リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

リケラボ 全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索するならリケラボ論文検索大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる

大学・研究所にある論文を検索できる 「Retracted randomised controlled trials were cited and not corrected in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines」の論文概要。リケラボ論文検索は、全国の大学リポジトリにある学位論文・教授論文を一括検索できる論文検索サービスです。
リケラボ

コピーが完了しました

URLをコピーしました

論文の公開元へ論文の公開元へ
書き出し

Retracted randomised controlled trials were cited and not corrected in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines

Kataoka, Yuki Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Ariie, Takashi Taito, Shunsuke Suzuki, Tomoharu Oide, Shiho Furukawa, Toshi A. 京都大学 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.015

2022.10

概要

[Background and Objectives] To investigate whether and when the correction is done in Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) when included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have been retracted. [Methods] In this meta-epidemiological study, we included SRs and CPGs citing the retracted RCTs from the Retraction Watch Database. We investigated how often the retracted RCTs were cited in SRs and CPGs. We also investigated whether and when such SRs and CPGs corrected themselves. [Results] We identified 587 articles (525 SRs and 62 CPGs) citing retracted RCTs. Among the 587 articles, 252 (43%) were published after retraction, and 335 (57%) were published before retraction. Among 127 articles published citing already retracted RCTs in their evidence synthesis without caution, none corrected themselves after publication. Of 335 articles published before retraction, 239 included RCTs that were later retracted in their evidence synthesis. Among them, only 5% of SRs (9/196) and 5% of CPGs (2/43) corrected or retracted their results. [Conclusion] Many SRs and CPGs included already or later retracted RCTs without caution. Most of them were never corrected. The scientific community, including publishers and researchers, should make systematic and concerted efforts to remove the impact of retracted RCTs.

論文の公開元へ

この論文で使われている画像

関連論文

関連論文をもっと見る

参考文献

[1] Guyatt GH, Rennie D, Meade M, Cook D. Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.

[2] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.

[3] Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011.

[4] Boughton SL, Wilkinson J, Bero L. When beauty is but skin deep: dealing with problematic studies in systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;6:ED000152.

[5] Wiedermann CJ, Joannidis M. The Boldt scandal still in need of action: the example of colloids 10 years after initial suspicion of fraud. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:1735e7.

[6] Wadhwa RR, Rasendran C, Popovic ZB, Nissen SE, Desai MY. Temporal trends, characteristics, and citations of retracted articles in cardiovascular medicine. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2118263.

[7] Elgazzar A, Hany B, Youssef SA, Hafez M, Moussa H, Eltaweel A. RETRACTED: efficacy and safety of ivermectin for treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 pandemic. Res Sq 2020. https: //doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-100956/v3.

[8] Samaha AA, Mouawia H, Fawaz M, Hassan H, Salami A, Bazzal A, et al. RETRACTED: effects of a single dose of ivermectin on viral and clinical outcomes in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects: a pilot clinical trial in Lebanon. Viruses 2021;13:989.

[9] Mehra MR, Desai SS, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. RETRACTED: hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6. S0140-6736 (20)31180-6.

[10] Brainard J. What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty. Science 2018;80. https: //doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAV8384.

[11] Kupferschmidt K. Researcher at the center of an epic fraud remains an enigma to those who exposed him. Science 2018;80. https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aav1079.

[12] Serghiou S, Marton RM, Ioannidis JPA. Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric. PLoS One 2021;16:e0248625.

[13] Lee TC, Senecal J, Hsu JM, McDonald EG. Ongoing citations of a retracted study involving cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:1535e7.

[14] Theis-Mahon NR, Bakker CJ. The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry. J Med Libr Assoc 2020;108:389e97.

[15] Hamilton DG. Continued citation of retracted radiation oncology literature-do we have a problem? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019;103:1036e42.

[16] Editorial policies|Cochrane Library. Available at https://www. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/editorial-policies#problematic-studies. Accessed March 13, 2022.

[17] Murad MH, Wang Z. Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research. Evid Based Med 2017;22:139e42.

[18] Retraction Watch Database. Available at http://retractiondatabase. org/RetractionSearch.aspx?&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport51. Accessed September 13, 2021.

[19] OSF the influence of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a metaepidemiological study protocol n.d. Available at https://osf.io/cjbdf/. Accessed December 27, 2021.

[20] Randomized Controlled Trial - MeSH - NCBI. Available at https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68016449. Accessed June 8, 2020.

[21] Web of Science Core Collection - Web of Science Group. Available at https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-sciencecore-collection/. Accessed September 13, 2021.

[22] Web of Science Core Collection Help. Available at https://images. webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca. html. Accessed October 25, 2021.

[23] ICMJE | recommendations|scientific misconduct, expressions of concern, and retraction. Available at http://www.icmje.org/recomme ndations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/scientific-misconductexpressions-of-concern-and-retraction.html. Accessed March 7, 2022.

[24] Steen RG. Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? J Med Ethics 2011;37:688e92.

[25] Candal-Pedreira C, Ruano-Ravina A, Fernandez E, Ramos J, Campos-Varela I, Perez-Rıos M. Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre-post study. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5: e003719.

[26] Avenell A, Stewart F, Grey A, Gamble G, Bolland M. An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031909.

[27] Mott A, Fairhurst C, Torgerson D. Assessing the impact of retraction on the citation of randomized controlled trial reports: an interrupted time-series analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy 2019;24: 44e51.

[28] Decullier E, Huot L, Maisonneuve H. What time-lag for a retraction search on PubMed? BMC Res Notes 2014;7:395.

[29] Suelzer EM, Deal J, Hanus K, Ruggeri BE, Witkowski E. Challenges in identifying the retracted status of an article. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2115648.

[30] Policy for managing potentially problematic studies: implementation guidance n.d. Available at https://documentation.cochrane.org/display/ EPPR/Policyþforþmanagingþpotentiallyþproblematicþstudies%3Aþ implementationþguidance. Accessed January 20, 2022.

[31] Teixeira da Silva JA, Bornemann-Cimenti H, Tsigaris P. Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature. Med Health Care Philos 2021;24:21e6.

[32] Barbour V, Kleinert S, Wager E, Yentis S. Guidelines for retracting articles. Hampshire, UK: Committee on Publication Ethics; 2019 Accessed January 20, 2022.

[33] Fanelli D, Ioannidis JPA, Goodman S. Improving the integrity of published science: an expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections. Eur J Clin Invest 2018;48:e12898.

[34] Fanelli D, Wong J, Moher D. What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses. Account Res 20211e18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 8989621.2021.1947810.

[35] Bao H. Efficacy and safety of flurbiprofen axetil in the prevention of pain on propofol injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit 2014;20:995e1002.

[36] Di Lorenzo N, Antoniou SA, Batterham RL, Busetto L, Godoroja D, Iossa A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) on bariatric surgery: update 2020 endorsed by IFSO-EC, EASO and ESPCOP. Surg Endosc 2020;34:2332e58.

[37] Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, Castro MJ, Gonzalez G, Ortiz-de-Solorzano J, et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: long-term followup after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities. Surg Endosc 2019;33:401e10.

参考文献をもっと見る

全国の大学の
卒論・修論・学位論文
を
一発検索！

この論文の関連論文を見る