis (MD Community Medicine), Post-Graduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, 2002.

8. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise MC, Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 706–713.

9. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, et al. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(6): 803–811.

10. Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, et al. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45: 961–972.

11. Bond MJ, Clark MS, Smith DS, et al. Lifestyle activities of the elderly: composition and determinants. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 63–69.

12. Panesar BS, Morrison P, Hunter J. A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 157–171.

13. Spector WD, Katz S, Murphy JB, et al. The hierarchical relationship between activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 481–489

14. Ogawa Y, Iwasaki K, Yasumura S. A longitudinal study on health status and factors relating to it in elderly residents of a community. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 1993; 40: 859–871.

15. Holbrook ME, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166– 170.

16. Turnbull JC, Kersten P, Habib M, at al. Validation of the Frenchay Activities Index in a general population aged 16 years and older. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1034–1038.

17. Miller WC, Deathe AB, Harris J. Measurement properties of the Frenchay Activities Index among individuals with a lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 414–422.

18. KP Suresh, S Chandrashekara: Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. J Hum Reprod Sci 2012; 5: 7–13.

19. Franchignoni F, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the locomotor capabilities index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 743–748.

20. Condie E, Scott H, Treweek S. Lower limb prosthetic outcome measures: a review of the literature 1995 to 2005. J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18: 13–45.

21. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(12 Suppl 2): S15–S20.

22. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 452–458.

23. Van Eijk MS, Van der Linde H, Buijck B, et al. Predicting prosthetic use in elderly patients after major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 45–52.

24. Haberman LJ, Bedotto RA, Colodney EJ. Silicone-only suspension (SOS) for the above-knee amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 1992; 4: 76–85.

25. Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature. Clin Biomech 2014; 29: 87–97.

26. Gholizadeh H, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Transfemoral prosthesis suspension systems: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 93: 809–823.

27. Hachisuka K, Chisaka H, Kawazu T, et al. Applied Activities of Daily Living and its standard value determined according to Frenchay Activities Index Scores for randomly sampled middle and advanced age people living at home. Jpn J Rehabil Med 2001; 38: 287–295.

28. Tsuya NO, Bumpass LL, Choe MK, et al. Employment and household tasks of Japanese couples, 1994– 2009. Demogr Res 2012; 27: 705–718.

29. Ohmine S, Kimura Y, Saeki S, et al. Community-based survey of amputation derived from the physically disabled person's certification in Kitakyushu City, Japan. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 196–202.

30. Sawamura S. Amputation and prosthesis. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Publisher, 2007: 1–16.

31. Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, Kim J, et al. Health-related profiles of people with lower limb loss. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96: 1474–1483.

32. McWhinnie DL, Gordon AC, Collin J, et al. Rehabilitation outcome 5 years after 100 lower-limb amputations. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1596–1599.

33. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. Population Statistics, http://www.ipss.go.jp/syoushika/tohkei/Popular/P_Detail2021.asp?fname=T07-32.htm.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文

一発検索!

この論文の関連論文を見る